1 |
A study of deep learning-based face recognition models for sibling identificationGoel, R., Mehmood, Irfan, Ugail, Hassan 20 March 2022 (has links)
Yes / Accurate identification of siblings through face recognition is a challenging task. This is predominantly because of the high degree of similarities among the faces of siblings. In this study, we investigate the use of state-of-the-art deep learning face recognition models to evaluate their capacity for discrimination between sibling faces using various similarity indices. The specific models examined for this purpose are FaceNet, VGGFace, VGG16, and VGG19. For each pair of images provided, the embeddings have been calculated using the chosen deep learning model. Five standard similarity measures, namely, cosine similarity, Euclidean distance, structured similarity, Manhattan distance, and Minkowski distance, are used to classify images looking for their identity on the threshold defined for each of the similarity measures. The accuracy, precision, and misclassification rate of each model are calculated using standard confusion matrices. Four different experimental datasets for full-frontal-face, eyes, nose, and forehead of sibling pairs are constructed using publicly available HQf subset of the SiblingDB database. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the chosen deep learning models to distinguish siblings based on the full-frontal-face and cropped face areas vary based on the face area compared. It is observed that VGGFace is best while comparing the full-frontal-face and eyes—the accuracy of classification being with more than 95% in this case. However, its accuracy degrades significantly when the noses are compared, while FaceNet provides the best result for classification based on the nose. Similarly, VGG16 and VGG19 are not the best models for classification using the eyes, but these models provide favorable results when foreheads are compared.
|
2 |
Monitorovací systém laboratória založený na detekcii tváreGvizd, Peter January 2019 (has links)
In the last decades there has been such a fundamental development in the technologies including technologies focusing on face detection and identification supported by computer vision. Algorithm optimization has reached the point, when face detection is possible on mobile devices. At the outset, this work analy-ses common used algorithms for face detection and identification, for instance Haar features, LBP, EigenFaces and FisherFaces. Moreover, this work focuses on more up-to-date approaches of this topic, such as convolutional neural networks, or FaceNet from Google. The goal of this work is a design and its subsequent im-plementation of an automated, monitoring system designated for a lab, which is based on aforementioned algorithms. Within the design of the monitoring system, algorithms are compared with each other and their success rate and possible ap-plication in the final solution is evaluated.
|
3 |
Analysis of different face detection andrecognition models for AndroidHettiarachchi, Salinda January 2021 (has links)
Human key point tracking such as face detection and recognition has become an increasingly popular research topic. It is a platform independent functionality and already being implemented on a wide range of platforms. Android is one such platform that runs on mobile phones and top of many edge devices such as car devices and smart home appliances. In the current times, AI and ML related applications are slightly moving into those edge devices due to various reasons such as security and low latency. The hardware enhancements are also backing this trend that happened over the last few years. Many solutions and algorithms have been proposed in this context, and various frameworks and models have also been developed. Even though there are different models available, they tend to deliver varying results in terms of performance. Evaluating these different alternatives to find an optimized solution is a problem worth addressing. In this thesis project, several selected face detection and recognition models have been implemented in an Android device, and their performance been evaluated. Google ML Kit showed the best results among the face detection methods since it took only around 68 milliseconds on average to detect a face. Out of the three face recognition algorithms evaluated, FaceNet was the most accurate as it showed an accuracy above 95% for most cases. Meanwhile, MobileFaceNet was the fastest algorithm, and it took only around 90 milliseconds on average to produce and output. Eventually, a face recognition application was also developed using the best performing models selected from the experiment.
|
4 |
Smart-Scooter Rider Assistance System using Internet of Wearable Things and Computer Visiongupta, Devansh 21 June 2021 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0186 seconds