Spelling suggestions: "subject:"high chools."" "subject:"high cchools.""
111 |
Staff utilization practices in the public secondary schools of Ohio /McKinney, Lorella Almedia January 1963 (has links)
No description available.
|
112 |
Instructional programs in secondary schools serving contrasting socioeconomic areas in large cities /Goodman, Thomas Leo January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
113 |
A study of the curriculum and the curriculum development program of the Stewart Junior High School at the University of Utah /Harmer, Earl Williams January 1958 (has links)
No description available.
|
114 |
Perceptions of speech education in Ohio secondary schools /Schoen, Kathryn Tucker January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
115 |
An analysis of perceived objectives in selected junior high schools /Gaddis, Hal Dean January 1968 (has links)
No description available.
|
116 |
The allocation and utilization of secondary school teachers : a case study /Shea, John Robert January 1969 (has links)
No description available.
|
117 |
Conant's recommendations for the American high school : implications for implementation in Ohio high schools /Steer, Donald R. January 1959 (has links)
No description available.
|
118 |
Academic Expectations of a High School and the Frequency of AcademicDishonesty as Reported by High School Principals in VirginiaNichols, Richard Duane 12 June 2014 (has links)
A review of research indicates that academic dishonesty is a common occurrence at all levels of education with high school being a significant determinant in whether one will engage in cheating at the college level. Current research is heavily concentrated on cheating at the college level. This study investigated the academic expectations of a high school and the frequency of academic dishonesty as reported by high school principals. Specifically, four research questions were addressed:
1. To what extent are the academic expectations of a high school related to the frequency of academic dishonesty as reported by high school administrators?
2. To what extent is the implementation of an honor code at a high school related to the frequency of academic dishonesty as reported by high school administrators?
3. What do high school administrators perceive as the most important causes of academic dishonesty?
4. To what degree do high school administrators perceive academic dishonesty as an important problem in high schools?
This quantitative research study used a sample drawn from public high school administrators (principals or assistant principals) in the Commonwealth of Virginia. A total of 129 participants from a possible 267 public high schools were surveyed. There was no relationship found between the implementation of an honor code and the frequency of academic dishonesty. School administrators perceived the academic expectations of the school and teacher, the lack of an honor code, and the enforcement of an honor code as less likely to be contributing factors to academic dishonesty in comparison to other factors. The main causes for student cheating perceived by the principals were a fear of failure, laziness or procrastination and ease of cheating. Overall, the principals placed less importance upon academic dishonesty in comparison to other disciplinary problems they face at the high school level. / Ph. D.
|
119 |
A Comparison of Selected Arkansas North Central Association Secondary Schools Using the Evaluative CriteriaRobbins, Homer Dale 08 1900 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to report the evaluation ratings and describe the Arkansas NCA secondary schools, as indicated in the Summary Reports of the Evaluative Criteria, 1960 edition, and to compare ratings on all sections and divisions, section D-J, by size classifications.
|
120 |
A follow-up study of the class of 1973 in U.S.D. 323 in KansasRottinghaus, Emmett J January 2010 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
Page generated in 0.1026 seconds