This study is a thesis ending a 120 credit masters program in Mathematics with specialization Financial Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). The subject of Smart beta is defined and studied in an index fund context. The portfolio weighting schemes tested are: equally weighting, maximum Sharpe ratio, maximum diversification, and fundamental weighting using P/E-ratios. The outcome of the strategies is measured in performance (accumulated return), risk, and cost of trading, along with measures of the proportions of different assets in the portfolio. The thesis goes through the steps of collecting, ordering, and ”cleaning” the data used in the process. A brief explanation of historical simulation used in estimation of stochastic variables such as expected return and covariance matrices is included, as well as analysis on the data’s distribution. The process of optimization and how rules for being UCITS compliant forms optimization programs with constraints is described. The results indicate that all, but the most diversified, portfolios tested outperform the market cap weighted portfolio. In all cases, the trading volumes and the market impact is increased, in comparison with the cap weighted portfolio. The Sharpe ratio maximizer yields a high level of return, while keeping the risk low. The fundamentally weighted portfolio performs best, but with higher risk. A combination of the two finds the portfolio with highest return and lowest risk. / Denna studie är ett examensarbete som avslutar ett 120 poängs mastersprogram i Matematik med inriktning mot Finansiell Matematik och Matematisk Statistik på Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH). Ämnet Smart beta studeras i kontexten av en indexfond, där de olika testade principerna för viktning i portföljerna är: likaviktad, maximerad Sharpe-kvot, maximerad diversifiering, och fundamental viktning användandes av P/E-tal. Utfallet i testerna utvärderas i ackumulerad avkastning, portföljrisk, kostnad att handla i portföljen, och ett antal mått på fördelningen av tillgångarna. Studien går stegvis igenom processen för att samla in, ordna, och ”tvätta” data. En kort förklaring av historisk simulering, metoden för att estimera stokastiska variabler såsom kovariansmatriser, är inkluderad, såväl som en analys av distributionen av data. Processen för att optimera portföljerna och hur regler för att vara en UCITS-fond kan omformas till optimeringsvillkor beskrivs. Resultaten indikerar att alla utom den mest diversifierade portföljen har högre ackumulerad avkastning än den marknadsviktade portföljen under testperioden. I alla testade fall ökar handelsvolymen liksom marknadspåverkan när en annan strategi än marknadsviktad används. Portföljen med maximerad Sharpe-kvot ger en hög avkastning med bibehållen låg risk. Den fundamentalt viktade portföljen ger bäst avkastning, men med en litet förhöjd risk. Kombinationen av de båda metoderna ger den portföljen med högst ackumulerad avkastning och samtidigt lägst risk under testperioden.

Subject background and discussion: In recent decades, issues of human rights, labor and environmental change has been hot topics world wide, which also has influenced the financial market. More and more investors use socially responsible investing (SRI) screens when constructing their portfolios. One form of SRI screen is to choose companies that have satisfied employees. Existing theory says that employee satisfaction is an intangible asset to the firm that will positively affect a firm’s performance in the future. Intangible assets are often unrecognized by the market and thereby not incorporated in the stock price. The efficient market hypothesis has been studied and debated for several decades. Proponents of the EMH argue that all available information is incorporated in the stock price, thus it is not possible to systematically beat the market. However, EMH is controversial, since research has shown different results regarding the possibility to make abnormal return from various investing strategy. Research question: Is it possible to make abnormal returns by investing in a portfolio of worldwide firms with top scores on the SRI screen employee satisfaction? Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to examine investor’s possibility to make abnormal return with controls for multiple risk factors by investing in worldwide firms with top scores in employee satisfaction. One sub-purpose is to examine how the market values intangibles depending on the degree of market efficiency. Another sub-purpose of the study is to test two different portfolio weighting methodologies, equally- and value weighted, and observe the differences between them. Theory: This study deals with the efficient market hypothesis and the concepts of SRI, employee satisfaction, intangible assets and several risk-adjusted measurements. Method: We have chosen to perform a quantitative study with a deductive approach to answer our research question. We used a sample size of 696 firms based on “Great Place to Works”- lists of companies with high employee satisfaction to construct sex portfolios with different holding periods and strategies. These portfolios have been explored and tested significantly with both equally and value weighted methods. Result/Analysis: The study finds significant evidence of an average annual abnormal return of 3,66% and 2,43% for our main portfolio over the market for equally- and value weighted, respectively, using the three-factor model. When adjusting for momentum, thus employing the four-factor model, all the predictive variables still identify strong persistence in the abnormal return, with statistical significance. Conclusion: The results show that it is possible to make abnormal returns, during the observed time period, regardless of the weighing methodology, although the equally weighted received higher abnormal returns. Thus, the market efficiency appears to be in weak form and does not fully value intangibles.