Tout d’abord, nous avons démontré l’origine périphérique de la corticostérone après l’administration d’un stress aigu. Pour cela, nous avons utilisé un modèle de souris déficient en transporteur de corticostérone : Corticosterone binding-globulin (Cbg-/-). Ensuite, nous avons déterminé si les effets rapides du stress sur le rappel mnésique dépendaient de mécanismes non-génomiques. Nous avons précisé si ces effets étaient médiés par les récepteurs aux minéralocorticoïdes (MR) ou aux glucocorticoïdes de l’hippocampe. Dans ce but dans un premier temps, nous avons injecté un complexe macromoléculaire de corticostérone (Cort-3CMO-BSA) qui ne franchit pas la membrane cellulaire pour évaluer l’implication de mécanismes membranaires. Dans un deuxième temps nous avons administré dans l’hippocampe dorsal (HD) ou ventral (HV), 15 minutes avant le stress, l’antagoniste MR (RU 28318) et l’antagoniste GR (RU 38486) et nous avons évalué les performances mnésiques à 15, 60, 105 et 120 minutes après le stress. En effet ces délais ont été choisis selon l’apparition de pics de corticostérone induit par le stress, mesurés par microdialyse, dans l’HD et l’HV.Les principaux résultats obtenus sont : i) les souris Cbg -/- ne présentent pas de déficit mnésique 15 min après l’administration d’un stress aigu, contrairement aux souris contrôles qui ont un déficit mnésique important; ii) De même, l’administration de métyrapone (un inhibiteur de synthèse de la corticostérone) prévient des effets rapides du stress sur la mémoire; iii) Nous avons démontré que les effets rapides délétères sont médiés par des récepteurs membranaires, puisque l’injection de Cort-3CMO-BSA dans l’HD produit des effets similaires au stress aigu. De plus, l’effet de l’injection du complexe Cort-3CMO-BSA n’est pas bloqué par l’injection systémique d’anisomycine (un inhibiteur de synthèse protéique) nous avons montré que les récepteurs membranaires aux glucocorticoïdes de type MR sont responsables des effets cognitifs rapides du stress et de la cort-3CMO-BSA sur le rappel mnésique ;iv) Dans l’HD, l’injection du RU 28318 bloquait les effets délétères du stress quand les performances mnésiques étaient évaluées 15 min après le stress, mais non aux délais plus longs. Au contraire, le RU 38486 prévenait les déficits mnésiques quand les performances étaient évaluées à 60 mais non à 105 min après le stress. Dans l’HV, le schéma opposé est observé puisque l’injection du RU 38486 est dénuée d’effet quand il est injecté à 60 min après le stress mais il bloque les déficits mnésiques induits 105 min après le stress. L’implication des récepteurs MR et GR et l’efficacité de leur antagoniste semble dépendant de l’évolution de la concentration de corticostérone au cours du temps dans l’HD et l’HV.Pour conclure, notre étude a mis en évidence que le stress aigu diminue le rappel mnésique hipocampo-dépendant par l’intermédiaire d’un mécanisme de “switch” impliquant les récepteurs MR puis GR de l’HD à des délais plus courts et ensuite seulement les récepteurs GR de l’HV à des délais plus long. / We first showed the peripheral origin of corticosterone after an acute stress administration (electric foot-shocks) using corticosterone binding globulin-deficient mice (Cbg -/-). Then, we intended to determine if the rapid effects of stress on memory retrieval depended on non-genomic mechanisms and in a further step to precise whether such effects are mediated by mineralocorticoid (MR) or glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in the hippocampus. To that aims, we first injected a macromolecular complex of corticosterone (Cort-3CMO-BSA) that cannot cross the cell membrane to assess the involvement of membrane mechanisms. In a second step, we injected 15 minutes before stress delivery either in the dorsal (DH) or ventral (VH) hippocampus the MR antagonist (RU 28318) and GR antagonist (RU 38486) and evaluated memory at 15, 60, 105 and 120 minutes after stress delivery. Indeed, these delays were chosen according to the occurrence of stress-induced corticosterone peaks measured by microdialysis in DH and VH.The main results obtained in this study are: i) Cbg -/- mice are not affected by stress delivery occurring 15 minutes before memory testing, in contrast wild-type control mice which exhibited an important memory retrieval deficit; ii) Similarly, the rapid effects of stress on memory could be prevented by the systemic injection of metyrapone (a corticosterone synthesis inhibitor); iii) We showed that the rapid (15min) deleterious of stress on memory are mediated by membrane receptors, since the injection of Cort-3CMO-BSA in the DH produced similar effects as stress delivery. Moreover, the effect of the Cort-3CMO-BSA complex is not blocked by systemic injection of anisomycin (a protein synthesis inhibitor); iv) In DH, the injection of RU 28318 blocked the deleterious effects of stress when testing occurred 15 min after stress but not for longer delays. In contrast, RU 38486 prevented memory retrieval impairments when performance was evaluated at 60 but not at 105 min after stress. In addition, the opposite pattern was observed in VH since RU 38486 was denied of any effects when injected at 60 min but blocked the stress-induced memory impairments at the 105 min post-stress delay. The involvement of MR and GR receptors and consequently the efficiency of their antagonists seem to depend on the time-course evolutions of stress-induced corticosterone rises within the DH and VH.In conclusion, our study evidenced that acute stress impairs hippocampus-dependent memory retrieval via a switch mechanism involving the MR then GR in DH at shorter delays and then only GR in VH at longer delay.

Acredita-se que diferenças hodológicas e diferente padrão de expressão gênica ao longo do eixo dorso/ventral do hipocampo seriam responsáveis pela distinta função entre a porção dorsal (HD) e ventral do mesmo (HV). HD seria responsável por processos cognitivos, tais como memória e aprendizagem espacial, e o HV pelas respostas neuroendócrinas e emocional-motivacionais ao estresse. No entanto, não há muitos estudos acerca de diferenças entre HD e HV na modulação de comportamentos relacionados à neurobiologia da depressão. Há, contudo, dados indicando que o bloqueio de receptores glutamatérgicos do tipo NMDA ou da síntese de NO no HD induz efeito semelhante ao dos antidepressivos (i.e. do tipo antidepressivo) no teste do nado forçado (TNF). Quanto ao HV, a função da neurotransmissão glutamatérgica/nitrérgica na neurobiologia da depressão permanece não investigado. Dessa forma, o objetivo do presente estudo foi realizar o bloqueio reversível do HD ou do HV, em diferentes momentos, em animais submetidos ao TNF. O próximo passo foi realizar a micro-injeção intra-HD ou intraHV do antagonista NMDA AP-7 ou do inibidor da óxido nítrico sintase neuronal (nNOS), N-PLA, ou do inibidor da guanilato ciclase solúvel (sGC), ODQ. Os resultados mostram que o bloqueio do HD ou do HV com cloreto de cobalto (CoCl2, bloqueador da neurotransmissão sináptica dependente de cálcio) não modificou o comportamento dos animais no TNF. No entanto a administração de AP-7 ou N-PLA ou ODQ no HV antes do teste, reduziu o tempo de imobilidade no TNF. Por outro lado, a injeção dessas drogas no HD foi capaz de reduzir o tempo de imobilidade quando administradas tanto depois do pré-teste quanto antes do teste. Estes resultados sugerem que as vias NMDA-NO do HD e do HV, estariam envolvidas na modulação da resposta comportamental frente ao estresse do nado forçado. Além disso, os dados indicam que a participação dessas estruturas é importante em diferentes momentos após a exposição ao estresse. / It is believed that hodological and genetic pattern of expression differences along dorsal/ventral hippocampal axis would be responsible for distinct functions attributed to its dorsal (DH) and ventral (VH) poles. DH would be responsible for cognitive process, such as spatial memory and learning, whereas the VH would be responsible for neuroendocrine and emotional-motivation responses to stress. However, there is no many studies about possible differences between DH and VH in the modulation of behavioral responses related to the neurobiology of depression. Though, there are data showing that the blockade of glutamatergic NMDA receptors blockers or NO synthesis inhibition within the DH induces similar effect to that of antidepressant drugs (like antidepressant effect) in the forced swimming test (FST). On the VH, The role of the glutamatergic/nitrergic neurotransmission remains to be investigated. Thus, the aim of this work was to perform the reversible blockade of DH or VH, at different times, in animals subjected to FST. Additionally, the next step was to perform a microinjections into the DH or the VH of NMDA antagonist (AP-7), inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, N-PLA), or the inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC, ODQ). The results show that blocking the VH or the DH (cobalt chloride, calcium dependent neurotransmission inhibitor) did not modify the behavior of animals during the TNF. However administration of AP-7, N-PLA or ODQ intra-HV, before testing, caused antidepressant-like effects. Moreover, injection of such drugs, intra-HD, was able to induce similar results when administered both after the pre-test and before testing. These results suggest that NMDA-NO pathway of both VH and DH is involved in the modulation of emotional responses to the forced swim stress, although there may be an interest differential participation of these structures at different times after exposure to stress.

Acredita-se que diferenças hodológicas e diferente padrão de expressão gênica ao longo do eixo dorso/ventral do hipocampo seriam responsáveis pela distinta função entre a porção dorsal (HD) e ventral do mesmo (HV). HD seria responsável por processos cognitivos, tais como memória e aprendizagem espacial, e o HV pelas respostas neuroendócrinas e emocional-motivacionais ao estresse. No entanto, não há muitos estudos acerca de diferenças entre HD e HV na modulação de comportamentos relacionados à neurobiologia da depressão. Há, contudo, dados indicando que o bloqueio de receptores glutamatérgicos do tipo NMDA ou da síntese de NO no HD induz efeito semelhante ao dos antidepressivos (i.e. do tipo antidepressivo) no teste do nado forçado (TNF). Quanto ao HV, a função da neurotransmissão glutamatérgica/nitrérgica na neurobiologia da depressão permanece não investigado. Dessa forma, o objetivo do presente estudo foi realizar o bloqueio reversível do HD ou do HV, em diferentes momentos, em animais submetidos ao TNF. O próximo passo foi realizar a micro-injeção intra-HD ou intraHV do antagonista NMDA AP-7 ou do inibidor da óxido nítrico sintase neuronal (nNOS), N-PLA, ou do inibidor da guanilato ciclase solúvel (sGC), ODQ. Os resultados mostram que o bloqueio do HD ou do HV com cloreto de cobalto (CoCl2, bloqueador da neurotransmissão sináptica dependente de cálcio) não modificou o comportamento dos animais no TNF. No entanto a administração de AP-7 ou N-PLA ou ODQ no HV antes do teste, reduziu o tempo de imobilidade no TNF. Por outro lado, a injeção dessas drogas no HD foi capaz de reduzir o tempo de imobilidade quando administradas tanto depois do pré-teste quanto antes do teste. Estes resultados sugerem que as vias NMDA-NO do HD e do HV, estariam envolvidas na modulação da resposta comportamental frente ao estresse do nado forçado. Além disso, os dados indicam que a participação dessas estruturas é importante em diferentes momentos após a exposição ao estresse. / It is believed that hodological and genetic pattern of expression differences along dorsal/ventral hippocampal axis would be responsible for distinct functions attributed to its dorsal (DH) and ventral (VH) poles. DH would be responsible for cognitive process, such as spatial memory and learning, whereas the VH would be responsible for neuroendocrine and emotional-motivation responses to stress. However, there is no many studies about possible differences between DH and VH in the modulation of behavioral responses related to the neurobiology of depression. Though, there are data showing that the blockade of glutamatergic NMDA receptors blockers or NO synthesis inhibition within the DH induces similar effect to that of antidepressant drugs (like antidepressant effect) in the forced swimming test (FST). On the VH, The role of the glutamatergic/nitrergic neurotransmission remains to be investigated. Thus, the aim of this work was to perform the reversible blockade of DH or VH, at different times, in animals subjected to FST. Additionally, the next step was to perform a microinjections into the DH or the VH of NMDA antagonist (AP-7), inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, N-PLA), or the inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC, ODQ). The results show that blocking the VH or the DH (cobalt chloride, calcium dependent neurotransmission inhibitor) did not modify the behavior of animals during the TNF. However administration of AP-7, N-PLA or ODQ intra-HV, before testing, caused antidepressant-like effects. Moreover, injection of such drugs, intra-HD, was able to induce similar results when administered both after the pre-test and before testing. These results suggest that NMDA-NO pathway of both VH and DH is involved in the modulation of emotional responses to the forced swim stress, although there may be an interest differential participation of these structures at different times after exposure to stress.