Spelling suggestions: "subject:"IP daw"" "subject:"IP caw""
1 |
The Interplay of Web Aggregation and RegulationZhu, Hongwei, Madnick, Stuart E., Siegel, Michael D. 01 1900 (has links)
The development of web technology has led to the emergence of web aggregation, a service that collects existing web data and turns them into more useful information. We review the development of both comparison and relationship aggregation and discuss their impacts on various stakeholders. The aggregator’s capability of transparently extracting web data has raised challenging issues in database and privacy protection. Consequently, new regulations are introduced or being proposed. We analyze the interactions between aggregation and related policies and provide our insights about the implications of new policies on the development of web aggregation. / Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA)
|
2 |
Gene Patents and Access to Genetic Diagnostic TestsKhanijoun, Harleen 20 November 2012 (has links)
The utilitarian theory contemplates rewarding the risks of inventors by providing them with
a defined period of exclusivity to recoup their investment. For inventions requiring further
investment, patents enable the creation of financial relationships between inventors and investors by
providing patent exclusivity during the commercialization process. Innovation, contrasted from
invention and conceptualized as commercialization, however, does not necessarily form the best
means for delivering to the public inventions intended to improve health. Although patent policy
conflates the economic growth and health improvement objectives of innovation, these goals do not
always align. While the exercise of BRCA patents instantiates exclusive practicing of patents that
failed to adequately deliver health technology, the patent system does not need significant change.
Rather, to maintain the expectations of patent holders while balancing the needs of the public,
current practices should continue with the encouragement of the creation of voluntary patent pools.
|
3 |
Gene Patents and Access to Genetic Diagnostic TestsKhanijoun, Harleen 20 November 2012 (has links)
The utilitarian theory contemplates rewarding the risks of inventors by providing them with
a defined period of exclusivity to recoup their investment. For inventions requiring further
investment, patents enable the creation of financial relationships between inventors and investors by
providing patent exclusivity during the commercialization process. Innovation, contrasted from
invention and conceptualized as commercialization, however, does not necessarily form the best
means for delivering to the public inventions intended to improve health. Although patent policy
conflates the economic growth and health improvement objectives of innovation, these goals do not
always align. While the exercise of BRCA patents instantiates exclusive practicing of patents that
failed to adequately deliver health technology, the patent system does not need significant change.
Rather, to maintain the expectations of patent holders while balancing the needs of the public,
current practices should continue with the encouragement of the creation of voluntary patent pools.
|
4 |
Health Claims under Reg. No. 1924/2006 : A new way to foster innovation within the agri-food industryMedici, Luca January 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Meme-dödar-direktiv eller kreatörernas upprättelse? : En analys av Copyright-direktivets artikel 17 (f.d. 13) / The death of memes or the redemption for creators? : An analysis of article 17 (previously 13) of the Copyright directiveLillhager, Henning January 2019 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
The why of geographical indicationsZappalaglio, Andrea January 2018 (has links)
This thesis explores the historical evolution of the nature of the link between a product and its place of origin in the European sui generis systems of GI protection, with a specific focus on the EU Regulation 1151/2012 on Geographical Indications for the protection of agricultural products and foodstuffs. It concludes that this link has substantively changed, since the 1930s, when some early forms of sui generis GI systems were introduced in southern Europe, especially in France and Italy. While these regimes were based exclusively on the concept of terroir, a cipher for the physical link between a product and a place, an empirical analysis carried out in the present work reveals that, today, the history of the product and of its method of production is, statistically, the predominant linking factor. Furthermore, the research shows that the historical link is almost always mentioned in the specifications of EU GI products, when protected both by Protected Designations of Origin (PDO) or Protected Geographical Indications (PGI), which are the two quality schemes provided by EU Law. In particular, the terroir element, which characterises PDOs, also appears frequently in PGI specifications, where it should be superfluous, thus suggesting that the differences between these two quality schemes are unclear. Finally, the emergence of the historical element confirms that GIs can contribute to the protection of products that are linked to a geographical area not by physical and environmental factors, but by the socio-cultural traditions of a specific place. Although history can constitute a valid product/link, however, it must be used with caution, as it can be mystified and reconstructed in an arbitrary and unfounded way. This is dangerous, because it can turn GIs into a mere marketing tool, thus damaging the origin function that distinguishes them from the broad family of quality labels.
|
7 |
State-Financed Merger and Acquisition Activity in Germany as a Catalyst for Robust Chinese Patent Law EnforcementPayne, Bridget Áine 01 January 2018 (has links)
Germany’s economic dominance in Europe, generous investment incentives, and technical manufacturing prowess has encouraged an influx of Chinese-led inbound activity, concentrated in high-tech sector mergers and acquisitions. A close examination of these M&As yields evidence of systemic Chinese state-financing through both state-owned and private vehicles that likely stems from China’s “Made in China 2025” policy, which hopes to stem capital outflow and to indigenize technological innovation. As Germany braces for what it sees to be continuous attempts by China to take patented German technology through M&As, it worries that Chinese patent law will allow for rampant patent infringement by copycat Chinese entities.
This paper presents an overview of the root causes of China’s heavy economic activity in Germany, as well as an analysis of the legal concerns held by German firms based on a close reading of the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China and strategic recommendations for German companies hoping to work with or in China.
|
Page generated in 0.0511 seconds