No description available.

H1 linker histone facilitates the formation of higher order chromatin structure and is essential for mammalian development. Mice have 11 H1 variants which are differentially regulated and conserved in human. Previous research indicates that H1 regulates the expression of specific genes in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). However, whether individual variants have distinct functions and how H1 participates in gene regulation remain elusive. An investigation of the precise localization of individual H1 variants in vivo would facilitate the elucidation of mechanisms underlying chromatin compaction regulated gene expression, while it has been extremely difficult due to the lacking of specific antibodies toward H1 variants. In this dissertation, I have generated a knock-in system in ESCs and shown that the N-terminally tagged H1 proteins are functionally interchangeable to their endogenous counterparts in vivo. H1d and H1c are depleted from GC- and gene-rich regions and active promoters, inversely correlated with H3K4me3, but positively correlated with H3K9me3 and associated with characteristic sequence features. Surprisingly, both H1d and H1c are significantly enriched at major satellites, which display increased nucleosome spacing compared with bulk chromatin. While also depleted at active promoters and enriched at major satellites, overexpressed H10 displays differential binding patterns in specific repetitive sequences compared with H1d and H1c. Depletion of H1c, H1d ,and H1e causes pericentric chromocenter clustering and de-repression of major satellites. Collectively, these results integrate the localization of an understudied type of chromatin proteins, namely the H1 variants, into the epigenome map of mouse ESCs, and demonstrate significant changes at pericentric heterochromatin upon depletion of this epigenetic mark.

In this thesis we have attempted to study four basic aspects of DNA-protein interactions: Affinity, specificity, accessibility and kinetics. With NF-kB as our model transcription factor, we wanted to investigate how a particular dimer recognizes a specific binding sequence? How fast are these interactions? And finally, how does the NF-kB interact with it binding site in the chromatin context? Specificity of NF-kB-DNA interactions has recently come into focus after it was shown that these dimers can bind to the sequences which do not fall into the NF-kB general consensus motif. We studied seven such sequences for their specificity for four NF-kB dimers. Our results show that p50 homodimers are least discriminative and can bind specifically to all these sequences. While as, RelA homodimers were highly discriminative and did not bind to most of these nontraditional sequences. We used two different methods to measure binding affinities: traditional gel mobility shift assay (EMSA) and a novel technique called as UV laser footprinting. Our results show that UV laser footprinting is the better method to determine the binding constants.For studying the dynamics of NF-kB-DNA binding, we combined UV laser footprinting with stopped flow device. This combination, not only give us one base pair resolution but also milli-second time resolution. Using p50 homodimers as a model transcription factor, we showed that the binding of this factor follows a two-step mechanism. First step involves the fast recognition of the sequence and second step follows a slower kinetics most likely for the stabilization of the complex. Our experiments suggest that flanking sequences play a role in the recognition and stabilization process of the complex formation.Finally, we also studied the accessibility of nucleosomes to NF-kB. Our in vitro data sheds light on the in vivo requirements for the alterations in chromatin structure necessary for the productive binding of NF-kB. These include either a removal of H2A-H2B dimers from the nucleosome and/or chromatin remodeler induced relocation of the histone octamer.Our data sheds light on the in vivo requirements for the alterations in chromatin structure necessary for the productive binding of NF-kB. We hypothesize that some factors like PU.1 might be able to target the chromatin remodeling/dimer eviction machinery to particular nucleosomes and lead to productive binding of NF-kB.

Dans cette thèse nous avons étudié quatre aspects fondamentaux de l’interaction ADN-protéine, notamment : l’affinité, la spécificité, l’accessibilité et la cinétique. En particulier, nous avons adressé les questions suivantes : comment un dimer du facteur de transcription NF-kB reconnait spécifiquement sa séquence d’ADN-cible, quelle est la rapidité de ces interactions, comment NF-kB interagit avec son site de fixation dans le contexte de la chromatine? Récemment, la spécificité de l’interaction NF-kB – ADN a reçu une attention particulière après l’observation que NF-kB peut se lier à des séquences qui n’entrent pas dans la classification de ses motifs « consensus ». Nous avons étudié la spécificité d’interaction de sept de ces motifs avec quatre dimers de NF-kB. Nos résultats montrent que le homo-dimer p50 sont les moins discriminatives et peuvent s’associer spécifiquement avec ces sept séquences. Par contre, les homo-dimers RelA se sont révélés hautement discriminatives ne pouvant pas s’associer spécifiquement avec ces séquences. Pour mesurer l’affinité de l’interaction nous avons utilisés deux méthodes distinctes : le traditionnel gel de retard (EMSA) et une nouvelle technique – « l’empreinte » au laser UV. Nos résultats montrent que le deuxième approche est plus approprié pour la mesure des constantes spécifiques de dissociation.Pour étudier la dynamique de l’interaction NF-kB – ADN, nous avons couplé l’empreinte au laser UV avec un appareil de mélange-rapide à façon. Cette combinaison nous a permis d’atteindre une résolution spatiale d’un nucléotide et temporaire de quelques millisecondes. Nous avons montré que l’homo-dimer p50 s’associe avec sa séquence-cible (MHC) H2 en suivant une cinétique à 2 pas. Le premier, de durée ~100 ms, reflète une reconnaissance initiale rapide, tandis que le deuxième, de durée ~1s, reflète une stabilisation lente du complexe. Nos expériences suggèrent aussi que les séquences voisines du site de reconnaissance jouent aussi un rôle dans la stabilisation du complexe.Finalement, nous avons étudié aussi l’accessibilité du nucléosome pour le NF-kB. Nos données in vitro montre que l’invasion spécifique de l’ADN à l’intérieure du nucléosome par NF-kB nécessite une perturbation majeure de la structure du nucléosome telle que l’éviction d’au moins un dimer d’histones H2A-H2B. / In this thesis we have attempted to study four basic aspects of DNA-protein interactions: Affinity, specificity, accessibility and kinetics. With NF-kB as our model transcription factor, we wanted to investigate how a particular dimer recognizes a specific binding sequence? How fast are these interactions? And finally, how does the NF-kB interact with it binding site in the chromatin context? Specificity of NF-kB-DNA interactions has recently come into focus after it was shown that these dimers can bind to the sequences which do not fall into the NF-kB general consensus motif. We studied seven such sequences for their specificity for four NF-kB dimers. Our results show that p50 homodimers are least discriminative and can bind specifically to all these sequences. While as, RelA homodimers were highly discriminative and did not bind to most of these nontraditional sequences. We used two different methods to measure binding affinities: traditional gel mobility shift assay (EMSA) and a novel technique called as UV laser footprinting. Our results show that UV laser footprinting is the better method to determine the binding constants.For studying the dynamics of NF-kB-DNA binding, we combined UV laser footprinting with stopped flow device. This combination, not only give us one base pair resolution but also milli-second time resolution. Using p50 homodimers as a model transcription factor, we showed that the binding of this factor follows a two-step mechanism. First step involves the fast recognition of the sequence and second step follows a slower kinetics most likely for the stabilization of the complex. Our experiments suggest that flanking sequences play a role in the recognition and stabilization process of the complex formation.Finally, we also studied the accessibility of nucleosomes to NF-kB. Our in vitro data sheds light on the in vivo requirements for the alterations in chromatin structure necessary for the productive binding of NF-kB. These include either a removal of H2A-H2B dimers from the nucleosome and/or chromatin remodeler induced relocation of the histone octamer.Our data sheds light on the in vivo requirements for the alterations in chromatin structure necessary for the productive binding of NF-kB. We hypothesize that some factors like PU.1 might be able to target the chromatin remodeling/dimer eviction machinery to particular nucleosomes and lead to productive binding of NF-kB.

At least eleven histone H1 variants exist in mammalian somatic cells that bind to the linker DNA and stabilize the nucleosome particle contributing to higher order chromatin compaction. In addition of playing a structural role, H1 seems to be involved in the activation and repression of gene expression. It is not well known whether the different variants have specific roles or regulate specific promoters. We have explored this by inducible shRNA-mediated knock-down of each of the H1 variants in a human breast cancer cell line. Rapid inhibition of each H1 variant was not compensated by changes of expression of other variants. A different, reduced subset of genes is altered in each H1 knock-down. Interestingly, H1.2 depletion represses expression of a number of cell cycle genes. This is concomitant with a G1 arrest phenotype observed in this cell line. In addition, H1.2 depletion caused decreased global nucleosome spacing. These effects are specific of H1.2 depletion as they are not complemented by overexpression of other variants and they do not occur in knock-downs for the other variants. Moreover, H1.4 depletion caused cell death in T47D, being the first report of the essentiality of an H1 variant for survival in a human cell type. In addition to this, we have also investigated specificities of H1 subtypes location in particular promoters of interest in our laboratory, as well as specific interactions with other factors by generating HA-tagged H1 variant expressing cell lines. / Al menos once variantes de la histona H1 han sido identificadas en mamíferos, todas ellas se unen al ADN entre nucleosomas contribuyendo así, a la estabilización de la partícula nucleosómica y a la compactación de la cromatina en estructuras de alto orden. Además de jugar un papel estructural, H1 parece estar implicada en la activación y represión de la expresión génica. Se desconoce si las diferentes variantes de H1 tienen funciones específicas o regulan promotores específicos. Con el objetivo de investigar esta hipótesis se han generado líneas celulares que inhiben de forma inducible, mediante la tecnología de ARN interferente, la expresión de cada una de las variantes de forma específica. La inhibición de cada una de las variantes no es compensada por cambios en la expresión del resto de subtipos. Distintos grupos de genes resultan alterados con la depleción de cada una de las variantes de H1. La inhibición de H1.2 reprime la expresión de una serie de genes de ciclo celular, correlacionando con un fenotipo de arresto celular en fase G1 observado en esta línea. Además, la inhibición de H1.2 causa una disminución global del espaciamiento entre nucleosomas. Todos estos efectos parecen ser específicos para la falta de H1.2 ya que no son complementados por la sobreexpresión de otras variantes. Por otro lado, la inhibición de H1.4 causa muerte celular en T47D. Ésta es la primera vez que se describe que una variante de H1 es esencial para la supervivencia de una línea celular humana.En un segundo plano, se han construido líneas celulares con expresión de las variantes de H1 fusionadas al péptido HA, con el objetivo de estudiar la especificidad de su localización en promotores de interés para el grupo, así como interacciones específicas con otros factores celulares.