本研究旨在建構適合臺灣的高等教育資歷架構指標構面，研究先以文獻歸納方式，初擬臺灣高等教育資歷架構構面指標，再以12位專家為對象，利用模糊德菲法建構指標，再以模糊層級分析法求得各構面指標權重。資料分析結論如下： 一、博士學位構面指標 (一)博士學位構面重要性以「能力」為最高，而以「技能」為最低 (二)「知識」構面下指標重要性以「具備該領域知識批判及理解能 力」為最高，而以「理解研究方法之最適選擇」為最低 (三)「技能」構面下指標重要性以「對於該領域知識有關文獻或方法能進行深入的評論」為最高，而以「批判性評估與運用數字、圖像及數據」為最低 (四)「能力」構面下指標重要性以「在專業領域或學術活動中具備高度自主性及反省能力」為最高，而以「透過研究提出有水準的論文，以創新或詮釋知識」為最低 (五)博士學位指標串聯權重重要性以「在專業領域或學術活動中具備高度自主性及反省能力」為最高，而以「批判性評估與運用數字、圖像及數據」為最低 二、碩士學位構面指標 (一)碩士學位構面重要性以「能力」為最高，而以「知識」為最低 (二)「知識」構面下指標重要性以「具備高度的專業領域知識」為最高，而以「理解研究方法之最適選擇」為最低 (三)「技能」構面下指標重要性以「整合研究結果並將其運用至實務中」為最高，而以「在專業領域中具備專業解決問題技能」為最低 (四)「能力」構面下指標重要性以「在複雜任務設定及工作成果上，展現領導力」為最高，而以「研究能獲認可」為最低 (五)碩士學位指標串聯權重重要性以「在複雜任務設定及工作成果上，展現領導力」為最高，而以「在專業領域中具備專業解決問題技能」為最低 三、學士學位構面指標 (一)學士學位構面重要性以「能力」為最高，而以「知識」為最低 (二)「知識」構面下指標重要性以「具備主修學科的基礎知識」為最高，而以「理解知識的暫時性及有限性」為最低 (三)「技能」構面下指標重要性以「具備終身學習能力，以便不斷更新知識」為最高，而以「在有限資訊下能做出合理決定」為最低 (四)「能力」構面下指標重要性以「在專業團體中展現合作力」為最高，而以「能在他人引導下工作並具備反省能力」為最低 (五) 學士學位指標串聯權重重要性以「在專業團體中展現合作力」為最高，而以「在有限資訊下能做出合理決定」為最低 四、高等教育著重「能力」構面 五、博士著重「知識」構面 六、研究所強調「自主性」與「領導力」，大學部強調「合作力」 本研究藉由結論發現，針對實務應用及未來研究提出如下之建議： 一、實務應用方面 (一)對於教育行政機關建議 1.建立高等教育學術資歷架構 2.評鑑指標強調學生能力構面 3.高教培育政策注重倫理道德 (二)對於高等教育機構建議 1.畢業條件參酌高等教育指標 2.課程規劃強調能力構面培育 3.博士培育首重自主反省能力 4.碩士培育強調複雜工作領導 5.學士培育主張團體合作能力 6.高教培育著重專業倫理道德 二、未來研究方面 (一)擴大研究對象 (二)加入質性方法 (三)增加研究變項 / The purpose of the study was to construct the indicators for the Taiwan Framework for Higher Education Qualifications. Research methods include literature analysis, fuzzy Delphi technique and fuzzy AHP. In the literature analysis, this study discussed the theory of Framework for Higher Education Qualifications, studied Framework for Higher Education Qualifications. of each country and explored the initial construction of indicators for the Taiwan Framework for Higher Education Qualifications. In the empirical research, fuzzy Delphi questionnaire and fuzzy AHP questionnaires were used to investigate educational administration representatives, scholars and experts. The conclusions of this study are： 1.Doctor degree： (1)The highest overall weight distribution of the level in the doctor degree is “competency ”. The lowest overall weight distribution of the level in the doctor degree is “skill ”. (2)The highest overall weight distribution in the knowledge level in the doctor degree is “have the Critical and comprehensive ability in the professional domain”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the knowledge level in the doctor degree is “understand the most appropriate choice of the research methods ”. (3)The highest overall weight distribution in the skill level in the doctor degree is “comment deeply on the literature and methods ”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the skill level in the doctor degree is “estimate critically and utilize the number, figure and data ”. (4)The highest overall weight distribution in the competency level in the doctor degree is “have autonomy and reflective ability in the professional domain ”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the competency level in the doctor degree is “publish the essay with decent level by research to innovate and interpret knowledge ”. (5)The most importance indicators in the doctor degree is “have autonomy and reflective ability in the professional domain”. The least importance indicators in the doctor degree is “estimate critically and utilize the number, figure and data”. 2.Master degree： (1)The highest overall weight distribution of the level in the master degree is “competency ”. The lowest overall weight distribution of the level in the master degree is “knowledge ”. (2)The highest overall weight distribution in the knowledge level in the master degree is “have the high level knowledge in the professional domain”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the knowledge level in the master degree is “understand the most appropriate choice of the research methods ”. (3)The highest overall weight distribution in the skill level in the master degree is “integrate the research conclusions and apply the research conclusions”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the skill level in the master degree is “have the problem solve skill in the professional domain”. (4)The highest overall weight distribution in the competency level in the master degree is “have the leadership in the complicate task”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the competency level in the master degree is “research can be recognized ”. (5)The most importance indicators in the master degree is “have the leadership in the complicate task”. The least importance indicators in the master degree is “have the problem solve skill in the professional domain”. 3.Bachelor degree： (1)The highest overall weight distribution of the level in the bachelor degree is “competency ”. The lowest overall weight distribution of the level in the bachelor degree is “knowledge ”. (2)The highest overall weight distribution in the knowledge level in the bachelor degree is “have the basic knowledge of the major subject”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the knowledge level in the bachelor degree is “understand the temporality and limitation of knowledge”. (3)The highest overall weight distribution in the skill level in the bachelor degree is “have the life learning ability”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the skill level in the bachelor degree is “make reasonable decision in the limited information”. (4)The highest overall weight distribution in the competency level in the bachelor degree is “cooperate in the profession team”. The lowest overall weight distribution in the competency level in the bachelor degree is “work by the guidance and have the reflective ability”. (5)The most importance indicators in the bachelor degree is “cooperate in the profession team”. The least importance indicators in the bachelor degree is “make reasonable decision in the limited information”. 3.Doctor degree focus on “knowledge ” level than master degree and bachelor degree. 4.Graduate focus on autonomy and leadership. Undergraduate focus on cooperation. In addition, this research intends to offer suggestion respectively on the aspect of practical application and future study.

Submitted by Marta Jesus (martaliciatelesbr@yahoo.com.br) on 2015-05-08T18:58:21Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE MARTA LICIA.pdf: 933082 bytes, checksum: 6a69d8bdeed61a8a3768854b3624e2e8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria Auxiliadora da Silva Lopes (silopes@ufba.br) on 2015-05-14T15:36:33Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE MARTA LICIA.pdf: 933082 bytes, checksum: 6a69d8bdeed61a8a3768854b3624e2e8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-14T15:36:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE MARTA LICIA.pdf: 933082 bytes, checksum: 6a69d8bdeed61a8a3768854b3624e2e8 (MD5) / CNPQ / Nesta pesquisa, apresenta-se uma discussão sobre o valor simbólico do diploma de nível superior para as professoras que atuam na Educação Infantil e Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental das redes públicas de ensino que fizeram parte da primeira turma do curso de Pedagogia realizado pela Universidade Federal da Bahia – UFBA, entre 2010 e 2013, durante a execução do Plano Nacional de Formação dos Professores da Educação Básica – PARFOR. O objetivo geral da pesquisa foi investigar o fenômeno da titulação dos professores da Educação Básica. Os objetivos específicos foram: a) conhecer as razões que levaram as professoras-estudantes a investir na obtenção do diploma de nível superior; b) compreender o significado da vivência universitária do curso de Pedagogia na trajetória dessas professoras; c) perceber as expectativas delas em torno das possíveis vantagens que esperavam ter ao concluírem a licenciatura; d) investigar o lugar ocupado pela UFBA no valor simbólico atribuído a formação de nível superior pelos participantes. Trata-se de um estudo de caso qualitativo, no qual foram utilizadas diversas estratégias, sobretudo, as desenvolvidas usualmente nos estudos etnográficos da área da educação, e a metodologia e o método da História Oral. Os principais interlocutores para a construção das categorias de análise foram: Pierre Bourdieu e Norbert Elias. Os achados apontam para a compreensão das aspirações das professoras-estudantes e de suas famílias em terem acesso a graus mais elevados de escolarização, especialmente, o direito a um diploma de nível superior, e mostram também a necessidade delas cursarem Pedagogia de forma a superarem um processo de estigmatização, provocado a partir da divulgação da LDB (Lei 9394/96) e vivenciado no interior das escolas e redes de ensino, por não terem a titulação desejável. Assim como, evidenciam a chance que as professoras tiveram de satisfazer essa necessidade, através da conclusão do curso em uma universidade pública como a UFBA, a qual no decorrer da vivência acadêmica ganhou um lugar de relevância e destaque na pesquisa. As considerações concernentes ao trabalho, dizem respeito à importância de investigar a perspectiva das professoras-estudantes, neste momento em que é preciso refletir sobre a forma como vem ocorrendo o processo de titulação dos docentes da Educação Básica, de nível médio para o ensino superior. / ABSTRACT In this research, I discuss the symbolic value of a superior-level diploma for female teachers who worked in Childhood Programs and Elementary classes in public educational systems. Specifically, the focus was on the first cohort who participated in the pedagogy program at the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) during the implementation of the National Plan for the Training of Teachers in Elementary Education—PARFOR, between 2010 and 2013. A key objective of the research was to evaluate what the diploma meant to Elementary Education teachers, based on the life stories of teachers - students. The research sought a) to learn the motives that led the teacher - students to seek a superior-level diploma; b) to evaluate the impact of enrolling, remaining in the course, and completing the pedagogical program on the trajectory of these teachers; c) to analyze expectations with respect to the possible benefits to be gained upon conclusion of the course of study; and d) investigate the symbolic value of a superior-level degree from UFBA. The research is of a qualitative nature. I used diverse research strategies, including ethnographic approaches to the study of education along with Oral Histories, to understand the personal background of the teacher-students, their day-today lives during the enrollment period, the course of study, and graduation from the university. Major works informing the study included those by Pierre Bourdieu and Norbert Elias. The findings demonstrate that the teacher-students and their families seek access to higher levels of education, in particular the right to a superior-level diploma in the case of the teachers. They also demonstrate a perceived need to attain a superior-level diploma in Education in order to overcome stigmas associated with the LDB (Law 9394/96) and biases exhibited inside the schools and school systems towards individuals without superior-level diplomas. The research demonstrates as well a sense of fulfillment and affirmation among those individuals who completed the course of study at UFBA. It is important to evaluate access to superior-level training and degree programs for teachers at elementary, middle and upper level schools. It is equally important to reflect on the personal experiences of individuals who pursue these advanced degrees.