La présente étude analyse d'un côté et sous une perspective philosophique et anthropologique, la relation de l'artiste au réel. De l'autre, elle étudie la place ontologique et esthétique de l'acteur/du performer dans l'art documentaire contemporain. Puisque toute forme de documentation est soutenue par une définition du « réel » ainsi que par le problème de sa juste « saisie », il semble indispensable d’interroger la notion de « perception » et ceci sous ses aspects ethnographiques ainsi que physiologiques. Le positionnement contemporain qui se dessine apparaît donc comme « constructiviste », à savoir que ce que nous appelons le réel y est le fruit d’une relation dialogique et égalitaire entre l’homme et les objets du monde. Cette relation s’est libérée du concept cartésien des res cogitans et res extensa qui s’opposent de façon hiérarchique. Pour l’art documentaire contemporain, ce premier constat comporte deux conséquences : d’un côté, nous observons que la rencontre de l’artiste avec le réel est tâtonnant et emprunt de doutes et que ses esthétiques relèvent du fragmentaire et de l’hétérogène. De l’autre, l’art documentaire contemporain se voit obligé d’interroger la notion du « jeu » avec les documents, notamment les limites – esthétiques comme éthiques - de la fictionnalisation. Le constat de la fonction épistémologique prépondérante du jeu au sein de l’art documentaire contemporain, représente le cœur de la présente thèse. / The aim of the present thesis is on one hand, to explore the relationship between artists and reality from a philosophical and anthropological perspective and on the other hand, to describe the ontological and aesthetical position of the actor/performer in contemporary documentary art, particularly in theatre. Since any form of documentation of reality requires a definition of the real and the ways to deal with it, or to capture it, a definition of “perception” is essential, from a philosophical, ethnographical and physiological perspective. The contemporary point of view in this respect can be described as absolutely constructivist. Reality stands out as the product of a balanced communication between subject and object. Observer and observed reality are not in opposition to each other, in a hierarchical and dichotomous way as Descartes formulated it in his rationalist concept of res cogitans and res extensa, but they rather interact into a dialogue. For the contemporary documentary art this definition of reality offers two sides: on one hand, in an attitude that meets reality rather carefully and doubtfully, it results in an opened, fragmented and heterogeneous form of art. On the other hand, documentary art deals with the ethical and aesthetical problem of playing (with) the documentation. Each and every documentary artist shall constantly assess, whether and to what extend art is allowed to play with reality. However, the statement that playing with reality fulfills a unique, both epistemological and anthropological function, is definitely the subject of the present study. / Die folgende Studie untersucht einerseits, aus philosophischer und anthropologischer Perspektive, die Beziehung des Künstlers zur Realität. Andererseits beschreibt sie die ontologische und ästhetische Stellung des Schauspielers/Performers in der zeitgenössischen Dokumentarkunst. Da jede Form von Dokumentation der Wirklichkeit eine Definition des Realen und den Möglichkeiten diesem zu begegnen, beziehungsweise es zu erfassen, voraussetzt, scheint es unumgänglich den Begriff der « perception » (Wahrnehmung) auf philosophische, aber auch ethnographische und physiologische Definitionen abzuklopfen. Die zeitgenössische Perspektive, die sich dabei abzeichnet, scheint unumschränkt konstruktivistisch, d.h. dass sich Wirklichkeit als Produkt einer gleichberechtigten Kommunikation beschreiben 347 lässt, auch da wo der Mensch ein Objekt wahrnimmt. Beobachter und beobachtete Realität stehen sich nicht, wie es Descartes rationalistisches Konzept der res cogitans und res extensa formuliert, hierarchisch und dichotomisch gegenüber, sondern dialogisieren vielmehr. Für die zeitgenössische Dokumentarkunst ergibt sich daraus einerseits, dass sie Wirklichkeit eher vorsichtig und zweifelnd begegnet und ihr dementsprechend im Rahmen der Kunst offene, fragmentarische und heterogene Formen gibt. Andererseits setzt sie sich mit dem ethischen und ästhetischen Problems des Spiels von oder mit Dokumenten auseinander. Ob und inwieweit die Kunst mit der Realität spielen darf, muss von jedem Dokumentarkünstler neu beantwortet werden. Die Feststellung aber, dass Spielen mit Realität eine ganz eigene, epistemologische und anthropologische Funktion erfüllt, wird anhand der vorliegenden Studie anschaulich.

This research-creation thesis describes and analyzes the dramaturgical methodologies of verbatim theatre – a form of documentary theatre that uses transcripts as the dominant source of its dialogue – through the practical exercise of play writing. This paper marks the theoretical component of my thesis, which analyzes both the dramaturgical process and the historical context of my play Exhibit A. Using verbatim transcripts from legal evidence for its dialogue, the play examines the psychology of two teenage boys responsible for the brutal rape and murder of an 18-year-old Canadian woman in 2010. As documentary theatre emphasizes socio-political themes, this thesis considers the dramaturgical, aesthetic, and ethical considerations of verbatim theatre through my experience as a playwright and researcher. Acknowledging both the historical antecedents of documentary theatre and its contemporary examples, this thesis will define an original typology of verbatim theatre entitled the “Subcategories of Verbatim Theatre”. These subcategories are identified as Tribunal, Literary, Historical Drama, Expository and Participatory. Each privileges different types and usages of documents, which are further defined as being primarily related to “text” or “aural” based testimony. The thesis relates the dramaturgical principles of each subcategory to artistic choices made in Exhibit A. A description of the various incarnations of verbatim and documentary theatre, as well as an analysis of my experience as a documentary playwright examines the dramatic representation of reality as highly constructed in this form of theatre where the selection and editing of a documentary play's archive is a creative process that is not dissimilar from the creation of fictional drama. In that sense, the documentary genre can be said to present a dramatic representation of the playwright's subjective version of the truth. Exhibit A thus stands as my creative reconstruction of the evidence presented in the Kimberly Proctor murder trial.

This research-creation thesis describes and analyzes the dramaturgical methodologies of verbatim theatre – a form of documentary theatre that uses transcripts as the dominant source of its dialogue – through the practical exercise of play writing. This paper marks the theoretical component of my thesis, which analyzes both the dramaturgical process and the historical context of my play Exhibit A. Using verbatim transcripts from legal evidence for its dialogue, the play examines the psychology of two teenage boys responsible for the brutal rape and murder of an 18-year-old Canadian woman in 2010. As documentary theatre emphasizes socio-political themes, this thesis considers the dramaturgical, aesthetic, and ethical considerations of verbatim theatre through my experience as a playwright and researcher. Acknowledging both the historical antecedents of documentary theatre and its contemporary examples, this thesis will define an original typology of verbatim theatre entitled the “Subcategories of Verbatim Theatre”. These subcategories are identified as Tribunal, Literary, Historical Drama, Expository and Participatory. Each privileges different types and usages of documents, which are further defined as being primarily related to “text” or “aural” based testimony. The thesis relates the dramaturgical principles of each subcategory to artistic choices made in Exhibit A. A description of the various incarnations of verbatim and documentary theatre, as well as an analysis of my experience as a documentary playwright examines the dramatic representation of reality as highly constructed in this form of theatre where the selection and editing of a documentary play's archive is a creative process that is not dissimilar from the creation of fictional drama. In that sense, the documentary genre can be said to present a dramatic representation of the playwright's subjective version of the truth. Exhibit A thus stands as my creative reconstruction of the evidence presented in the Kimberly Proctor murder trial.

(Anglicky) This diploma thesis conducts a survey of dramatic and theatre work of contemporary German dramatist and director Falk Richter (born 1969) in the context of German political theatre of 20th century, thus primarily Brecht and Piscator tradition. At the same time, the concepts of political and post-dramatic theatre are defined and elaborated. The work points out that the current political function of theatre and its chance to directly influence social reality is understood differently than in the case of both pre-war and post-war epic drama by Erwin Piscator and Bertolt Brecht, or in the documentary drama of the 1960s. The key goal of the thesis is to analyze and interpret chosen Richter's dramatic writings and mainly the project Trust, which was created in collaboration with Dutch choreographer Anouk van Dijk. The project can be perceived as a current form of Richter's poetry, which gradually deviates from the "drama" theatre and inclines to motion drama with dance and performance elements. It is showed how the authors deal with present social and personal issues, which are transformed into theatre expression, motion and dance. At last, the thesis examines in what consists the politics of this project.