Organizational Ambidexterity är ett relativt nyuppkommit begrepp och få undersökningar har gjorts kring ämnet. De tidigare undersökningar som har bedrivits har främst fokuserat på hur ledarskap framkallar Organizational Ambidexterity. Tidigare undersökning har även forskat i hur dess komponenter, utforskande och bearbetande, kan samexistera i en organisation då de två komponenterna konkurrerar om samma resurser. För att vända blicken bort från ledarens roll i en organisation att inverka på Organizational Ambidexterity, har studien fokuserat på belöningssystemets inflytande på Organizational Ambidexterity med bankorganisationer som objekt.   Belöningssystem förekommer i både finansiell och icke-finansiell form. Finansiella belöningar kan tillkännages som en transaktion utav finansiell ersättning vid utfört arbete. Icke-finansiell belöning är ersättning vilket inte medför direkta kostnader för en organisation. Det kan ske i form av utbildning eller beröm från chefen.   Studien har genomförts på så vis att de empiriska material som frambringats ska förklara om och i så fall vilka belöningssystem som motiverar organisationen att arbete i både en utforskande och bearbetande kapacitet för att uppnå Organizational Ambidexterity. Detta för att uppnå konkurrensfördelar på marknaden.   Teorin stödjer sig på att finansiella belöningar leder till en mer bearbetande kapacitet och icke-finansiella belöningar framkallar en mer utforskande kapacitet. De empiriska material som samlats in stödjer inte detta resonemang till fullo då det visat sig att finansiella belöningar inte används i en större utsträckning och att det inte heller leder till en mer bearbetande kapacitet. Emellertid användes de icke-finansiella belöningarna i en större utsträckning och har till viss del påvisat att det inverkar över organisationens förmåga att arbeta i en utforskande kapacitet. / Organizational Ambidexterity is a relatively new concept and few studies have been done on the subject. Previous studies have focused on how leadership develops Organizational Ambidexterity. Previous investigations have also done research into how its components, exploration and exploitation, can co-exist in an organization where the two components compete for the same resources. To turn your gaze away from the leaders’ role in organizations and how they affect Organizational Ambidexterity, this study has focused on the reward systems influence on Organizational Ambidexterity with the banking organizations as an object.   Reward systems are present in both financial and non-financial terms. Financial rewards are transactions of financial compensation for work performed. Non-financial rewards are compensation which does not involve direct costs to an organization. It may take the form of training or appreciation from the boss.   This study was conducted in such a way that the empirical material that has emerged will explain if and how the reward systems motivate the organization to work in both an exploration and exploitation capacity to achieve Organizational Ambidexterity. This is done in order achieve competitive advantages in the market.   The theory relies on that financial rewards will lead to more exploitative capacity and non-financial rewards elicit more exploratory capability. The empirical material collected does not support this argument in full, since it was found that financial rewards are not used to a greater extent and that financial rewards does not lead to a more exploitative capacity. However, the use of non-financial rewards to a greater extent has partially demonstrated an impact on the organizations ability to work in an exploratory capacity.

Incentives are a well-known concept which primarily are used to motivate, recruit and keep employees within the organization. Financial incentives are associated with monetary reward in exchange for an achieved goal or performance. Non-financial incentives are on the other hand associated with non-monetary rewards such as appreciation, to praise, responsibility, education and evolvement. This essay aims to create an understanding for how the start-up companies are using financial and non-financial incentives. We base our results from an owners perspective and are using five interviews with the CEO of each company. The questions had a focus within incentives as well as recruitment and to keep key competence. The result showed that the start-up companies are mainly using non-financial incentives and that they generally experience themselves to be competitive on the labour market. Though there is a lack of competence within programming in their trade and all respondents agree that the start-up companies is an underdog among the large and more established companies, in the competition of key competence. Since the previous studies within this subject is lacking, we hope to contribute with increased understanding of how start-up companies are using financial and non-financial incentives.