Objective: To examine the impact on dental utilisation following the introduction of a participating provider scheme (Regional and Rural Oral Health Program {RROHP)). In this model dentists receive higher third party payments from a private health insurance fund for delivering an agreed range of preventive and diagnostic benefits at no out-ofpocket cost to insured patients. Data source/Study setting: Hospitals Contribution Fund of Australia (HCF) dental claims for all members resident in New South Wales over the six financial years from l99811999 to 200312004. Study design: This cohort study involves before and after analyses of dental claims experience over a six year period for approximately 81,000 individuals in the intervention group (HCF members resident in regional and rural New South Wales, Australia) and 267,000 in the control group (HCF members resident in the Sydney area). Only claims for individuals who were members of HCF at 31 December 1997 were included. The analysis groups claims into the three years prior to the establishment of the RROHP and the three years subsequent to implementation. Data collection/Extraction methods: The analysis is based on all claims submitted by users of services for visits between 1 July 1988 and 30 June 2004. In these data approximately 1,000,000 services were provided to the intervention group and approximately 4,900,000 in the control group. Principal findings: Using Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts, special cause variation was identified in total utilisation rate of private dental services in the intervention group post implementation. No such variation was present in the control group. On average in the three years after implementation of the program the utilisation rate of dental services by regional and rural residents of New South Wales who where members of HCF grew by 12.6%, over eight times the growth rate of 1.5% observed in the control group (HCF members who were Sydney residents). The differences were even more pronounced in the areas of service that were the focus of the program: diagnostic and preventive services. Conclusion: The implementation of a benefit design change, a participating provider scheme, that involved the removal of CO-payments on a defined range of preventive and diagnostic dental services combined with the establishment and promotion of a network of dentists, appears to have had a marked impact on HCF members' utilisation of dental services in regional and rural New South Wales, Australia.

O objetivo do trabalho é estudar o processo de incorporação de tecnologias médicas no sistema de saúde brasileiro, mediante a realização de um estudo de caso na área de equipamentos de diagnóstico por imagem, com foco nas variáveis que influenciam a tomada de decisão. Considerando que os modernos sistemas de saúde são o resultado da complexa interação de processos econômicos, políticos e sociais, adotou-se a abordagem teórica fornecida pela Economia Política da Saúde, que fornece elementos para discutir a saúde a partir de suas especificidades enquanto mercadoria ou bem econômico, como direito social e como espaço de inovação tecnológica e acumulação de capital. Os métodos utilizados incluíram pesquisa bibliográfica sobre o tema, análise de dados secundários e entrevistas semi-estruturadas com representantes dos principais segmentos que participam do processo de incorporação da tecnologia estudada / This work aims at studying the process of new medical technologies incorporation in the Brazilian healthcare system. For this purpose a case study of a new image diagnostic technology was conducted, focusing the variables that affect decision-making process. Considering that modern healthcare systems are the result of complex interaction of economical, political and social processes, the theoretical approach of Political Economy of Health was adopted, which provides elements to discuss health as a merchandise or an economic good, as a social right, and as a space for technological innovation and capital accumulation. Methods included documental research, data analysis, and semi-structured interviews with main actors and institutions that participate of incorporation process of the studied technology

Health and public health services in England are under increasing financial pressure. At the same time, nearly 40% of the total disease burden is potentially amenable to known causes with two of the leading behavioural risk factors being unhealthy diets and physical inactivity. To better inform decision makers and improve health in England, this thesis aims to develop a cost-effectiveness model that can directly compare diet and physical activity interventions. Published public health economic models were reviewed and the strengths and weaknesses of the modelling structures were explored. A pre-existing multistate life table model, PRIMEtime, was developed into PRIMEtime Cost Effectiveness (PRIMEtime CE). Disease specific NHS England costs were derived from NHS England Programme Budgeting Data and unrelated disease costs from NHS cost curves. Social care costs were quantified using a Department of Health tool for estimating wider societal costs. Disease specific utility decrements were adopted from a catalogue of EuroQoL five dimensions questionnaire scores. The cost effectiveness of reformulating food to have less salt and of expanding access to leisure centres in England were modelled from an NHS and social care perspective over a 10 year time horizon, including government and industry costs. Salt reformulation was dominant with an estimated cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) of -£17,000 (95% uncertainty interval, -£40,000 to £39,000), compared with £727,000 (£514,000 to £1,064,000) for increasing access to leisure centres. Sensitivity analyses and cross validation testing of outcomes demonstrated how cost per QALY estimates were sensitive to the choice of model scope, parameters, and structure. PRIMEtime CE is a tool for decision makers to compare interventions affecting diet and physical activity, enabling them to make better informed choices about how to spend finite resources. Future work will focus on making the model freely available and expanding its risk factors to enable comparisons of other public health interventions.

O objetivo do trabalho é estudar o processo de incorporação de tecnologias médicas no sistema de saúde brasileiro, mediante a realização de um estudo de caso na área de equipamentos de diagnóstico por imagem, com foco nas variáveis que influenciam a tomada de decisão. Considerando que os modernos sistemas de saúde são o resultado da complexa interação de processos econômicos, políticos e sociais, adotou-se a abordagem teórica fornecida pela Economia Política da Saúde, que fornece elementos para discutir a saúde a partir de suas especificidades enquanto mercadoria ou bem econômico, como direito social e como espaço de inovação tecnológica e acumulação de capital. Os métodos utilizados incluíram pesquisa bibliográfica sobre o tema, análise de dados secundários e entrevistas semi-estruturadas com representantes dos principais segmentos que participam do processo de incorporação da tecnologia estudada / This work aims at studying the process of new medical technologies incorporation in the Brazilian healthcare system. For this purpose a case study of a new image diagnostic technology was conducted, focusing the variables that affect decision-making process. Considering that modern healthcare systems are the result of complex interaction of economical, political and social processes, the theoretical approach of Political Economy of Health was adopted, which provides elements to discuss health as a merchandise or an economic good, as a social right, and as a space for technological innovation and capital accumulation. Methods included documental research, data analysis, and semi-structured interviews with main actors and institutions that participate of incorporation process of the studied technology

Die Palliativversorgung (PV) verfolgt das Ziel, die Lebensqualität in der noch verbleibenden Lebenszeit von Patienten mit lebensbedrohlichen Erkrankungen zu maximieren. Deutschland verfügt mittlerweile über ein umfassendes PV-System im ambulanten und stationären Sektor und einen Anspruch auf PV als Teil der Regelversorgung. Im Rahmen dieser Untersuchung soll überprüft werden, ob die Inanspruchnahme der PV-Institutionen der vom Gesetzgeber und medizinischen Experten intendierten Reihenfolge entspricht und ob es Überlebenszeit- oder Gesundheitsausgabenunterschiede gibt (jeweils im Vergleich zu Nicht-Palliativpatienten). Dazu wird ein Paneldatensatz der AOK PLUS (Sachsen und Thüringen) mit Patienten verwendet, die zwischen 2009 und 2012 an einer Krebserkrankung litten (n=447.191). PV-Patienten werden entsprechend ihres Inanspruchnahmeverhaltens in vier Interventionsgruppen eingeteilt, von denen jeder mittels Propensity Score Matchings eine eigene Kontrollgruppe zugeordnet wird. Als statistische Werkzeuge werden v.a. Übergangswahrscheinlichkeiten, Kaplan-Meier-Überlebensfunktionen sowie lineare und nicht-lineare Regressionsmodelle verwendet. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass die Reihenfolge der Inanspruchnahme im Einklang mit Gesetzen und Richtlinien ist. Überlebensnachteile der PV-Patienten können nicht festgestellt werden. Die Gesundheitsausgaben steigen nach erstmaliger Inanspruchnahme einer PV-Institution in allen Stichproben stark an. Dieses Ergebnis ist sehr robust gegenüber Änderungen der Modellspezifikation, des Modelltyps und der Stichprobe. Die Ergebnisse lassen auf eine hohe Struktur- und Prozessqualität der PV-Angebote schließen. Jedoch führt die Inanspruchnahme von PV in ihrer derzeitigen Form offenbar nicht zu Einsparungen. Ein weiterer Ausbau des PV-Systems finanziert sich demnach nicht „von selbst“. Aufgrund der sehr kurzen Nachbetrachtungszeiträume bleibt die gesundheitsökonomische Analyse der PV weiterhin herausfordernd. / Palliative Care (PC) is an approach for patients with life-threatening diseases that focuses on improving quality of life rather than maximizing the remaining life time. Meanwhile, Germany possesses a comprehensive PC system in the ambulatory and inpatient sector where PC treatments are part of standard care. The objective of this research is to evaluate whether patients are using PC institutions as intended by law and medical experts and whether PC patients differ in terms of survival time or health care expenditures (HCE) in comparison to non-PC patients. For this purpose, a panel data set from the statutory health insurance AOK PLUS (covering the German federal states Thuringia and Saxony) is used, that includes all deceased cancer patients between 2009 and 2012 (n=447,191). According to their usage of PC institutions, PC patients were grouped into four different intervention groups and thus each of them was paired with a control group derived from a propensity score matching. A variety of statistical tools has been used, e.g. transition probabilities, Kaplan-Meier survival functions as well as linear and non-linear regression models. Results show that the intended sequences of PC usage are in accordance with law and medical guidelines. There are no disadvantages in survival of PC patients. In all four samples, HCE of PC patients are higher after the initial contact with a PC institution. This result is very robust against adjustments to the model specification, the model type and the sample. Results suggest that structural and process quality of PC is high. However, no saving effect can be identified for PC in its current form. A further extension of the PC system is therefore not “self-financing”. Due to the very short post treatment time, health economic analysis of PC remains challenging.

Aufgabenstellung: Die Europäische Kommission strebt an, die Zahl der Getöteten im Straßenverkehr in der EU bis zum Jahr 2010 zu halbieren, unter anderem durch Einsatz von Telemedizin in der präklinischen Notfallrettung. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist die Untersuchung der Kosten-Wirksamkeit von Telemedizinsystemen für die präklinische Notfallrettung bei Verkehrsunfällen in Deutschland. Methodik: Aus Sicht der Gesellschaft und der Krankenkassen werden drei Varianten eines Telemedizinsystems mit dem Status Quo in Deutschland, das heißt dem "Nicht-Einsatz von Telemedizin" in der präklinischen Notfallrettung, verglichen. Die Analyse erfolgt auf Basis retrospektiv erhobener Daten für einen Zeithorizont von zehn Jahren. Berücksichtigt werden Systemkosten, Kosten der Personenschäden und Strukturkosten des Rettungsdienstes. Diese werden diskontiert und nicht inflationsbereinigt. Der Nutzen wird mittels gewonnener Lebensjahre durch die Verkürzung des therapiefreien Intervalls und die Verbesserung der Laienhilfe gemessen. Aufgrund der Uneinheitlichkeit der Daten werden Annahmen und Abschätzungen getroffen. Ergebnis: Im Basisergebnis ist der Kosten-Wirksamkeits-Quotient für die Variante "Telemedizin für Laienhelfer" (299.366 Euro pro gewonnenes Lebensjahr) höher als für die Variante "Automatische Unfallmeldung" (247.977 Euro pro gewonnenes Lebensjahr). Den besten Kosten-Wirksamkeits-Quotient erzielt die Vollausstattung mit 239.524 Euro pro gewonnenem Lebensjahr. Im Rahmen von multivariaten Sensitivitätsanalysen (best und worst case scenario) wird festgestellt, dass eine Senkung der Systemkosten die Gesamtkosten überproportional reduziert und dass durch eine schnelle Marktdurchdringung der Kosten-Wirksamkeits-Quotient des Telemedizinsystems deutlich verbessert werden kann. Fazit: Für alle drei Varianten des Telemedizinsystems werden hohe Kosten pro gewonnenes Lebensjahr erwartet. Eine Einführung dieser Systeme erscheint nur in einer abgestimmten europäischen Vorgehensweise realistisch. / Objective: Since the European Commission set a goal of reducing the number of road accident deaths across the EU by 2010 to one half, the use of telemedicine for pre-clinical traffic accident emergency rescue is very high on the agenda. The purpose of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of telemedical devices for pre-clinical traffic accident emergency rescue in Germany. Methods: Three telemedical devices are compared from the perspective of society and health insurance with baseline assumptions in Germany, i.e. the non-application of telemedicine in pre-clinical emergency rescues. The analysis is based on retrospective statistical data covering a period of ten years. Costs resulting from telemedical device, personal injury, wasted journeys and erroneous dispatching of rescue services are discounted and not adjusted for inflation. The outcome is measured in terms of "life years gained" by reducing therapy-free intervals and improvements in first-aid provided by laypersons. Due to the uncertainty of data, certain assumptions and estimates are necessary. Results: In the base case scenario the cost-effectiveness ratio of the device "Telemedicine for laypersons" (Euro 299,366 per life year gained) would be higher than of the "Automatic Accident Alert" (Euro 247,977 per life year gained). The full equipment device has the best cost-effectiveness ratio (Euro 239,524 per life year gained). Multi-way sensitivity-analysis with best and worst case scenarios show that decreasing costs of telemedical device would disproportionately reduce total costs, and that rapid market penetration would largely increase the cost-effectiveness ratio of the devices. Conclusion: The net costs per life year gained in the application of the three telemedical devices are estimated as quite high. The implementation of the devices seems only realistic as part of a larger European co-ordinated initiative.

This thesis shows how the Process Analysis Method (PAM) can be applied to assess technologies used to mitigate arsenic from drinking water in rural India, using a set of sustainability indicators. Stakeholder perspectives, gathered from a fieldwork survey of 933 households in West Bengal in 2012, played a significant role in this assessment. This research found that the ‘Most Important’ issues as specified by the technology users are cost, trust, distance from their home to the clean water source (an indicator of convenience), and understanding the health effects of arsenic. It was also found that none of the ten technologies evaluated are economically viable, as many do not charge user-fees, which creates reliance upon donations to meet recurring costs. Utilisation of a technology is strongly related to sociocultural capital, but in many cases, features that contribute to sociocultural value, like regular testing of the treated water, are not included in the financial budget. It is suggested that increased awareness might change attitudes to arsenic-rich waste and its disposal protocols. This waste is often currently discarded in an uncontrolled manner in the local environment, giving rise to the possibility of point-source recontamination. All technologies proved to have difficulties in dealing with waste, except the Tipot and Dug wells which produce no waste. Of the methods considered, the BESU technology scored highest, but still only with 47-62% of the maximum scores achievable within each domain. This explains the widespread failure of mitigation projects across the region. The indicators and metrics show where improvements can be made. A model scheme based on these findings is outlined which could be applied with the objective of increasing utilisation and improving sustainability. It can be concluded that a product stewardship approach should be taken in regard to design, implementation and operation of the technologies, including the creation of a regulated toxic waste collection and disposal industry.