No description available.

Darbe iškelta hipotezė, kad netradicinės seksualinės orientacijos asmenys turi taikių susirinkimų laisvę. Siekiant patvirtinti arba paneigti hipotezę, atlikta teorinė taikių susirinkimų laisvės ir seksualinės orientacijos koncepcijų analizė, nagrinėtos tarptautinės žmogaus teisių apsaugos dokumentų normos, reglamentuojančios taikių susirinkimų laisvę ir apžvelgtas šių normų aiškinimas teisminėje praktikoje. Apžvelgtas nediskriminacijos principo seksualinės orientacijos pagrindu įtvirtinimas tarptautinės žmogaus teisių apsaugos dokumentuose bei jo praktinio taikymo aspektas. Atlikta taikių susirinkimų laisvės ir nediskriminacijos principo seksualinės orientacijos pagrindu reglamentavimo apžvalga atskirų valstybių vidaus teisės aktuose. Analizuotos Lietuvos teisės aktų normos, reguliuojančios diskriminacijos seksualinės orientacijos pagrindu draudimą, pateikiami konkretūs pavyzdžiai bei aprašomas taikių susirinkimų laisvės reglamentavimas ir praktinis jos įgyvendinimas. / The hypothesis of the work is that the homosexuals have the freedom of peaceful assembly. The first part of the work describes the terms related to the freedom of peaceful assembly, the sorts of assemblies, main principles determining the proper regulation of this freedom and legal restrictions of the freedom of assembly. The aspects of sexual orientation are discussed and the brief history of homosexual movements is presented. The second part of the work analyzes the provisions of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, American Convention on Human Rights and African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, regulating the prohibition of discrimination and freedom of peaceful assembly. Also there are analyzed the primary and secondary legal acts of the European Union, which form the EU policy on the protection of human rights. The third part of the work is dedicated to the analysis of the national legal base of the United States of America, Canada, South African Republic, Finland and Poland, which regulate the freedom of peaceful assembly and protection of homosexuals. The last part of the work reviews the Lithuanian legal norms regulating the prohibition of the discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, presents the concrete examples and describes the regulation of freedom of peaceful assembly and its practical implementation.

This is a case study aiming to clarify the potentially outdated focus on the populist features in modern populist parties. By analyzing the right-wing populist party of Fidesz and the left-wing populist party of Syriza the aim is to clarify whether populism as a feature is descriptive enough to illustrate these parties, regardless their ideological stance, or whether ideology should be taken more into account than it tends to do today. To do this, the policies of each party are mapped to distinguish populist similarities, despite their ideological disparity and their differences. The analysis is delimited by the three pillars of civil society: Freedom of Associations, Freedom of Peaceful Assemblies and Freedom of Expression, referred to as the three pillars of civil society. The study shows that the descriptiveness of Fidesz as a right-wing populist party is conformed. However, the policies of Syriza demonstrate a variation of partially right-wing and left-wing populism, but also tendencies of no populism at all in their foreign policies. The descriptiveness of contemporary left-wing populist parties in the case of Syriza is thereby questionable.