Práce se zabývá rizikovým a rozvojovým kapitálem, který se dostává do popředí zájmu nejen velkých investorů jakými jsou u nás především banky, pojišťovny a penzijní fondy, ale také státu, který si začal uvědomovat důležitost rizikového kapitálu jako zdroje financování malých a středních podniků. U rizikového a rozvojového kapitálu v užším slova smyslu tzn. venture capital jde především o investice do společností s vysokým růstovým potenciálem v raných fázích růstu společnosti, formou vkladu do základního kapitálu. Kapitál může být poskytnut k financování rozšíření výrobní kapacity, průniku na nové trhy nebo vývoj nového výrobku, popřípadě dalšího provozního kapitálu.

Český akciový trh v posledních letech zažíval neuvěřitelný boom. V roce 2004 rostl pražský index PX meziročně o 56,6%, v roce 2005 o 42,73% a nakonec v roce 2006 o 5,8%. Byly období, kdy pražská burza rostla nejvíce z celé Evropy. Zažila ale také několik korekcí svého vývoje. A právě na analýze těchto korekcích se snažím v mé diplomové práci najít faktory ovlivňující český akciový trh nejvíce. Co bylo jejich příčinou? Proč index PX ztrácel na hodnotě? Jsou to vyspělé trhy, které ovlivňují pražský trh nejvíce, je to vývoj ve střední Evropě, nebo je snad Praha k těmto vlivům imunní? Ovlivňuje nějakým způsobem pražský akciový trh cena ropy? Byl největší propad na burze v historii (v roce 2006 během cca. měsíce propad o 24,74%) způsoben událostmi v USA, nebo byla prvotní příčina někde úplně jinde? Domnívám se, že nalezením odpovědí na výše položené otázky definuji faktory, které český akciový trh ovlivňují nejvíce. Nejprve analyzuji jednotlivá období(propady českého akciového trhu v letech 2004, 2005 a 2006) a poté provádím průnik nejdůležitějších faktorů pro definování těch pro pražskou burzu nejvýznamějších.

Tato práce se zabývá strategií investování do nemovitostí prostřednictvím speciálních fondů kvalifikovaných investorů. Analyzuje ekonomickou podstatu těchto investic a otázky související s jejich výnosností a rizikem. Dále specifikuje organizační uspořádání investičního procesu v zahraničí i v České republice a uvádí hlavní trendy investičního odvětví. V praktické části práce je vytvořena modelová investiční strategie nemovitostního fondu kvalifikovaných investorů, na kterou navazuje kapitola věnovaná vytváření plánu peněžních toků modelového fondu.

Traditional asset pricing models such as Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) have been used widely in academics and practice due to their simplicity and popularity. The CAPM is a prescriptive model that describes the relationship between a stock’s required return and risk relative to the movements in the market, while the DCF is a descriptive model that measures the realized rate of return on a stock based on the market price of the stock, which in turn incorporates investor perceptions about the stock and the market. In an ideal, efficient market where investors behave rationally, we should not see much of a difference between stock returns estimated from these two models. However, because investor perceptions affect the DCF estimate of returns, changes in investor confidence without accompanying changes in firm risk can affect the DCF estimate without changing the CAPM estimate. High growth firm returns are more likely to incorporate changes in investor perception because more of their value is generated from realization of future growth opportunities. In this research, I study whether investor sentiment affects the DCF estimate of stock return more than the CAPM estimate, and whether this impact is more pronounced for high growth firms. I find results consistent with this hypothesis. I find that investor sentiment causes a divergence between the CAPM and DCF estimates of stock returns, and this divergence is higher for high growth firms compared to low growth firms. My findings suggest that high growth firm stock prices are more prone to distortions due to hype or investor pessimism.

This study investigates whether market learning explains the absence of the accrual anomaly in recent years by examining three conditions associated with the presence of the anomaly in prior research: (i) a differential relation between future earnings and cash flows versus accruals, (ii) incorrect weighting of cash flows and accruals by investors when predicting earnings, and (iii) association of earnings forecast errors with returns. All of these conditions are widely documented in the anomaly period. In the no-anomaly period, I continue to find a differential relation of cash flows and accruals with future earnings. However, investors appear to correctly weight accruals and cash flows in their earnings predictions implicit in beginning-of-year security prices, consistent with learning. This study also investigates whether improvements in analyst forecasts contribute to investor learning and the absence of the anomaly. The association between analyst optimism and accruals is weaker in the no-anomaly period, but is still statistically significant. Furthermore, the anomaly ended simultaneously for firms followed by analysts and for non-followed firms, suggesting that improvements in analyst forecasts alone cannot account for improved market efficiency with respect to accruals. The results suggest that the anomaly was similar for firms held by institutional investors and for firms with no institutional holdings before the discovery of the anomaly while the anomaly ended sooner for held firms than for non-held firms after the discovery of the anomaly, consistent with the conjecture that arbitrage by institutional investors reduce the anomaly. Overall, the findings are consistent with market learning and suggest that improvement in investors' interpretation of accruals after the discovery of the anomaly explains the end of the anomaly. This improvement in investor learning is not due to changes in analysts' forecasting behavior, however.

Introduction: When the American investment bank Morgan Stanley suddenly decide to increase their target stock price of the Ericsson stock by 100 percent, it became the point of origin for our interest in investor relations. In this particular case the increase of target stock price was announced right after new Morgan Stanley analysts started covering the stock. Why this tremendous increase in target stock price, we will probably never know. Perhaps the new analysts perceived the information disclosed from Ericsson’s investor re-lations function different from the prior analyst, and ended up in adjusting the target stock price. Problem: Stock prices today are very dependent on the market expectations of future company growth. Market actors estimate the potential growth by analysing information disclosed by the company. It has therefore become increasingly important for companies to manage their investor relations with a strategic marketing perspective to be able to meet the internal and external needs. Companies must also present themselves to investors in a way that appeals both on a rational and an emotional level. Once new investors are attracted and old ones are kept, companies must constantly communicate about their performance to uphold investors trust and there by creating or maintain long-term relationships. Purpose: The purpose is to explore if and how a marketing perspective is applicable when managing investor relations in traded companies. Method: This study has been conducted with qualitative research method. Collection of empirical data has been done through six semi-structured interviews with directors and managers whom all work with investor relations for their respective company. The six par-ticipating companies are all traded on the Stockholm stock exchange. The collected data were first analysed with the Kotler, Kartajaya & Young (2004) model and secondly ana-lyzed from a relationship marketing point of view. Analysis: The analysis shows that our sample of companies subconsciously work in align-ment with the Kotler et al. (2004) model and that they also work with different types of re-lationship marketing. Together this provides a holistic image of how traded companies work with a marketing perspective in their investor relations. Conclusion: After having analysed our empirical findings it is our belief that a marketing perspective is applicable when managing investor relations.

Investor Relations is a function used by companies to compete for capital by creating relations with investors. It is a young function, earlier practiced by the same people who had responsible for exercising the Public Relations. Investor Relations has evolved a great deal lately but there are still no concrete theories behind the function. The aim though is clear and there are literature explaining how to practice the different parts. The most research within Investor Relations uses the theory of Relationship Marketing. Lately the two authors Hägg and Preiholt have started to examine what they call Financial Marketing since Investor Relations is about relations between actors on financial markets primarily. In this paper, we examine the aspect of information in Investor Relations. Communication is very important for good results. Therefore it is essential that the information given to the different stakeholders is understood by everyone. The first questions is whether the information is really distributed to everyone. For this there are several legal restrictions who make sure that, at least the companies noted on the stock market, release information that can affect the stock price in a manner that is considered reaching all the stakeholders at the same time. The second question is whether the level of the information is low enough for everyone interested to understand. There is a tendency to insert a text box in the annual reports where some words and concepts are explained. The companies bring more complex notions into discussion when the information regarded is communicated only with more professional agents, like analytics for example. The third question treated in this paper regards how willing the noted companies are to share information beyond what is required by the legal restrictions. More than half of the content of the annual report consists of additional information. The companies are generally very open to the public and do not mind sharing information. Among the factors that stand in the way of this are first of all the question of resources, primarily financial ones. The second factor is the increasing legal restrictions. To make sure all of restrictions are being followed correct, both the resources and the creativity have to take the downside. There is also a matter of deciding what more information needs to be communicated and shared. The companies might feel that the regulations cover about everything and no more additional information is necessary. It is up to the management of any company to decide what information to communicate, how and when. Generally it is considered that the information is being well distributed to everyone interested. The problem is that not every single shareholder is really interested. In the financial market, the information is available for everyone and free to acquire. By only a phone call one can ask the CEO anything regarding the company. The primarily difference between those who are in possession of more information than others is as simple as that they spend much more time on collecting and analyzing information. In combination with their past experiences and their professional knowledge they get an advantage.

One of the main factors that spurred the 2008 financial crisis was the trading of securitized products without a clear understanding of the risks that those products bore. I argue that an appropriate regime of mandatory disclosure is the primary instrument regulators should refer to in order to correct the informational asymmetries that are present in the market for securities products. Subsequently, I take into consideration the CSA proposed legislation for the mandatory disclosure of securitized products and analyze its main components under the light of the principles of investor protection and market efficiency. I find that the new legislation should be welcome by market operators because it is a good balancing effort between the necessity to protect the investors and fostering the efficiency of the market.

One of the main factors that spurred the 2008 financial crisis was the trading of securitized products without a clear understanding of the risks that those products bore. I argue that an appropriate regime of mandatory disclosure is the primary instrument regulators should refer to in order to correct the informational asymmetries that are present in the market for securities products. Subsequently, I take into consideration the CSA proposed legislation for the mandatory disclosure of securitized products and analyze its main components under the light of the principles of investor protection and market efficiency. I find that the new legislation should be welcome by market operators because it is a good balancing effort between the necessity to protect the investors and fostering the efficiency of the market.

Seed technology ventures require external sources of debt and equity funding, once they have exhausted founders personal resources, to achieve their potential economic impact. The primary source of equity finance for seed ventures is from Business Angels who invest their own money in the company and frequently provide additional sources of assistance to the entrepreneur. Once seed ventures have completed their business plans, however informally, they pitch their opportunity to potential investors, However, less than three per cent of these pitches to Business Angels are successful. It is suggested that a major reason for this low success rates is a lack of understanding by pitching entrepreneurs of how Business Angels make their investment decisions. Investigating how Business Angels make their investment decisions will identify some of the causes of this high failure rate. In turn this will help to suggest ways for entrepreneurs to increase their likelihood of successful interactions with investors. Real-time techniques that involve observing successive interactions between five Business Angels and 150 pitching entrepreneurs are used to gather data on the investment decision-making process. The technique of observational interaction has been used in psychological research to observe interpersonal relationships and their development within the context of a complex process. This complex process can best be understood by breaking down the process into stages. In this research the initial interaction between entrepreneur and Business Angel is investigated. It is found that initially the Business Angels use a filtering technique to expeditiously reject most opportunities. This allows, allow them to concentrate their limited resources on further investigation of a few promising opportunities that appear to offer the highest potential return. The unique data set used in this research is taken from a reality TV show – CBC Dragons’ Den – where entrepreneurs participate in order to receive real investment from five wealthy individuals known as “Dragons”. Using the video material gathered during the recording of the show it is possible to observe how the five Dragons initially filter out most opportunities, before looking at more positive factors when determining their interest in investing in the few opportunities remaining. This filtering process involves a non-compensatory technique - Elimination-By-Aspects, where the presence of a single one of eight potential fatal flaws is sufficient reason for rejection. While this may not be the most accurate technique, it is the most cost effective approach to decision-making for the investors. To increase accuracy at later stages, the investors adopt a more compensatory decision-making approaches. Improved understanding of the staged nature of the process, and how Business Angels identify fatal flaws at the initial stage of the interaction, provides valuable insights to both investors and entrepreneurs. Armed with this knowledge they can take steps to eliminate such flaws and improve the overall efficiency of the decision making process. This in turn will lead to an increase in successful outcomes of such interactions and consequently the number of seed ventures that are successful in raising third-party funding from Business Angels.