No description available.

Mao, Yina. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 67-73). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / List of Tables --- p.2 / List of Figures --- p.3 / Abstract --- p.4 / 摘要 --- p.5 / Acknowledgement --- p.6 / Chapter 1. --- Introduction --- p.7 / Chapter 2. --- Theories and hypotheses --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1 --- actors and third parties --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Belief in a just world --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Threat to the belief in a just world --- p.13 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- Maintenance of the belief in a just world --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.4 --- Current research focus and the research gap --- p.15 / Chapter 2.1.5 --- Actors and third parties --- p.17 / Chapter 2.1.6 --- Hypothesis development --- p.22 / Chapter 2.2. --- Heuristic cues --- p.27 / Chapter 2.3 --- Multiple strategies --- p.29 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- Co-occurrence of strategies --- p.29 / Chapter 3. --- Method --- p.37 / Chapter 3.1 --- Research design --- p.37 / Chapter 3.2 --- Scenarios --- p.38 / Chapter 3.3 --- Pilot study --- p.40 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- Measurements --- p.40 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- Description of the sample --- p.43 / Chapter 3.3.3 --- Analysis --- p.43 / Chapter 3.3.4 --- Adjustments --- p.45 / Chapter 3.4 --- Power analysis --- p.45 / Chapter 3.5 --- Main study --- p.47 / Chapter 3.6 --- results --- p.48 / Chapter 4. --- Conclusions and implications --- p.58 / References --- p.67 / Appendix: Questionnaire used in this study (Chinese version) based on scenario 1 --- p.74

How individuals form justice perceptions has been a fundamental question in justice research. While most justice researchers treat justice perceptions as results of deliberate cognitive process, very few studies examined the role of affect in justice perception formation. Among these studies, most of them perceive affect as outcomes of justice; others investigating the predicting role of affect in justice perceptions were far from enough, either due to lack of solid theoretical foundation or due to the limitation of methodology. Based on the Affect Infusion Model, this dissertation focused on exploring the predicting role of affect in justice perception formation and three moderating contextual factors, including personal relevance, emotional control, and group context. A pilot study and two experimental studies, with both student sample and employee sample, were conducted. Structural equation modeling, ANOVA and regression were employed to test the hypotheses. / Results showed that people in positive affective states perceived higher distributive justice, procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and informational justice than their counterparts in negative affective states. Moreover, personal relevance moderated the relationships between affect and distributive justice and procedural justice so that the relationships above were enhanced as personal relevance increased. It is also suggested that individuals constrained the influence of their affect on procedural justice in group context, compared to the case when they make individual judgment. Surprisingly, the moderating effect of emotional control was not found as predicted. Results, implications, limitations as well as future directions were discussed. / Mao, Yina. / Adviser: C.S. Wong. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A, page: . / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2010. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 118-133). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest Information and Learning Company, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstract also in Chinese.

published_or_final_version / Psychology / Master / Master of Philosophy

No description available.

This study investigated the Big Five as predictors of procedural justice perceptions. Perceptions of a personality test, an assessment interview, a cognitive test, and the process as a whole were measured immediately after testing and again after the selection process outcome was known. The strongest pattern of relationships emerged between extraversion and procedural justice perceptions of the personality test and the individual assessment interview. No other personality factors were consistently predictive of procedural justice perceptions. Selection process outcome was not predictive of procedural justice perceptions. Comparisons across measures revealed that applicants perceived the assessment interview more positively than the personality test or the cognitive test and that applicants perceived the process as a whole more positively than the individual measures.