Marine capture fisheries contribute over 50% of total world fish production and more than 70% of this production is utilized for processing. The Canadian commercial fishing industry is one of the world’s most valued industries but generates large quantities of solid waste and wastewater. The increasing growth of the fish processing industry, the need for reduction of pollutants and the need to increase returns on raw material has led fish processors to adopt new ways of utilizing the wastes. In particular, efforts have focused on converting the biological substance in solid fish processing waste to various valuable compounds including both nutritional and non-nutritional products. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) are heteropolysaccharide molecules with potential therapeutic applications and anticoagulant properties. Anticoagulants are responsible for curing major death-causing diseases such as strokes and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to develop an economically feasible technique to extract sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) from fish processing waste. Two different fish (mackerel and herring) were used to optimize the extraction of sGAG. The effects of hydrolysis time (3, 6, 12 and 24 hrs) and papain concentration (15 and 20u/ml) on the extraction of sGAGs from different fish parts (whole fish, flesh, head, gut, fins and tails, skin and bones) were evaluated. The highest concentration of sGAGs (206.7 mg/g) was obtained from the mackerel head sample at 6 hrs of hydrolysis time and 20 u/ml of enzyme concentration while the highest concentration of sGAGs (236.3 mg/g) was obtained from herring gut at 12 hrs of hydrolysis time and 20 u/ml of enzyme concentration. The concentration of sGAG obtained from other part of mackerel were flesh (23.96 mg/g), waste (163.23 mg/g), fins and tail (86.63 mg/g), gut (203.52 mg/g), skin (105.45 mg/g) and bones (97.2 mg/g). However, the concentration of sGAG obtained from other parts of herring were flesh (39.34 mg/g), waste (130.15 mg/g), head (162.76 mg/g), fins and tail (148.53 mg/g), skin (65.89 mg/g) and bones (75.57 mg/g). Comparing the overall concentration of sGAG in waste samples of the fish, the mackerel produced higher sGAG than the herring.

The suitability of water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) as a viable feedstock for renewable energy production was investigated in this project. Water hyacinth used in this study was harvested from the Vaal River near Parys in the northwest region of the Free State province, South Africa (26°54′S 27°27′E). The wet plants were processed in the laboratory at the North-West University by separating the roots from the leaves and the stems, thus obtaining two separate water hyacinth feedstock. Characterisation of the feedstock showed that the stems and leaves are more suitable for bio-energy production than roots, due to the higher cellulose and hemicellulose content and very low lignin content of the stems and leaves. Water hyacinth was evaluated as feedstock for the production of bio-ethanol gel, bio-ethanol, bio-oil and bio-char. The recovery of water from the wet plants for use in bio-refining or for use as drip-irrigation in agriculture was also investigated. Cellulose was extracted from water hyacinth feedstock to be used as a gelling agent for the production of ethanol-gel fuel. A yield of 200 g cellulose/kg dry feedstock was obtained. The extracted cellulose was used to produce ethanol-gel with varying water content. The gel with properties closest to the SANS 448 standard contained 90 vol% ethanol and 10 vol% water, with 38 wt% cellulose. This gel was found to ignite readily and burn steadily, without flaring, sudden deflagrations, sparking, splitting, popping, dripping or exploding from ignition until it had burned to extinction, as required by SANS 448. The only specifications that could not be met were the viscosity (23,548 cP) and the high waste residue (32 wt%) left after burning. The other major concern is the extremely high costs involved with the manufacturing of ethanol-gel from water hyacinth cellulose. It can be concluded that ethanol-gel cannot be economically produced using water hyacinth as feedstock. Chemical and enzymatic extraction of water from the feedstock, which is stems and leaves or roots, showed that the highest yield of water was obtained using a combination of Celluclast 1.5 L, Pectinex Ultra SP-L and additional de-ionised water. A yield of 0.89 ± 0.01 gwater/gwater in biomass was realised. This is, however, only 0.86 wt% higher than the highest yield obtained (0.87 ± 0.01 gwater/gwater in biomass) using only Pectinex Ultra SP-L and de-ionised water. It is recommended to use only Pectinex Ultra SP-L and de-ionised water at a pH of 3.5 and a temperature of 40°C. Using one enzyme instead of two reduces operating costs and simplifies the chemical extraction process. The extracted water, both filtered and unfiltered, was not found to be suitable for domestic use without further purification to reduce the total dissolved solids (TDS), potassium and manganese levels. Both the unfiltered and filtered water were, however, found to be suitable for industrial and agricultural purposes, except for the high TDS levels. If the TDS and suspended particle level can be reduced, the extracted water would be suitable for domestic, industrial and agricultural use. The potential fermentation of the sugars derived from the water hyacinth, using ultrasonic pretreatment, was investigated. Indirect ultrasonic treatment (ultrasonic bath) proved to be a better pretreatment method than direct sonication (ultrasonic probe). The optimum sugar yield for the ultrasonic bath pretreatment with 5% NaOH was found to be 0.15 g sugar/g biomass (0.47 g sugar/g available sugar) using an indirect sonication energy input of 27 kJ/g biomass. The optimum sugar yield is lower than those reported in other studies using different pretreatment methods. Theoretically a maximum of 0.24 g ethanol can be obtained per g available sugar. This relates to an ethanol yield of 0.08 g ethanol/kg wet biomass. The low yield implies that ethanol production from water hyacinth is not economically feasible. The production of bio-oil and bio-char from water hyacinth through thermochemical liquefaction of wet hyacinth feedstock was investigated. An optimum bio-char yield of 0.55 g bio-char/g biomass was achieved using an inert atmosphere (nitrogen) at 260°C and the stems and leaves as feedstock. With the roots as feedstock a slightly lower optimum yield of 0.45 g bio-char/g biomass was found using a non-reducing atmosphere (carbon monoxide) at 280°C. The bio-oil yield was too low to accurately quantify. As water is required during thermochemical liquefaction, it was found unnecessary to dry the biomass to the same extent as was the case with the pretreatment and fermentation of the water hyacinth, making this a more feasible route for biofuel production. Bio-char produced through liquefaction of roots as the feedstock and leaves and stems as the other feedstock had a higher heating value (HHV) of 10.89 ± 0.45 MJ/kg and 23.31 ± 0.45 MJ/kg respectively. Liquefaction of water hyacinth biomass increased the HHV of the feedstock to a value comparable to that of low grade coal. This implies a possible use of water hyacinth for co-gasification. The most effective route for bio-energy production in the case of water hyacinth was found to be thermochemical liquefaction (12.8 MJ/kg wet biomass). Due to the high production costs involved, it is recommended to only use water hyacinth as a feedstock for biofuel production if no alternative feedstock are available. / MIng (Chemical Engineering), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

The suitability of water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) as a viable feedstock for renewable energy production was investigated in this project. Water hyacinth used in this study was harvested from the Vaal River near Parys in the northwest region of the Free State province, South Africa (26°54′S 27°27′E). The wet plants were processed in the laboratory at the North-West University by separating the roots from the leaves and the stems, thus obtaining two separate water hyacinth feedstock. Characterisation of the feedstock showed that the stems and leaves are more suitable for bio-energy production than roots, due to the higher cellulose and hemicellulose content and very low lignin content of the stems and leaves. Water hyacinth was evaluated as feedstock for the production of bio-ethanol gel, bio-ethanol, bio-oil and bio-char. The recovery of water from the wet plants for use in bio-refining or for use as drip-irrigation in agriculture was also investigated. Cellulose was extracted from water hyacinth feedstock to be used as a gelling agent for the production of ethanol-gel fuel. A yield of 200 g cellulose/kg dry feedstock was obtained. The extracted cellulose was used to produce ethanol-gel with varying water content. The gel with properties closest to the SANS 448 standard contained 90 vol% ethanol and 10 vol% water, with 38 wt% cellulose. This gel was found to ignite readily and burn steadily, without flaring, sudden deflagrations, sparking, splitting, popping, dripping or exploding from ignition until it had burned to extinction, as required by SANS 448. The only specifications that could not be met were the viscosity (23,548 cP) and the high waste residue (32 wt%) left after burning. The other major concern is the extremely high costs involved with the manufacturing of ethanol-gel from water hyacinth cellulose. It can be concluded that ethanol-gel cannot be economically produced using water hyacinth as feedstock. Chemical and enzymatic extraction of water from the feedstock, which is stems and leaves or roots, showed that the highest yield of water was obtained using a combination of Celluclast 1.5 L, Pectinex Ultra SP-L and additional de-ionised water. A yield of 0.89 ± 0.01 gwater/gwater in biomass was realised. This is, however, only 0.86 wt% higher than the highest yield obtained (0.87 ± 0.01 gwater/gwater in biomass) using only Pectinex Ultra SP-L and de-ionised water. It is recommended to use only Pectinex Ultra SP-L and de-ionised water at a pH of 3.5 and a temperature of 40°C. Using one enzyme instead of two reduces operating costs and simplifies the chemical extraction process. The extracted water, both filtered and unfiltered, was not found to be suitable for domestic use without further purification to reduce the total dissolved solids (TDS), potassium and manganese levels. Both the unfiltered and filtered water were, however, found to be suitable for industrial and agricultural purposes, except for the high TDS levels. If the TDS and suspended particle level can be reduced, the extracted water would be suitable for domestic, industrial and agricultural use. The potential fermentation of the sugars derived from the water hyacinth, using ultrasonic pretreatment, was investigated. Indirect ultrasonic treatment (ultrasonic bath) proved to be a better pretreatment method than direct sonication (ultrasonic probe). The optimum sugar yield for the ultrasonic bath pretreatment with 5% NaOH was found to be 0.15 g sugar/g biomass (0.47 g sugar/g available sugar) using an indirect sonication energy input of 27 kJ/g biomass. The optimum sugar yield is lower than those reported in other studies using different pretreatment methods. Theoretically a maximum of 0.24 g ethanol can be obtained per g available sugar. This relates to an ethanol yield of 0.08 g ethanol/kg wet biomass. The low yield implies that ethanol production from water hyacinth is not economically feasible. The production of bio-oil and bio-char from water hyacinth through thermochemical liquefaction of wet hyacinth feedstock was investigated. An optimum bio-char yield of 0.55 g bio-char/g biomass was achieved using an inert atmosphere (nitrogen) at 260°C and the stems and leaves as feedstock. With the roots as feedstock a slightly lower optimum yield of 0.45 g bio-char/g biomass was found using a non-reducing atmosphere (carbon monoxide) at 280°C. The bio-oil yield was too low to accurately quantify. As water is required during thermochemical liquefaction, it was found unnecessary to dry the biomass to the same extent as was the case with the pretreatment and fermentation of the water hyacinth, making this a more feasible route for biofuel production. Bio-char produced through liquefaction of roots as the feedstock and leaves and stems as the other feedstock had a higher heating value (HHV) of 10.89 ± 0.45 MJ/kg and 23.31 ± 0.45 MJ/kg respectively. Liquefaction of water hyacinth biomass increased the HHV of the feedstock to a value comparable to that of low grade coal. This implies a possible use of water hyacinth for co-gasification. The most effective route for bio-energy production in the case of water hyacinth was found to be thermochemical liquefaction (12.8 MJ/kg wet biomass). Due to the high production costs involved, it is recommended to only use water hyacinth as a feedstock for biofuel production if no alternative feedstock are available. / MIng (Chemical Engineering), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

La caractérisation de nanomatériaux dans des matrices alimentaires et animales suscite un intérêt scientifique important afin d’évaluer les risques potentiels de l’exposition liés à l’utilisation grandissante des nanomatériaux par plusieurs industries, y compris un certain nombre d’applications agroalimentaires. Un facteur limitant à l’étude et la réglementation des nanomatériaux dans des matrices complexes telle que la nourriture est l’absence de méthodes standardisées pour l’extraction et l’analyse de nanoparticules, tout en évitant l’altération de certaines caractéristiques physicochimiques des nanoparticules. Les travaux présentés dans ce mémoire abordent l’optimisation de plusieurs approches de préparation d’échantillon (hydrolyse enzymatique et alcaline) pour l’extraction de nanoparticules d’Ag préalablement équilibrées dans une matrice de boeuf haché mi-maigre. Les nanoparticules extraites ont été analysées par spectrométrie de masse à plasma à couplage inductif en mode particule unique (SP-ICP-MS) permettant la mesure de leur taille et concentration, mais aussi de la concentration en métal dissous, le tout à de très faibles concentrations (de l’ordre du ng/L). La validation de l’analyse par SP-ICP-MS a été réalisée par évaluation de la répétabilité, de la détermination des limites de détection et par une investigation de l’influence du traitement de données sur l’interprétation des résultats. Les pertes de nanoparticules lors de la préparation des échantillons ont été minimisées par l’identification et l’optimisation de paramètres clés tels que la composition du médium d’extraction, l’utilisation d’ultrasons et de la manipulation de l’échantillon après dégradation de la matrice. Les meilleurs recouvrements ont été obtenus par hydrolyse alcaline de la matrice en utilisant de l’hydroxyde de tetramethylammonium (TMAH), mais les échantillons obtenus étaient moins stables et plus susceptibles aux altérations des propriétés physicochimiques des nanoparticules que pour la dégradation par hydrolyse enzymatique utilisant lipase et pancréatine de porc. / The regulation and characterization of nanomaterials in foods and animal matrices are of great interest due to the potential risks associated with their exposure and the increasing number of instances where they are used within the food industry. One factor limiting the scientifically rigorous regulation of nanoparticles in foods is the lack of standardized procedures for the extraction of nanoparticles (NP) from complex matrices, without alteration of their physico-chemical properties. To this end, two sample preparation approaches (enzymatic- and alkaline-based hydrolyses) were tested and optimized in order to extract 40 nm Ag NP, following their equilibration with a fatty ground beef matrix. Extracted NP were characterized using single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS), allowing the determination of NP size and concentrations and also dissolved metal concentrations at trace levels. Validation of the SP-ICP-MS analysis was achieved by an evaluation of the repeatability and accuracy and by a determination of the various detection limits. Finally, we also looked into the influence of data treatment on interpretation of the results. NP losses during the sample preparation were minimized by identifying and optimizing key parameters such as the composition of the extraction media, usage of ultrasonication or the handling of the sample after separation from the undigested matter, among other points. The alkaline approach using TMAH (tetramethylammonium hydroxide) was found to have the highest recoveries, however processed samples were found to be less stable and more prone to alteration of the Ag NP physicochemical characteristics than samples processed using an enzymatic digestion based upon pork pancreatin and lipase.