Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Köln, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [281]-283).

Esta pesquisa se concentra na discussão acerca da utilização da terminologia Sturm und Drang no que se refere o repertório de Joseph Haydn escrito nas cercanias da década de 1770. Este período das composições de Haydn tem sido considerado como parte do movimento precursor do romantismo, que na literatura é denominado Sturm und Drang. Entretanto, existem algumas inconsistências na incorporação desta nomenclatura na música de Haydn. Desta forma, através do exame de preceptivas do século XVIII, destacando o tratado escrito por Johann Mattheson, Der Vollkommene Capellmeister [O Mestre de Capela Perfeito ] de 1739, se pretende recuperar o universo de referências musicais do compositor austríaco e reavaliar as suas composições inseridas na categoria Sturm und Drang. Através da consideração sobre os argumentos daqueles que defendem a existência do Sturm und Drang musical, visamos neste trabalho, por meio do confronto das ideias, avaliar a adequação da utilização do termo ao contexto musical de Joseph Haydn. / This research concentrates in the quarrel regarding the use of Sturm und Drang terminology commonly used to define Joseph Haydn\'s repertoire composed around 1770. This period of Haydn\'s composition has been considered as part of the literatute movement known as Sturm und Drang. However, there are some inconsistencies in the incorporation of this nomenclature in music. In such a way, through the examination of treatises from the 18th century , detaching the treaty written by Johann Mattheson, in 1739, Der Vollkommene Capellmeister [The Perfect Chapel Master] , it is intended to understand the thoughts of this period in music and be able to infer about Haydn\'s composition. Thus, by means of the confrontation of the ideas between the scholars who defend the existence of the musical Sturm und Drang and the 18th century treatises, verify the legitimacy of Sturm und Drang terminology in Haydn\'s musical context.

Dubblett finns

Thesis--Copenhagen. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [327]-329) and index.

Thesis--Copenhagen. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [327]-329) and index.

Esta pesquisa se concentra na discussão acerca da utilização da terminologia Sturm und Drang no que se refere o repertório de Joseph Haydn escrito nas cercanias da década de 1770. Este período das composições de Haydn tem sido considerado como parte do movimento precursor do romantismo, que na literatura é denominado Sturm und Drang. Entretanto, existem algumas inconsistências na incorporação desta nomenclatura na música de Haydn. Desta forma, através do exame de preceptivas do século XVIII, destacando o tratado escrito por Johann Mattheson, Der Vollkommene Capellmeister [O Mestre de Capela Perfeito ] de 1739, se pretende recuperar o universo de referências musicais do compositor austríaco e reavaliar as suas composições inseridas na categoria Sturm und Drang. Através da consideração sobre os argumentos daqueles que defendem a existência do Sturm und Drang musical, visamos neste trabalho, por meio do confronto das ideias, avaliar a adequação da utilização do termo ao contexto musical de Joseph Haydn. / This research concentrates in the quarrel regarding the use of Sturm und Drang terminology commonly used to define Joseph Haydn\'s repertoire composed around 1770. This period of Haydn\'s composition has been considered as part of the literatute movement known as Sturm und Drang. However, there are some inconsistencies in the incorporation of this nomenclature in music. In such a way, through the examination of treatises from the 18th century , detaching the treaty written by Johann Mattheson, in 1739, Der Vollkommene Capellmeister [The Perfect Chapel Master] , it is intended to understand the thoughts of this period in music and be able to infer about Haydn\'s composition. Thus, by means of the confrontation of the ideas between the scholars who defend the existence of the musical Sturm und Drang and the 18th century treatises, verify the legitimacy of Sturm und Drang terminology in Haydn\'s musical context.

Master of Music / Department of Music, Theatre, and Dance / Major Professor Not Listed / LUCAS CHARLES JOHNSON Trumpet Repertoire: A Report on the Trumpet Solo Literature by Bitsch, Hovhaness, Ketting, and Haydn (Under the direction of JIM JOHNSON) This report provides analysis of Marcel Bitsch’s Quatre Variations sur un Theme de Domenico Scarlatti, Alan Hovhaness’ Prayer of Saint Gregory, Otto Ketting’s Intrada, Joseph Haydn’s Concerto for Trumpet in E-flat Major. This report contains four chapters, one devoted to each piece. Chapters include the composer’s biographical information, historical significance (if applicable), theoretical analysis, and performance considerations.

Advanced cello students and their studio teachers have a wide range of literature to study and perform that spans approximately 400 years. Despite this wealth of repertoire, advanced music from the classical era is often understudied or overlooked due to difficulties of the accompanying part, written either for the piano or the orchestra. For example, Beethoven’s cello sonatas tend to be avoided by teachers of advanced young students because of the difficulties in securing a pianist. Additionally, Haydn’s cello concerti demand a great deal of rehearsal time with an experienced pianist in preparing the student to perform with a full ensemble. The purpose of this study is to provide pedagogical assistance to the cello studio teacher of advanced students. This detailed teaching edition reduces the original accompaniment into a single cello part to be played by the studio teacher during lessons. The transcriptions do not replace the music written for the piano, but functions as a three-part pedagogical bridge: teaching the student the solo; accompanying the student in the cello reduction; and preparing the student to play with the accompaniment as originally conceived. The two compositions presented in this aid are Beethoven’s Sonata for Cello and Piano No. 3 in A major, Op. 69 and Haydn’s Cello Concerto No. 1 in C major, Hob. VIIb.1. This practical study will refer to An Annotated Translation of Evegeny Shenderovich’s Overcoming Technical Difficulties in the Piano Transcriptions of Orchestral Scores by Marcelina Turcanu.

No description available.

This thesis approaches Haydn’s sonata-form procedures from the perspective of the eighteenth-century listener, asking, if a moment is allegedly “witty” according to modern analysts, would Haydn's contemporary audience have heard it as such? Eighteenth-century wit has two sides: wit involves an aspect of surprise or deception, a breaking of understood norms; however, wit must also involve an unsuspected congruity, a broader connection created only by breaking the aforementioned norm. Taking this as my starting point, I explore false recapitulations in the Haydn’s music, concluding that this device cannot be considered witty because it did not break an understood convention. I then provide detailed analyses of the first movements of Haydn’s “Military” Symphony no. 100 and String Quartet in D major, op. 33 no. 6, arguing that they are witty not solely because they are disruptive, but because this disruption binds the sonata together in an unexpected way.