The impact of H2 partial pressure (H2 pp) during the hydrotreating of heavy gas oil, derived from Athabasca bitumen, over commercial NiMo/¥ã-Al2O3 catalyst was studied in a micro-trickle bed reactor. The experimental conditions were varied as follows: temperature: 360 to 400¨¬C, pressure: 7 to 11 MPa, gas/oil ratio: 400 to 1270 mL/mL, H2 purity range of 0 to 100 vol. % (with the rest either CH4 or He), and LHSV range of 0.65 to 2 h-1. The two main objectives of the project were to study the nature of the dependence of H2 pp on temperature, pressure, gas/oil ratio, LHSV (Liquid Hourly Space Velocity), and H2 purity. The project was divided into three phases: in phase one the effect of H2 purity on hydrotreating of heavy gas oil (HGO) was studied, in phase two the nature of H2 pp dependency and the effect of H2 pp on hydrotreating of HGO was investigated, and in phase three kinetic studies were carried out using different kinetic models.<p> The objective of phase one was to study the effect of hydrogen purity on hydrotreating of HGO was studied in a trickle bed reactor over a commercial Ni−Mo/¥ã-alumina catalyst. Methane was used as a diluent for the hydrogen stream, and its effect on the catalyst performance was compared to that of helium, which is inert toward the catalyst. Furthermore, a deactivation study was conducted over a period of 66 days, during which the catalyst was subjected to H2 purities ranging from 75 to 95% (with the rest methane); no significant deterioration in the hydroprocessing activities of the catalyst was observed. Therefore, it was concluded that methane was inert toward a commercial Ni−Mo/¥ã-alumina catalyst. However, its presence resulted in hydrogen partial pressure reduction, which in turn led to a decrease in hydrodesulphurization (HDS), hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), hydrodearomatization (HDA) conversions. This reduction can be offset by increasing the total pressure of the system. HDS, HDN, HDA, and mild hydrocracking (MHC) conversions were studied. Also determined were cetane index, density, aniline point, diesel index, and fractional distribution of the products.<p> The main objective of phase two was to study the effects of H2 pp on hydrotreating conversions, feed vaporization, H2 dissolution, and H2 consumption were studied. The results show that HDN and HDA are significantly more affected by H2 partial pressure than HDS; with the HDN being the most affected. For instance as the inlet H2 partial pressure was increased from 4.6 to 8.9 MPa HDS, HDN, and HDA conversions increased for 94.9%, 55.1%, and 46.0% to 96.7%, 83.9%, and 58.0% , respectively. Moreover, it was observed that H2 dissolution and H2 consumption increased with increasing H2 pp. No clear trend was observed for the effect of H2 pp on feed vaporization.<p> In phase three the kinetics of HDS, HDN, and HDA were studied. The power law, multi-parameter, and Langmuir - Hinshelwood type models were used to fit the data. The prediction capacities of the resulting models were tested. It was determined that, while multi-parameter model yielded better prediction, L-H had an advantage in that it took a lesser number of experimental data to determine its parameters. Kinetic fitting of the data to a pseudo-first-order power law model suggested that conclusions on the effect of H2 pp on hydrotreating activities could be equally drawn from either inlet or outlet hydrogen partial pressure. However, from the catalyst deactivation standpoint, it is recommended that such conclusions are drawn from the outlet H2 partial pressure, since it is the reactor point with the lowest hydrogen partial pressure.

The impact of H2 partial pressure (H2 pp) during the hydrotreating of heavy gas oil, derived from Athabasca bitumen, over commercial NiMo/¥ã-Al2O3 catalyst was studied in a micro-trickle bed reactor. The experimental conditions were varied as follows: temperature: 360 to 400¨¬C, pressure: 7 to 11 MPa, gas/oil ratio: 400 to 1270 mL/mL, H2 purity range of 0 to 100 vol. % (with the rest either CH4 or He), and LHSV range of 0.65 to 2 h-1. The two main objectives of the project were to study the nature of the dependence of H2 pp on temperature, pressure, gas/oil ratio, LHSV (Liquid Hourly Space Velocity), and H2 purity. The project was divided into three phases: in phase one the effect of H2 purity on hydrotreating of heavy gas oil (HGO) was studied, in phase two the nature of H2 pp dependency and the effect of H2 pp on hydrotreating of HGO was investigated, and in phase three kinetic studies were carried out using different kinetic models.<p> The objective of phase one was to study the effect of hydrogen purity on hydrotreating of HGO was studied in a trickle bed reactor over a commercial Ni−Mo/¥ã-alumina catalyst. Methane was used as a diluent for the hydrogen stream, and its effect on the catalyst performance was compared to that of helium, which is inert toward the catalyst. Furthermore, a deactivation study was conducted over a period of 66 days, during which the catalyst was subjected to H2 purities ranging from 75 to 95% (with the rest methane); no significant deterioration in the hydroprocessing activities of the catalyst was observed. Therefore, it was concluded that methane was inert toward a commercial Ni−Mo/¥ã-alumina catalyst. However, its presence resulted in hydrogen partial pressure reduction, which in turn led to a decrease in hydrodesulphurization (HDS), hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), hydrodearomatization (HDA) conversions. This reduction can be offset by increasing the total pressure of the system. HDS, HDN, HDA, and mild hydrocracking (MHC) conversions were studied. Also determined were cetane index, density, aniline point, diesel index, and fractional distribution of the products.<p> The main objective of phase two was to study the effects of H2 pp on hydrotreating conversions, feed vaporization, H2 dissolution, and H2 consumption were studied. The results show that HDN and HDA are significantly more affected by H2 partial pressure than HDS; with the HDN being the most affected. For instance as the inlet H2 partial pressure was increased from 4.6 to 8.9 MPa HDS, HDN, and HDA conversions increased for 94.9%, 55.1%, and 46.0% to 96.7%, 83.9%, and 58.0% , respectively. Moreover, it was observed that H2 dissolution and H2 consumption increased with increasing H2 pp. No clear trend was observed for the effect of H2 pp on feed vaporization.<p> In phase three the kinetics of HDS, HDN, and HDA were studied. The power law, multi-parameter, and Langmuir - Hinshelwood type models were used to fit the data. The prediction capacities of the resulting models were tested. It was determined that, while multi-parameter model yielded better prediction, L-H had an advantage in that it took a lesser number of experimental data to determine its parameters. Kinetic fitting of the data to a pseudo-first-order power law model suggested that conclusions on the effect of H2 pp on hydrotreating activities could be equally drawn from either inlet or outlet hydrogen partial pressure. However, from the catalyst deactivation standpoint, it is recommended that such conclusions are drawn from the outlet H2 partial pressure, since it is the reactor point with the lowest hydrogen partial pressure.

Les fluides spéciaux (mélanges d’hydrocarbures utilisés comme solvants pour applications diverses) sont produits à partir de l’hydrodésaromatisation des charges pétrolières (naphta et distillats moyens) initialement riches en aromatiques. Leur mise en marché respecte une exigence environnementale (moins de 100 ppm en aromatique) parfois difficile à atteindre compte tenu de la composition initiale de la charge. Par conséquent, à partir de l’identification des molécules réfractaires à l’hydrogénation, un choix de molécules modèles réparti selon trois familles, les monoaromatiques (toluène, indane, tétraline, cyclohexylbenzène, nonylbenzène), les diaromatiques (naphtalène, biphényle) et les triaromatiques (phénanthrène), a permis d’étudier leur réactivité dans les conditions opératoires d’hydrogénation.A partir d’une approche expérimentale couplée à la modélisation cinétique, les schémas réactionnels et une échelle de réactivité ont été établis pour ces molécules modèles. Leur transformation conduit majoritairement du produit totalement hydrogénés. Les monoaromatiques sont les plus réactifs alors que les triaromatiques sont les moins réactifs. Néanmoins, en mélange, le pouvoir inhibiteur d’une molécule sur l’hydrogénation des autres aromatique augmente avec son aromaticité. Le phénanthrène est alors la molécule la plus inhibitrice. Les polyaromatiques engendrent alors une accumulation de monoaromatiques rendant difficile l’hydrogénation totale des charges pétrolières. Ceci est dû à des effets de compétition à l’adsorption à la surface du catalyseur entre les aromatiques qui ont été chiffrés en déterminant à partir d’un modèle suivant le formalisme de Langmuir-Hinshelwood. / Special fluids (hydrocarbon mixture used as solvents for various applications) are produced from deep hydrodearomatization of petroleum distillates (naphta and middle distillates) with high aromatic contents. Their commercialization follows a stringent environmental regulation (less than 100 ppm of aromatics) that is not always reachable due to the initial feedstock composition. Therefore, from the refractory molecules identification for hydrogenation, a selection of three families of model molecules, monoaromatics (toluene, indane, tetralin, cyclohexylbenzene, and nonylbenzene), diaromatics (naphthalene, biphenyl) and triaromatics (phenanthrene) allowed to study their reactivity in the hydrogenation operating conditions.By an experimental approach coupled with kinetic modeling, reaction schemes and a reactivity scale were established for these model molecules. Their transformation leads to the major formation of the saturated product. Monoaromatics are the most reactive while triaromatics are the less reactive. However, in mixture, the inhibiting strength of a molecule on the other aromatic hydrogenation increases with their aromaticity. Therefore, phenanthrene is the strongest inhibitor. Polyaromatics provoke an accumulation of monoaromatics generating a challenging petroleum distillates total hydrogenation. This is due to competitive adsorption effects at the catalyst surface between aromatics that was quantified from a model following the Langmuir-Hinshelwood formalism.