• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A judicialização da política e o problema da lei complementar nº 135/2010: uma análise da democracia contemporânea revisitada pela intervenção jurisdicional

Fernandes, Maurício Machado 02 March 2012 (has links)
Submitted by Mariana Dornelles Vargas (marianadv) on 2015-06-15T13:59:11Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Judicializacao_politica.pdf: 1824110 bytes, checksum: d4d9346fd29b7595c86112cc5100ea47 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-15T13:59:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Judicializacao_politica.pdf: 1824110 bytes, checksum: d4d9346fd29b7595c86112cc5100ea47 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-02 / Nenhuma / A Lei Complementar nº 135, de 2010, pretendeu, desde a intervenção popular – presente no âmbito da democracia participativa –, inaugurar uma nova fase no processo da democracia representativa brasileira, trazendo para o campo das inelegibilidades novos pressupostos de legitimidade para a política. Contudo, tal proposição arrastou o debate em torno ao tema para o ambiente da jurisdição (constitucional, em particular), bem como para a “justiça especializada” eleitoral. Este é o quadro que referencia o debate posto nesta dissertação, nos fazendo transitar pela tradição democrática, pelo tema das inelegibilidades, pelo constitucionalismo e suas garantias, pelo perfil do Estado contemporâneo e pelo papel de suas instituições. Ao final, as questões abertas, que pautaram o debate, levaram a novos lugares e novas interrogações. / The Complementary Law nº 135 of 2010, intended, since the popular intervention - present within the participatory democracy, to inaugurate a new phase in the process of representative democracy in Brazil, bringing to the field of ineligibility new assumptions of legitimacy for the policy. However, such a proposition dragged the debate on the issue of jurisdiction for the environment (constitutional, in particular) as well as "justice specialist" election. This is the reference frame that put the debate in this dissertation, making us walk around the democratic tradition, the issue of ineligibility, the constitutionalism and its guarantees, the profile of the contemporary state and the role of their institutions. In the end, the open questions, which guided the debate, led to new places and new questions.

Page generated in 0.1569 seconds