Univ., Diss.--Münster (Westfalen), 2002.

Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die Testteilnahmemotivation von Schülerinnen und Schülern in großangelegten Schulleistungsstudien. Es wurde ein theoretisches Erwartung-Wert-Anstrengung-Modell der Testteilnahmemotivation herausgearbeitet, das in drei empirischen Studien überprüft wurde. Dabei wurde das komplexe Beziehungsgefüge zwischen Erfolgserwartung, dem wahrgenommene Wert des Tests, Anstrengungsbereitschaft und Testleistung untersucht. Datengrundlage der Studie I bildete die erste PISA-Erhebung aus dem Jahr 2000, in der die Testteilnahmemotivation durch Fragen zur Anstrengungsbereitschaft und zum wahrgenommenen Wert des Tests erhoben wurde. In Studie II und III gaben die Jugendlichen, die an der Ländervergleichsstudie im Jahr 2012 teilnahmen, Einschätzungen zu ihrer Erfolgserwartung, dem wahrgenommenen Wert des Tests und ihrer Anstrengungsbereitschaft ab. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Testteilnahmemotivation zur Erklärung individueller Unterschiede in der Testleistung beiträgt (Studie I), auch wenn diverse Hintergrundinformationen der Teilnehmenden berücksichtigt werden (Studie III). Die theoretisch angenommenen Beziehungen im Erwartung-Wert-Anstrengung-Modell wurden fast vollständig bestätigt: Vor allem der wahrgenommene Wert, aber auch die Erwartungen sagten die berichtete Anstrengungsbereitschaft der Teilnehmenden vorher; die Erfolgserwartung und die Anstrengungsbereitschaft wiesen einen Zusammenhang mit der Testleistung auf (Studie II). Im Verlauf eines Leistungstests berichteten die Teilnehmenden im Durchschnitt eine Abnahme in der Anstrengung und dem Wert sowie einen stabilen Verlauf ihrer Erfolgserwartung. Zur Erklärung der Testleistung trug neben der anfänglichen Erfolgserwartung und Anstrengungsbereitschaft auch die Veränderung in der Erfolgserwartung bei (Studie III). Für eine hohe Testleistung ist es wichtig, dass die Teilnehmenden den Test motiviert beginnen und während des Tests selbstsicher bezüglich ihrer Erfolgserwartung bleiben. / The thesis investigates effects of test-taking motivation on test performance in low-stakes assessments. An expectancy-value-effort model of test-taking motivation was developed and tested in three empirical studies. The studies investigated the complex relationship between expectancy for success, perceived value of the test, test-taking effort, and test performance. The database of study I is the first PISA study. Test-taking motivation was assessed with questions about effort and the perceived value of the test. Study II and III are premised on the national assessment study in the year 2012. The students reported their expectancy for success, their perceived value of the test, and their test-taking effort. Overall, the results showed that test-taking motivation explained test performance (study I) although controlling for various students’ background characteristics (e.g., socio-economic background, study III). We found support for nearly all of the theoretically assumed relationships in the expectancy-value-effort model: Expectancy for success and perceived value of the test explained test-taking effort; expectancy for success and test-taking effort had the most pronounced effects on test performance (study II). The students reported, on average, a stable course of expectancy for success over the testing session; perceived importance of the test and test-taking effort slightly decreased within the testing session. The initial expectancy for success and the initial test-taking effort as well as change in expectancy for success explained students’ test performance. Above all, it is crucial that students begin the test with a high level of test-taking motivation and remain confident about a successful test completion to the end of the testing session.

Univ., Diss.--Würzburg, 2005.

Johan Adam Heyns is probably the most productive and noteworthy Afrikaans theologian of the twentieth century, born in South Africa. He was a real pioneer in his field. It is a well known fact that the kingdom of God played a vital role in all of his work. In fact, he used it as a systematic-theological category, which flows like a perennial river of opportunity, consistently through all of his writings. It gave him the opportunity to be consistent in both his systematic theology and in his ethics. Heyns used the kingdom of God as a systematic-theological category to show clearly how man and God can be co-workers in this world in a dialogical relationship. This relationship, of which God is the initiator, are characterised by the covenant between God, the Father-King, and man, the obedient child-servant. He also used the opportunity to integrate his love for philosophy with his love for theology. This integration opened up a wide spectrum of thoughts, ideas and meanings which he could scientifically analyze, explore, connect and merge together systematically. His contact with Stoker and their shared Calvinistic worldview as well as their shared Afrikaans culture and Christian religion, together with the influence of amongst others Du Toit and Snyman, Oberholzer, Vollenhoven, Barth, Brunner and Berkouwer, laid the foundation for his frame of reference. Unfortunately there was philosophical flooding from time to time, because it caused him to fill the kingdom of God with philosophical concepts which allowed him to think of the kingdom of God as an ontological cosmic-universal entity. His philosophical background and connection also leads to some inadequate speculations in his theology and especially in his eschatology. Inadmissibly he didn’t always use the Bible appropriately, although his doctrine of Scripture and hermeneutics were satisfactory. Heyns could have explored the important part which prayer must play in theology more thoroughly. But he did pioneer’s work in Dogmatics and Ethics in Afrikaans and as an ecumenist and church leader, which we must really appreciate. Lastly his philosophical modus operandi also had a positive side. It helped him to differentiate between important theological concepts. Heyns distinguished between the rule of God and the kingdom of God, as well as between the realisation of the kingdom of God and the eschatological fulfilment of God’s kingdom. These differentiations were tested on some theological problems, including the question whether the kingdom of God is really an ontological entity, the Theodicy problem and the “Nah-erwartung” problem. It was found that these differentiations, when used consistently, have valuable theological problem solving abilities. Although Heyns perhaps didn’t realise this, and he weren’t consistent in the use of these differentiations, he must be credited for identifying and clarifying them. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Dogmatics and Christian Ethics / unrestricted