1.1\xThis thesis studies land expropriation disputes from the angle of property right, exploring its origins from the relationships between township (town) government and villagers, village collective and villagers, and different villagers, focusing on peasants' resisting low land expropriation compensation instead of their fighting against land expropriation. Specifically, this research will discuss three questions. What is the nature of property right? How had the landed property rights been regulated and adjudicated? How do women gain and loss their land rights and interests?;1.2\xIn terms of the nature of property right, two kinds of idea are widely spread in academic circle; the first follows a materialist-legalist viewpoint and considers property rights as a bundle of rights, whereas the second adopts a constructivist perspective and considers property rights as a network of social relations. With defected land institutions and peasants' complicated social life, both of the two ideas cannot provide a suitable explanation for some new phenomena in land expropriation disputes, leaving a gap between property right theory and practice. Building on the foundation of Zhang Xiaojun's (2007) idea of "multiple property rights" and drawing upon Pierre Bourdieu's discussion of capitals, this research will propose the idea of "composite property rights" to systematize the discussion. This concept examines the transformation of symbolic, social, and cultural capital into economic capital, and in turn the transformation of economic capital into property rights. In so doing, I hope to provide a better framework for understanding the mechanisms through which various capitals can be mobilized to "realize" the landed property rights.;1.3\xSince this research regards composite property rights as the nature of property right, the answer of the second research question then transfers into: what are the characteristics of the practical logic of composite property rights? Basing the rationale of resistance on peasants' local perception of land rights, peasants explore an action strategy, boundary-treading resistance. This concept reveals their tactics on three different relationships. First, as to the relation with the state, the peasants' resistance treads on state laws and land institution by taking advantage of their capitals. Second, in terms of the relation with local government and developers, their strategies rely on probing counterparty's loopholes, treading on boundaries of administrative enforcement of policy. Third, in regard to the relation among villagers or familial relationship, their behaviors challenges the village rules and traditions, treading on the boundaries of traditional moral principles.;1.4\xIn order to use the two concepts, this research specifically analyzes women's striving for land rights and interests. After building a framework of membership, this research transfers the third research question into a specific one: since rural land is owned by rural collective economic organization, how can an individual become its member? In sum, women's tactics include (1) taking full advantage of village collective's self-contradictory decision which admits their huji but refuses their cuji, (2) revoking their previous promise, and (3) exploring the loophole of household register management. During their striving for membership, they utilize their various capitals: (1) they use money as deposit to get villagers meeting's support, or gift to gain cadre's favor, to move in/back their huji, (2) with their relatives' help, they can get information and other support.;1.5\xBy attaching all kinds of capitals to the property right transformation from economic capital to economic property right, peasants' resources can be transformed into capitals; and these capitals enter their citizen life, alleviating their pauperization. At the same time, boundary-treading resistance characterizes land-lost peasants as peasant-citizens who keenly take petty advantage of others and merely try to be smart, so their resistance has a long way to catch up with safeguarding rights of citizen.

published_or_final_version / Urban Planning / Master / Master of Science in Urban Planning

published_or_final_version / Urban Planning / Master / Master of Science in Urban Planning

published_or_final_version / Urban Design / Master / Master of Urban Design

黃永豪. / 手稿本, 複本影印手稿本. / 香港中文大學硏究院歷史學部碩士論文. / 參考文獻 : leaves 227-239. / Huang Yonghao. / Chapter 第一章 --- 前言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二章 --- 沙田的壯貌與鄉紳的作用 --- p.15 / Chapter 第三章 --- 沙田的租佃關係 --- p.62 / Chapter 第四章 --- 東莞明倫堂與萬頃沙　 --- p.82 / Chapter 第五章 --- 大梁龍氏與東海十六沙 --- p.116 / Chapter 第六章 --- 結論 --- p.153 / 附錄 --- p.158 / 注釋 --- p.176 / 徵引書目 --- p.227

published_or_final_version / Housing Management / Master / Master of Housing Management

published_or_final_version / Urban Planning / Master / Master of Science in Urban Planning

郭錦洲. / "2008年8月". / "2008 nian 8 yue". / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 130-134). / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Guo Jinzhou. / 序言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一章 --- 地方社會與王權一一元末明初鮑氏的發展 --- p.17 / Chapter 第一節 --- 「父子爭死」 --- p.17 / Chapter 第二節 --- 入《宋史》的背後 --- p.20 / Chapter 第三節 --- 兩種身份：地方精英與儒學 --- p.24 / Chapter 第四節 --- 《孝順事實》 --- p.27 / 小結 --- p.30 / Chapter 第二章 --- 墳庵、社壇與祠堂一一祭祀和控產的演變 --- p.32 / Chapter 第一節 --- 墳庵 --- p.32 / Chapter 第二節 --- 社壇 --- p.35 / Chapter 第三節 --- 祠堂 --- p.40 / 小結 --- p.45 / Chapter 第三章 --- 清代鮑氏宗族的重塑 --- p.48 / Chapter 第一節 --- 族譜的創立一一鮑琮與鮑志道 --- p.49 / Chapter 第二節 --- 族譜的歷史和創新 --- p.53 / Chapter 第三節 --- 重修宣忠堂 --- p.58 / 小結 --- p.65 / Chapter 第四章 --- 棠樾村內鮑氏宗族的整合 --- p.66 / Chapter 第一節 --- 龍山慈孝堂 --- p.66 / Chapter 第二節 --- 棠樾敦本堂 --- p.69 / Chapter 第三節 --- 世孝祠一整合不同派系的宗祠 --- p.78 / 小結 --- p.83 / Chapter 第五章 --- 義田的設立和管理 / Chapter 第一節 --- 宣忠戶與節儉戶 --- p.88 / Chapter 第二節 --- 私田到義田 --- p.94 / Chapter 第三節 --- 義田的登記和課稅 --- p.101 / Chapter 第四節 --- 信託財產 --- p.111 / 小結 --- p.116 / 結論：棠樾鮑氏宗族與義田 --- p.118 / 參考文獻 --- p.130 / 論文附錄 / 附錄1：慈孝里坊和御詩 --- p.i / 附錄2：貞白里坊 --- p.ii / 附錄3：鮑氏第四代至十六代世系圖 --- p.iii / 附錄4：鄭玉師承圖 --- p.iv / 附錄5：孝順事實 --- p.v / 附錄6：大和社柱腳 --- p.v / 附圖7：明末至清中葉棠樾村圖 --- p.vi / 附錄8：清朝棠樾村圖， --- p.vii / 附錄9：宣忠堂圖 --- p.viii / 附錄10：宣忠堂祭位圖 --- p.ix / 附錄11：始祖墓 --- p.x / 附錄12：鮑慶雲墓 --- p.x / 附錄13：敦本堂祭位圖 --- p.xi / 附圖14：敦本堂 --- p.xii / 附圖15：敦本堂內木主 --- p.xii / 附錄16：現時敦本堂門匾 --- p.xiii / 附錄17：1990年代敦本堂剛重修後的門匾 --- p.xiii / 附錄18：家廟圖 --- p.xiv / 附錄19：鮑氏宗族、宣忠支派、三大房、十四分支關係圖 --- p.xv / 附錄20：現時棠樾村地圖 --- p.xvi / 附錄21：棠樾村地理位置圖 --- p.xvii / 附錄22：宣忠支派第16至27代關係圖 --- p.xviii / 附錄23：1785至1820年棠樾村大事表 --- p.xxi

University of Macau / Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities / Department of Government and Public Administration

University of Macau / Faculty of Social Sciences. / Department of Government and Public Administration