Thesis (MCur)--Stellenbosch University, 2011. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Parents and/or caregivers all over the world are expected to comply with existing childhood immunisation programmes in order to prevent outbreaks of preventable childhood diseases. The most important justification for this study was the 2010 measles outbreak in the Western Cape province of South Africa. This outbreak correlated with the study conclusions of Corrigall, Coetzee and Cameron (2008:41) as they found the immunisation coverage in the Western Cape to be insufficient to prevent outbreaks of preventable childhood diseases. From the literature, it seemed that attitudes and factors that influence parent and/or caregiver compliance with the routine childhood immunisation schedule in the Witzenberg sub-district of the Western Cape persist. In doing this study, the researcher’s purpose was to discover what those factors were. The aim was to determine, understand and describe the attitudes and factors influencing parent and/or caregiver compliance with the routine childhood immunisation schedule, and the nature thereof. The set objectives were to gain knowledge of and insight into the factors influencing participants’ adherence with routine childhood immunisation; and participants’ feelings, attitudes, and experiences surrounding immunisation within the context of their health care environment. A quantitative research approach, with a smaller qualitative component, was selected for this study which had an exploratory descriptive design. The population targeted for data collection included parents and/or caregivers of children aged 0 to 60 months in the Witzenberg sub-district (N=8374), as well as in community health centres (CHCs) that provided immunisation and/or other primary health care services in the mentioned subdistrict (N=16). The non-probability convenience sampling of parents and/or caregivers consisted of 376 participants (n=376), while 8 CHCs (n=8) were selected through systematic sampling. The measuring instrument used as the data collection technique for this study was a selfadministered questionnaire. A pilot study was conducted to pre-test the questionnaire, and its reliability and validity were further ensured by submitting it for review to research experts in methodology and nursing. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used to analyse the study data. MS Excel was used to capture the quantitative data after which it was analysed using descriptive statistics by means of STATISTICA version 9-software. Tesch’s approach to qualitative data analysis was used as a guideline with the purpose of identifying and categorising the essential qualitative data and grouping it together in one descriptive framework. The main findings were that parents and/or caregivers involved in this study were positive about immunisation and their experiences within the health service environment. They also felt that health workers were playing an important role in their decision-making process. However, their knowledge regarding the purpose of and contra-indications for immunisation were insufficient, and most parents reported that their children experienced side effects after immunisation. Key recommendations on conclusion of the study include clear, accurate and specific information to parents about the purpose of immunisation and its contra-indications and side effects. Vaccinators and managers should be informed about the persistent problem with mild vaccination side effects and refresher courses should be provided with regard to infection control, administration techniques and the reporting of adverse effects. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Daar word van ouers en/of versorgers oor die wêreld verwag om aan bestaande kinderimmunisasieprogramme te voldoen ter voorkoming van vaksien-voorkombare siektes. Die belangrikste regverdiging vir die studie was die masel-uitbreking in die Wes-Kaapprovinsie van Suid-Afrika in 2010. Die uitbraak het die studiebevindinge ondersteun van Corrigall, Coetzee en Cameron (2008:41), wat bevind het dat immunisasiedekking in die Wes-Kaap onvoldoende was om ʼn uitbreking van voorkombare kindersiektes te verhoed. Volgens die literatuur het dit voorgekom asof die gesindhede en faktore wat ouers en/of versorgers se houding jeens die roetine- kinder-immunisasieskedule in die Witzenberg sub-distrik van die Wes-Kaap beïnvloed, voortduur. Die navorser het met hierdie studie ten doel gehad om die faktore te ontdek, ten einde die gesindhede en faktore wat ‘n invloed uitoefen te bepaal, te verstaan en te omskryf. Die doelwitte was om kennis in te win oor en insig te verkry in die faktore wat ouers en/of versorgers se aanhanklikheid met routine kinder immunisering beinbloed; en in ouers en/of versorgers se gevoelens, houdings en ondervindings ten opsigte van immunisasie in hulle gesondheidsorg-omgewing. ‘n Kwantitatiewe navorsingsbenadering met ‘n kleiner kwalitatiewe komponent is geselekteer vir die studie wat ‘n ondersoekend-beskrywende navorsingsontwerp gehad het. Die populasie wat geteiken is vir data-insameling was ouers en/of versorgers van kinders van 0 tot 60 maande in die Witzenberg sub-distrik (N=8374), asook gemeenskapsgesondheidsentrums wat immunisasie en/of ander primêre gesondheidsorgdienste in die genoemde sub-distrik aanbied (N=16). Die nie-waarskynlike gerieflikheidsteekproef van ouers en/of versorgers het uit 376 deelnemers (n=376) bestaan, terwyl 8 (n=8) gemeenskapsgesondheidsentrums deur middel van sistematiese steekproefbepaling geselekteer is. Die meetinstrument vir data-insameling in die studie was self-geadministreerde vraelyste. ‘n Loodsstudie is uitgevoer as vooraf-toetsing van die vraelys en die geldigheid en betroubaarheid daarvan is verder verseker deur die vraelys aan navorsingskenners in navorsingsmetodologie en verpleging te onderwerp. ‘n Kombinasie van kwantitatiewe en kwalitatiewe metodes is gebruik vir die analisering van die studie-data. Die kwantitatiewe data is op MS Excel ingevoer waarna beskrywende statistieke deur middel van Statistica weergawe 9-sagteware gebruik is om dit te analiseer. Tesch se benadering tot kwalitatiewe data-analise is as riglyn gebruik met die doel om belangrike data te identifiseer, te kategoriseer en in ‘n beskrywende raamwerk te groepeer. In die studie is daar hoofsaaklik bevind dat ouers en/of versorgers positief is oor immunisasie en hul ondervinding binne die gesondheidsorgomgewing, en dat gesondheidswerkers ʼn belangrike rol in hul besluitnemingsproses speel. Hul kennis aangaande die doel van en kontra-indikasies vir immunisasie was egter onvoldoende en die meeste ouers en/of versorgers het gerapporteer dat hul kinders ná immunisasie probleme met newe-effekte ondervind het. Die hoofaanbevelings wat uit die studie voortgespruit het, was dat duidelike, akkurate en spesifieke inligting aan ouers en/of versorgers verskaf moet word aangaande die doel van immunisasie en die kontra-indikasies daarvoor. Immuniseerders en bestuurders moet ook ingelig word oor die voortdurende voorkoms van newe-effekte sodat opknappingskursusse oor infeksiebeheer, korrekte toedieningstegnieke en die rapportering van newe-effekte aangebied kan word.

Background: The anti-vaccination movement has gained attention in the media over the last few years, which has revived the debate as to whether parents should vaccinate their children or not. Infections, whose incidence has previously been declining as a result of compliance to national immunization programmes, have made a resurgence and the protection of the society that comes with vaccinations is decreasing. Vaccines are one of the most cost-efficient measures available to health care to prevent spreading of diseases and decrease mortality at the population level. Aim: To study the factors that influence parents’ decisions not to vaccinate their children in accordance with national immunization programmes to increase the understanding of these decisions. Method: A scoping review of articles retrieved from the databases PubMed and CINAHL. A content analysis was used to interpret content and create context. The result was based on 23 articles. Results: Several reasons why parents don't vaccinate their children were uncovered. A fear of adverse effects and a lack of trust in health care, authorities and vaccines were prominent reasons for vaccination refusal. Where parents gathered information, how they defined health and culture or religion where other factors that influenced the decision not to vaccinate. Conclusion: The main findings indicate a lack of trust in authorities, health care or vaccines among parents. Gathering information from the internet and media have contributed to ignorance about and a fear of the effects of vaccines. Health care staff need to improve their person-centered care and adapt information about vaccines to the recipient. / Bakgrund: Antivaccinationsrörelsen har fått medial uppmärksamhet de senaste åren, vilket har aktualiserat debatten huruvida föräldrar ska vaccinera eller inte vaccinera sina barn. Infektioner, vars utbredning tidigare minskat till följd av följsamhet till vaccinationsprogram, har åter fått fäste och det samhällsskydd som följer vaccinationer har minskat. Vaccin är en kostnadseffektiv åtgärd inom hälso- och sjukvården för att förhindra smittspridning och minska mortaliteten på befolkningsnivå. Syfte: Undersöka faktorer som påverkar föräldrars beslut att inte vaccinera sina barn enligt nationella vaccinationsprogram för att öka förståelsen för dessa beslut. Metod: Scoping review baserad på artiklar hämtade ur databaserna PubMed och CINAHL. Innehållsanalys tillämpades för att förstå innehåll och skapa sammanhang. Resultatet baseras på 23 artiklar. Resultat: I resultatet framkom olika skäl till att föräldrar inte vaccinerar sina barn. Rädsla för biverkningar och bristande tillit till sjukvården, myndigheter och vaccin var framträdande orsaker till vaccinvägran. Var föräldrar inhämtade information, hur de definierade hälsa samt kultur och religion var andra faktorer som påverkade beslutet att inte vaccinera. Slutsats: Resultatets primära fynd baseras på någon form av bristande tillit till myndigheter, sjukvården eller vaccin hos föräldrarna. Internet och media som informationskälla har bidragit till felaktiga uppfattningar om och rädsla för vacciners effekt. Sjukvården måste bli bättre på personcentrerad vård och individanpassa information om vaccin.