Cette thèse s'inscrit dans le cadre de la conception de véhicules autonomes, et plus spécifiquement de la vérification de contrôleurs de tels véhicules. Nos contributions à la résolution de ce problème sont les suivantes : (1) fournir une syntaxe et une sémantique pour un modèle de systèmes hybrides, (2) étendre les fonctionnalités du model checker statistique Cosmos à ce modèle et (3) valider empiriquement la pertinence de notre approche sur des cas d'étude typiques du véhicule autonome.Nous avons choisi de combiner le modèle des réseaux de Petri stochastiques de haut niveau (qui était le formalisme d'entrée de Cosmos) avec le formalisme d'entrée de Simulink afin d'atteindre un pouvoir d'expression suffisant. En effet Simulink est très largement utilisé dans le domaine automobile et de nombreux contrôleurs sont spécifiés avec cet outil. Or Simulink n'a pas de sémantique formellement définie. Ceci nous a conduit à concevoir une telle sémantique en deux temps : tout d'abord en introduisant une sémantique dite exacte mais qui n'est pas opérationnelle puis en la complétant par une sémantique approchée intégrant le facteur d'approximation recherché.Afin de combiner le modèle à événements discrets des réseaux de Petri et le modèle continu spécifié en Simulink, nous avons proposé au niveau syntaxique une interfacereposant sur de nouveaux types de transitions et au niveau sémantique une extension de la boucle de simulation. L'évaluation de ce nouveau formalisme a été entièrement implémentée dans Cosmos.Grace à ce nouveau formalisme, nous avons développé et étudié les deux cas d'étude suivants : d'une part une circulation dense sur une section d'autoroute et d'autre part l'insertion du véhicule dans une voie rapide. L'analyse des modélisations correspondantes a démontré la pertinence de notre approche. / This thesis takes place in the context of autonomous vehicle design, and concerns more specifically the verification of controllers of such vehicles. Our contributions are the following: (1) give a syntax and a semantics for a hybrid system model, (2) extend the capacities of the model-checker Cosmos to that kind of models, and (3) empirically confirm the relevance of our approach on typical case studies handling autonomous vehicles.We chose to combine high-level stochastic Petri nets (which is the input formalism of Cosmos) with the input formalism of Simulink, to obtain an adequate expressive power. Indeed, Simulink is largely used in the automotive industry and numerous controllers have been specified using this tool. However, there is no formal semantics for Simulink, which lead us to define such a semantics in two steps:first, we propose an exact (but not operational) semantics, then we complete it by an approximate semantics that includes the targeted approximation level.In order to combine the discrete event model of Petri nets and the continous model specified in Simulink, we define a syntactic interface that relies on new transition types; its semantics consists of an extension of the simulation loop. The evaluation of this new formalism has been entirely implemented into Cosmos.Using this new formalism, we have designed and studied the two following case studies: on one hand, a heavy traffic on a motorway segment, and on the other hand the insertion of a vehicle into a motorway. Our approach has been validated by the analysis of the corresponding models.

Model checking is a technique used to verify whether a model meets a given specification by exhaustively and automatically checking each reachable state in the model. It is a well-developed technique, but it suffers from some issues, perhaps most importantly the state space explosion problem. Models may contain so many states that must be checked means that the model checking procedure may be intractable. In this thesis we investigate whether procedure summaries can be used to improve the performance of model checking. Procedure summaries are concise representations of parts of a program, such as a function or method. We present a design and an implementation of dynamically generated summaries as an extension of Java PathFinder, a virtual machine executing Java bytecode that is able to model check programs written in Java by backtracking execution, to explore different schedulings etc. We find that our summaries incur an overhead that outweighs the benefits in most cases, but the approach shows promise in certain cases, in particular when stateless model checking is used. We also provide some statistics related to cases when our summaries are applicable that could provide guidance for future work within this field. / Model checking, eller modellkontroll, är en välkänd teknik inom programverifikation som används för att verifiera att en modell, ofta av ett program, uppfyller en given specifikation genom att undersöka alla nåbara tillstånd i modellen. Det är en välutvecklad teknik som lider av några brister, en av de viktigaste är det så kallade state space explosion-problemet. Modellerna kan bestå av så många olika tillstånd att \textit{model checking} inte går att använda. I den här rapporten undersöker vi om vi kan tillämpa så kallade procedur-sammanfattningar för att förbättra prestandan av model checking. Procedur-sammanfattningar är representationer av delar av program, till exempel metoder eller funktioner. Vi presenterar en design och implementation av dynamiskt genererade sammanfattningar i form av ett tillägg till Java PathFinder, en virtuell maskin som exekverar Java bytecode som kan utföra model checking genom att backa körningar för att till exempel utforska olika schemaläggningar. Våra procedur-sammanfattningar har i många fall en negativ effekt på körtid, men visar på lovande resultat i vissa fall, i synnerhet när så kallad stateless model checking används. Vi presenterar också resultat kopplat till fall när våra sammanfattningar är applicerbara som kan leda vägen för fortsatt arbete inom området.

Formal verification techniques are growing increasingly vital for the development of safety-critical software and hardware in practice. Techniques such as requirements-based design and model checking for system verification have been successfully used to verify systems for air traffic control, airplane separation assurance, autopilots, CPU logic designs, life-support, medical equipment, and other functions that ensure human safety. Formal behavioral specifications written early in the system-design process and communicated across all design phases increase the efficiency, consistency, and quality of the system under development. We argue that to prevent introducing design or verification errors, it is crucial to test specifications for satisfiability. We advocate for the adaptation of a new sanity check via satisfiability checking for property assurance. Our focus here is on specifications expressed in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). We demonstrate that LTL satisfiability checking reduces to model checking and satisfiability checking for the specification, its complement, and a conjunction of all properties should be performed as a first step to LTL model checking. We report on an experimental investigation of LTL satisfiability checking. We introduce a large set of rigorous benchmarks to enable objective evaluation of LTL-to-automaton algorithms in terms of scalability, performance, correctness, and size of the automata produced. For explicit model checking, we use the Spin model checker; we tested all LTL-to-explicit automaton translation tools that were publicly available when we conducted our study. For symbolic model checking, we use CadenceSMV, NuSMV, and SAL-SMC for both LTL-to-symbolic automaton translation and to perform the satisfiability check. Our experiments result in two major findings. First, scalability, correctness, and other debilitating performance issues afflict most LTL translation tools. Second, for LTL satisfiability checking, the symbolic approach is clearly superior to the explicit approach. Ironically, the explicit approach to LTL-to-automata had been heavily studied while only one algorithm existed for LTL-to-symbolic automata. Since 1994, there had been essentially no new progress in encoding symbolic automata for BDD-based analysis. Therefore, we introduce a set of 30 symbolic automata encodings. The set consists of novel combinations of existing constructs, such as different LTL formula normal forms, with a novel transition-labeled symbolic automaton form, a new way to encode transitions, and new BDD variable orders based on algorithms for tree decomposition of graphs. An extensive set of experiments demonstrates that these encodings translate to significant, sometimes exponential, improvement over the current standard encoding for symbolic LTL satisfiability checking. Building upon these ideas, we return to the explicit automata domain and focus on the most common type of specifications used in industrial practice: safety properties. We show that we can exploit the inherent determinism of safety properties to create a set of 26 explicit automata encodings comprised of novel aspects including: state numbers versus state labels versus a state look-up table, finite versus infinite acceptance conditions, forward-looking versus backward-looking transition encodings, assignment-based versus BDD-based alphabet representation, state and transition minimization, edge abbreviation, trap-state elimination, and determinization either on-the-fly or up-front using the subset construction. We conduct an extensive experimental evaluation and identify an encoding that offers the best performance in explicit LTL model checking time and is constantly faster than the previous best explicit automaton encoding algorithm.

Regular model checking is a method for verifying infinite-state systems based on coding their configurations as words over a finite alphabet, sets of configurations as finite automata, and transitions as finite transducers. We implement regular model checking using inference of regular languages. The method builds upon the observations that for infinite-state systems whose behavior can be modeled using length-preserving transducers, there is a finite computation for obtaining all reachable configurations.   Our new approach to regular model checking via inference of regular languages is based on the Angluin's L* algorithm that is used for finding out an invariant which can answer our question whether the system satisfies some property.   We also provide an intro to the theory of finite automata, model checking, SAT solving and Anguin's L* and Bierman algorithm of learning finite automata.

No description available.

Doctor of Philosophy / Department of Computing and Information Sciences / Matthew Dwyer / John M. Hatcliff / To analyze an open system, one needs to close it with a definition of its environment, i.e., its execution context. Environment modeling is a significant challenge: environment models should be general enough to permit analysis of large portions of a system's possible behaviors, yet sufficiently precise to enable cost-effective reasoning. This thesis presents the Bandera Environment Generator (BEG), a toolset that automates generation of environment models to provide a restricted form of modular model checking of Java programs, where the module's source code is the subject of analysis along with an abstract model of the environment's behavior. Since the most general environments do not allow for tractable model checking, BEG has support for restricting the environment behavior based on domain-specific knowledge and assumptions about the environment behavior, which can be acquired from a variety of sources. When the environment code is not available, developers can encode their assumptions as an explicit formal specification. When the environment code is available, BEG employs static analyses to extract environment assumptions. Both specifications and static analyses can be tuned to reflect domain-specific knowledge, i.e., to describe domain-specific aspects of the environment behavior. Initially, BEG was implemented to handle general Java applications; later, it was extended to handle two specific domains: Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) implemented using the Swing/AWT libraries and web applications implemented using the J2EE framework. BEG was evaluated on several non-trivial case studies, including industrial applications from NASA, SUN, and Fujitsu. This thesis presents the domain-specific environment generation for GUI and web applications and describes BEG, its extensible architecture, usage, and how it can be extended to handle new domains.

Higher-order recursion schemes are systems of equations that are used to define finite and infinite labelled trees. Since, as Ong has shown, the trees defined have a decidable monadic second order theory, recursion schemes have drawn the attention of research in program verification, where they sit naturally as a higher-order, functional analogue of Boolean programs. Driven by applications, fragments have been studied, algorithms developed and extensions proposed; the emerging theme is called higher-order model checking. Kobayashi has pioneered an approach to higher-order model checking using intersection types, from which many recent advances have followed. The key is a characterisation of model checking as a problem of intersection type assignment. This dissertation contributes to both the theory and practice of the intersection type approach. A new, fixed-parameter polynomial-time decision procedure is described for the alternating trivial automaton fragment of higher-order model checking. The algorithm uses a novel, type-directed form of abstraction refinement, in which behaviours of the scheme are distinguished according to the intersection types that they inhabit. Furthermore, by using types to reason about acceptance and rejection simultaneously, the algorithm is able to converge on a solution from two sides. An implementation, Preface, and an extensive body of evidence demonstrate empirically that the algorithm scales well to schemes of several thousand rules. A comparison with other tools on benchmarks derived from current practice and the related literature puts it well beyond the state-of-the-art. A generalisation of the intersection type approach is presented in which higher-order model checking is seen as an instance of exact abstract interpretation. Intersection type assignment is used to characterise a general class of safety checking problems, defined independently of any particular representation (such as automata) for a class of recursion schemes built over arbitrary constants. Decidability of any problem in the class is an immediate corollary. Moreover, the work looks beyond whole-program verification, the traditional territory of model checking, by giving a natural treatment of higher-type properties, which are sets of functions.

As a technique to ensure absence of undesired interference in transactional computations, Concurrency Control (CC) guarantees logical data consistency via providing transaction isolation, thus contributing to their dependability. However, single-version CC, which requires that a transaction system always works on the current version of a data item, may introduce unpredictable delays for real-time transactions because of unbounded blocking time which may cause deadline misses. Compared to single-version CC (current value of a data item is available but the historical values are overwritten and not accessible) mechanism, multi-version Concurrency Control (MVCC, historical values of a data item are maintained in a version list and accessible) mechanisms have several advantages. The benefit of multiple versions for concurrency control is helping the scheduler avoid rejecting operations, which could improve the concurrency for real-time transaction systems. Because transactions are less likely to be blocked using MVCC, timeliness could be improved. Transaction isolation levels, out of which the serializable one is the highest, control the degree of interference-freedom of concurrent transactions. Instead of serializable isolation, some MVCC mechanisms are known to achieve a relaxed level of isolation. In order to select an appropriate MVCC mechanism that guarantees both timeliness and an acceptable level of isolation for a given transaction set, trade-off analysis between isolation and timeliness is necessary. However, even though approaches have been proposed to analyze timeliness and isolation together, they only focus on lock-based single-version concurrency control algorithms, not on MVCC. In this thesis, we focus on modeling multi-version based real-time transaction system as a network of timed automata, and verify the consistency of the tradeoff transaction timeliness and isolation in UPPAAL. We propose a modular modeling approach to model real-time multi-version transaction systems by reusing and extending set of basic blocks. The proposed approach not only reduces the modeling efforts, but also enables easy adjustment for adapting current MVCC mechanism to another. Assuming a given transaction set, we model three MVCC algorithms including multi-version Timestamp Ordering, a variant of multi-version Two-Phase locking and a Two-Version Priority Ceiling Protocol, and verify both timeliness and isolation level. The verification results show that Two-Version Priority Ceiling Protocol outperforms the other two MVCC algorithms with the given transaction set.

A reactive control system is a computer system reacting to certain stimuli emitted by its environment in order to maintain it in a desired state. Distributed reactive control systems are generally composed of several processes, running in parallel on one or more computers, communicating with one another to perform the required control task. By their very nature, distributed reactive control systems are hard to design. Their distributed nature and/or the communication scheme used can introduce subtle unforeseen behaviours. When dealing with critical applications, such as plane control systems, or traffic light control systems, those unintended behaviours can have disastrous consequences. It is therefore essential, for the designer, to ensure that this does not happen. For that purpose, rigorous and systematic techniques can (and should) be applied as early as possible in the development process. In that spirit, this work aims at providing the designer with the necessary tools in order to facilitate the development and validation of such distributed reactive control systems. In particular, we show how using a dedicated language called dSL (Distributed Supervision language) can be used to ease the development process. We also study how validations techniques such as model-checking and testing can be applied in this context.

Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.