Thesis (PhD)--Macquarie University, Division of Society, Culture, Media and Philosophy, Dept. of Sociology 2009. / "October 2008" Bibliography: leaves 273-293.

Submitted by JUSCELINO DA SILVA PESSOA null (didicso03@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-12-09T16:47:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Juscelino da Silva Pessoa.pdf: 1669495 bytes, checksum: 6568d9a85695192fb2f040d725ec04c2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Felipe Augusto Arakaki (arakaki@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2016-12-13T11:05:51Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 pessoa_js_me_arafcl.pdf: 1669495 bytes, checksum: 6568d9a85695192fb2f040d725ec04c2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-13T11:05:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 pessoa_js_me_arafcl.pdf: 1669495 bytes, checksum: 6568d9a85695192fb2f040d725ec04c2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-08-18 / A presente investigação tem como objetivo analisar criticamente as contribuições do pensamento de Norberto Bobbio para o debate sobre as lutas, as conquistas e a necessidade de proteger os “Direitos do Homem”. Bobbio chamou a era moderna de “A Era dos Direitos” e fez dos “Direitos do Homem” um objeto de estudo que completou uma trilogia que, segundo ele, é composta de “três momentos necessários do mesmo “movimento” histórico”. (BOBBIO, 1992). Os três momentos a que se refere o pensador italiano são Direitos do Homem, Democracia e Paz. Esta pesquisa visa a abordar o problema dos conflitos existentes nas relações entre Direito, Poder e Estado no contexto das lutas por reconhecimento, da redistribuição e da busca da proteção dos direitos do Homem. / This research aims to critically analyze the Norberto Bobbio´s thinking contributions to the debate about the struggles, achievements and the need to protect the "human rights". Bobbio called the modern era "The Age of Rights" and made of "Human Rights" an object of study that completed a trilogy which, he said, consists of "three required times of the same historic move”. (BOBBIO, 1992). These three times referred to the Italian thinker are Human Rights, Democracy and Peace. This research aims to address the problem of conflicts in the relationship between law and power in the context of struggles for recognition, redistribution and the pursuit of protection of human rights.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luis Antonio Rossi.pdf: 1400243 bytes, checksum: 2f54e0af614700d9bf2c495d5740d146 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-09 / This thesis aims at analyzing the position of the Supreme Court when examining the constitutionality of the Clean Record Law subsuming the decision on the debate brought by jurists Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on a country s Judicial Review. Through analysis and reflection on who should be the "guardian of the Constitution", this investigation seeks to demonstrate that the Brazilian constitutional system has adopted Kelsen s positivism. However, the amplitude of the 1988 Constitution, the process of Law constitutionalization , the ideology of fundamental rights and the idleness of both the Executive (lack of an efficient public administration) and the Legislative (legislative inertia) transformed Brazilian Supreme Court into a hybrid court: sometimes as a true Constitution Court in the formalistic conception of Kelsen (judgment of the Amnesty Law, for example) or as a true Reich President or a Moderator Power in Schmitt s conception. By addressing and analyzing the judgement of the Clean Record Law this thesis claims that the Brazilian legal system has been going through a crisis caused by too much constitutionalization of law and has therefore caused the Supreme Court to change into an autonomous power: the Legal Reich / A presente tese, subsumindo a decisão diante do debate entre os juristas Hans Kelsen e Carl Schmitt sobre o controle de constitucionalidade pátrio, tem o escopo de analisar o comportamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal no julgamento da constitucionalidade da Lei da Ficha Limpa. A tese, ao analisar e refletir sobre quem deve ser o guardião da Constituição , pretende demonstrar que o sistema constitucional brasileiro adotou o positivismo de Hans Kelsen, mas a amplitude da Constituição de 1988, o processo de constitucionalização do Direito, a ideologia dos direitos fundamentais e a inércia dos Poderes Executivo (falta de uma gestão pública eficiente) e Legislativo (inércia legislativa) transformaram a Corte Suprema brasileira num tribunal híbrido: ora um verdadeiro Tribunal Constitucional, na concepção formalista de Hans Kelsen (julgamento da Lei de Anistia, por exemplo), ora um verdadeiro Presidente do Reich ou Poder Moderador, na concepção de Carl Schmitt. Ao abordar e analisar o julgamento da Lei da Ficha Limpa, a tese quer demonstrar que o sistema jurídico pátrio passa por uma crise ocasionada pela constitucionalização em demasia do direito e, por conseguinte, pela transformação do Supremo Tribunal Federal em Poder autônomo: o Reich jurídico

The rule-making power of the European Commission, dissertation Mgr. Mgr. Jiří Lenfeld, M.A.; supervisor: doc. JUDr. Richard Král, Ph.D., LL.M. Charles University, Faculty of Law, Department of European Law Prague, March 2013 The aim of the dissertation is to analyse the role of the European Commission in the legislative process of the European Union with the focus on procedures for adoption of legally binding Union acts. The European Commission is one of the main institutions of the European Union. It represents and upholds the interests of the EU as a whole and manages the day-to-day business of implementing EU policies. However, to limit the role of the European Commission to that of an executive body would be misleading. Its role in the EU institutional system is much broader than that. The European Commission is the most important legislator among the EU institutions and is also empowered with an almost exclusive power to submit drafts of EU legal acts. The rule-making power of the European Commission could be seen from two different points of view. In a narrow sense of the word it could be seen as a power conferred on the European Commission by the Treaties to propose drafts and to adopt EU legal acts implementing legally binding Union acts. However, the exercise of the rule-making power may...