As the investment treaty arbitration regime matures, consensus is emerging as to the need for public interest considerations to be taken into account in resolving disputes under international investment agreements (IIAs). However, the question of how such considerations should be reflected remains contentious. This thesis proposes that the remedies stage of the process can, and should, play a role in taking account of public interest considerations and so in easing the tension between host state regulatory sovereignty and investment protection that lies at the heart of the investment treaty regime. Thus, this thesis argues that, while, on the one hand, there is a need to introduce an element of reciprocity into the investment treaty arbitration process in order to ensure continuing state co-operation and to reflect the broader underlying purposes of IIAs, on the other, the primary object of the system remains the protection of foreign investors. These competing imperatives can lead to difficulties in taking account of public interest considerations at the merits stage of the arbitration process. Therefore, in order to reconcile these competing imperatives and to achieve an optimal balance between host state regulatory sovereignty and investment protection, this thesis proposes that public interest considerations should be recognised at the remedies stage where such considerations cannot be taken into account either sufficiently or at all at the merits stage and identifies a number of situations in which this approach would be appropriate. Potential doctrinal bases for implementation of this approach are also examined and the conclusion reached that, given the significant degree of discretion afforded to tribunals in applying the full reparation principle and the role that equity can permissibly play in quantifying damages, this approach can, save in the case of lawful expropriations, be implemented within the parameters of existing legal principles.

1 ABSTRACT Implications of Termination of International Investment Agreements The international investment arbitration proceedings under the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States ("ICSID arbitration proceedings" and "ICSID Convention") represents predominantly used mechanism of Investor-state dispute settlement. The adjudicative system of investment arbitration resolving disputes concerning breaches of foreign investment protection within the territory of the host states granted by bilateral investment treaties ("BITs") faces increasing criticism. The reluctance to abide by the binding awards of the arbitral tribunals on behalf of the host states and evolving displeasure towards the ICSID arbitration system triggered the wave of terminations of international investment agreements initiated by the states of the Latin America. Termination of international investment agreements significantly disturbs the procedural protection of foreign investments and ultimately deprives the foreign investors of the right to have their claims against the host states heard in designated arbitration forum. The ICSID arbitration proceedings are characteristic for the interconnection between international investment agreements, particularly the ICSID Convention...

Doctor Legum - LLD / The existing traditional international investment law regime which is largely based on the conventional European and North American Model Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) has come under intense criticism. The argument is that this regime, among other things, prioritises the protection of foreign investors and investments while sidelining significant public interest issues of the host countries. The inability to adequately accommodate public interest issues in the international investment law has unduly constrained the host countries’ sovereign right to regulate investments in public interests and pursue their public policy objectives.

O Direito e o investimento estrangeiro guardam uma relação muito íntima. Sabese que o Direito exerce o papel de induzir ou de reduzir o investimento estrangeiro, tendo em conta o tratamento legal conferido ao receber capital ou bens vindos do exterior. O núcleo central da presente tese é o estrangeiro. Costuma-se estudar a relação de investimento, porém é exatamente sobre a discriminação no tratamento conferido ao investidor estrangeiro que reside o principal papel a ser exercido pelo Direito Internacional do Investimento. Diante desta falha metodológica, a presente tese propõe-se estudar uma nova aproximação metodológica para o Direito Internacional do Investimento, sobretudo para adequar sua análise do contemporâneo Direito Internacional Público e seu princípio da cooperação internacional. Ao final da presente tese, conclui-se que o Direito Internacional do Investimento tem analisado as relações das chamadas Empresas Transnacionais e desconsiderado as pequenas e médias empresas, cuja participação no cenário internacional deve ser incentivada, em especial por meio do associativismo, entre empresas nacionais e estrangeiras. / The law and foreign investment maintain a very close relationship. It is known that the law plays the role of inducing or reducing foreign investment, taking into account the legal treatment given to capital or goods received from abroad. The core of this thesis is the foreigner. It is often study the investment relationship, but it is exactly on discrimination in treatment given to foreign investors that lay the main role to be exercised by international Law Investment. Given this methodological weakness, this thesis proposes to study a new methodological approach to the International Investment Law, mainly to adjust its analysis to contemporary International Law and its principle of international cooperation. At the end of this thesis, it is concluded that the International Investment Law already has explored the relationship of the Transnational Corporations and yet disregarded the small and medium companies, whose involvement in the international arena should be encouraged, in particular through associations, among national and foreign companies.

No contexto de avanço da globalização, o Investimento Estrangeiro Direto (IED) mostra-se como um dos principais veículos para a inserção internacional dos países. Como os objetivos das empresas transnacionais e dos Estados hospedeiros não são os mesmos, há a necessidade de adoção de políticas que levem à convergência. No plano legal, observou-se nas últimas décadas a consolidação do regime internacional dos investimentos, com o crescimento exponencial do número de tratados de investimento e de arbitragens investidor-Estado fundadas nos mesmos. Mas há insatisfações de parte a parte com o sistema. Por um lado, os países tentam limitar o ativismo dos árbitros mediante a revisão de seus tratados. Por outro, tanto os investidores como os Estados começam a perceber que não há vencedores reais na arbitragem, dadas as suas diversas deficiências. Nomeadamente: custos elevados, longa duração, incoerência nas decisões e desgaste para as relações investidor-Estado no longo prazo. Nesse diapasão, surgem propostas de alternativas. Pensadores do sistema, valendo-se do Planejamento de Sistemas de Disputas, têm desenvolvido Políticas de Prevenção de Controvérsias. Tais políticas fundamentam-se nas dinâmicas de busca de soluções baseadas em interesses contrapostas às baseadas na força e nos direitos seguindo processos de administração precoce de conflitos. Diversos países, em diferentes níveis de desenvolvimento, têm tido êxito na implementação dessas políticas. A difusão das melhores práticas, movimento apoiado por organizações internacionais, oferece oportunidades para a melhora da governança, através da promoção de maior coerência e coordenação nas ações do Estado, da transparência e do império da lei. O tema é de interesse para o Brasil, país que, diferentemente dos demais, nunca ratificou um único tratado de investimento. Isso porque já surgem vozes na indústria clamando por uma mudança de posição, diante da emergência do país também como um exportador de capital. Caso tal inflexão se confirme, o Brasil tem a oportunidade de tomar partido das melhores experiências internacionais, usando tais tratados como instrumentos na sua estratégia de desenvolvimento. / Against the background of globalization, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is perceived as one of the key vehicles in the pursuit of countries for global insertion. Since the purposes of transnational corporations and host States do not coincide, there is a need to implement policies leading to convergence. In the legal dimension, the last two decades have witnessed the consolidation of the international investment regime, with an exponential growth in the number of investment treaties and investor-State arbitration proceedings based on them. However, both sides are experiencing discontent with the current system. On the one hand, countries attempt to limit arbitrators activism, undertaking a review of treaties they are parties to. On the other, both investors and States have come to realize that there are no true winners in arbitration, in light of its several shortcomings. Namely: high costs, long duration, discrepant decisions and damages to the long term relationship between investors and States. In line with these concerns, several proposals for alternatives have come to light. System thinkers, based on concepts of Dispute Systems Design, have been developing Dispute Prevention Policies. Such policies are rooted in seeking interest-based solutions as opposed to power and rights-based ones following processes of early conflict management. Several countries, with varying levels of development, have succeeded in implementing such policies. Spreading best practices, an initiative supported by international organizations, allows for improvements in domestic governance, through the promotion of greater coherence and coordination in State actions, transparency and the rule of law. This matter is of interest to Brazil, a country that, unlike others, has never ratified a single investment treaty. There are now growing demands from Brazilian corporations for a shift in position, in view of the countrys emergence as a source of outward FDI. Should such a shift take place, Brazil has in its hands the opportunity to learn from international best practices and use such treaties as instruments in its development strategy.

No contexto de avanço da globalização, o Investimento Estrangeiro Direto (IED) mostra-se como um dos principais veículos para a inserção internacional dos países. Como os objetivos das empresas transnacionais e dos Estados hospedeiros não são os mesmos, há a necessidade de adoção de políticas que levem à convergência. No plano legal, observou-se nas últimas décadas a consolidação do regime internacional dos investimentos, com o crescimento exponencial do número de tratados de investimento e de arbitragens investidor-Estado fundadas nos mesmos. Mas há insatisfações de parte a parte com o sistema. Por um lado, os países tentam limitar o ativismo dos árbitros mediante a revisão de seus tratados. Por outro, tanto os investidores como os Estados começam a perceber que não há vencedores reais na arbitragem, dadas as suas diversas deficiências. Nomeadamente: custos elevados, longa duração, incoerência nas decisões e desgaste para as relações investidor-Estado no longo prazo. Nesse diapasão, surgem propostas de alternativas. Pensadores do sistema, valendo-se do Planejamento de Sistemas de Disputas, têm desenvolvido Políticas de Prevenção de Controvérsias. Tais políticas fundamentam-se nas dinâmicas de busca de soluções baseadas em interesses contrapostas às baseadas na força e nos direitos seguindo processos de administração precoce de conflitos. Diversos países, em diferentes níveis de desenvolvimento, têm tido êxito na implementação dessas políticas. A difusão das melhores práticas, movimento apoiado por organizações internacionais, oferece oportunidades para a melhora da governança, através da promoção de maior coerência e coordenação nas ações do Estado, da transparência e do império da lei. O tema é de interesse para o Brasil, país que, diferentemente dos demais, nunca ratificou um único tratado de investimento. Isso porque já surgem vozes na indústria clamando por uma mudança de posição, diante da emergência do país também como um exportador de capital. Caso tal inflexão se confirme, o Brasil tem a oportunidade de tomar partido das melhores experiências internacionais, usando tais tratados como instrumentos na sua estratégia de desenvolvimento. / Against the background of globalization, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is perceived as one of the key vehicles in the pursuit of countries for global insertion. Since the purposes of transnational corporations and host States do not coincide, there is a need to implement policies leading to convergence. In the legal dimension, the last two decades have witnessed the consolidation of the international investment regime, with an exponential growth in the number of investment treaties and investor-State arbitration proceedings based on them. However, both sides are experiencing discontent with the current system. On the one hand, countries attempt to limit arbitrators activism, undertaking a review of treaties they are parties to. On the other, both investors and States have come to realize that there are no true winners in arbitration, in light of its several shortcomings. Namely: high costs, long duration, discrepant decisions and damages to the long term relationship between investors and States. In line with these concerns, several proposals for alternatives have come to light. System thinkers, based on concepts of Dispute Systems Design, have been developing Dispute Prevention Policies. Such policies are rooted in seeking interest-based solutions as opposed to power and rights-based ones following processes of early conflict management. Several countries, with varying levels of development, have succeeded in implementing such policies. Spreading best practices, an initiative supported by international organizations, allows for improvements in domestic governance, through the promotion of greater coherence and coordination in State actions, transparency and the rule of law. This matter is of interest to Brazil, a country that, unlike others, has never ratified a single investment treaty. There are now growing demands from Brazilian corporations for a shift in position, in view of the countrys emergence as a source of outward FDI. Should such a shift take place, Brazil has in its hands the opportunity to learn from international best practices and use such treaties as instruments in its development strategy.

O Direito e o investimento estrangeiro guardam uma relação muito íntima. Sabese que o Direito exerce o papel de induzir ou de reduzir o investimento estrangeiro, tendo em conta o tratamento legal conferido ao receber capital ou bens vindos do exterior. O núcleo central da presente tese é o estrangeiro. Costuma-se estudar a relação de investimento, porém é exatamente sobre a discriminação no tratamento conferido ao investidor estrangeiro que reside o principal papel a ser exercido pelo Direito Internacional do Investimento. Diante desta falha metodológica, a presente tese propõe-se estudar uma nova aproximação metodológica para o Direito Internacional do Investimento, sobretudo para adequar sua análise do contemporâneo Direito Internacional Público e seu princípio da cooperação internacional. Ao final da presente tese, conclui-se que o Direito Internacional do Investimento tem analisado as relações das chamadas Empresas Transnacionais e desconsiderado as pequenas e médias empresas, cuja participação no cenário internacional deve ser incentivada, em especial por meio do associativismo, entre empresas nacionais e estrangeiras. / The law and foreign investment maintain a very close relationship. It is known that the law plays the role of inducing or reducing foreign investment, taking into account the legal treatment given to capital or goods received from abroad. The core of this thesis is the foreigner. It is often study the investment relationship, but it is exactly on discrimination in treatment given to foreign investors that lay the main role to be exercised by international Law Investment. Given this methodological weakness, this thesis proposes to study a new methodological approach to the International Investment Law, mainly to adjust its analysis to contemporary International Law and its principle of international cooperation. At the end of this thesis, it is concluded that the International Investment Law already has explored the relationship of the Transnational Corporations and yet disregarded the small and medium companies, whose involvement in the international arena should be encouraged, in particular through associations, among national and foreign companies.

Magister Legum - LLM (Mercantile and Labour Law) / Most developed countries that enjoy the lion's share of foreign investment do not have domestic legal frameworks on foreign direct investment. This is because investors are attracted by a holistic picture of these countries. Such countries have strong institutions of governance, enjoy political and economic stability, embrace democracy, have respect for rights, and have high levels of development - factors which attract investors. In terms of regulation, many of these countries are heavily reliant on bilateral investment treaties. However, this is not the case in developing countries such as Zimbabwe. The existence of an effective and efficient legal framework on the governance of foreign direct investment is an important consideration for investors. This emanates from the fact that developing countries often have weak legal systems, shaky economies and uncertain political environments.

Magister Legum - LLM

TREATY SHOPPING IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW ABSTRACT Treaty shopping is a term used to describe a change of the corporate structure of an investor with the aim of falling within the scope of a chosen investment treaty that would otherwise not be accessible to the investor in order to take advantage of its benefits. This thesis offers a comprehensive overview and analysis of treaty shopping in international investment law with the aim of clarifying what the limits of treaty shopping are and whether they are currently taken into account by investment tribunals. The thesis first examines several related theoretical issues. After introducing the notion of treaty shopping and outlining the negative impacts it may have (Chapter 1), the attention is turned to the question of how to approach the nationality of legal persons in international law and under investment treaties, since nationality is the key concept that enables treaty shopping (Chapter 2). Different corporate nationality criteria - incorporation, seat, control and effective activities - are introduced and described. The chapter also strives to illuminate how nationality is understood under the ICSID Convention. The subsequent analysis focuses on the denial of benefits clauses (Chapter 3) that are inserted into some treaties to prevent treaty...