Schizophrenia is a debilitating psychiatric condition affecting almost one percent of the US population. Typical antipsychotics (e.g., haloperidol) have been in use for several decades and are generally very effective in treating the emotional and cognitive effects of schizophrenia, but are used as the last line of treatment due to their severe extrapyramidal motor side effects under chronic exposure. The present study was conducted to investigate the role of sex in determining the oromotor side effects of typical antipsychotics via measuring different behavioral dimensions of male and female Sprague-Dawley rats licking sucrose after haloperidol treatment. The results showed a stronger sensitivity in female rats than male rats within total licking responses and inter-lick intervals. The present results suggest closer attention needs to be paid to the role that sexual hormones play in the motor slowing and behavior-reducing effects of antipsychotics.

3,4-methlenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), the main constituent of Ecstasy, is a ring-substituted amphetamine commonly abused in recreational users. High doses of MDMA determined by allometric scaling produce serotonin (5-HT) axon deneveration. Studies suggest that this interspecies scaling does not reflect human use. An 'effects' scale comparing similar behavioral and physiological effects between species has been postulated as more accurate for translational studies. Experiment 1 examined the effects of MDMA on serotonergic forebrain innervation using immunohistochemical labeling targeting the serotonin transporter protein (SERT). Experiments 2 and 3 examined low and high doses of MDMA on spatial memory, prefrontal functioning, and serotonergic neurotoxicity using 'effects' scaling. Long Evans rats were given MDMA regimens of: chronic low dose (daily injections of 1.5 mg/kg for 10 days); binge low dose (2 days of 4 x 1.5 mg/kg spaced 2 hours apart), binge high dose (2 x 7.5 mg/kg sp aced 2 hours apart). Acquisition, retention, and spatial reversal (SR) were measured in a water maze task. A 2.0 mg/kg MDMA drug challenge was then given prior to a serial spatial reversal (SSR) task to assess performance while under the effect of the drug. Attentional set shifting and behavioral flexibility were assessed in an intradimensional extradimensionl (IED) task using odor/texture discriminations. MDMA chronic and binge low doses did not impair water maze or IED performance and produced no reductions in SERT expression. MDMA binge high dose resulted in significant reductions of SERT density in the prefrontal cortex, striatum, cortical mantle, hippocampus, amygdala, and many thalamic nuclei. Despite prominent 5-HT denervation, water maze performance was unaffected. Selective impairment in behavioral flexibility on the IED test was found. / This suggests that low doses of MDMA do not produce long-term deleterious effects. But, high doses of MDMA taken in 'binges' produces widespread loss of forebrain SERT fiber innervation and significant impairments in reversal learning, while leaving attentional set shifting and spatial navigation unscathed. / by Stephanie Brooke Linley. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2011. / Includes bibliography. / Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2011. Mode of access: World Wide Web.

University of Macau / Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences

Introduction: Although drug-related problems (DRPs) are known to be prevalent in elderly patients, there are not many studies that have been performed in geriatric outpatients at public health facilities in South Africa. Thus, the prevalence of DRPs in elderly outpatients attending Addington Hospital was investigated and suitable preventive intervention strategies to overcome or minimise these DRPs were developed. Research Methodology: The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 was conducted in March and April 1998, during which 281 elderly patients on chronic medical treatment were chosen for the study by systematic random sampling, according to specific inclusion criteria. Data collection was via a retrospective review of the elderly patient's medical notes and by personally interviewing the patient. Two research instruments were used in this phase. The customised Patient Profile (PF) form helped to delineate DRPs in the elderly patients. A Prescription Intervention Form (PIF) was used to inform the prescriber of the DRP and to make recommendations to change the drug therapy in order to overcome the DRP. In phase 2 of the study, intervention strategies were devised to address some of the major DRPs identified in phase 1 of the study. A patient counselling leaflet, prescribing guidelines for geriatric patients and a protocol for counselling of in-patients were developed. In addition, two DRP reporting systems were developed for surveillance of adverse drug reactions and medication errors during dispensing. Results and Discussions: Most geriatric subjects suffered from multiple, chronic conditions, these being hypertension (64.8%) followed by ischaemic heart disease (43.8%), musculoskeletal disorders (arthritis or gout) (42.7%), diabetes (29.2%), chronic obstructive airways disease (13.2%), hypercholesteremia (11.7%) and arrythmias (atrial fibrillation) (11.0%). The 281 patients were taking 1730 prescribed drugs, with a mean of 6.2 (range 3 to 15) prescribed drugs per patient. An astounding 45.6% of the total geriatric patients were taking or using between 7 to 9 medicines and 10.3% were taking or using between 10 to 15 medicines. The antihypertensives (15.9%) were the most widely prescribed drugs followed by medicines acting on CNS (10.9%), coronary vasodilators (9.1%), diuretics (9.1%) and medicines acting on the musculoskeletal system (8.7%). A total of 856 actual DRPs experienced by 262 geriatric patients (93.2%) ranged from 1 to 11 DRPs. The greater the number of prescribed drugs the greater the actual DRPs experienced by geriatric patients (p = 0.000). The most common DRPs were those involved in drug safety (56.6%); effectiveness of the drug therapy (20.8%); compliance (7.8%) and indication of drug therapy (7.6%). 159 elderly patients (56.6%) experienced 223 adverse effects either with their current or past prescribed medicines. The most common ADRs were as follows: gastro-intestinal ulceration (11.0%), cough (9.3%), diuretic side effects (dehydration, fatigue, hypotension, etc) (7.1%), constipation (6.8%), equilibrium problems (6.4%) and headaches (6.4%). For those DRPs warranting interventions, the mean number of prescription interventions in the entire sample population of 281 elderly patients was 0.65 ± 1.16. 87 elderly patients (30.1 %) had from 1 to 4 interventions on their current prescription. The most common prescription interventions were on problems involving drug therapy monitoring (26.9%), safety of drug therapy (26.5%), indication of drug therapy (17.5%), prescribing errors (15.3%) and prescription information omission (11.1 %). The three intervention strategies and DRPs surveillance reporting systems were successfully devised and developed. Conclusions: A profile related to the elderly patient's medical history and pharmacotherapy was completed for each of the 281 patients. General trends of prescribing pattern prevalence of DRPs and the prescribed inappropriate medication was established. The interventions of problem prescriptions were based on a newly developed PIF. The development and implementation of suitable intervention strategies to minimise DRPs were as follows: a compliance information leaflet, prescribing guidelines and the protocol for counselling in-patients. A medication error form as well as an adverse drug reaction reporting forms was developed for surveillance of DRPs. The recommendations for clinical practice and directions for future research that are presented should help to make drug therapy in the elderly safer and more effective. / Thesis (M.Pharm.)-University of Durban-Westville, 2000.

Mucositis manifesting as diarrhoea is a common side effect of chemotherapy which remains poorly understood. It is one of a number of manifestations of alimentary mucositis, which affects the entire gastrointestinal tract. The exact number of patients that are affected by diarrhoea as a result of treatment is uncertain, although it is believed that approximately 10% of patients with advanced cancer will be afflicted. Despite advances in the understanding of oral and small intestinal mucositis over recent years, large intestinal mucositis, including diarrhoea, has not been well defined and the underlying mechanisms of the condition are yet to be established. The majority of the literature available concerning diarrhoea is based on clinical observations, with very little basic research existing. However, from the research conducted, it is likely that the intestinal microflora and mucins play a role in the development of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. This thesis will examine in detail what is known about the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea (CID). Furthermore it will explore the potentially important relationship between intestinal microflora, the luminal environment and the subsequent development of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and diarrhoea. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used chemotherapy agent in clinical oncology practice. Two of its major side effects are mucositis and diarrhoea. The structure of mucins offers mucosal protection, and allows maintenance of intestinal flora by providing attachment sites and preventing bacterial overgrowth and/or penetration. Following treatment with 5-FU, we showed decreases in Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus spp., and an increase in Escherichia spp. in the jejunum. In the colon, 5-FU caused decreases in Enterococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus spp. Real time PCR of faecal samples showed decreasing trends in Lactobacillus spp. and Bacteroides spp., and an increasing trend in E. coli. Significant increases (p<0.05) were seen in Clostridium spp. and Staphylococcus spp. at 24 h. Goblet cell numbers decreased significantly in the jejunum from 24-72 h, with a significant increase in the percentage of cavitated goblet cells, suggesting 5-FU treatment causes significant changes in intestinal flora and mucin secretion in rats. These changes could result in systemic effects, and in particular may contribute to the development of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Irinotecan causes cholinergic and delayed onset diarrhoea in patients, in which β-glucuronidase produced by gut bacteria is thought to be involved. Diarrhoea was observed in treated rats, as expected, following irinotecan treatment. β-glucuronidase expression increased in the jejunum and colon. Faecal flora changed quantitatively after treatment also, with increases in E. coli, Staphylococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. (all β-glucuronidase producing), and decreases in Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp. (both beneficial bacteria), and Bacteroides spp. (β-glucuronidase producing, major component of intestinal flora), suggesting that irinotecan-induced diarrhoea may be caused by an increase in β-glucuronidase producing bacteria. However, the increase in bacteria may also be caused by irinotecan, further exaggerating the toxicity of the drug, and emphasising the need for these specific bacteria to be therapeutically targeted for successful treatment regimens to be accomplished. Mucus production appears to be increased after irinotecan treatment, which may contribute to the development of diarrhoea. Goblet cells were demonstrated to decrease significantly after irinotecan treatment. However, mucin secretion increased. Mucin expression changed significantly after treatment. Muc2 and Muc4 decreased significantly in the villi of the jejunum after treatment, Muc2 and Muc4 decreased significantly in the crypts. Muc2 decreased significantly in the colon. This indicates that irinotecan causes an increase in mucin secretion and a net decrease in mucin-producing goblet cells, and the expression of Muc2 and Muc4 in the gastrointestinal tract is altered following treatment. Increased mucin secretion is likely to be related to altered mucin expression, and may contribute to chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. To determine if the changes to the intestinal microflora caused by chemotherapy could be translated to the clinic, a pilot clinical study was carried out. Sixteen patients experiencing CID were recruited to the study with two control subjects. A large proportion of patients (75%) demonstrated a reduced anaerobic component of their faecal microflora. A reduced diversity of species was also observed in patients. The majority of patients exhibited decreases in Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., whilst all patients exhibited decreases in Bacteroides spp. and Enterococcus spp. Patients receiving antibiotics did not exhibit any marked differences to patients not receiving antibiotics. This indicates that the results observed in the animal studies are clinically relevant, and further research into this area should be undertaken. CID is associated with marked changes in the intestinal microflora. These changes may result in diminished bacterial functions within the gut, altering gut function and initiating intestinal damage, resulting in the onset of diarrhoea. In conclusion, there is clear evidence demonstrating chemotherapy treatment results in changes to the intestinal microflora and mucin secretion, which may be responsible in part for the development of severe mucositis and diarrhoea. Irinotecan toxicity may be compounded by the increase in β-glucuronidase producing bacteria. The intestinal flora of cancer patients experiencing CID is also noticeably different to that of healthy subjects. Irinotecan causes changes to mucin secretion, and the specific expression of Muc2, Muc4 and Klf4, suggesting that secretory control by the enteric nervous system may also be affected by chemotherapy. This research has extended the understanding of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and diarrhoea, complex side effects of chemotherapy. However, new areas for future research have also been identified. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1352119 / Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Adelaide, School of Medicine, 2009

Mucositis manifesting as diarrhoea is a common side effect of chemotherapy which remains poorly understood. It is one of a number of manifestations of alimentary mucositis, which affects the entire gastrointestinal tract. The exact number of patients that are affected by diarrhoea as a result of treatment is uncertain, although it is believed that approximately 10% of patients with advanced cancer will be afflicted. Despite advances in the understanding of oral and small intestinal mucositis over recent years, large intestinal mucositis, including diarrhoea, has not been well defined and the underlying mechanisms of the condition are yet to be established. The majority of the literature available concerning diarrhoea is based on clinical observations, with very little basic research existing. However, from the research conducted, it is likely that the intestinal microflora and mucins play a role in the development of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. This thesis will examine in detail what is known about the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea (CID). Furthermore it will explore the potentially important relationship between intestinal microflora, the luminal environment and the subsequent development of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and diarrhoea. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used chemotherapy agent in clinical oncology practice. Two of its major side effects are mucositis and diarrhoea. The structure of mucins offers mucosal protection, and allows maintenance of intestinal flora by providing attachment sites and preventing bacterial overgrowth and/or penetration. Following treatment with 5-FU, we showed decreases in Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus spp., and an increase in Escherichia spp. in the jejunum. In the colon, 5-FU caused decreases in Enterococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus spp. Real time PCR of faecal samples showed decreasing trends in Lactobacillus spp. and Bacteroides spp., and an increasing trend in E. coli. Significant increases (p<0.05) were seen in Clostridium spp. and Staphylococcus spp. at 24 h. Goblet cell numbers decreased significantly in the jejunum from 24-72 h, with a significant increase in the percentage of cavitated goblet cells, suggesting 5-FU treatment causes significant changes in intestinal flora and mucin secretion in rats. These changes could result in systemic effects, and in particular may contribute to the development of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Irinotecan causes cholinergic and delayed onset diarrhoea in patients, in which β-glucuronidase produced by gut bacteria is thought to be involved. Diarrhoea was observed in treated rats, as expected, following irinotecan treatment. β-glucuronidase expression increased in the jejunum and colon. Faecal flora changed quantitatively after treatment also, with increases in E. coli, Staphylococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. (all β-glucuronidase producing), and decreases in Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp. (both beneficial bacteria), and Bacteroides spp. (β-glucuronidase producing, major component of intestinal flora), suggesting that irinotecan-induced diarrhoea may be caused by an increase in β-glucuronidase producing bacteria. However, the increase in bacteria may also be caused by irinotecan, further exaggerating the toxicity of the drug, and emphasising the need for these specific bacteria to be therapeutically targeted for successful treatment regimens to be accomplished. Mucus production appears to be increased after irinotecan treatment, which may contribute to the development of diarrhoea. Goblet cells were demonstrated to decrease significantly after irinotecan treatment. However, mucin secretion increased. Mucin expression changed significantly after treatment. Muc2 and Muc4 decreased significantly in the villi of the jejunum after treatment, Muc2 and Muc4 decreased significantly in the crypts. Muc2 decreased significantly in the colon. This indicates that irinotecan causes an increase in mucin secretion and a net decrease in mucin-producing goblet cells, and the expression of Muc2 and Muc4 in the gastrointestinal tract is altered following treatment. Increased mucin secretion is likely to be related to altered mucin expression, and may contribute to chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. To determine if the changes to the intestinal microflora caused by chemotherapy could be translated to the clinic, a pilot clinical study was carried out. Sixteen patients experiencing CID were recruited to the study with two control subjects. A large proportion of patients (75%) demonstrated a reduced anaerobic component of their faecal microflora. A reduced diversity of species was also observed in patients. The majority of patients exhibited decreases in Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., whilst all patients exhibited decreases in Bacteroides spp. and Enterococcus spp. Patients receiving antibiotics did not exhibit any marked differences to patients not receiving antibiotics. This indicates that the results observed in the animal studies are clinically relevant, and further research into this area should be undertaken. CID is associated with marked changes in the intestinal microflora. These changes may result in diminished bacterial functions within the gut, altering gut function and initiating intestinal damage, resulting in the onset of diarrhoea. In conclusion, there is clear evidence demonstrating chemotherapy treatment results in changes to the intestinal microflora and mucin secretion, which may be responsible in part for the development of severe mucositis and diarrhoea. Irinotecan toxicity may be compounded by the increase in β-glucuronidase producing bacteria. The intestinal flora of cancer patients experiencing CID is also noticeably different to that of healthy subjects. Irinotecan causes changes to mucin secretion, and the specific expression of Muc2, Muc4 and Klf4, suggesting that secretory control by the enteric nervous system may also be affected by chemotherapy. This research has extended the understanding of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and diarrhoea, complex side effects of chemotherapy. However, new areas for future research have also been identified. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1352119 / Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Adelaide, School of Medicine, 2009

Mucositis manifesting as diarrhoea is a common side effect of chemotherapy which remains poorly understood. It is one of a number of manifestations of alimentary mucositis, which affects the entire gastrointestinal tract. The exact number of patients that are affected by diarrhoea as a result of treatment is uncertain, although it is believed that approximately 10% of patients with advanced cancer will be afflicted. Despite advances in the understanding of oral and small intestinal mucositis over recent years, large intestinal mucositis, including diarrhoea, has not been well defined and the underlying mechanisms of the condition are yet to be established. The majority of the literature available concerning diarrhoea is based on clinical observations, with very little basic research existing. However, from the research conducted, it is likely that the intestinal microflora and mucins play a role in the development of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. This thesis will examine in detail what is known about the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea (CID). Furthermore it will explore the potentially important relationship between intestinal microflora, the luminal environment and the subsequent development of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and diarrhoea. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used chemotherapy agent in clinical oncology practice. Two of its major side effects are mucositis and diarrhoea. The structure of mucins offers mucosal protection, and allows maintenance of intestinal flora by providing attachment sites and preventing bacterial overgrowth and/or penetration. Following treatment with 5-FU, we showed decreases in Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus spp., and an increase in Escherichia spp. in the jejunum. In the colon, 5-FU caused decreases in Enterococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Streptococcus spp. Real time PCR of faecal samples showed decreasing trends in Lactobacillus spp. and Bacteroides spp., and an increasing trend in E. coli. Significant increases (p<0.05) were seen in Clostridium spp. and Staphylococcus spp. at 24 h. Goblet cell numbers decreased significantly in the jejunum from 24-72 h, with a significant increase in the percentage of cavitated goblet cells, suggesting 5-FU treatment causes significant changes in intestinal flora and mucin secretion in rats. These changes could result in systemic effects, and in particular may contribute to the development of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. Irinotecan causes cholinergic and delayed onset diarrhoea in patients, in which β-glucuronidase produced by gut bacteria is thought to be involved. Diarrhoea was observed in treated rats, as expected, following irinotecan treatment. β-glucuronidase expression increased in the jejunum and colon. Faecal flora changed quantitatively after treatment also, with increases in E. coli, Staphylococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. (all β-glucuronidase producing), and decreases in Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp. (both beneficial bacteria), and Bacteroides spp. (β-glucuronidase producing, major component of intestinal flora), suggesting that irinotecan-induced diarrhoea may be caused by an increase in β-glucuronidase producing bacteria. However, the increase in bacteria may also be caused by irinotecan, further exaggerating the toxicity of the drug, and emphasising the need for these specific bacteria to be therapeutically targeted for successful treatment regimens to be accomplished. Mucus production appears to be increased after irinotecan treatment, which may contribute to the development of diarrhoea. Goblet cells were demonstrated to decrease significantly after irinotecan treatment. However, mucin secretion increased. Mucin expression changed significantly after treatment. Muc2 and Muc4 decreased significantly in the villi of the jejunum after treatment, Muc2 and Muc4 decreased significantly in the crypts. Muc2 decreased significantly in the colon. This indicates that irinotecan causes an increase in mucin secretion and a net decrease in mucin-producing goblet cells, and the expression of Muc2 and Muc4 in the gastrointestinal tract is altered following treatment. Increased mucin secretion is likely to be related to altered mucin expression, and may contribute to chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea. To determine if the changes to the intestinal microflora caused by chemotherapy could be translated to the clinic, a pilot clinical study was carried out. Sixteen patients experiencing CID were recruited to the study with two control subjects. A large proportion of patients (75%) demonstrated a reduced anaerobic component of their faecal microflora. A reduced diversity of species was also observed in patients. The majority of patients exhibited decreases in Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., whilst all patients exhibited decreases in Bacteroides spp. and Enterococcus spp. Patients receiving antibiotics did not exhibit any marked differences to patients not receiving antibiotics. This indicates that the results observed in the animal studies are clinically relevant, and further research into this area should be undertaken. CID is associated with marked changes in the intestinal microflora. These changes may result in diminished bacterial functions within the gut, altering gut function and initiating intestinal damage, resulting in the onset of diarrhoea. In conclusion, there is clear evidence demonstrating chemotherapy treatment results in changes to the intestinal microflora and mucin secretion, which may be responsible in part for the development of severe mucositis and diarrhoea. Irinotecan toxicity may be compounded by the increase in β-glucuronidase producing bacteria. The intestinal flora of cancer patients experiencing CID is also noticeably different to that of healthy subjects. Irinotecan causes changes to mucin secretion, and the specific expression of Muc2, Muc4 and Klf4, suggesting that secretory control by the enteric nervous system may also be affected by chemotherapy. This research has extended the understanding of chemotherapy-induced mucositis and diarrhoea, complex side effects of chemotherapy. However, new areas for future research have also been identified. / http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url= http://library.adelaide.edu.au/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=1352119 / Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Adelaide, School of Medicine, 2009

The present study attempted to predict the serious side effects of akathisia and parkinsonism on the basis of individualized measurement of changes in visuomotor functioning. The following were the hypotheses for this investigation. 1. A deterioration of visuomotor ability as measured by a modification of Haase and Janssen' s (1965) Handwriting Test will predict which patients undergoing neuroleptic therapy will experience the extrapyramidal symptoms of akathisia and parkinsonism (symptom group) and which will not (no-symptom group). 2. A deterioration of visuomotor ability as measured by the Bender-Gestalt will predict which patients undergoing neuroleptic therapy will experience the extrapyramidal symptoms of akathisia and parkinsonism (symptom group) and which will not (no-symptom group). It was not possible to predict the symptom group as a whole on the basis of the Handwriting Test scores since a t test of the difference was not significant between group means. However, inspection of these scores showed clear deterioration of performance among the patients who experienced parkinsonian reactions as opposed to those who experienced akathisia or who did not experience extrapyramidal symptoms at all. The symptom group was separated into akathisic and parkinsonian groups and compared to the subjects who did not experience extrapyramidal side effects (no-symptom group). A one-way ANOVA showed a nonsignificant difference between the three groups. Similar analysis of the Bender-Gestalt scores failed to support the second hypothesis since no significant difference was found between groups.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-17T15:26:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2015-05-04. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2015-09-17T15:45:57Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000842358_20160501.pdf: 688314 bytes, checksum: c0e58d7c09371b47da4b8dfd21b13c6b (MD5) Bitstreams deleted on 2016-05-04T13:08:28Z: 000842358_20160501.pdf,. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2016-05-04T13:09:32Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000842358.pdf: 2362291 bytes, checksum: 607ef5f590e4380cff19bf4d439fa958 (MD5) / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Introdução. O omeprazol é amplamente administrado e, na maioria das vezes, o uso é efetivo e seguro. No entanto, estudos avaliaram que o omeprazol foi o medicamento mais relacionado com a admissão hospitalar devido RAM. Tais RAM talvez possam ser explicadas devido ao uso abusivo ou prescrição irracional de omeprazol. Todavia, não foi avaliado o risco e o benefício do uso profilático do omeprazol, considerando o uso aprovado e o uso não aprovado, e as consequências para a segurança do paciente. Objetivo. Identificar e avaliar o risco de ocorrência de EAM e o benefício através da efetividade do uso profilático de omeprazol em pacientes internados. Método. Conduziu-se um estudo coorte observacional de agosto a outubro de 2013 e dezembro/2013 a maio/2014, no Hospital Estadual Américo Brasiliense. Os pacientes internados foram classificados em três grupos: a) uso de omeprazol profilático aprovado, b) uso de omeprazol profilático não aprovado; c) não uso de omeprazol. Foram excluídos os pacientes que fizeram uso de omeprazol não profilático. Os pacientes foram monitorados diariamente com auxílio do roteiro de investigação adequado previamente. Os dados foram tabulados segundo a presença ou ausência de efetividade e de eventos adversos nos três grupos. Resultados. Foram monitoradas 427 hospitalizações, sendo 136 expostos ao omeprazol profilático não aprovado e 52 expostos ao omeprazol profilático aprovado. Identificaram-se apenas dois casos de suspeita de inefetividade e 14 de eventos adversos. Observou-se diferença significativa na concentração sérica da creatinina e ureia para os pacientes que usavam omeprazol profilático aprovado. Conclusão. Há duas vezes mais pacientes expostos ao omeprazol profilático não aprovado comparado ao uso aprovado. Não houve associação do omeprazol profilático com fator de risco, no entanto, houve diferença significativa no... / Introduction. Omeprazole is a widely used drug; in most cases, it is effective and safe. However, studies have found omeprazole to be the drug most frequently related to hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The ADRs could have occurred as a result of abuse or irrational prescribing of omeprazole. Despite that possibility, the risks and benefits of prophylactic omeprazole considering the approved and off-label uses and the potential consequences for patient safety have not been assessed. Objective. To identify and assess the risk of adverse drug events and the benefit provided by the effective use of prophylactic omeprazole in hospitalized patients. Methods. This observational cohort study was conducted from August to October 2013 and December 2013 to May 2014 at the Américo Brasiliense State Hospital. The inpatients were classified into three groups: a) approved use of prophylactic omeprazole b) off-label use of prophylactic omeprazole, and c) not using omeprazole. Patients who used no prophylactic omeprazole were excluded. The patients were monitored daily with the aid of a pre-established research protocol. Data were tabulated according to drug effectiveness or ineffectiveness and presence of adverse events in the three groups. Results. A total of 427 hospitalized patients were monitored in the study. Of these, 136 patients were exposed to prophylactic omeprazole used off-label and 52 exposed to on-label use of prophylactic omeprazole. Two cases of suspected ineffectiveness and 14 adverse events were recorded. There was a significant difference in serum creatinine and urea for patients using on-label prophylactic omeprazole. Conclusion. There are twice as many patients using off-label prophylactic omeprazole as patients using it for approved indications. There was no association of prophylactic omeprazole with risk factors, but there was a significant difference in the increase in serum creatinine and urea for ... / FAPESP: 13/12681-2

Drug-induced gingival overgrowth is a disfiguring condition that is a side effect encountered in susceptible responder patients common to three groups of drugs - immunosupressants, calcium channel blockers and anticonvulsant agents. The altered overgrown gingiva can be aesthetically displeasing but in severe cases it can cause functional problems and such patients may eventually require excision of excess tissue. The underlying mechanisms that mediate drug-induced gingival overgrowth is uncertain and the various investigations into the pathogenesis of this disease suggest that it is multifactorial. This study investigated the effects of exogenous addition of cycJosporin and amlodipine on the growth and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts and the production of collagen by these cells. Results showed that these drugs have a direct stimulatory effect on the gingival fibroblasts of responder patients in vitro and there seems to be a synergistic effect between the two drugs. Findings of this study have important relevance as it suggests that fibroblast proliferation and collagen production must play a significant role in the pathogenesis of drug-induced gingival overgrowth. / Dissertation (MSc (Odontology))--University of Pretoria, 2006. / Dental Management Sciences / unrestricted