The counterfeit phenomenon was analyzed in this magisterial work, and was interpretation made of it. In any museum appears to discover some forgeries that can be clarified only with time though time can veil it. Forgeries are made usually by faired people who lengthened manner or style of one or another famous artist. On one glance to history is clear, that the phenomenon of adulteration is popular in these quarters, where finances and profit are in hand also in the world of art. This phenomenon does not passes neither history nor politics. Some myths and legends are so vital, that it can encourage the modern man to a fantasies, that embolden to falsification of a facts. The rigging is not only material wealth, but intellectual property can be rigged too. Though the religious society declaring Christian moralities speak against any inferiority or lying and cheating, there are facts of its members can not resist a temptation to firm up their positions in peoples harts by invoking worldly unfair games. The erect hypothesis approved there for the proposition can be made that so widely spread forgery is not popular as a peace of art itself. There is gathered and systematized information allows to make an abstract opinion on forgery in this magisterial work. The oeuvre part of this magisterial work “Fake” is important up to date this theme was not used as artificial expression, there for it can become not only an object of exhibitions, but perform the social function:... [to full text]

Magistro baigiamąjame darbe nagrinėjama asmens tapatybės nustatymo Internete samprata bei praktinis realizavimas, analizuojama ar pakankamai teisiškai reglamentuota, taip pat ar yra būtinumas kriminalizuoti asmens tapatybės klastotę Internete, atribojant ją nuo paprasto sukčiavimo. Pagrindinis tyrimo tikslas - išanalizuoti teisinius ir praktinius asmens tapatybės Internete buvimo, slėpimo ir klastojimo aspektus, nurodyti pagrindines teisines problemas, su kuriomis susiduriama siekiant išlikti anonimiškam, o taip pat pateikti išvadas ir siūlymus kaip tobulinti teisinį reguliavimą. Darbe iškelta hipotezė, kad asmens tapatybės nustatymo internete samprata bei praktinis realizavimas yra neaiški ir nepakankamai teisiškai reglamentuota, taip pat reiktų kriminalizuoti asmens tapatybės klastotę elektroninėje erdvėje, atribojant ją nuo paprasto sukčiavimo, nepasitvirtino šiais aspektais: Lietuvoje nėra atskirai išskirta ir kriminalizuota asmens tapatybės klastotė Internete, tačiau to ir nereikia, kadangi visiškai užtenka šiuo metu galiojančių teisės aktų. Lietuvoje teisinė bazė pilnai reglamentuota ir pakankama, kad tinkamai kvalifikuoti nusikalstamas veikas, padaromas elektroninėje erdvėje. Dabartinis Lietuvoje veikiantis teisinis reguliavimas nėra pritaikytas anonimiškumui elektroninėje erdvėje, todėl siūlytina derinti šiuo metu galiojančias prekybos ir paslaugų taisykles prie elektroninės komercijos keliamų poreikių. Didžiausią dėmesį skirti anonimiškų vartotojų, ypatingai tų... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Master work examines the concept of online identity and the practical implementation, analysis, or enough legally regulated, including whether there is the need to criminalize identity fraud in the Internet banned it from a simple fraud. The main purpose of the study - to examine the legal and practical identity online presence, evasion and fraud aspects of major legal problems encountered in order to survive in anonymous, as well as the conclusions and proposals for improving the legal regulations. The paper put forward a hypothesis that a person's identity online and practical realization of the concept is unclear and not legally regulated, should also be criminalize identity fraud in cyberspace banned it from a mere fraud, failed the following aspects: Lithuania does not separately distinguished, and criminalized identity forgery Internet, however, and it is not necessary, because sufficient current legislation. Lithuania legal basis for a fully regulated and sufficient suitably qualified criminal acts committed in cyberspace. Current Lithuania acting regulation is not adapted to the anonymity of cyberspace, and therefore propose to combine the existing marketing and service rules for electronic commerce needs are. Focus on the anonymity of users, particularly those using electronic means, protection of the rights. It is also proposed to create an entirely new regulatory framework to govern completely anonymous transactions for the needs, but also specify the rights... [to full text]