Spelling suggestions: "subject:"johannesburg stock exchange."" "subject:"johannesburg stock cxchange.""
61 |
Modeling and forecasting stock return volatility in the JSE Securities ExchangeMasinga, Zamani Calvin January 2016 (has links)
Thesis (M.M. (Finance & Investment))--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, Wits Business School, 2016 / Modeling and forecasting volatility is one of the crucial functions in various fields of financial engineering, especially in the quantitative risk management departments of banks and insurance companies. Forecasting volatility is a task of any analyst in the space of portfolio management, risk management and option pricing. In this study we examined different GARCH models in Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) using univariate GARCH models (GARCH (1, 1), EGARCH (1, 1), GARCH-M (1, 1) GJR-GARCH (1, 1) and PGARCH (1, 1)).
Daily log-returns were used on JSE ALSH, Resource 20, Industrial 25 and Top 40 indices over a period of 12 years. Both symmetric and asymmetric models were examined. The results showed that GARCH (1, 1) model dominate other models both in-sample and out-of-sample in modeling the volatility clustering and leptokurtosis in financial data of JSE sectoral indices.
The results showed that the JSE All Share Index and all other indices studied here can be best modeled by GARCH (1, 1) and out-of-sample for JSE All Share index proved to be best for GARCH (1, 1). In forecasting out-of-sample EGARCH (1, 1) proved to outperformed other forecasting models based on different procedures for JSE All Share index and Top 40 but for Resource 20 RJR-GARCH (1, 1) is the best model and Industrial 25 data suggest PGARCH (1, 1) / DM2016
|
62 |
The stock market as a leading indicator of economic activity: time-series evidence from South AfricaSayed, Ayesha January 2016 (has links)
A 50% research report to be submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of:
MASTER OF COMMERCE (FINANCE)
UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND / Several studies have assessed the forward-looking characteristic of share prices and confirmed their resultant capability as leading indicators of economic activity, especially in advanced economies. Contention however exists when evaluating the role of stock markets as leading indicators for less developed countries. This study examines the validity of the stock market as a leading indicator of economic activity in South Africa using quarterly time-series data for the period January 1992 to June 2014. Causality and cointegration between the JSE All Share Index against Real GDP and Real Industrial Production is evaluated by employing Granger-causality tests and the Johansen cointegration procedure. The empirical investigation indicates that unidirectional causality exists between the nominal and real stock indices and economic activity in South Africa, and confirms a long-run relationship between the JSE and GDP and Industrial Production. Therefore, similar to the study by Auret and Golding (2012), in a South African context, the stock market is in fact a leading indicator of economic activity. / MT2017
|
63 |
An in-depth validation of momentum as a dominant explanatory factor on the Johannesburg Stock ExchangePage, Moshe Daniel January 2017 (has links)
A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, University of the Witwatersrand, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D), September 2016 / This study considers momentum in share prices, per Jegadeesh and Titman (1993, 2001), on the cross-section of shares listed on the JSE. The key research objective is to define whether momentum is significant, independent and priced. ‘Significant’ implies that momentum produces significantly positive nominal and risk-adjusted profits, ‘independent’ means that momentum is independent of other non-momentum stylistic factor premiums and finally, ‘priced’ suggests that momentum is a priced factor on the JSE and thereby contributes to the cross-sectional variation in share returns. In order to determine the significance of the momentum premium on the JSE, univariate momentum sorts are conducted that consider variation in portfolio estimation and holding periods, weighting methodologies as well as liquidity constraints, price impact and microstructure effects. The results of the univariate sorts clearly indicate that momentum on the JSE is both significant and profitable assuming estimation and holding periods between three and twelve months. Furthermore, consistent with international and local literature, momentum profits reverse assuming holding periods in excess of 24 months. In order to determine whether momentum is independent, bivariate sorts and time-series attribution regressions are conducted using momentum and six non-momentum factors, namely: Size, Value, Liquidity, Market Beta, Idiosyncratic Risk and Currency Risk. The results of the bivariate sorts and time-series attribution regressions clearly indicate that momentum on the JSE is largely independent of the nonmomentum stylistic factors considered. Lastly, cross-sectional panel regressions are conducted where momentum is applied, in conjunction with the considered non-momentum factors, as an independent variable in order assess the relationship between the factors and expected returns on a share-by-share basis. The results of the panel data cross-sectional regressions clearly indicate that momentum produces a consistently significant and independent premium, conclusively proving that momentum is a priced factor that contributes to the cross-sectional variation in share returns listed on the JSE. / XL2018
|
64 |
Stock price reaction to earnings announcements: a comparative test of market efficiency between NSE securities exchange and JSE securities exchangeRono, Hilda Chepchumba 22 August 2013 (has links)
Thesis (M.M. (Finance & Investment))--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, Graduate School of Business Administration, 2013. / This study examined stock market reaction to annual earnings announcements using the most
recent data from the Nairobi Securities Exchange (Kenya) and JSE Securities exchange
(South Africa). The period of study is 1 January 2005, to 31 December, 2011. Using the event
study methodology, the magnitude of market reaction to the earnings announcements for a
sample of 261 listed firms on NSE and JSE is tested. Abnormal returns (ARs) were computed
for each firm and tested how announcements impact a firms’ share price. The results show
positive and significant returns on the announcement month for JSE, whereas the returns for
NSE are negative and significant on the second month after announcement. In our study, JSE
and NSE observed mean CAR of (+1.64%) and (-1.8606) respectively, suggesting that
earnings contain important information for the market. We find that there is no post earnings
announcement drift observed over the next six months after the announcement. The results
are consistent with the efficient market hypothesis, thus suggesting that the Johannesburg
securities exchange and Nairobi securities exchange are informationally efficient to earnings
announcements by the sample of listed firms. Furthermore, our results show NSE firms
performed better than JSE firms during the economic boom and meltdown, whereas JSE
firms observed a good performance during the economic recession compared to NSE firms.
|
65 |
The impact of mergers and acquisitions announcements on the share price performance of acquiring companies: South African listed companiesNdlovu, Mthabisi January 2017 (has links)
Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Management in Finance & Investment
in the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management Wits Business School at the University of the Witwatersrand
2017 / This thesis empirically examines the stock market reaction to mergers and acquisitions (M&A) announcements in South Africa, and also analyses the effects of the method payment. Data was collected from 34 acquisitions, consisting of acquirer and target companies in the same industry listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, (JSE). The transactions were of mergers and acquisitions for the period 2003 – 2013. The event study methodology was used to calculate cumulative average abnormal returns for the acquiring companies over the total event window. Parametric t-tests were then applied to test the significance of the cumulative average abnormal returns, and a comparison of the pre and post-announcement returns was done over the event window. A comparison is also done for cash and share acquisitions over the entire event window (-10, +10). From the findings, it is clear that there were no significant abnormal returns or significant differences between the pre and post announcement returns. Comparing the two payment methods (cash and share payments), the results also show that there were no significant differences between these methods. The study therefore concluded that merger and acquisition announcements did not create any value for shareholders of acquiring companies during and around the announcement period. / MT2017
|
66 |
Higher moment asset pricing on the JSEBester, Johan January 2016 (has links)
Thesis (M.Com. (Finance))--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, School of Economic and Business Sciences, 2016 / The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of relaxing the assumption of multivariate normality typically utilised within the traditional asset pricing framework. This is achieved in two ways. The first involves the introduction of higher moments into the linear Capital Asset Pricing Model while the second involves a Monte Carlo experiment to determine the impact of skewness and kurtosis on test statistics traditionally employed to assess the validity of asset pricing models. We commence by establishing non-normality for the majority of sample portfolios. A cross-sectional regression approach is employed to estimate factor risk premia and test higher moment Capital Asset Pricing Models. Unconditional coskewness and unconditional cokurtosis are found to be priced within the market equity (size) sorted and book equity/market equity (value) sorted portfolio sets over the period January 1993 to December 2013. Conditional coskewness and conditional cokurtosis are found to be priced for only the size sorted portfolios over the period January 1997 to December 2013. Factor risk premia estimated for coskewness are generally positive while risk premia estimated for cokurtosis are negative. This suggests a positive relationship between coskewness and expected return and a negative relationship between cokurtosis and expected return. The results of the asset pricing model tests are mixed. The pricing errors for higher moment Capital Asset Pricing Models are shown to be significantly different from zero for size sorted portfolios while pricing errors on the value sorted, dual size-value sorted and industry portfolios are found to be statistically insignificant. This suggest that none of the asset pricing models tested are the true model as it would explain variation in expected returns regardless of the data generating process. Finally we show that the Ordinary Least Square Wald test statistic has the most desirable size characteristics while the Generalised Least Squares J-test statistic has the most desirable power characteristics when dealing with non-normal data.
|
67 |
The dynamics of market efficiency: testing the adaptive market hypothesis in South AfricaSeetharam, Yudhvir January 2016 (has links)
A thesis submitted to the School of Economic and Business Sciences, Faculty of Commerce,
Law and Management, University of the Witwatersrand in fulfilment of the requirements for
the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph/D).
Johannesburg, South Africa
June 2016 / In recent years, the debate on market efficiency has shifted to providing alternate forms of the
hypothesis, some of which are testable and can be proven false. This thesis examines one
such alternative, the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH), with a focus on providing a
framework for testing the dynamic (cyclical) notion of market efficiency using South African
equity data (44 shares and six indices) over the period 1997 to 2014. By application of this
framework, stylised facts emerged. First, the examination of market efficiency is dependent
on the frequency of data. If one were to only use a single frequency of data, one might obtain
conflicting conclusions. Second, by binning data into smaller sub-samples, one can obtain a
pattern of whether the equity market is efficient or not. In other words, one might get a
conclusion of, say, randomess, over the entire sample period of daily data, but there may be
pockets of non-randomness with the daily data. Third, by running a variety of tests, one
provides robustness to the results. This is a somewhat debateable issue as one could either run
a variety of tests (each being an improvement over the other) or argue the theoretical merits
of each test befoe selecting the more appropriate one. Fourth, analysis according to industries
also adds to the result of efficiency, if markets have high concentration sectors (such as the
JSE), one might be tempted to conclude that the entire JSE exhibits, say, randomness, where
it could be driven by the resources sector as opposed to any other sector. Last, the use of
neural networks as approximators is of benefit when examining data with less than ideal
sample sizes. Examining five frequencies of data, 86% of the shares and indices exhibited a
random walk under daily data, 78% under weekly data, 56% under monthly data, 22% under
quarterly data and 24% under semi-annual data. The results over the entire sample period and
non-overlapping sub-samples showed that this model's accuracy varied over time. Coupled
with the results of the trading strategies, one can conclude that the nature of market efficiency
in South Africa can be seen as time dependent, in line with the implication of the AMH. / MT2017
|
68 |
Statistical arbitrage on the FTSE/JSE TOP 40 index / An empirical approach to statistical arbitrage on the FTSE/JSE TOP 40 IndexNgcobo-Koyana, Mandlenkosi Svato January 2017 (has links)
Submitted as a Requirement of the
Master of Management (Finance and Investment Management)
University of the Witwatersrand Business School
Johannesburg / The mid 2000’s saw the materialization of research into the financial engineering field of high frequency trading. It is arguable that the most prominent model to emerge from the research has been pairs trading. This idea can be extended to allow for more than two assets in a modelling method now known as statistical arbitrage.
The research identifies a collection of assets with a deterministic component; it then follows a multiple linear regression to exploit persistent mispricings among these assets. Further, multiple linear regression metrics are used to identify the analytic form of the trading rule and to validate the performance of the model.
The first part of model constructs combinations of assets which contain a significant predictable component by co-integration, the second part builds a predictive models for the dynamics of the mispricing using statistical model.
The success of the model is demonstrated with reference to a statistical analysis of 5-minute closing prices on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) TOP40 Index and the constituent shares of the JSE TOP40 Index. / MT2017
|
69 |
Index/sector seasonality in the South African stock marketNaidoo, Justin Rovian 25 August 2016 (has links)
This paper aims to investigate the apparent existence of two anomalies in the South African stock market based on regular strike action, namely the month of the year effect and seasonality across specific sectors of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
|
70 |
The effect of analysts' stock recommendations on shares' performance on the JSE securities exchange in South AfricaPiyackis, Alessandra 31 August 2016 (has links)
A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management at the University of the Witwatersrand in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MM in Finance and Investment
March 2015 / Individual investors often do not have access to share trading information and even if they do, they may not be able to understand or accurately interpret this information. Investors rely on financial analysts’ forecasts and stock recommendations in order to make profitable investment decisions. The role of the financial analyst is an important one with two key objectives: earnings forecasts and stock recommendations (Loh and Mian 2006). These financial analysts play a significant role in the efficient functioning of global stock markets.
The aim of the financial analyst is to evaluate shares trading on the stock market and their future price appreciation or depreciation to develop new buy, hold or sell recommendations to maximize shareholder wealth. The extant literature recognizes that new buy, hold and sell recommendations made by financial analysts have a substantial impact on the market (Womack, 1996). Research on financial analysts has become prevalent in financial literature with the promotion of financial analysts to the level of integral economic proxies worthy of individual examination (Bradshaw, 2011).
The aim of this research report is to investigate whether financial analysts’ stock recommendations enhance or destruct shareholder wealth. The extant literature on financial analysts’ stock recommendations and forecasts suggests that the analysts’ recommendations have both a significant and an insignificant effect on stock prices in the market following the months after the change in recommendation is made. The accuracy of the financial analysts’ stock recommendations are measured in the months following the change in recommendation through determining if the recommendation outperforms the market benchmark.
This report examines the effects of analysts’ recommendations on the performance of stocks on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and concludes through determining if the share underperforms or
outperforms the market benchmark surmising that to a varying degree there is value to be found in financial analysts’ stock recommendations for the individual investor.
|
Page generated in 0.0718 seconds