Thesis (Th. M.)--Calvin Theological Seminary, 1988. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 96-101).

This dissertation examines the impact of Martyn Lloyd-Jones' medical training upon his homiletical methodology. Chapter 1 sets forth the thesis and charts the course forward. Chapter 2 reconstructs the intellectual culture of Lloyd-Jones' youth, both at home and at school. It also introduces the most significant intellectual influence in Lloyd-Jones' early life, his medical chief Thomas Horder. Chapter 3 reconstructs the decade that Lloyd-Jones spent at Saint Bartholomew's Hospital with an emphasis on both the institutional context and the educational content of his medical training. Chapter 4 moves into the central focus of the dissertation, demonstrating how his medical training shaped his homiletical practice. In this chapter Lloyd-Jones' definition of preaching is expounded. After clearly defining what preaching is, Chapter 5 demonstrates how Lloyd-Jones went about doing it. It focuses on his sermons in general, while Chapter 6 focuses on his actual preparation and delivery of sermons. Chapter 7 investigates how Lloyd-Jones' medical training shaped his pastoral ministry in a more general fashion by demonstrating that in all of his ministerial activities he was always `The Doctor.' And Chapter 8 offers some concluding reflections.

Thesis (Th. M.)--Calvin Theological Seminary, 1988. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 96-101).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Calvin Theological Seminary, 1989. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 104-110).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Harding Graduate School of Religion, 1980. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 249-259).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Harding Graduate School of Religion, 1980. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 249-259).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Harding Graduate School of Religion, 1980. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 249-259).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Regent College, 1990. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 208-220).

Thesis (Th.M. (Ethics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.

Submitted by Roberth Novaes (roberth.novaes@live.com) on 2018-07-11T15:23:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AS GRANDES ESPERANÇAS DO SR. PIP - UM ESTUDO INTERTEXTUAL (DISSERTAÇÃO COMPLETA).pdf: 742350 bytes, checksum: 180153cce3b278388400fd09dfe773eb (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Setor de Periódicos (per_macedocosta@ufba.br) on 2018-07-11T16:52:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AS GRANDES ESPERANÇAS DO SR. PIP - UM ESTUDO INTERTEXTUAL (DISSERTAÇÃO COMPLETA).pdf: 742350 bytes, checksum: 180153cce3b278388400fd09dfe773eb (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-11T16:52:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AS GRANDES ESPERANÇAS DO SR. PIP - UM ESTUDO INTERTEXTUAL (DISSERTAÇÃO COMPLETA).pdf: 742350 bytes, checksum: 180153cce3b278388400fd09dfe773eb (MD5) / FAPESB / Esta dissertação busca identificar e analisar os diversos vínculos intertextuais presentes no romance neozelandês O Sr. Pip (2007), de Lloyd Jones, em especial aqueles estabelecidos com o romance vitoriano Grandes Esperanças, escrito por Charles Dickens, em 1861. A pesquisa desenvolve-se orientada pelo conceito de intertextualidade, derivado dos estudos do filósofo russo Mikhail Bakhtin e cunhado por Julia Kristeva, por volta de 1960, na França. Nessa direção, a noção de texto se expande para abrigar não só o texto literário, mas também os variados discursos sociais que definem o contexto de produção de uma obra, como política, religião e a própria língua falada. Evidencia-se, por conseguinte, a teia de diálogo e remissões que se tece no âmbito textual, possibilitando a problematização de conceitos mais tradicionalistas como originalidade e autenticidade. Além disso, a pesquisa debruça-se sobre a acentuada marca da tradição oral na narrativa de O Sr. Pip, apontado pelo próprio autor como fio condutor de sua narrativa. Assim, com base em referenciais teóricos da área de estudos de oralidade como Walter Ong (1998), Erick Havelock (1996) e Paul Zumthor (1993; 2014), busca-se compreender como se opera o discurso oral e de que forma a narrativa de O Sr. Pip, bem como a de Grandes Esperanças se constrói com elementos deste discurso. Vista como um dos intertextos presentes entre os dois romances, a oralidade torna-se um elemento importante na medida em que desloca a narrativa canônica do texto dickensiano, baseada na leitura de livros, para uma contação de histórias, recriando assim o romance inglês em um movimento desconstrutor, possibilitando a problematização da noção de cânone literário. / This study aims at identifying and analysing the various intertexts found in the New Zealand novel Mr. Pip (2007) by Lloyd Jones, especially those that refer to the Victorian novel Great Expectations, written by Charles Dickens in 1861. This research is guided by the concept of intertextuality derived from Russian philosopher Mikhail Bakhtin’s studies and further developed by Julia Kristeva, around 1960, in France. Thus, the notion of text broadens in order to refer not only to the literary text but also to other social discourses as politics, religion and the spoken language itself. Consequently, the whole network of dialogue and references that operates at the textual level becomes clearer, questioning more conservative concepts such as originality and authenticity. Plus, this research addresses the theme of orality within the narrative of Mr. Pip, which Jones himself affirms to be central to his novel. Therefore, guided by the study of scholars from within the field of Orality and Literacy such as Walter Ong (1998), Erick Havelock (1996) and Paul Zumthor (1993; 2014), this work seeks to understand how the oral discourse operates and how the narratives of Mr. Pip as well as of Great Expectations are shaped by oral features. The oral language, considered here as one of the intertexts between these two novels, becomes then an important element as it transposes the canonical narrative of the Dickensian text, based on the reading of books, into an environment of story-telling, recreating the English novel in a deconstructive movement and questioning the notion of literary canon.