Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:24:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2010-08-31Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:10:56Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 margiotti_ms_me_rcla.pdf: 1182925 bytes, checksum: b4c9d85ad6576c74e326ae7738ce3e94 (MD5) / Esta dissertação tem por objeto um estudo sobre a Progressão Continuada e os documentos Expectativas de Aprendizagem, publicados pela Secretaria do Estado da Educação de São Paulo às escolas da etapa I do Ensino Fundamental (1º ao 5º ano). Em uma escola pública estadual do município de Limeira foi realizada uma pesquisa de campo a fim de verificar a concepção de pais, professores e direção de escola acerca dos documentos Expectativas de Aprendizagem em relação ao regime de Progressão Continuada, visto que ambos estão vigorando nas escolas da rede estadual paulista. Partimos do pressuposto de que há uma tensão entre o que propõe a Progressão e as Expectativas. De acordo com documentos legais, a Progressão Continuada exige o trabalho em forma de ciclos, sendo que no estado de São Paulo optou-se pela organização em Ciclo I, que vai do 1º ao 5º ano, e Ciclo II, que se estende do 6º ao 9º ano do Ensino Fundamental. A Progressão Continuada ainda requer outras mudanças para que a mesma obtenha sucesso, os espaços escolares devem ser organizados de maneira que facilite a progressão da aprendizagem dentro do ciclo. Entretanto, no ano de 2008, a SEE-SP publicou as Expectativas de Aprendizagem, que parecem desconsiderar a ideia de ciclos proposta pela Progressão, ao direcionar para os professores do Ciclo I os conteúdos a serem trabalhados a cada série. Apesar de fazerem referência à Progressão Continuada, os documentos são bem diretivos e apresentam orientações precisas sobre qual conteúdo o aluno deve dominar ao final de cada série, e não ao final do ciclo, tal como supõe a Progressão. Desde a sua implantação, os conteúdos propostos pelos documentos passaram a fazer parte do planejamento dos professores e, desta forma, são também contemplados em avaliações. As Expectativas de Aprendizagem passaram a funcionar como uma espécie... / The aim of this work is a study on the Continued Progression and Learning Expectations, documents published by the State Secretariat of Education of São Paulo schools of cycle I of the Elementary School (1st to 5th year). In a public school, in the city of Limeira was conducted a research to verify the conception of parents, teachers and school management about documents Learning Expectations in relation to the regime of Continued Progression, as both are in effect in São Paulo schools . We think that there is a tension between what proposes to Progression and Expectations. According to legal documents, Continued Progression requires the work in the form of cycles, and the state of São Paulo was chosen by the organization in Cycle I, which runs until the 5th year, and Cycle II, which extends from the 6th to 9th grade of elementary school. The Continued Progression still requires other changes to be successful, the school spaces should be organized in a manner that facilitates the progression of learning within the cycle. However, in 2008 the SEE-SP published Learning Expectations, that seem to disregard the idea proposed by the progression of cycles, by directing the teachers from the first cycle the contents to be worked on every series. While making reference to the continued progression, the documents are good managers and have specific guidelines about what content students should master after each series, not the end of the cycle, as the supposed progression. Since its implementation, the proposed content for the documents became part of teacher planning and, thus, are also contemplated in evaluations. Learning Expectations, began to function as a sort of guide for teachers Cycle I. However, there is a mix between what proposes the progression and expectations in the actions described by the teachers. Moreover, we note that there is a reinterpretation by teachers about... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)

Orientador: Maria Aparecida Segatto Muranaka / Banca: Cleiton de Oliveira / Banca: Raquel Fontes Borghi / Resumo: Esta dissertação tem por objeto um estudo sobre a Progressão Continuada e os documentos Expectativas de Aprendizagem, publicados pela Secretaria do Estado da Educação de São Paulo às escolas da etapa I do Ensino Fundamental (1º ao 5º ano). Em uma escola pública estadual do município de Limeira foi realizada uma pesquisa de campo a fim de verificar a concepção de pais, professores e direção de escola acerca dos documentos Expectativas de Aprendizagem em relação ao regime de Progressão Continuada, visto que ambos estão vigorando nas escolas da rede estadual paulista. Partimos do pressuposto de que há uma tensão entre o que propõe a Progressão e as Expectativas. De acordo com documentos legais, a Progressão Continuada exige o trabalho em forma de ciclos, sendo que no estado de São Paulo optou-se pela organização em Ciclo I, que vai do 1º ao 5º ano, e Ciclo II, que se estende do 6º ao 9º ano do Ensino Fundamental. A Progressão Continuada ainda requer outras mudanças para que a mesma obtenha sucesso, os espaços escolares devem ser organizados de maneira que facilite a progressão da aprendizagem dentro do ciclo. Entretanto, no ano de 2008, a SEE-SP publicou as Expectativas de Aprendizagem, que parecem desconsiderar a ideia de ciclos proposta pela Progressão, ao direcionar para os professores do Ciclo I os conteúdos a serem trabalhados a cada série. Apesar de fazerem referência à Progressão Continuada, os documentos são bem diretivos e apresentam orientações precisas sobre qual conteúdo o aluno deve dominar ao final de cada série, e não ao final do ciclo, tal como supõe a Progressão. Desde a sua implantação, os conteúdos propostos pelos documentos passaram a fazer parte do planejamento dos professores e, desta forma, são também contemplados em avaliações. As Expectativas de Aprendizagem passaram a funcionar como uma espécie... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: The aim of this work is a study on the Continued Progression and Learning Expectations, documents published by the State Secretariat of Education of São Paulo schools of cycle I of the Elementary School (1st to 5th year). In a public school, in the city of Limeira was conducted a research to verify the conception of parents, teachers and school management about documents Learning Expectations in relation to the regime of Continued Progression, as both are in effect in São Paulo schools . We think that there is a tension between what proposes to Progression and Expectations. According to legal documents, Continued Progression requires the work in the form of cycles, and the state of São Paulo was chosen by the organization in Cycle I, which runs until the 5th year, and Cycle II, which extends from the 6th to 9th grade of elementary school. The Continued Progression still requires other changes to be successful, the school spaces should be organized in a manner that facilitates the progression of learning within the cycle. However, in 2008 the SEE-SP published Learning Expectations, that seem to disregard the idea proposed by the progression of cycles, by directing the teachers from the first cycle the contents to be worked on every series. While making reference to the continued progression, the documents are good managers and have specific guidelines about what content students should master after each series, not the end of the cycle, as the supposed progression. Since its implementation, the proposed content for the documents became part of teacher planning and, thus, are also contemplated in evaluations. Learning Expectations, began to function as a sort of "guide" for teachers Cycle I. However, there is a mix between what proposes the progression and expectations in the actions described by the teachers. Moreover, we note that there is a reinterpretation by teachers about... (Complete abstract click electronic access below) / Mestre

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-27T16:33:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Patricia Tanganelli Lara.pdf: 3531709 bytes, checksum: 83be276fadcc821c68dcc173018d4542 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-09 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities requires the development of educational proposals for learning the content established in school. The guidelines established by PMSP seek operationalize the teaching strategies geared towards students with disabilities included in regular education classes through the support of Regent's professor of Follow-up and support room the inclusion. Whose current instrument is the document entitled "Evaluation Referential About Student Learning with Intellectual Disabilities Elementary School I" (São Paulo, 2008), based on "Curriculum Guidelines Preposition of Expectations of Learning Elementary School I" (2007). This document is intended to support the evaluation of the teacher of the classroom, have students with intellectual disabilities, to analyse the learning process and propose actions for the resizing of the pedagogical practices. This research aims to analyze the guidelines, conceptions and theoretical and practical propositions contained in this Benchmark, by matching them with those contained in the guidelines for Curriculum students considered normal. The analysis of the data collected and organized, the documents cited above, was based on the contributions of Vygotsky (1997, 2001, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009), in particular the concepts of zone of proximal development, mediation processes and exploration of abstraction ability of students with intellectual disabilities. The main findings of the investigation can be thus described: 1) that the suggested adaptations Express, by lentificação and reduction of content, the prospect of impossibility of access to written language, but that expectations of school content learning (Oral Language, mathematics, science, geography and history) promote generally the development of abstract thought, which shows that the prospect of irreversibility of mental deficiency lies especially in relation to the field of written language; 2) the constant reiteration that indicated expectations can only be met with support from the teacher or more experienced colleagues are damaging to the development of abstract thought, which meets with the vygostskyana perspective, that the document claims to be its theoretical basis / A inclusão dos alunos com deficiência intelectual requer o desenvolvimento de propostas educacionais para a aprendizagem dos conteúdos estabelecidos na escola. As orientações estabelecidas pela PMSP procuram operacionalizar as estratégias de ensino voltadas para alunos com deficiência incluídos em classes do ensino regular através do apoio do professor regente da Sala de Apoio e Acompanhamento à Inclusão SAAI, cujo instrumento atual é o documento intitulado Referencial de Avaliação sobre a Aprendizagem do Aluno com Deficiência Intelectual RAADI Ensino Fundamental I (São Paulo, 2008), baseado nas Orientações Curriculares Preposição de Expectativas de Aprendizagem Ensino Fundamental I (São Paulo, 2007). Este documento tem o objetivo de subsidiar a avaliação do professor da sala de aula comum, que tenham alunos com deficiência intelectual, para analisar o processo de aprendizagem e propor ações para o redimensionamento das práticas pedagógicas. Esta pesquisa teve o objetivo de analisar as orientações, as concepções e proposições teórico-práticas contidas nesse Referencial, cotejando-as com aquelas contidas nas Orientações Curriculares destinadas aos alunos considerados normais. A análise dos dados colhidos e organizados, dos documentos citado acima, foi realizada com base nas contribuições de Vygotsky (1997, 2001, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009), em especial os conceitos de zona de desenvolvimento proximal, processos de mediação e exploração da capacidade de abstração dos alunos com deficiência intelectual. Os principais achados da investigação podem ser assim descritos: 1) que as adaptações sugeridas expressam, pela lentificação e redução do conteúdo, a perspectiva de impossibilidade de acesso à língua escrita, mas que as expectativas de aprendizagem dos demais conteúdos escolares (Linguagem Oral, Matemática, Ciências, Geografia e História) favorecem, de maneira geral, o desenvolvimento de pensamento abstrato, o que revela que a perspectiva de irreversibilidade da deficiência mental reside especialmente em relação ao domínio da língua escrita; 2) a reiteração constante de que as expectativas indicadas só podem ser cumpridas com apoio do professor ou de colegas mais experientes prejudicam o desenvolvimento do pensamento abstrato, o que vai de encontro com a perspectiva vygostskyana, que o documento afirma ser sua base teórica

<p>This paper uses evidence from a small-scale interview of five primary school principals within the Stockholm Municipality to examine their focus on student learning. To facilitate this analysis, four questions were addressed:</p><p>• What are the expectations principals have of learning for their students?</p><p>• Has there been a change in perception of learning in the 21st Century?</p><p>• How do principals think they have influence on student learning?</p><p>• How do principals see their role towards lifelong learning?</p><p>This thesis argues that we have to redefine learning for the 21st Century through emphasizing a more holistic approach to both teaching and learning and by paying more attention to learning outcomes. It explores contemporary trends in leadership education and connects them to the literature. In practice, the study uses two models, instructional leadership and transformational leadership, to integrate the the data collected. It proposes that school principals play a part in student learning through their roles of setting directions, developing people and developing the organisation.</p><p>The main results showed that the principals and vice-principals who participated in the study were aware of their roles in student learning. However, their roles were not immediately identifiable with a particular leadership style but a combination of styles. They realised that they did not encourage lifelong learning, which is an important component of 21st Century learning.</p><p>Key Words:</p><p>21st Century learning, lifelong learning, learning expectations, learning outcomes, leadership styles, instructional leadership, transformational leadership, cultural change leadership.</p>

This paper uses evidence from a small-scale interview of five primary school principals within the Stockholm Municipality to examine their focus on student learning. To facilitate this analysis, four questions were addressed: • What are the expectations principals have of learning for their students? • Has there been a change in perception of learning in the 21st Century? • How do principals think they have influence on student learning? • How do principals see their role towards lifelong learning? This thesis argues that we have to redefine learning for the 21st Century through emphasizing a more holistic approach to both teaching and learning and by paying more attention to learning outcomes. It explores contemporary trends in leadership education and connects them to the literature. In practice, the study uses two models, instructional leadership and transformational leadership, to integrate the the data collected. It proposes that school principals play a part in student learning through their roles of setting directions, developing people and developing the organisation. The main results showed that the principals and vice-principals who participated in the study were aware of their roles in student learning. However, their roles were not immediately identifiable with a particular leadership style but a combination of styles. They realised that they did not encourage lifelong learning, which is an important component of 21st Century learning. Key Words: 21st Century learning, lifelong learning, learning expectations, learning outcomes, leadership styles, instructional leadership, transformational leadership, cultural change leadership.

Submitted by THALITA FERNANDA DE OLIVEIRA MACEDO null (thalitika@hotmail.com) on 2016-03-13T14:51:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTAÇÃO THALITA MACEDO.pdf: 2084946 bytes, checksum: fc0493f6adfc99b0d8828725e66f90d6 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Felipe Augusto Arakaki (arakaki@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2016-03-14T22:04:49Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 macedo_tfo_me_bauru.pdf: 2084946 bytes, checksum: fc0493f6adfc99b0d8828725e66f90d6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-14T22:04:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 macedo_tfo_me_bauru.pdf: 2084946 bytes, checksum: fc0493f6adfc99b0d8828725e66f90d6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-01 / Outra / A temática em torno das expectativas de aprendizagem e os processos avaliativos vêm sendo discutida há muito tempo, avançando bastante, mas obviamente ainda existem lacunas e o momento atual é muito propício para se pensar nisso, dada a discussão que se coloca em torno das proposições curriculares nas redes de ensino e da base nacional comum curricular. Em face da importância de se realizar pesquisas sobre esse assunto e pelo interesse na implantação de ações direcionadas a amenizar os dilemas que vão se colocando neste âmbito, pretendemos, neste estudo, investigar e analisar as expectativas de aprendizagem e os processos avaliativos na Educação Física para os 1º, 2º e 3º anos do Ensino Fundamental, culminando numa matriz orientadora na qual estejam presentes tanto as expectativas de aprendizagem quanto os processos avaliativos. Para tanto, essa pesquisa se orientou pela abordagem qualitativa de investigação a partir de um estudo exploratório. Como técnica de coleta utilizamos as entrevistas semiestruturadas com trinta professores de Educação Física atuantes nos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental, em especial, com os três primeiros anos. Com base no eixo Expectativas de aprendizagem, emergiram do estudo as categorias de análise “Dimensões dos conteúdos” e “Associação entre objetivo e conteúdo”, e do eixo Avaliação,as categorias foram “Processos avaliativos”, “Dificuldades para avaliar” e “Expectativas para facilitar o processo avaliativo”. Podemos apontar que o cenário da literatura e o contexto da pesquisa estabelecem uma perspectiva acerca das dimensões dos conteúdos (atitudinais, conceituais e procedimentais), a Educação Física sendo entendida como uma disciplina que integra o aluno na cultura corporal de movimento, a organização curricular pensada por ciclos de escolarização e uma diversificação dos procedimentos e instrumentos de coleta de dados para a avaliação nas aulas. Como considerações, registramos nossas impressões a respeito da importância de sistematizar as expectativas de aprendizagem por ciclos escolares, contemplar os conteúdos a partir dos saberes para conhecer e para praticar e a utilização dos instrumentos de avaliação, com o objetivo de descobrir os caminhos percorridos pelos alunos ao longo do processo de ensino e de aprendizagem no intuito de oportunizar a efetiva aprendizagem.Também, reconhecer que existem caminhos possíveis para trabalhar a avaliação em Educação Física, explorando a temática das expectativas de aprendizagem nos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental e valorizando os saberes produzidos pelos professores. A expectativa com esta investigação foi, a partir da articulação entre as produções bibliográficas e os dados coletados com os professores, por meio de entrevista, a possibilidade de construir um livreto no qual estivessem demarcadas tanto as expectativas de aprendizagem quanto os processos avaliativos na Educação Física escolar para os 1º, 2º e 3º anos do Ensino Fundamental. Este material elaborado teve como propósito sistematizar as expectativas de aprendizagem e os instrumentos de avaliação, a fim de orientar os professores de Educação Física no desenvolvimento das práticas avaliativas na escola. Além disso, fornecer subsídios para tomadas de decisão sobre o trabalho pedagógico, contribuindo dessa forma para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem nas aulas de Educação Física. / The theme around the learning expectations and the availability processes has been discussed since long, having come forth quite a bit, but there are still gaps obviously seen, and the current moment of time is rather proper for this kind of discussion, considering the debate around propositions for learning programs within the school systems and the national learning program. Upon the importance of performing research about this subject, and for the interest in the implementation of actions directed towards lessening the dilemmas that are being faced in this context, this study intends to investigate and analyze the expectations of learning and the evaluation processes of Physical Education within the first three years of the elementary level of school, culminating in an orienteering compass in which both the learning perspectives and the evaluation processes are present. For this purpose, the research was guided by the qualitative approach of investigation based on an exploratory study. As a technique for collecting data, we have used semi-structured interviews with thirty Physical Education teachers working on the first years of elementary school, in special the first three years. Based on the guide of Learning expectations, from this study emerged the analysis categories “Dimensions of content” and “Association between goals and content”, while from the guide of Evaluation, the categories were “Evaluation processes”, “Difficulties of evaluating” and “Expectations to make the evaluation process easier”. We can point out that the contexts of literature and research establish a perspective around the dimensions of content (within the levels of attitude, concept and method), in which Physical Education is comprehended as a subject that integrates students in a corporal culture of movement, in addition to the curricular organization thought of by learning circles and a diversification of procedures and data-collecting instruments used for the classes’ evaluation. As considerations, we have registered our impressions on the importance of systematizing the learning expectations in learning cycles, as well as covered contents based on the knowledge required to absorb and practice the use of the evaluation instruments, having the objective of finding the paths walked by the students during the learning process, with the intent of making effective learning to be available. In addition to that, we have recognized the fact that there are possible ways to work with evaluation processes on Physical Education, exploring the themes of learning expectations in the first few years of elementary school, and recognizing the values of the knowledge produced by teachers. The expectative of this investigation, based on the articulation between bibliographical productions and the data collected from interviewing the teachers, was the possibility of building a booklet in which both the learning expectations and the availability processes for Physical Education in the first three years of elementary schools were clearly traced. This elaborated material had the goal of systematizing the learning expectations and the evaluation instruments, having the goal of orienting Physical Education teachers in the development of the evaluation practices in school. In addition to that, it strives to provide basis for decision-making about the pedagogical labor, in this manner contributing to the teaching and learning process on Physical Education classes.