Thesis (doctoral)--University of Mysore. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [97]-103).

No description available.

Texte remanié de: Th.--Droit--Montpellier I, 1981. / Bibliogr. p. 251-269. Index.

No description available.

No description available.

In his autobiography, Thomas Jefferson argued that his goal in the American Revolution had been to eliminate “feudal and unnatural distinctions” in colonial American society as part of the struggle for independence. This thesis focuses on Jefferson’s years as a revolutionary legislator in the new state of Virginia, and argues that while he was correct in labelling Virginia a feudal society, his reforms were insufficient to the scale of social reformation that he identified. Material addressed includes Jefferson’s synthesis of British feudal and mercantile history that he constructed during the early years of the revolution, his proposed constitution for the state of Virginia, and his legislative reforms to the judiciary, landownership, the established church, education, citizenship, and slavery.

Notre étude vise à dégager deux phases successives dans la construction de la royauté normande de Sicile. La première est entamée par Roger II. Le pouvoir est personnel, non défini juridiquement ; il dépend essentiellement de la capacité du roi à l’imposer. Le roi muselle l’aristocratie féodale et préfère s’entourer de l’aristocratie orientale, plus habituée à un pouvoir fort, qu’il utilise dans son administration. La seconde advient durant le règne de Guillaume Ier. Autour de 1161, la pression seigneuriale rompt la dynamique antérieure. L’émir des émirs, symbole de la domination administrative orientale, est assassiné et remplacé par un conseil de familiares regis. Ces poussées aristocratiques contraignent le pouvoir royal à s’institutionnaliser. Les contours juridiques de la fonction royale se définissent et s’occidentalisent. / The object of our study is to distinguish two following stages in the building of the Norman Kingship of Sicily. The first is initiated by Roger II. Power is personal, juridically undefined and depends mostly on the king’s ability to enforce it. The king muzzles the feudal aristocracy and rather likes to engage with the eastern aristocracy, more used to a strong power, in the administration of his affairs. The second arrives during the reign of William I. Around 1161, pressure from the lords breaks the previous dynamic. Amiratus amiratorem, emblem of the domination of the east on the administration, is killed and replaced by a council of famiiares regis.The rise of the aristocracy compels to the institutionalisation of the royal power. The royal function becomes juridically limited and is no longer influenced by an eastern approach.

Proefschrift--Leyden. / "Stellingen": [2] p. laid in. "Summary": p. 244-247. "Lijst van aangehaaide literatuur": p. [248]-253.

Thesis (memoria de licenciatura)--Universidad de Valladolid, 1976. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 19-23).

Thesis--Lyon. / Label mounted on cover: "Diffusion: Librairie Klincksieck ... Paris."