Au début du XIXe siècle, l’introduction du peuple sur la scène sociale et artistique marque la fin de "l’époque de l’individu". C’est désormais la question de la totalité qui s’affirme dans tous les domaines et qui impose dans le champ dramatique une relation nouvelle entre personnages individuels et personnages collectifs. Ces derniers sont pour Goethe, Baudelaire et Wagner l’occasion d’une tension dialectique susceptible de générer de nouvelles formes théâtrales. Il reviendra à l’école naturaliste (de Zola à Hauptmann) de favoriser plus ouvertement cette articulation en faisant du milieu un acteur à part entière. L ‘antithèse de premier mouvement est fomentée par le Symbolisme qui revendique une même volonté de dépassement des conventions mais par l’invention de personnages-mythes et de choralités polymorphes exilés de toute réalité historico-sociale. Si Maeterlinck et Claudel montrent les limites de ce modèle, d’autres obédiences (Mallarmé) conçoivent l’essence du théâtre comme celle d’un dialogue entre le héros et la foule sur fond d’une ritualité sociale en voie de transformation. Avec le Futurisme Italien et Apollinaire cette ritualité atteint son point d’incandescence et revendique une fusion de l’individuel et du collectif pleinement assumée. Loin de ces synthèses provocantes, Pirandello comme Ibsen et les expressionnistes, s’attacheront pourtant à éclairer le rôle désormais oppressif du collectif sur le personnage individuel. Prenant acte de ce renversement des rapports hiérarchiques et dialectiques du drame, le théâtre de Brecht n’offre-t-il pas alors l’alternative d’une collusion plus dynamique et moins mortifère entre personnage individuel et personnage collectif ? / Collective Character, Individual Character: Scenes of a Dialectical Journey (1830-1930) At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the introduction of the people into the social and artistic scene marks the end of the "era of the individual". Henceforth, it is the question of totality that is affirmed in all fields and that imposes in the dramatic field a new relation between individual and collective characters. The latter are for Goethe, Baudelaire and Wagner the occasion for a dialectic tension susceptible to generate new theatrical forms. It will be the Naturalist School (from Zola to Hauptmann) which favours more openly this articulation in making the milieu itself an actor. The antithesis of the first movement is instigated by symbolism, which claims the same desire to go past conventions, but through the invention of character-myths and of polymorphous choralités exiled from any socio-historical reality. While Maeterlinck and Claudel show the limits of this model, other persuasions (Mallarmé) conceive the essence of theatre as one of a dialogue between the hero and the crowd against the backdrop of a social ritual in the process of transformation. With Italian futurism and Apollinaire this ritualism reaches its point of incandescence and claims a fully assumed fusion of the individual and the collective. Far from the these provocative syntheses, Pirandello, Ibsen and the expressionists will devote themselves to throwing light on the now opressive role of the collective on the individual character. Taking note of this reversal of hierarchical and dialectical relations in drama, does not Brecht’s theatre offer the alternative of a more dynamique and less deadly collusion between individual and collective characters?

Esta dissertação visa a discutir a noção e os limites da originalidade como requisito material para obtenção de registros de desenhos industriais. Começando com a originalidade no texto da Lei n. 9.279/96 e fazendo algumas distinções adotadas pela doutrina e jurisprudência, passa-se para a fundamentação da originalidade no texto constitucional. Aborda-se em seguida os diversos aspectos relativos direta e indiretamente à originalidade no exame de mérito e validade dos registros de desenho industrial, bem como nas ações de infração. Por fim, são identificados os critérios fundamentais para averiguação da distinguibilidade dos desenhos e busca-se aplicar algumas das conclusões parciais a casos práticos. / This dissertation aims at discussing the notion and boundaries of originality as a material requisite for the validity of industrial design registration. By starting with the originality in the text of Federal Law No. n. 9.279/96 and making some distinctions adopted by doctrine and case law, the work moves to the concept of originality in the constitutional text. In sequence, the diverse aspects related directly and indirectly to the originality in the exam of merits and validity of industrial design registrations are viewed, as well as in the infringement lawsuits. Ultimately, this work searches the fundamental criteria for evaluating the distinctiveness of the designs and aims at applying some of the conclusions reached to practical scenarios.

Esta dissertação visa a discutir a noção e os limites da originalidade como requisito material para obtenção de registros de desenhos industriais. Começando com a originalidade no texto da Lei n. 9.279/96 e fazendo algumas distinções adotadas pela doutrina e jurisprudência, passa-se para a fundamentação da originalidade no texto constitucional. Aborda-se em seguida os diversos aspectos relativos direta e indiretamente à originalidade no exame de mérito e validade dos registros de desenho industrial, bem como nas ações de infração. Por fim, são identificados os critérios fundamentais para averiguação da distinguibilidade dos desenhos e busca-se aplicar algumas das conclusões parciais a casos práticos. / This dissertation aims at discussing the notion and boundaries of originality as a material requisite for the validity of industrial design registration. By starting with the originality in the text of Federal Law No. n. 9.279/96 and making some distinctions adopted by doctrine and case law, the work moves to the concept of originality in the constitutional text. In sequence, the diverse aspects related directly and indirectly to the originality in the exam of merits and validity of industrial design registrations are viewed, as well as in the infringement lawsuits. Ultimately, this work searches the fundamental criteria for evaluating the distinctiveness of the designs and aims at applying some of the conclusions reached to practical scenarios.