Thesis (Ed. D.)--University of Hawaii, 1992. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 355-356) / Photocopy. / xiii, 356 leaves 28 cm

Health promotion and public health research increasingly recognise that a range of community organisation and attitudinal factors are important to a community’s level of readiness, or capacity, to undertake effective prevention activity required to reduce population rates of adolescent substance abuse. Although the importance of tailoring community capacity building to readiness levels is acknowledged, little research has been done to date, to develop a systematic framework for measuring readiness in Australia. / Equally in Australia where national and state government drive public health drug policy and programme development, their interaction and support of community level interventions and efforts has not been widely examined. / This methodological study of 100 telephone interviews with 60 community practitioners (15 in each community) was conducted to identify and assess the specific attitudinal, systemic and resource characteristics of four regional communities in order to extend their capacity or readiness to address adolescent substance abuse within their community. The study provided the opportunity to assess the feasibility, reliability and validity and utility of two North American questionnaires that had been developed to provide quantitative measurement of community readiness. Additional questions were included to try and gauge to what extent state government engaged with, and responded to, the four regional communities in the planning and initiation of prevention activity. Examination of this domain would also contribute to the understanding of state and community engagement with community empowerment. / Each of the readiness questionnaires appeared comprehensible within the Australian context, requiring only minor modifications to wording and format to obtain reliable responses from community practitioners. Community readiness ratings for the four communities were consistent across the two instruments with each questionnaire assessing some overlapping and some distinct domains. / The comparison of results from the two community readiness survey instruments suggested some advantages for the TECPR instrument in its slightly higher face validity to key informants and its ability to significantly discriminate the total readiness scores for the four communities. Analysis revealed some associations between the two readiness assessment methods; supporting the view that they were assessing some common underlying dimensions but also that they each provided some unique information. Analysis of the additional questions related to community empowerment suggested that the two assessment methods each contributed unique information in predicting local perceptions of community empowerment. / It is concluded that each questionnaire has the potential to elicit detailed and reliable data concerning community-readiness, which can be quantitatively analysed; and is not unduly time-consuming or burdensome to the researcher or the respondents. One of the questionnaires holds particular merit for communities where research expertise in not available. Measurement of community readiness appears feasible in the Australian context opening opportunities for improved planning and evaluating of community development initiatives aimed at preventing adolescent substance abuse.

Ecotourism emerged as an alternative form of tourism in the 1990s to mitigate the faults of conventional (mass) tourism in meeting the needs of sustainable development. It has since become widespread in Thailand and is adopted not only in natural areas but also in rural communities. Key elements of ecotourism include a focus on ecological resources, sustainable management, environmental education, and community participation. Community participation receives a high degree of consideration among developers in Thailand. Ecotourism (ET) is seen to support this concept and is increasingly geared in the direction of social development. These trends form the backdrop to this study on community participation in ecotourism development. The study applies a triangulation methodology to collect data by combining both qualitative and quantitative methods, combining theory and empirical study to analyse the context of how local people have participated in ecotourism development. The study pays particular attention to the practices and opinions of local people in recognition of communities' rights and responsibilities in controlling their own development. The empirical study was carried out at two levels, including a general survey by postal questionnaire (thirty-one respondents) and in-depth study in four areas (Umphang, Khiriwong, Sasom and Tha Madua). The research merges theory and practice into an analysis and empirical presentation throughout the study. Theoretically, the thesis is informed by political economy and political ecology approaches, together with the concept of participation in community development and tourism development models. The research found that many communities achieve a degree of self-management in offering tourism services such as homestays, guided tours, cultural performances and cultural products. Community ecotourism organisations have been established in most communities in order to serve these new activities and to create a collective management process. Similarities in pattern and differentiation in practices among many communities were supported by different outside initiatives, developed according to similar aims and involving similar processes, but there is no uniformity or single model that is effectively applied to all communities. One significant barrier for local communities to take a major role in ecotourism is the access to ecotourism resources, which are mostly located in protected areas and are controlled by state agencies. This has led them to promote primarily their own cultural resources. Consequently, these practical changes have led to a transformation of the dominant development concept from Ecotourism (ET) to Community-based Ecotourism (CBET). Results also show that most practices involve a level of cooperation in decision-making and action with other stakeholders who are in a better position to run tourism businesses. It is difficult for local communities to be empowered to control the whole situation, which is sometimes claimed to be the ultimate goal level of local participation. The demands of marketing and conflict in management among local people, together with the limitations in accessing natural resources, are the weakest points of and constraints on the communities. To deal with these limitations, communities try to create relationships with outsiders. To develop better management of community tourism, many communities rely on help and support from outside, especially from government agencies. This, however, impels the community to become dependent on outsiders. It is also hard for communities to generate a high level of income offering basic services, since there are many levels of demand from different types of ecotourists. In summary, the main contributions of this study are: an understanding of community tourism in Thailand; the experiences of ecotourism development in the community from the leading case studies; directions, roles and responsibilities of actors and community organisations in particular; a range of options for community action in support of a more participatory process in ecotourism development. Last but not least is a set of recommendations for community-based ecotourism development from the level of policy application to practical improvement at the community level.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Ohio University, August, 2007. / Title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ed. D.)--Illinois State University, 2007. / Title from title page screen, viewed on March 11, 2008. Dissertation Committee: Thomas P. Crumpler, Ellen A. Spycher (co-chairs), Anita P. Bohn, Nancy J. Bragg. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 209-218) and abstract. Also available in print.

Thesis (MPhil)--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.

Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio University, June, 2007. / Title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Ohio University, August, 2007. / Title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Toronto, 2004. / Adviser: P. Sawchuk.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Tulsa, 1985. / Bibliography: leaves 72-74 [i.e. 72-73].