Interactive gambling transactions take place over the internet, which is essentially a borderless environment. Typically, interactive gambling providers are located off-shore in tax-friendly destinations in order to maximise their profits. In the context of cross-border transactions, value-added tax (VAT) place of supply rules provide certainty regarding where a supply is deemed to take place in order to determine the correct treatment for VAT purposes. In contrast to a number of other countries, South Africa has limited place of supply rules. This creates uncertainty regarding where the activities of a non-resident supplier is deemed to take place. The absence of detailed place of supply rules impacts on the determination of whether the transaction will be liable to VAT in South Africa and also creates uncertainty regarding whether or not a non-resident is liable to register for VAT in South Africa. The main purpose of this study is to critically analyse the South African VAT implications of interactive gambling in the absence of detailed place of supply rules. This objective is achieved by analysing the South African VAT Act in the context of interactive gambling legislation to determine whether it succeeds in providing certainty regarding the place of supply of interactive gambling for purposes of the VAT Act. This analysis highlights the problems associated with the limited place of supply rules in South Africa. This study also critically analyses the legislation in a number of countries with place of supply rules from a South African perspective. The study concludes that the VAT place of supply rules in South Africa are not specific enough to create certainty regarding where the supplies of a non-resident interactive gambling supplier to a South African resident is deemed to take place and consequently whether the supply will be subject to VAT in South Africa. This may result in a failure to bring these transactions within the VAT net. The study further concludes that the place of supply rules in the European Union are in line with the guidelines issued by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as well as recent South African case law (albeit not specifically related to the place of supply for VAT purposes), which indicates that interactive gambling transactions should be taxed where the consumer is situated. By implementing place of supply rules based on European legislation, through amending the current legislation or by issuing interpretation guidance, the problems associated with the limited place of supply rules in South Africa can be alleviated. This will also ensure that South African providers of interactive gambling services can compete on an equal footing with off-shore providers. AFRIKAANS : Inter-aktiewe dobbel transaksies vind plaas oor die internet, wat in beginsel ‘n grenslose omgewing is. Die verskaffers van inter-aktiewe dobbel dienste is tipies nie-inwoners wat gebaseer is in belastingvriendelike bestemmings om sodoende hulle winste te maksimeer. In die konteks van hierdie oorgrens transaksies, verskaf plek van lewering reëls duidelikheid oor waar lewering geag word plaas te vind om sodoende die korrekte behandeling in terme van belasting op toegevoegde waarde (BTW) vas te stel. Anders is in verskeie ander lande, het Suid-Afrika beperkte plek van lewering reëls. Dit veroorsaak onduidelikheid oor waar die aktiwiteite van ‘n nie-inwoner geag word plaas te vind. Die afwesigheid van gedetailleerde plek van lewering reels gee ook aanleiding tot onsekerheid oor of die transaksies van die nie-inwoner onderworpe sal wees aan BTW in Suid-Afrika, asook oor die verpligting van die nie-inwoner om in Suid-Afrika vir BTW te registreer. Hierdie studie het ten doel om die Suid-Afrikaanse BTW gevolge van inter-aktiewe dobbel in die afwesigheid van plek van lewering reëls krities te analiseer. Dit word bereik deur die BTW-wet in die konteks van inter-aktiewe dobbel te ontleed om sodoende vas te stel of die BTW-wet daarin slaag om duidelikheid te verskaf oor die plek van lewering van oorgrens inter-aktiewe dobbel transaksies. Hierdie analise bring die probleme wat gepaard gaan met die beperkte plek van lewering reels in Suid-Afrika na vore. Die studie kom tot die slotsom dat die huidige BTW plek van lewering reels in Suid-Afrika nie spesifiek genoeg is om duidelikheid te verskaf oor waar ‘n nie-inwoner se lewering van inter-aktiewe dobbel dienste aan ‘n Suid-Afrikaanse inwoner geag word plaas te vind nie. Gevolglik is daar onduidelikheid oor of hierdie transaksies onderworpe sal wees aan BTW in Suid-Afrika. Dit mag tot gevolg hê dat hierdie transaksies moontlik die Suid-Afrikaanse BTW-net ontglip. Die studie kom verder tot die gevolgtrekking dat die plek van lewering reëls wat in die Europese Unie toegepas word, bepaal dat inter-aktiewe dobbel transaksies vir BTW doeleindes belasbaar is waar die klient geleë is. Dit is in ooreenstemming met die riglyne van die OECD, sowel as onlangse Suid-Afrikaanse regspraak (alhoewel die betrokke hofsaak nie spesifiek die plek van lewering vir BTW doeleindes aangespreek het nie). Deur soortgelyke plek van lewering reëls in Suid-Afrika te implementeer kan die probleme wat met die beperkte plek van lewering reëls gepaard gaan, verminder word. Dit kan vermag word deur bestaande wetgewing te wysig of deur interpretasie riglyne deur die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomstediens uit te reik. Die implementering van plek van lewering reëls sal ook verseker dat Suid-Afrikaanse verskaffers van inter-aktiewe dobbel dienste op ‘n gelyke voet met nie-inwoners kan kompeteer. / Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Taxation / unrestricted

Gambling has proven to be an ever growing industry and triggered tax regulating authorities in different countries to review the taxation on the income of the providers and even the individuals constantly entering into gambling transactions. South Africa is no exception to this and during the 2010 budget speech the National Treasury has indicated their intention to review the taxation of gambling winnings in the hands of the gambler. Currently only the professional gambler is taxed on his gambling winnings in South Africa. Although prior research has been performed on the taxation of gambling winnings in the United States and Australia, no research on this topic has been performed from a South African perspective. This study extends on these prior studies by performing an analysis of the taxation of gambling winnings in the hands of the individual from a South African perspective. The aim of this study is to determine how South Africa can amend the current income tax legislation effectively to include gambling winnings in the personal income tax of all gamblers. From a theoretical perspective, the study aims to identify alternative ways to tax gambling winnings which is currently not included in South African legislation and practices. Although the provision and participation in interactive gambling remain illegal within the borders of South Africa, this study aims to investigate the legalisation and/or regulation thereof as an alternative to the taxation of gambling winnings in the hands of all gamblers. This study discusses the administrative burden on the tax payer and the gambling provider if the National Treasury considers taxing gambling winnings in the hands of all gamblers and concluded that the status quo against the taxation of gambling winnings of the casual gambler should prevail. Consideration should be given to legalise and regulate interactive gambling as an alternative in order to broaden the tax base. AFRIKAANS : Dobbelary groei van krag tot krag en dit is juis as gevolg van hierdie groei dat die belastingowerhede in verskeie lande besluit het om die belasting op die inkomste van dobbeloperateurs en dobbelaars gereeld te hersien. Suid-Afrika is geen uitsondering nie en die Nasionale Tesourie het tydens die 2010 begrotingsrede aangedui dat hulle die belastinghantering van inkomste verkry uit dobbelary in die hande van die dobbelaar gaan hersien. Tans word slegs die inkomste van die professionele dobbelaar in Suid-Afrika belas. Alhoewel die belastinghantering van inkomste uit dobbelary voorheen in die Verenigde State en Australië nagevors is, bestaan geen navorsing van hierdie aard oor die situasie in Suid-Afrika nie. Hierdie studie is ’n uitbreiding van hierdie vorige navorsing deur middel van ’n analise van die belastinghantering van inkomste uit dobbelary in die hande van dobbelaars in Suid-Afrika. Die studie het ten doel om vas te stel hoe Suid-Afrika se huidige inkomstebelastingwetgewing effektief gewysig kan word om inkomste uit dobbelary in die persoonlike inkomstebelasting van alle dobbelaars in te sluit. Vanuit ’n teoretiese perspektief poog die studie om alternatiewe belastinghanterings van inkomste uit dobbelary te identifiseer wat tans nie in Suid-Afrikaanse wetgewing en praktyke vervat is nie. Alhoewel interaktiewe dobbelary onwettig is in Suid-Afrika, ondersoek hierdie studie die bekragtiging en regulering van die voorsiening en deelname daaraan as ’n alternatief tot die belasting op inkomste uit dobbelary in die hande van elke dobbelaar. Die studie bespreek die administratiewe las op die dobbeloperateur sowel as die dobbelaar indien die Nasionale Tesourie sou oorweeg om die inkomste uit dobbelary in die hande van elke dobbelaar te belas en kom tot die slotsom dat die huidige hantering waar inkomste van die geleentheidsdobbelaar nie belas word nie, in plek moet bly. Oorweging moet geskenk word aan die bekragtiging en regulering van interaktiewe dobbelary as ’n alternatief om sodoende die belastingbasis te vergroot. / Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Taxation / Unrestricted

There has been a continuous increase in the popularity of interactive gambling in South Africa due to the wide range of channels in which the public can now quickly and easily access gambling opportunities. Although there is uncertainty related to whether or not interactive gambling is considered to be legal in South Africa, the total value of income earned from interactive gambling by South African residents is conservatively estimated to be between R4 billion and R10 billion per year. Unfortunately, due to the fact that interactive gambling does not have national boundaries, it is difficult to determine the true worth of the industry. There appears to be no academic research which has examined whether income received from interactive gambling qualifies to be taxed in terms of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. This study will contribute to an academic understanding of the interactive gambling industry in South Africa and an understanding of the South African Revenue Service’s (SARS’s) policies and practices relating to the taxation of income earned from interactive gambling by resident South African individuals. The purpose of this study was to critically analyse whether income earned from interactive gambling by resident South African individuals should be taxed by SARS. This study also investigated which laws currently regulate the interactive gambling industry within South Africa and how the regulation and taxation of interactive gambling in South Africa compares to that of other developing and developed countries. This study also investigated the legality and estimated value of interactive gambling income earned in South Africa by resident South African individuals. This study concluded that income earned from interactive gambling should be subject to either normal income tax or to capital gains tax (CGT), depending on the intention of the taxpayer. This study noted that enforcing regular reporting from local licensed interactive gambling service providers would be the best method of effectively collecting tax that is owed by interactive gamblers on income generated from this form of gambling in South Africa. This study further concluded that the most appropriate regulatory model to be applied in South Africa would be a protectionist model. This model protects the residents of a country by having a regulated interactive gambling industry that is protected from outside intruders. A regulated industry will result in economic benefits such as taxation, investment and employment within South Africa. The difficulties associated with electronic-commerce could be overcome through regulation of the industry which would be beneficial to SARS. AFRIKAANS : Inter-aktiewe dobbel onder die Suid-Afrikaanse publiek is baie populêr en het ‘n voortgesette toename vanweë die beskikbaarheid en toeganklikheid wat deur tegnologie daargestel word. Alhoewel daar onsekerheid is aangaande of inter-aktiewe dobbel wettig is al dan nie, word die inkomste wat deur Suid Afrikaanse inwoners verdien word konserwatief geraam en beloop tussen R4 en R10 biljoen per jaar. Aangesien die toeganklikheid wat deur die internet gebied word nie net tot Suid-Afrika beperk is nie, maar wêreldwyd strek, is dit feitlik onmoonlik om die waarde van die industrie te bepaal. Daar is tot op hede geen akademiese navorsing gedoen om te bepaal of inkomste verdien uit inter-aktiewe dobbel belasbaar is ingevolge die Inkomstebelastingwet 58 van 1962. Hierdie studie sal bydra tot ‘n akademiese begrip van SARS se beleid en die toepassing daarvan op inkomste verdien uit inter-aktiewe dobbel deur Suid-Afrikaanse individue. Dus was die doel van hierdie navorsingstudie om te bepaal of inkomste verdien uit interaktiewe dobbel deur ‘n Suid Afrikaanse individu deur SARS belasbaar is of nie en die aspekte krities te analiseer. Hierdie studie ondersoek ook die wette wat huidiglik die belasbaarheid van inkomste uit inter-aktiewe dobbel in Suid Afrika reguleer asook hoe die regulasies vergelyk met die van ander ontwikkelende en onwikkelde lande. Verder word ondersoek ingestel om die wettigheid van inter-aktiewe dobbel en die waarde daarvan te bepaal. Die gevolgtrekking is dat inkomste verdien uit inter-aktiewe dobbel onderhewig moet wees aan of normale belasting of kapitaalwinsbelasting. Die navorsing en studie toon ook dat daar gelisensieerde inter-aktiewe dobbel diensverskaffers moet wees wat dan die invordering van die inkomste uit hierdie tipe dobbel kan beheer en dat inter-aktiewe dobbelaars wel die nodige belasting oorbetaal uit inkomste verdien in Suid-Afrika op hierdie manier. Ter afsluiting van die navorsing word daar ‘n model voorgestel wat toegepas moet word in Suid-Afrika, eerstens om die inwoners van die land te beskerm deur ‘n goed-gereguleerde inter-aktiewe dobbel stelsel daar te stel en tweedens moet daar ook die nodige beskerming verleen word teen buitelandse indringers. ‘n Goed gereguleerde model vir die industrie sal voordelig wees vir Suid Afrika deurdat die belasbaarheid van die inter-aktiewe dobbelinkomste ‘n inspuiting vir die ekonomie kan wees, sowel as werkskeppingvoordele bied. Wetstoepassing en regulering van die industrie sal ook voordelig wees vir SARS aangesien die probleme wat nou geassosieer word met elektroniese-handel voorkom en tot die minimum beperk kan word. / Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Taxation / unrestricted

With the exception of horse racing, any form of gambling was criminalised in South Africa until the dawn of constitutional democracy in 1994. In the same year, the Lotteries and Gambling Board Act, 1993, came into force decriminalising, amongst others, casinos and gambling games within the Republic. This Act has since been repealed and gambling is governed by the National Gambling Act, 2004, as well as by provincial gambling laws. Interactive / online gambling is illegal pending authorisation by a national legislation. Such legislation, the National Gambling Amendment Act, 2008, seeking to regulate interactive gambling awaits proclamation of the date of its commencement by the President. The National Gambling Policy, 2016, dashes any hope of regulation of interactive gambling, however, as it seeks to embargo the introduction of (new) forms of gambling, including but not limited to interactive gambling. The scourge of problem gambling and the protection of traditional forms of gambling, that is, casinos, are the main reasons for advocating for the continued prohibition of interactive gambling. Problem gambling is not unique to interactive gambling, but affects all modes of gambling. South Africa is among countries with a high rate of problem gambling. It is feared that interactive gambling will exacerbate the scourge of problem gambling as gamblers with access to the internet will now have unlimited gambling opportunities around the clock. On the other hand, interactive gambling offers practical solutions to the implementation of harm minimisation strategies to deal with problem gambling such as limitations on gambling deposits, losses and time. Prohibition of interactive gambling is difficult to enforce and deprives the country of an opportunity to control, through licensing, this mode of gambling and possible benefit from taxation and licensing fees. It further exposes gamblers – who despite prohibition choose this mode of gambling – to unregulated and illegal gambling websites. This thesis attempts to provide safeguards for regulation of interactive gambling and to embrace the benefits of the technological development that makes interactive gambling a reality. The United Kingdom (UK) is a prime example of a country that has successfully legalised and licensed interactive gambling in its jurisdiction. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL. D.