Issued also as Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University. / Bibliography: p. [271]-279.

Thesis (M.A.)--Victoria University of Wellington, 2010. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thèse--Université de Toulouse. / "Bibliographie": p. [7].

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, Dept. of Anthropology, August, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.

Inaug.-Diss.--Marburg. / Lebenslauf. Chap. I and II only of his "Rechtsgeschichte und recht der gemeinen marken in Hessen. I. t. Die hessische markgenossenschaft des späteren mittelalters," pub. in "Arbeiten zum handels-, gewerbe- und landwirt-schaftsrecht," nr. 3, Marburg, 1909. (viii, 260 p.). "Verzeichnis häufiger und abgekürzt angeführter schriften": p.[v]-vii.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

This mini-dissertation is an investigation into wealth and poverty, land and class issues. These issues are very topical in the current South African political debate. The land issue, especially, is and will for the foreseeable future remain, a contentious issue especially on the African soil (cf. for instance the Zimbabwe situation, Khoi-San land claims). The question asked is, can the Bible make a valuable contribution to solving these problems? This study investigates whether Qoheleth can make a meaningful contribution to issues such as wealth and poverty, class and land. The book Qoheleth was chosen for its apparent “revolutionary” stance against traditional wisdom. In wisdom literature and tradition, the sages are known to situate themselves between the wealthy and the poor. Forming part of the protest phase of development of wisdom thought, it was necessary to evaluate Qoheleth to determine on whose side he is on, the haves or have-nots? Does he also protest against economic injustice? An ideological appreciation of Qoheleth was done to determine this. It was found that Qoheleth reinscribes the status quo of his time in terms of established hierarchies. He disappoints on the issue of the haves and the have-nots and does not provide a way out of social injustice. He certainly is not much of a voice for the have-nots. Qoheleth’s apparent “revolutionary” stance is rather an intellectual reaction against the doctrine of retribution, but not in a political or social sense. The Old Testament prophets might be far more useful in addressing current issues on social injustice. / Prof. H. Viviers

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, Dept. of Economics, 1973. / Also available on the Internet.