Osteoporosis is a major public health concern, affecting over 200 million people worldwide. There is valid evidence outlining how osteoporosis can be diagnosed and managed, but gaps exist between evidence and practice. Graham’s “Knowledge to Action” (KTA) process for knowledge translation and the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex interventions were used to address these gaps. The first 4 KTA steps were collapsed into 3 phases of the PhD research plan. In PhD Phase 1, a systematic review was conducted to identify tools that facilitate decision making in osteoporosis disease management (DM). Results showed that few DM tools exist, but promising strategies were those that incorporated reminders and education and targeted physicians and patients. PhD Phase 2 used the findings from the systematic review and consultation with clinical and human factors engineering experts to develop a conceptual design of the tool. Multiple components targeted to both physicians and patients at the point of care, and which could be used as a standalone system or modifiable for integration with electronic health record systems were outlined. PhD Phases 3a and 3b were devoted to the assessment of the barriers to knowledge. In Phase 3a, a qualitative study of focus groups was conducted with physicians to identify attitudes and perceived barriers to implementing decision support tools in practice, and to identify the features that should be included in the design. Findings from 4 focus groups combined with aging research, and input from design and information experts were used to transform the conceptual design into a functional prototype. In Phase 3b, each component of the prototype was tested in 3 usability evaluation studies using an iterative, participant-centered approach to assess how well the prototype met end users’ needs. Findings from the usability study informed the final prototype, which is ready for implementation as part of the post PhD plan to fulfill the requirements of the remaining steps of the KTA and MRC frameworks.

Several studies have documented a deficiency in the delivery of preventive services to adolescents during physician visits in the United States. In many instances, a correlation has been noted between insufficient training and provision of adolescent medicine services in the practicing physician population. The American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Society for Adolescent Medicine recommend adolescent providers deliver comprehensive health services to teenagers. This study sought to assess and compare Pediatric, Family Medicine and Obstetric-Gynecology resident perceptions of their responsibility, training, experience and comfort with providing comprehensive health care services adolescents. We asked residents to identify the following: (1) adolescent health services they considered part of their scope of practice in their respective field; (2) the level of training they had received with regard to select adolescent health services; (3) the experience they had performing select clinical activities with adolescents; and (4) their comfort with aspects of adolescent care. We further asked two questions to test resident knowledge of an adolescents right to consent to contraception or an abortion without parental notification in the state of their residency. A total of 87 residents (31 Obstetric-Gynecology, 29 Family Medicine and 27 Pediatric) were surveyed. Most residents from all three fields felt the full range of adolescent preventive and clinical services represented in the survey fell under the scope of their practice. Most residents also reported high levels of comfort with examined aspects of adolescent care. In regard to some activities, the positive scope and comfort responses were matched by high reported levels of training and experience, including defining confidentiality; counseling about eating, exercise and obesity; counseling about substance abuse; and discussing STDs, sexual partners and contraception. However, for multiple key adolescent services, considerable discrepancies existed between reported levels of training and experience and the positive responses concerning scope and comfort. In particular the results of study suggested all residents need considerably more training and experience with mental health issues, referring teenagers for substance abuse treatment, and addressing physical and sexual abuse. Overall, there were also significant differences between fields. Family Medicine residents reported the greatest potential for providing comprehensive health care. However, they suffered from the overall deficiencies in training and experience noted above. Obstetric-Gynecology residents reported deficiencies in the provision of several preventive counseling and general health services. Pediatric residents reported multiple deficiencies in the provision of sexual health services. Our results indicate, at this time and in the near future, it is unlikely that adolescents will be able to obtain the full range of recommended preventive and clinical services in a single physician visit unless residencies programs actively incorporate increased training in the full range of adolescent preventive and clinical health services.

Community health nurses, like all other health professionals, are being called to develop new clinical practices based on collaboration and are faced with the demands of working both interprofessionally and interorganizationally (D’Amour et al., 2008). In Capital Health, public health nurses (PHNs), family practice nurses (FPNs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) are all working in different aspects of breastfeeding support and promotion. However, there is no formal structure for collaboration of services, despite the strong desire of these nurses to work together to improve breastfeeding outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the roles of PHNs, FPNs and NPs who work in breastfeeding support and promotion in Capital Health and the structures and processes needed to support the development of collaboration amongst these groups of nurses. Through the analysis of semi-structured focus group interviews and follow-up focus group interviews with a purposeful sample (n=10) of four PHNs, four FPNs and two NPs, four major themes and sub themes were identified that represented the nurses experience with collaboration between public health and primary care in breastfeeding support and promotion. The data generated revealed that participants had not experienced active collaboration, rather developing or potential collaboration (D’Amour et al., 2008). The first theme, Establishing Interpersonal Relationships, provided an overview of the precipitators and barriers to forming relationships and the outcomes of interpersonal relationships between public health and primary care nurses. The second major theme, The Organizational Context: Structures and Processes in the Everyday Work Environment outlines the impact of the organizational context of the nurses work environment on the development of collaboration. Benefits of Collaboration was the third theme identified in the study. Consistent with other studies on collaboration between primary care and public health nurses, the nurses interviewed believed that the development of collaboration in breastfeeding support and promotion would benefit health care professionals and the clients that they serviced. The last theme, Development of New Practices Grounded in Collaboration, described new initiatives or innovations that the participants explained were needed for the development of collaboration between PHNs, FPNs and NPs. Implications for practice include organizational support for PHNs, FPNs and NPs to work to the full scope of their competencies and providing them with opportunities to meet and establish relationships to facilitate joint planning initiatives related to breastfeeding support and promotion. Additionally, exploration of flexible roles and funding structures as alternatives to fee-for-service should be explored in primary care organizations. The development of a communication infrastructure is necessary for future development of collaboration between public health and primary care in breastfeeding support and promotion. Future research is needed in this area with a broader, more diverse sample, exploring organizational structures needed to improve breastfeeding outcomes and optimize FPN and NP roles. PHNs, FPNs and NPs have the opportunity to impact the model of care for breastfeeding families in the Capital Health District of Nova Scotia, optimizing their capacity to address issues in practice and ensuring that breastfeeding support and promotion activities address the complex social factors that influence the breastfeeding experience.

Bibliographische Beschreibung Petra Hönigschmid Motivierung von Medizinstudenten zur allgemeinärztlichen Tätigkeit durch Hausärztliche Praktika – eine Prä-Post-Studie Universität Leipzig, Dissertation 62 Seiten, 20 Tabellen, 1 Abbildung, 36 Literaturverweise Referat: In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde untersucht, inwieweit frühzeitige hausärztliche Praktika am Beispiel des Leipziger Wahlfachs Allgemeinmedizin Vorklinik die Einstellung und den Berufswunsch zur Hausarztmedizin beeinflussen. In einer Prä-Post-Studie wurden alle für dieses Wahlfach eingeschriebenen Medizinstudenten der Universität Leipzig von Februar 2008 bis Februar 2010 befragt. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass bei einem geeigneten Lehrkonzept die Ausbildung bei niedergelassenen Hausärzten einen positiven Effekt auf die Karrierewahl Allgemeinmedizin hat. Die große Bandbreite an Erkrankungen, die Behandlung komplexer Krankheitsbilder und der Aufbau langfristiger Patientenbeziehungen wurden dabei sehr geschätzt. Nach dem Praktikum stieg der Berufswunsch Allgemeinmedizin signifikant an. Etwa die Hälfte der Studierenden konnte sich eine niedergelassene Tätigkeit vorstellen. Bezüglich der Kontrollierbarkeit der wöchentlichen Arbeitszeit und der Organisation eines vernünftigen Verhältnisses zwischen Arbeit und Freizeit gab es nach dem Praktikum keine wesentlichen Abweichungen. Die Studierenden schätzten dies als realisierbar ein. Auch eine höhere Arbeitsbelastung des Hausarztes im Vergleich zu anderen Fachärzten konnte nach dem Praktikum nicht bestätigt werden. Die vermutete Arbeitszeit eines Hausarztes wurde nach dem Praktikum nach oben korrigiert. Das Interesse an einer Famulatur, einem PJ-Tertial oder einer Promotion in der Allgemeinmedizin war nach dem Praktikum unverändert hoch. Die Evaluierung der Lehrveranstaltung zeigte, dass die Arbeitsweise des Lehrarztes und die damit verbundene Vorbildwirkung für die Studierenden einen wesentlichen Aspekt für die spätere Karrierewahl darstellen.

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / This thesis describes a study of the utilisation of computers by individual general practitioners (GPs) in Australia, and compares the practice behaviour of GPs who use a computer as a clinical tool, either by prescribing, ordering tests, or storing patient data in an electronic medical record format, with those who do not use a computer for these functions. A survey of individual GP’s use of computers was conducted among 1,336 GPs who participated in the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) program between October 2003 and March 2005. The GPs were then assigned to groups according to their clinical use (or not) of a computer, and were compared on a range of variables including the characteristics of the GPs themselves, their practices, their patients, the morbidity they managed for their patients, and the managements they provided. Their behaviour was also compared, using a set of quality indicators designed for use with the BEACH data, and applicable in a primary care setting, to determine whether the clinical use of a computer has an affect on the quality of care GPs provide to their patients. Finally, GPs who use clinical software with embedded pharmaceutical advertising were compared with GPs not exposed to advertisements via this media, to determine whether such advertising influences the prescribing behaviour of GPs to favour advertised brands. From 44 quality indicators examined, clinical computer users performed ‘better’ on four and ‘worse’ on four. For the remaining 36 they exhibited no difference. Exposure to pharmaceutical advertising embedded in clinical software did not influence the prescribing behaviour of the GPs so exposed. Despite the belief espoused in the literature that computer use will improve the quality of patient care, I have found no evidence to demonstrate that the use of a computer for clinical activity has (as yet) affected, either positively or negatively, the quality of care GPs provide to their patients. The current push to computerise general practice will mean that this method of assessment will be difficult to replicate in the future, given the absence of control groups. Other research methods will need to be developed.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Linköpings universitet, 2008. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2003. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karolinska institutet, 2002. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2005. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

The study was designed to explore the proposition that conduct of and participation in research by general practitioners in British Columbia would be both desirable and feasible. Desirability was defined in terms of benefits for knowledge, for the medical practice, and for society at large. Feasibility was defined in terms of being acceptable for the general practitioner, for the patient, for the practice, and for the requirements of research. To answer specific questions related to desirability and feasibility of research by general practitioners, information was obtained from the literature, from a questionnaire survey of the total general practitioner population of British Columbia, and from a random sample of patients in practices selected at random from respondents to the questionnaire to general practitioners. In the survey of general practitioners, 2,344 questionnaires were mailed. Of the 563 (24%) which were returned, 508 were available for analysis. Five were returned by the post-office undelivered, seven were too late for analysis, and forty-three were returned with information indicating that the respondent was not in general practice. Forty- eight respondents were anonymous, and the remainder identified themselves. The response of general practitioners represented a variety of geographic locations, ages, types of practice, and medical schools. Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada had a response rate of 39%. In the survey of patients, 15 out of 20 general practitioners who were contacted agreed to submit questionnaires to their patients. Of the patients surveyed, approximately 90% completed the questionnaires. Most were regular patients of the doctors, and represented a full range of ages, and both sexes. General practitioners and their patients agreed that research by general practitioners was desirable, and suggested many areas suitable for research. The benefits of research to the general practitioners, patients, and society were considered to be incentives, encouraging research activity. Important among the benefits were the discovery of new knowledge and the contribution to the academic base of general practice. The feasibility of research was explored in terms of the conditions required for its conduct. Attitudes were receptive to the concept of research, as many of the general practitioners had previously been involved in projects. Major deterrents were heavy workload and lack of time, for the general practitioners, and in their practices the high overhead and pressure of work on the staff were problems. Training for research was variable, with some general practitioners having none and a few having much training. Inadequacy of the usual office records was recognized, so that research would usually require special methods. General practitioners had little awareness of resources available for help, advice or financing, but most were aware of the need for such resources. Patients were willing to cooperate in studies. They suggested that the cost of research should be borne primarily by governments, and to a lesser extent by foundations and the public. Recommendations were made for the support of research, to help overcome the problems which decrease its feasibility. There should be encouragement of training in research methods, at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. This would include presentation of research findings to scientific meetings of medical societies, and visits to and from eminent research workers in general practice. Some assistance should be given to the general practitioners, such as help in developing office records for research or payment for time spent on research. Resources for help in planning studies and processing results should be readily available, including both consultant advice and the provision of grants. Conclusions from the study were that research by general practitioners in British Columbia is desirable, and that it is feasible but has several major deterrent factors which can inhibit research activity. Because of these factors, the great potential for research in British Columbia is still far from being realized. / Medicine, Faculty of / Population and Public Health (SPPH), School of / Graduate