Baggrund: Kalaallit Nunaat (Grønland) har opbygget en unik organisering af det forebyggende og sundhedsfremmende arbejde, hvor centralt og lokalt niveau er forbundet gennem et forebyggelsesudvalg og en forebyggelseskonsulent i hver kommune. Paarisa, Center for Folkesundhed, havde lederskabet og har udviklet en uddannelse for forebyggelseskonsulenterne.     Formål: At samle og analysere indhentede erfaringer fra arbejdet med organiseringen af det forebyggende og sundhedsfremmende arbejde i perioden 1996 til 2007.   Metode: Officielle dokumenter blev analyseret ved et retrospektivt, deskriptivt og eksplorativt casestudie. Semistrukturerede interviews med udvalgte nøglepersoner og anbefalinger til det fremtidige forebyggende og sundhedsfremmende arbejde, som blev givet af forebyggelses-konsulenterne på et seminar i 2007, blev ligeledes inkluderet. Endelig blev der gennemført et litteraturstudie med henblik på at analysere partnerskaber som et redskab til at højne folkesundheden. Dette studie blev anvendt til triangulering af resultaterne.   Resultater: For at fremme af folkesundheden lokalt skal der arbejdes tværsektorielt og være vilje til koordinering og samarbejde. Dette kan ske ved netværksarbejde, men formelle partnerskaber anbefales. For at opnå succes, skal der desuden være forbindelse mellem centralt og lokalt niveau / Background: Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) has built up a unique organization of the preventive and health promotion work in which central and local level are linked through a preventive board and a consultant in each municipality. Paarisa, the Public Health Center, had the leadership and developed an education for the local consultants.   Aim: To collect and analyze acquired experiences of the process of organizing the preventive and health promotive work in the period from 1996 to 2007.   Method: Official documents were analyzed in a retrospective, descriptive and explorative case study. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with key-persons and recommendations to the future preventive and health promotion work provided by the preventive consultants at a seminar in 2007 were likewise included. A literature study was conducted in order to analyze partnerships as a tool to strengthen public health. This study was used for triangulation of the results.   Results: In order to promote public health locally, it is necessary to work cross-sectorial and have the will to coordinate and cooperate. This can be in form of networking, but formal partnerships are recommended. To achieve success, there should be connections between central and local level. / <p>ISBN 978-91-85721-91-7</p>

No description available.

INTRODUCTION. This dissertation concerns childbirth and its position within the Greenlandic society. It takes a world relational view to health promotion during, focusing on the perinatal family and the importance of the mothers, the child, their families and the local community as equal pieces of a whole. AIM. The aim of the dissertation is to present new concepts and knowledge concerning the health of the perinatal family in Greenland. It looks holistically at the place of birth with focus on the issue of support of the perinatal family. It seeks to present the perinatal family and its position within the Greenlandic society. It links the changes in health policy with the concepts of family, attitude and community structure. It draws on statistical, historical, anthropological and cultural data within the context of the Greenlandic perinatal family. METHOD AND MATERIAL. The dissertation is comprised of four studies and uses multidisciplinary methods. Over an eight-year period from 2003 to 2011, narrative interviews and focus groups were collected at four sites in Greenland: Nuuk, Ilulissat, Sisimiut and Tasiilaq. Data included seven focus groups with 35 participants, supplemented with 18 individual interviews of mothers, fathers and Culture Bearers, as well as two literature studies. The mode of conducting focus groups and interviews was based on the principles in the Helsinki Declaration. RESULTS. The perinatal family’s concepts of safety are often connected directly to access to family and community. Family is perceived as security, and lack of family support and network as insecurity. The concept of family and community is culturally specific and connected to the immediate family, extended family and kin. There is a cultural room for birth in Greenland, where the health of the perinatal family lies in their ability to strengthen the bonds within family, kinship and community networks. The mothers of the study perceived themselves as the bearers of their children; the fathers considered themselves to be the artisans and caregivers for their family; the community, including the extended family, deemed an important support network for the families. CONCLUSION. It is important to understand the link that exists between traditional and cultural properties and the health of the child within the family. These are elements of the eco cultural pathways that are already integrated within the family interactions and could be a way to strengthen family interaction and health. Families and community support these traditions and in healthy eco cultural exchanges it enhances the child’s role as a health–promoting agent within the family. Greenlandic public health, health promotion programs and the national perinatal guidelines have a physical health focus, but do not address the mental, social and spiritual dimensions of perinatal health. This fragmented way of perceiving and implementing health does not support the relational worldview that is an integral part of the culture of Greenland, and thus many families struggle to exercise choice within the system / INDLEDNING. Afhandlingen omhandler fødselen og dets betydning i det grønlandske samfund, idet der anlægges et holistisk sundhedsfremmende syn på den perinatale periode og der fokuseres på vigtigheden af kvinder, børn, deres familier og lokalsamfundet som ligeværdige dele af helheden. MÅL. Målet med afhandlingen er, at præsentere nye begreber og viden om sundheden om den perinatale familie i Grønland. Der ses holistisk på fødested og dens indflydelse på familiestøtte i den perinatale periode. Afhandlingen tilstræber at præsentere den perinatale familie og dens placering i det grønlandske samfund. Den forbinder ændringerne i sundhedspolitikken med begreberne familie, holdninger og samfundsstruktur. Den bygger på statistisk, historisk, medicinsk-antropologisk og kulturel data inden for rammerne af den perinatale sundhed i Grønland. METODER OG MATERIALER. Afhandlingen indeholder fire studier som benytter sig af tværfaglige metoder. Der er i en otteårig periode fra 2003 til 2011 gennemført fokusgrupper og individuelle interviews, ligesom der er gennemført to litteraturstudier i samme periode. Det empiriske data er indsamlet fire steder i Grønland: Nuuk, Ilulissat, Sisimiut og Tasiilaq. Syv fokusgrupper med i alt 35 deltagere, er suppleret med 18 individuelle interview med kvinder, fædre og Kulturbærer. De anvendte metoder til gennemførsel af afhandlingens interviews og fokusgrupper er i overensstemmelse med Helsinki-Erklæringen RESULTATER. For de perinatale familier er begrebet sikkerhed ofte knyttet direkte til familie og samfund. Familien opfattes som sikkerhed, og manglende mulighed for familie støtte og netværk opfattes omvendt som usikkerhed. Begrebet ansvar er for familien og samfundet kulturelt specifikt og er knyttet til den nærmeste familie, udvidede familie og slægtninge. Der findes et ‘kulturelt rum’ for fødsel i Grønland, hvor den perinatale families evne til at styrke båndene indenfor familien, slægtskabet og det lokale netværk er medvirkende til familiens sundhed. Lokalsamfundene, familierne og kvinderne i studierne opfatter sig selv som bærer af deres børn, fædrene opfatter sig som støtteskabende omsorgsgiverer for deres familie, og lokalsamfundet, herunder den udvidede familie, opfatter sig som et vigtigt støttenetværk for familierne. KONKLUSION. Det er vigtigt at forstå det sammenhæng, der eksisterer mellem traditionelle og kulturelle egenskaber og barnets sundhed i familien. Disse er elementer af de øko-kulturelle stier, der allerede er integreret i familiens samspil og kan være måder hvorved familiens samspil og dens sundhed styrkes. Familierne og samfundet støtter disse traditioner og i en sund øko-kulturudveksling styrker det barnets rolle som sundhedsfremmende agent inden for familien. Grønlandsk folkesundhed, sundhedsfremmende programmer og de nationale perinatale retningslinjer har et fysisk sundhedsfokus, men der tages ikke højde for de mentale, sociale og åndelige dimensioner indenfor perinatal sundhed. Denne opsplittede måde at opfatte og gennemføre sundhed på, understøtter ikke det relationelle verdenssyn der udgør en integrerende del af kulturen i Grønland, hvofor mange familier kæmper for at udøve selvbestemmelse inden for systeme / AALLARNIINEQ. Ilisimatuutut allaatigisap ernineq pillugu imarisaqarpoq, erninerullu kalaallit inuiaqatigiinni pingaaruteqassusia aamma sammineqarluni, erninerup nalaani ataatsimut isiginninnittaaseqarluni aammalu arnat, meeqqat, ilaqutaasa najukkamilu innuttaasut ataatsimoornermi naligiittut isigalugit. ANGUNIAGAQ. Ilisimatuutut allaatigisami anguniagaavoq, isummat nutaat ilisaritissallugit kalaallillu ilaqutariit meeraalu erninerup nalaani peqqissutsimut ilisimasariaqartut sammineqassallutik. Ilisimatuutut allaatigisap anguniarpaa ilaqutariit ernininerup nalaani ilisaritissallugit aammalu erninerup kalaallit inuiaqatigiinni inissisimanera takutissallugu. Peqqinnissaqarnermi allannguutit eqqarsaatigalugit ilaqutariissuseq, isummersortarneq inuiaqatigiinnilu aqqissuusaaneq sammineqarput. Sumi inunngorsimaneq ataatsimut isiginnittaaseqarluni sammineqassaaq aammalu erninerup nalaanni sumi inunngorsimaneq ilaqutariinnut tunaartaanersoq. Allaaserisami paasissutissat Kalaallit Nunaanni erninerup iluani peqqinnissaqarnikkut tunngasutigut aamma statistikkikkut, oqaluttuarisaanikkut, antropologiskimik, biofysiskimik, kulturikkullu tunngavilersuutit atorneqassapput. ILISIMATUSARNERMI NAJOQQUTASSANIK KATERSUINEQ. Atuagarsornikkut misissuinerit ukiuni arfineq pingasuni ingerlanneqarput ukioq 2003-miit ukioq 2011 ilanngullugu, soorlulusooq alaatsinaanneqartunik apersuinerit inunillu ataasiakkaanik apersuinerit ingerlanneqarsimallutik. Atuagassiaqarnikkut misissuinerit marluk ingerlanneqarsimapput, ilisimatusarnikkut paasissutissanik misissuinerit Kalaallit Nunaanni piffinni sisamaasuni ingerlanneqarsimalluni: Nuuk, Ilulissat, Sisimiut Tasiilarlu. Alaatsinaanneqartunik apersuinerit arfineq marluk, taakku katillutik 33-nik peqataasullit ingerlanneqarsimapput, tassungalu ilanngullugu inunnik ataasiakkaanik 18-iusunik arnanik, ataataasunik, kulturikkullu ersuttunik apersuinerit. Ilisimatusarnikkut sakkugineqartut ilisimatuutut allaatigisami apersuinermi alaatsinaanneqartunillu apersuinerit Helsinki-Erklæring naapertorlugu ingerlanneqarput ILISIMATUSARNIKKUT INERNERI. Nunasiaajunnaarnermi ernineq arnanut namminerminut tunngatinneqarpoq taamaasilluni ernineq pillugu paasissutissat amerlagisassaanngitsutut oqaatigisariaqarlutik. Erninermut naalakkersuinikkut anguniakkat malittarisassallu sumiiffinni ataasiakkaani qinikkanit allaffimmilu aqutsisunit saqqummiunneqartarsimapput, qaqutiguinnartumillu arnanut ernilersunut aammalu najukkami inuiaqatigiinnut isumaqatiginninniutaasarsimallutik. Ilaqutariinnut erneqqajaasunut isumannaallisaaneq isummap imarisaatut isigalugu ilaquttariinnut inuiaqatigiinnullu tunngatinneqarput. Ilaquttariit toqqaannartumik isumannaallisaasutut isigineqarput, ilaqutariinnilu qanigisanilu tapersersuisoqarsinnaanngikkangat nalornineq pilersarluni. Akisussaaneq ilaqutariinnut inuiaqatigiinnullu isummap imarisaatut isigalugu kulturikkut immikkut isigineqarpoq qaniginerpaasanullu tunngatinneqarluni, ilaquttanut qanigisanullu allanut. Kalaallit Nunaanni erninermut tunngasut "kulturikkut immikkut inissaqartinneqarput", tamatumani erninerup nalaani ilaqutariit imminut qanilleqqajaallaqqissisarlutik, ilaqutariissuseq najukkamilu inuiaqatigiit ataqatigiinnerat peqqissutsimut tapertaalluartarlutik. ILISIMATUSARNERUP NAAMMASSILERNERANI ISUMMIUSSAQ. Kalaallit ilaqutariit unamminartunik naapitsinermi naapertuulluartumik aaqqiisinnaasimapput, tamatumani nunarsuarmioqatigiinni aningaasaqarnikkut ineriartornermi inuiaqatigiillu malinnaataasumik ineriatorfiata kingunerisaannik pisimasut anigorluarsimallugit. Najukkami inuiaqatigiit, ilaqutariit arnallu misissuinermi meeqqanik nammattutut imminut paasinnipput, ataataasullu ilaqutariinni meeqqanut tapersersuisutut inuttullu isumaginnittutut imminut paasinnipput, aammalu najukkami inuiaqatigiit ilaqutariillu tamarmiusut ilaqutariinnut pineqartunut ataqatigiiaattut pingaarutilittut imminut paasillutik.

U.S. Arctic foreign policy and the U.S. influence on Greenland has been studied predominantly regarding U.S. military and defence concerns. However, during the Trump Administration, the U.S. Arctic foreign policy agenda significantly shifted, placing Greenland as an integral component of the 2017-2021 Republican administration’s Arctic geopolitical aspirations, and not only for defence purposes. I argue that U.S-Greenland relations were significantly impacted when President Trump offered to purchase Greenland from the Kingdom of Denmark in the summer of 2019. Following the offer, Greenland emerged as a focal point of the Trump Administration’s geopolitical and economic security interests in the Arctic. Consequently, Greenland finds itself at the centre of a complex Arctic arena, with vastly larger and more powerful states taking an interest in Greenland’s economic potential due to its natural resources. Nevertheless, Trump’s offer was highly problematic as Greenland is an Inuit nation with the political goal to become independent from their colonial ties with Denmark. Despite the offer causing initial outrage, U.S.-Greenland collaborative relations have only developed since. I analyze why this has occurred, conveying that the similar approaches of Trump and Greenland towards climate change created the possibility for the strengthening of U.S.-Greenland bilateral relations. Climate change threatens the Arctic, yet the melting ice also provides more accessibility to rich natural resources. Climate change therefore presents not only threats, but opportunities. Greenland has a right and desire to pursue economic development for a financially viable independence through utilizing carboniferous, extractive industries. The U.S. has also sought to utilize the economic opportunity that Arctic climate change presents but with different motives. The U.S. and Greenland have subsequently become interlinked in a complex Arctic constellation of foreign policy and economic opportunity. Regardless of changing approaches to climate change, the Trump Administration has significantly impacted the future of U.S.-Greenland relations and Greenland’s political future. / Graduate