Considerando que à na linguagem e por meio dela que o indivÃduo se constitui como sujeito, desenvolvemos esta pesquisa, centrada na interrelaÃÃo que podemos estabelecer entre o processo da argumentaÃÃo, a problematizaÃÃo sobre discurso e sobre gÃnero textual e a subjetividade. Buscamos investigar, em fÃbulas bastante peculiares, como se dà a construÃÃo da argumentaÃÃo baseada no modelo dialogal da Teoria da ArgumentaÃÃo de Christian Plantin (1996; 2008) e partimos da hipÃtese de que a argumentaÃÃo na fÃbula em estudo se constrÃi especialmente por meio de estratÃgias usadas pelo narrador, instanciado por um sujeito/autor, as quais lhe permitem assumir papÃis argumentativos diferentes de acordo com seu nÃvel de envolvimento na argumentaÃÃo. Ainda acreditamos que, conforme a teoria plantiniana, o narrador assume tais papÃis a fim de fazer avaliaÃÃes do mundo narrado como recurso argumentativo, num movimento em direÃÃo ao leitor; que a inserÃÃo dessas avaliaÃÃes confere à fÃbula analisada um modo particular de organizaÃÃo; que a subjetividade se instaura sobremodo por meio do recurso da interposiÃÃo â forma privilegiada da intervenÃÃo do sujeito na construÃÃo do seu dizer. A projeÃÃo do narrador nas fÃbulas analisadas constitui formas de interaÃÃo e comunicaÃÃo entre este e o interlocutor, o que conduziu nossa pesquisa a uma anÃlise que busca uma semiÃtica da interaÃÃo textual, a partir da qual se pode depreender que o sentido construÃdo em um texto, por um dado discurso, nÃo deriva do sistema, mas das atividades do uso desse sistema, das suas possibilidades à elaboraÃÃo de sentidos, compartilhados dialÃgica e socialmente pelos interlocutores. O corpus da pesquisa à constituÃdo de cem fÃbulas de MillÃr Fernandes, formas atualizadas do gÃnero fÃbula, as quais foram analisadas qualitativamente, a partir do instrumental oferecido pela Teoria da Avaliatividade, de Martin & White (2005), mais especificamente pelo subsistema do engajamento, em busca de uma abordagem pragmÃtico-discursiva. Acreditamos que o processo argumentativo de que tratamos nas fÃbulas millorianas â que deixam entrever um discurso e um contradiscurso â de fato se dà a partir do recurso da interposiÃÃo usado pelo narrador, para se projetar no texto, e isso lhe permite assumir papÃis argumentativos diferentes, de acordo com seu engajamento no jogo argumentativo. Esse engajamento se estabelece num continuum, num contexto de menor ou maior expansÃo dialÃgica, sobremodo porque identificamos inÃmeras ocorrÃncias em que esses papÃis se sobrepÃem ou se imbricam. / Considering that in language and through it the individual is constituted as subject, we developed this research, focusing on the interrelation we can establish between the process of argumentation, questioning about discourse, text genre and subjectivity. We sought to investigate in very peculiar fables, how the construction of arguments based on the dialogic model of the Argumentation Theory of Christian Plantin (1996, 2008) takes place, and set out from the hypothesis that the arguments in the fable studied builds itself especially through strategies used by the narrator, instantiated by a subject/author, which allow it to take different argumentative roles according to its level of involvement in the argument. We also believe that, according to the Plantinian theory, the narrator assumes such roles in order to assess the narrated world as an argumentative resource, in a movement toward the reader, that the inclusion of these reviews give the fable considered a particular form of organization, that the subjectivity is established greatly through the use of interposition - privileged form of the intervention of the subject in the construction of its sayings. The projection of the narrator in the analyzed fables constitutes forms of interaction and communication between him/her and the interlocutor, which led our research to an analysis that searches for the semiotics of textual interaction, from which one can infer that the meaning constructed in a text, for a single discourse, does not derive from the system, but from the activities of the use of this system, and from its possibilities of elaboration of meanings, dialogically and socially shared by the interlocutors. The research corpus is composed of one hundred of Millor Fernandes fables, current forms of the fable gender, which were qualitatively analyzed, from the instrumentals provided by the Theory of Assessment of Martin & White (2005), more specifically the engagement subsystem in search of a pragmatic-discursive approach. We believe that the argumentative process we are dealing with in the Millorian fables - that display a speech and a counter speech- actually happens when the resource of interposition is used by the narrator to project himself in the text, and it allows him to take different argumentative roles, according to his engagement in argumentative game. This engagement happens in a continuum, in a context of greater or lesser dialogic expansion, greatly because we identified numerous instances in which these roles overlap or intertwine.

SAMPAIO, Maria Helena Mendonça. Argumentação e diálogo: por uma abordagem pragmático-discursiva das fábulas millorianas. 2014. 204f. – Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Letras Vernáculas, Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística, Fortaleza (CE), 2014. / Submitted by Márcia Araújo (marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2015-06-05T13:10:59Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_tese_mhmsampaio.pdf: 1697352 bytes, checksum: c34c3efe57bf39a03e44ec1f772a7e1c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Márcia Araújo(marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2015-06-05T13:40:49Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_tese_mhmsampaio.pdf: 1697352 bytes, checksum: c34c3efe57bf39a03e44ec1f772a7e1c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-05T13:40:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_tese_mhmsampaio.pdf: 1697352 bytes, checksum: c34c3efe57bf39a03e44ec1f772a7e1c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 / Considering that in language and through it the individual is constituted as subject, we developed this research, focusing on the interrelation we can establish between the process of argumentation, questioning about discourse, text genre and subjectivity. We sought to investigate in very peculiar fables, how the construction of arguments based on the dialogic model of the Argumentation Theory of Christian Plantin (1996, 2008) takes place, and set out from the hypothesis that the arguments in the fable studied builds itself especially through strategies used by the narrator, instantiated by a subject/author, which allow it to take different argumentative roles according to its level of involvement in the argument. We also believe that, according to the Plantinian theory, the narrator assumes such roles in order to assess the narrated world as an argumentative resource, in a movement toward the reader, that the inclusion of these reviews give the fable considered a particular form of organization, that the subjectivity is established greatly through the use of interposition - privileged form of the intervention of the subject in the construction of its sayings. The projection of the narrator in the analyzed fables constitutes forms of interaction and communication between him/her and the interlocutor, which led our research to an analysis that searches for the semiotics of textual interaction, from which one can infer that the meaning constructed in a text, for a single discourse, does not derive from the system, but from the activities of the use of this system, and from its possibilities of elaboration of meanings, dialogically and socially shared by the interlocutors. The research corpus is composed of one hundred of Millor Fernandes fables, current forms of the fable gender, which were qualitatively analyzed, from the instrumentals provided by the Theory of Assessment of Martin & White (2005), more specifically the engagement subsystem in search of a pragmatic-discursive approach. We believe that the argumentative process we are dealing with in the Millorian fables - that display a speech and a counter speech- actually happens when the resource of interposition is used by the narrator to project himself in the text, and it allows him to take different argumentative roles, according to his engagement in argumentative game. This engagement happens in a continuum, in a context of greater or lesser dialogic expansion, greatly because we identified numerous instances in which these roles overlap or intertwine. / Considerando que é na linguagem e por meio dela que o indivíduo se constitui como sujeito, desenvolvemos esta pesquisa, centrada na interrelação que podemos estabelecer entre o processo da argumentação, a problematização sobre discurso e sobre gênero textual e a subjetividade. Buscamos investigar, em fábulas bastante peculiares, como se dá a construção da argumentação baseada no modelo dialogal da Teoria da Argumentação de Christian Plantin (1996; 2008) e partimos da hipótese de que a argumentação na fábula em estudo se constrói especialmente por meio de estratégias usadas pelo narrador, instanciado por um sujeito/autor, as quais lhe permitem assumir papéis argumentativos diferentes de acordo com seu nível de envolvimento na argumentação. Ainda acreditamos que, conforme a teoria plantiniana, o narrador assume tais papéis a fim de fazer avaliações do mundo narrado como recurso argumentativo, num movimento em direção ao leitor; que a inserção dessas avaliações confere à fábula analisada um modo particular de organização; que a subjetividade se instaura sobremodo por meio do recurso da interposição – forma privilegiada da intervenção do sujeito na construção do seu dizer. A projeção do narrador nas fábulas analisadas constitui formas de interação e comunicação entre este e o interlocutor, o que conduziu nossa pesquisa a uma análise que busca uma semiótica da interação textual, a partir da qual se pode depreender que o sentido construído em um texto, por um dado discurso, não deriva do sistema, mas das atividades do uso desse sistema, das suas possibilidades à elaboração de sentidos, compartilhados dialógica e socialmente pelos interlocutores. O corpus da pesquisa é constituído de cem fábulas de Millôr Fernandes, formas atualizadas do gênero fábula, as quais foram analisadas qualitativamente, a partir do instrumental oferecido pela Teoria da Avaliatividade, de Martin & White (2005), mais especificamente pelo subsistema do engajamento, em busca de uma abordagem pragmático-discursiva. Acreditamos que o processo argumentativo de que tratamos nas fábulas millorianas – que deixam entrever um discurso e um contradiscurso – de fato se dá a partir do recurso da interposição usado pelo narrador, para se projetar no texto, e isso lhe permite assumir papéis argumentativos diferentes, de acordo com seu engajamento no jogo argumentativo. Esse engajamento se estabelece num continuum, num contexto de menor ou maior expansão dialógica, sobremodo porque identificamos inúmeras ocorrências em que esses papéis se sobrepõem ou se imbricam.

Islamic fundamentalism is a hotly debated and contested issue in the global arena and is often depicted as having replaced communism as the predominant threat to the West in the post-Cold War world. This study analyses the ideologies espoused by Islamic fundamentalist groups in Algeria, Sudan and South Africa by means of the dialogic model of interpretation in order to arri ve at a more thorough, less judgment al understanding thereof. The study begins with an in -depth analysis of various definitions of the concept Islamic fundamentalism. This is followed by a critical discussion of rationalist approaches to Islamic fundamentalism as well as reference to the ir shortcomings in order to justify the use of the dialogic model of interpretation. This model aims to critically evaluate Islamic fundamentalist ideas through interaction with the irrespective originators, thereby questioning the validity of a s ingle Western rationalist- inspired version of the truth. Structural factors, the political, cultural and soc io-economic conditions in Algeria, Sudan and South Africa, are also accommodated by the model. Consequently, the rise of Islamic revivalism is discussed within the historical context of the increasing influence of the West in the world of Islam and the introduction (and eventual failure) of secularist ideologies in the post-independence era. The focus is on different strands of Islamic political thought, Islamic fundamentalists, Islamic traditionalists, Islamic modernists and Islamic pragmatists. The country case studies, Algeria, Sudan and South Africa are then approached by means of an indepth analysis of the ideologies of prominent Islamic fundamentalist groups, as well as a consideration of structural (political, economic and social) factors. [n the case of Algeria, a detailed discuss ion of the ideology of the Front Islamique du Salut (F1S - Islamic Salvation Front) is placed in the context of the rise of Islamic fundamentalism and the dynamics of the current civil war. When it comes to Sudan, the ideology of the ruling National Islamic Front (NIF) is discussed, and is also placed in the context of the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in that country, as well as a discussion of government policies since 1989, with specific reference to the Sudanese civ il war and the current crisis in the Darfur region. In terms of South Africa, the focus is on the ideology of People against Gangsterism and Drugs (PAGAD), which is placed in the context of the urban terrorist attacks that characterised the Western Cape a few years ago. The final chapter looks at what has been learned from using the dialogic model of interpretation (with an additional evaluation of structural factors) as a theoretical approach. Recommendations are made with regard to each of the respective case studies which may be potentially useful for a future resolution of the conflicts in Algeria and Sudan, and, in the case of South Africa, may help ensure continuing stability as far as Islamic fundamentalism is concerned. Copyright / Dissertation (MA (Political Science))--University of Pretoria, 2006. / Political Sciences / unrestricted