Submitted by Sandra Pereira (srpereira@ufrrj.br) on 2016-10-06T11:57:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2011 - Abiana Campos Mendes.pdf: 5441718 bytes, checksum: a474f3da1a4381a0845ca4749092c950 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-06T11:57:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2011 - Abiana Campos Mendes.pdf: 5441718 bytes, checksum: a474f3da1a4381a0845ca4749092c950 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-13 / This paper presents the results of a survey that aimed to analyze the transition process when change the administrative level in the current Campus Planaltina/Federal Institute of Brasilia - IFB. This was the time when that school came out of the administrative government of the Federal District, where he spent more than two decades, and returned to the Union, because of the expansion plan of the Federal Network of Professional and Technical Education - Office of Professional Education and Technology / Ministry of Education, held in the government of President Lula da Silva, from 2005. We sought to determine whether there was compliance with current legislation - the Federal Constitution and the Law of Directives and Bases of National Education, with regard to democratic management of public schools. The analysis was based on cooking by the academic community, of institutional documents namely: Curriculum of the Campus Planaltina, the Statute and Institutional Development Plan of the IFB. Education, power and participation issues were highlighted because of its interrelationship with democracy. The research instruments used were structured interviews conducted with teachers, technicians and students involved in the transition process. From the qualitative data analysis proved that the considered undemocratic actions taken by management of the IFB, may have been given the difficulty that still is to a people who lived more than twenty years under a ruthless military dictatorship act democratically, whether talking with peers (participation) stating whether any points for reasons that require explanation (transparency), and / or perhaps because our laws still leave gaps for the power to send some to obtain any personal benefit to override the will of the collective . The research showed the importance of the struggle for a democratic school, which brings together and unites people around principles such as justice and equality, which contribute to have a more fraternal society, showed that this fight must continue so as to achieve an education based on ethical principles that can guide human conduct and balanced with good social functioning. / Este trabalho apresenta os resultados de uma pesquisa que teve como objetivo analisar o processo de transi??o quando da mudan?a de esfera administrativa no atual Campus Planaltina, do Instituto Federal de Bras?lia ? IFB. Este foi o momento em que esta escola saiu da esfera administrativa do governo do Distrito Federal, onde esteve por mais de duas d?cadas, e voltou a pertencer ? Uni?o, devido ao plano de expans?o da Rede Federal de Educa??o Profissional e Tecnol?gica ? Secretaria de Educa??o Profissional e Tecnol?gica/Minist?rio da Educa??o, ocorrido no governo do presidente Lula da Silva, a partir de 2005. Buscou-se verificar se houve acatamento ? legisla??o vigente ? a Constitui??o Federal e a Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educa??o Nacional, no que se refere ? gest?o democr?tica da escola p?blica. A an?lise foi feita com base na confec??o, pela comunidade acad?mica, dos documentos institucionais quais sejam: a Matriz Curricular do Campus Planaltina, o Estatuto e o Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional do IFB. Educa??o, poder e participa??o foram temas em destaque devido ao seu interrelacionamento com a democracia. Os instrumentos de pesquisa utilizados foram entrevistas semiestruturadas realizadas com docentes, t?cnicos administrativos e discentes envolvidos no processo de transi??o. A partir da an?lise qualitativa dos dados comprovou-se que as a??es consideradas antidemocr?ticas realizadas pela gest?o do IFB, possam ter se dado pela dificuldade que ainda seja para um povo que viveu mais de vinte anos sob uma cruel ditadura militar agir democraticamente, quer seja dialogando com seus pares (participa??o) quer seja esclarecendo pontos que por motivos quaisquer necessitem de explica??o (transpar?ncia), e/ou talvez porque nossa legisla??o ainda deixe brechas para que o poder de mando de alguns para obter qualquer benef?cio pr?prio se sobreponha ? vontade da coletividade. A pesquisa mostrou a import?ncia da luta por uma escola democr?tica, que une e re?ne cidad?os em torno de princ?pios como justi?a e igualdade, que contribuem para termos uma sociedade mais fraterna; mostrou tamb?m que esta luta deve continuar para que se consiga uma educa??o baseada em princ?pios ?ticos que possam nortear a conduta humana equilibradamente e com bom funcionamento social.