Spelling suggestions: "subject:"grammar, comparative."" "subject:"grammar, eomparative.""
71 |
De tertia in verbo finito persona, inprimis de verbis impersonalibus disputatio.Müller, Hermann Johannes. January 1863 (has links)
Pr.
|
72 |
Geschichte der grammatischen Terminologie im 17. JahrhundundertLeser, Ernest. January 1912 (has links)
Inaug.-diss.--Freiburg i. Br. / Lebenslauf. "Fur Anordnung und Behandlung des Stoffes waren mir folgende werke vorbildlich": p. [81].
|
73 |
L'adjectif de relation en français, italien, anglais et allemand; étude comparée.Schmidt, Reinhard, January 1972 (has links)
Thesis--Tübingen. / Summary in English. Bibliography: p. 205-212.
|
74 |
The "Summa modorum significandi":Siger de Courtrai, Riley, John Marie, January 1900 (has links)
The editor's thesis (Ph. D.)--St. Louis University. / Latin and English on opposite pages. Description based on print version record. Bibliography: p. 136-140.
|
75 |
Toward an understanding of morphological segmentation in unfamiliar languagesCowan, Nelson. January 1980 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1980. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 57-59).
|
76 |
Empirical studies of noun meaning for computational models of understandingBennett, John Boyce, January 1976 (has links)
Thesis--Wisconsin. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 220-222).
|
77 |
The effect of syntactic complexity on readabilityBrewer, Richard Kemp, January 1972 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1972. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.
|
78 |
Transformational analysisChomsky, Noam. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis--University of Pennsylvania. / Bibliography: leaf xiii.
|
79 |
Constraints on deletion in syntaxHankamer, Jorge, January 1971 (has links)
Thesis -- Yale University. / Includes bibliography.
|
80 |
Grammar and logicFielding, David Anthony January 1963 (has links)
The structure of our world is given in the grammar of our native tongue. If so people whose native tongue has quite a different grammar must be living in a quite different world. A logic such as Aristotle's may seem universal to the speakers of Greek, in fact it may seem universal to speakers of any Indo-European tongue, but the logic will hold good only for the 'universe' of the language or language-family in question.
This implies a relationship between logic and grammar rather like the one Russell and Whitehead -claimed for mathematics and logic. Their Principia Mathematica tried to show that the mathematical notion of number rests on, or arises out of, the logical notion of class, that is, we come to understand what a number is through our grasp of what a class is. This thesis is a kind of Principia Logica: it suggests that the whole framework of common sense logic rests on, or arises out of, the grammatical structure of the language the logic was conceived in or took shape in terms of. And if so logical criteria come into being and take shape inside a language or language-family, and are dependent for their validity and even for their meaning on the structure of the language in question. To test, or to try to test, a mode of thought or an argument form against a logical system would be to put the cart before the horse: the logic only makes sense because the form of argument or mode of thought was there already.
If so philosophers and logicians ought to think of the words 'world', 'universe' and 'universal' with tongue in cheek. In so far as a judgment seems to us universally true it is unlikely to hold good for the world of an alien language family. If our world is not the only world anybody writing logic or philosophy down ought to make it clear whose world he has in mind - and to do this it may be enough to make sure it is addressed to somebody in particular. Western philosophers seem to have addressed themselves to the whole world, or to mankind, or God. This thesis shows, if nothing else, how hard it can be to address even one other human being.
To sum up with another analogy; it seems to me, as a single man, that the difference between one and two is greater than the difference between any other two numbers. There may be a world of difference between zero and one, but between one and two there's all the difference in the world - and that's the difference that matters. Perhaps the only way 1,000 differs from 1,001, as Frege puts it, is in the expression on its face. / Arts, Faculty of / Philosophy, Department of / Graduate
|
Page generated in 0.0537 seconds