Grip kinetics are emerging as an important measure in clinical assessments of handwriting pathologies and fine motor rehabilitation as well as in biometric and forensic applications. The signature verification literature in particular has extensively examined the spatiotemporal, kinematic, and axial pressure characteristics of handwriting, but has minimally considered grip kinetics. Therefore, the focus of this thesis was to investigate the variability of grip kinetics in adults during signature writing. To address this goal, a database of authentic and well-practiced bogus signatures were collected with an instrumented pen that recorded the forces applied to its barrel. Four different analytical studies were conceived. The first study investigated the intra- and inter-participant variability of grip kinetic topography on the pen barrel based on authentic signatures written over 10 days. The main findings were that participants possessed unique grip force topographies even when the same grasp pattern was employed and that participants could be discriminated from each other with an average error rate of 1.2% on the basis of their grip force topographies. The second study examined the stability of different grip kinetic features over an extended period of a few months. The analyses revealed that intra-participant variation was generally much smaller than inter-participant variations even in the long term. In the third study, grip kinetics associated with authentic and well-practiced bogus signatures were compared. Differences in grip kinetic features between authentic and bogus signatures were only observed in a few participants. The kinetics of bogus signatures were not necessarily more variable. The variation of grip kinetic profiles between participants writing the same bogus signature was evaluated in the fourth study and an average error rate of 5.8% was achieved when verifying signatures with kinetic profile-based features. Collectively, the findings of this thesis serve to inform future applications of grip kinetic measures in biometric, clinical and industrial applications.

This study examined muscle activation and relative joint angles during a conventional deadlift while using either a double‐pronated or overhand/underhand (OU) grip. Ten weight‐trained individuals performed the deadlift with 60% and 80% of their 1‐repetition maximum, with three different grip variations. EMG recordings were taken of the left and right biceps brachii, brachioradialis, upper trapezius, and upper latissimus dorsi. Motion capture was used to measure angles of the wrist, elbow, knee, and hip. With an OU grip, significant bilateral asymmetry was seen in EMG activity of biceps brachii and brachioradialis. Mean wrist and elbow angle also showed significant bilateral asymmetry when using an OU grip. Training recommendations for the OU grip deadlift should emphasize the need to vary which hand is supinated/pronated to avoid muscle imbalances and possible injury. Furthermore, it may be preferential to use a double‐pronated grip to avoid asymmetric training altogether.

AIM The aim of this study was to identify the immediate effects on cortical excitability and grip control of a short intervention of EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation, compared to voluntary activation of the finger flexor muscles, in people with chronic stroke. STUDY DESIGN This experimental study used a within-subject design with experimental and control interventions. PARTICIPANTS Fifteen people with chronic stroke participated in the study. INTERVENTION Participants performed a simple force tracking task with or without EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the finger flexor muscles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cortical excitability was measured by single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Multi-digit grip control accuracy was measured during ramp and sine wave force tracking tasks. Maximal grip strength was measured before and after each intervention to monitor muscle fatigue. RESULTS No significant increases in cortico-motor excitability were found. Intracortical inhibition significantly increased following the EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation intervention immediately post-intervention (t = 2.466, p = .036), and at 10 minutes post-intervention (t = 2.45, p = .04). Accuracy during one component of the force tracking tasks significantly improved (F(1, 14) = 4.701, p = .048), following both EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary activation interventions. Maximal grip strength reduced significantly following both interventions, after the assessment of cortical excitability (F(1, 8) = 9.197, p = .16), and grip control (F(1, 14) = 9.026, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation during short duration force tracking training does not increase cortical excitability in participants with chronic stroke. Short duration force tracking training both with and without EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation leads to improvements in training-specific aspects of grip control in people with chronic stroke.

AIM The aim of this study was to identify the immediate effects on cortical excitability and grip control of a short intervention of EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation, compared to voluntary activation of the finger flexor muscles, in people with chronic stroke. STUDY DESIGN This experimental study used a within-subject design with experimental and control interventions. PARTICIPANTS Fifteen people with chronic stroke participated in the study. INTERVENTION Participants performed a simple force tracking task with or without EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the finger flexor muscles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cortical excitability was measured by single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Multi-digit grip control accuracy was measured during ramp and sine wave force tracking tasks. Maximal grip strength was measured before and after each intervention to monitor muscle fatigue. RESULTS No significant increases in cortico-motor excitability were found. Intracortical inhibition significantly increased following the EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation intervention immediately post-intervention (t = 2.466, p = .036), and at 10 minutes post-intervention (t = 2.45, p = .04). Accuracy during one component of the force tracking tasks significantly improved (F(1, 14) = 4.701, p = .048), following both EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary activation interventions. Maximal grip strength reduced significantly following both interventions, after the assessment of cortical excitability (F(1, 8) = 9.197, p = .16), and grip control (F(1, 14) = 9.026, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation during short duration force tracking training does not increase cortical excitability in participants with chronic stroke. Short duration force tracking training both with and without EMG-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation leads to improvements in training-specific aspects of grip control in people with chronic stroke.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Rutgers University, 2010. / "Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering." Includes bibliographical references (p. 132-138).

Thesis (M.S.)--Slippery Rock University, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 36-37). Also available online (PDF file) by a subscription to the set or by purchasing the individual file.

Thesis (M.Med.Sc.)--University of Hong Kong, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 68-69). Also available in print.

Thesis (M.S.)--Slippery Rock University, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 36-37).

No description available.

No description available.