There are few maize varieties that are drought tolerant in semi-arid eastern Kenya and farmer perceptions of drought tolerant maize cultivars have not been studied in this region. Farmers in this region use maize landraces that have not been studied for their potential future hybridization. The main objectives of this study were therefore to: (i) study farmer perceptions of drought and preference for maize varieties, (ii) improve drought tolerance in maize populations in the semi-arid eastern Kenya using S1 family recurrent selection, and (iii) classify maize landraces according to their heterotic patterns. A participatory rural appraisal (PRA) was conducted in Machakos and Makueni districts in semi-arid eastern Kenya. A total of 175 farmers were involved in focus group discussions. An open ended questionnaire and a checklist were used to guide the farmers during the discussion sessions. Scoring and ranking techniques were used to assess farmers’ preferences of maize varieties and constraints to maize production. The farmers grew maize as their major crop followed by beans. Nearly 60% of the farmers grew local maize landraces, whose seed they recycled from season to season; 40% grew improved varieties, but mainly composites rather than hybrids. The key farmers’ criteria for choosing a maize variety in order of importance were drought tolerance, early maturity, high yield, and disease resistance. The major constraints to maize production were drought, lack of technical know-how, pests, poor soils, and inadequate seed supply. Maize traits preferred by farmers in a drought tolerant variety included high yield, recovery after a dry spell and the stay green characteristic. Two maize landrace populations MKS and KTU from semi-arid eastern Kenya and three CIMMYT populations V032, ZM423, and ZM523 were subjected to two cycles of S1 progeny recurrent selection for drought tolerance in yield and traits indicative of drought tolerance were measured during flowering and grain filling from February 2005 to September 2007. Evaluation to determine selection gains was done in one trial replicated five times. It was laid out as a 4x4 lattice design and drought was imposed at reproductive stage by withholding irrigation one week before flowering and resumed during grain filling. The trial was repeated under well-watered conditions which served as a control experiment. After two cycles of selection under drought stress conditions, KTU population had a realized gain in yield of 0.2 t ha-1, MKS population 1.2 t ha-1 and ZM423 0.4 t ha-1, whereas in V032 and ZM523, grain yield reduced by 1.1 t ha-1 and 0.6 t ha-1, respectively. Under well watered conditions, the realized gains in grain yield were positive in all the populations except V032, where there was a reduction of 0.1 t ha-1. Selection increased the genetic variability and heritability estimates for yield in S1 lines of MKS and ZM423 populations, but decreased in KTU, V032 and ZM523 populations. The research to identify heterotic patterns was undertaken using ten maize landraces from the semi-arid eastern Kenya, six maize landraces from coastal Kenya, and three maize populations from CIMMYT. These populations were planted at Kiboko Research Farm during the short rains of October-December 2005 and crossed to two population testers, Embu 11 and Embu 12. The evaluation of the test crosses was done during the long rains of March-June 2006. Percentage heterosis for yield ranged from -17.7% to 397.4%, -79.4 to 22.2% for anthesis-silking interval, -23.9% to 29.2% for ear height, -0.1 to 1.1 for ear diameter, -7.1 to 21.2% for ear length and -5.9% to 30.3% for plant height. iii General combining ability (GCA) effects were significant (p=0.05) for all the traits, while specific combining ability (SCA) effects were not significant (p>0.05), implying that variation among these crosses was mainly due to additive rather than nonadditive gene effects. Since SCA was not significant (p>0.05) for yield, maize populations were classified based on percentage heterosis for yield alone. The maize populations therefore, were grouped into three different heterotic groups P, Q and R. Twelve landrace populations and two CIMMYT populations showed heterosis with Embu 11 and no heterosis with Embu 12 were put in one group P. Two landrace populations that showed no heterosis with either tester were put in group Q. Two landrace populations and one CIMMYT population showed heterosis with both testers were put in group R. None of the populations showed heterosis only with Embu 12 and no heterosis with Embu 11. The main constraint to maize production was drought and the farmers preferred their landraces whose seed they recycled season to season. After two cycles of recurrent selection, the landrace populations showed improved progress in yield. Thus, further selection will be beneficial in the populations where genetic variability increased. Therefore, these populations can further be improved per se and released as varieties and/or incorporated into the existing maize germplasm to broaden their genetic base, given that their heterotic patterns have been identified. Considering that farmers recycle seed, breeding should be towards the development of open-pollinated varieties which are drought tolerant. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2007.

Low soil nitrogen (N) and drought impede maize production in the small-scale farming sector in Zambia; and adoption of new cultivars with improved tolerance might enhance production. This study: a) assessed farmer preferences for maize cultivars; b) determined genotype x environment interaction effects among popular maize cultivars under contrasting soil fertility levels and; c) investigated landraces for tolerance to low N and drought using S1 selection. The study was carried out in Zambia from 2004-07. Farmer preference influencing the adoption of maize cultivars was investigated using both formal and informal surveys in Luangwa, Chibombo and Lufwanyama rural districts representing the three agro-ecological regions of Zambia. Focus group discussions and personal interviews were used to collect data on issues that affected maize production in these areas. It has been found that although farmers perceived landraces to be low yielding, they believed that they were superior to improved cultivars for: tolerance to drought; tolerance to low soil fertility; grain palatability; grain storability; and poundability. The need for food security, their inability to apply fertiliser, and their need for drought tolerant cultivars significantly (p ≤ 0.05) influenced farmers in adopting cultivars. The farmers would readily adopt cultivars that address these concerns. The predominant use of certain landraces (76%) reflected their superiority in meeting some of these needs. The performance of nine popular cultivars (three for each of hybrids, OPVs and landraces) under contrasting levels of soil fertility, across six environments (ENVs) in the three agro-eological regions, was evaluated. An ENV was defined as season x location combination. The fertilizer treatments were full fertilization, basal dressing, top dressing and nil fertilization. The cultivars exhibited significant non-crossover type of genotype x fertilisation interaction effects at three ENVs, while the genotype x fertilisation interaction effects, were non-significant at the other three ENVs. The cultivars exhibited dynamic stability by increasing grain yield (GY) when fertilization was increased. Landraces yielded higher than all open pollinated varieties and were generally higher yielding than two hybrids. Based on average rank for GY, the five highest yielding cultivars were MRI724, Gankata, MM603, Kazungula and Pandawe. Superiority of landraces revealed their genetic potential for GY under low soil fertility and they should be used as germplasm in developing cultivars targeting such environments. Ninety-six local landraces were selfed to generate S1 lines (2004/05 season) which were crossed to a tester (2005/06 season). Testcrosses were evaluated under optimal, low N, and drought conditions (2006/07 season). Data on GY, anthesis-silking interval, number of ears per plant, leaf senescence, leaf rolling, tassel size and grain texture were recorded in all the trials during the study period. Testcrosses, their S1 parents and landraces that were superior under low N, drought, optimal conditions and across environments were identified; these should be used to develop varieties targeted to a particular environment. Selection for tolerance to drought also selected for tolerance to low N. Selection for low N tolerance also selected for GY under drought and optimal conditions. Therefore, in selecting for tolerance to abiotic stresses, use of optimal and managed stress environments was effective. The following landraces were superior at 10% selection intensity: LR38, LR84 and LR86 (optimal, low N and drought conditions); LR11, LR35 and LR76 (low N and drought conditions); LR12 (optimal and drought conditions); LR40 and LR93 (low N conditions only); LR79 (drought conditions only) and; LR74 and LR85 (optimal conditions only). These landraces should be used as source germplasm targeting respective environments. Significant (p ≤ 0.05) positive general combining ability effects for GY under both low N and drought conditions were found implying that additive gene action conditioned GY under the abiotic stresses. The heritability for GY under low N (0.38), and drought (0.17) conditions, was low suggesting that selection based on GY alone was not effective. The genetic correlation for GY between optimal, and either low N (rG=0.458), or drought (rG = 0.03) environments, was low (rG < 0.5) suggesting that indirect selection would not be effective either. Therefore, use of secondary traits for selection is discussed. The study established that most farmers depended on local landraces for seed and would adopt low input improved varieties that yield higher than the landraces. Some landraces were found superior to some improved cultivars under contrasting fertilisation regimes. The study also found that landraces had genetic variation for tolerance to low N and drought. Landraces, S1 lines and testcrosses superior under low N, drought, optimal conditions and across environments were selected and they should be used to develop cultivars targeting respective environments. Policy implications of these results are discussed. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2007.

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the principal crop of Southern Africa but production is threatened by gray leaf spot (Cercospora zea-maydis L.) and phaeosphaeria leaf spot (Phaeosphaeria maydis L.) diseases, drought and the use of unadapted cultivars, among other constraints. There are few studies of gray leaf spot (GLS) and Phaeosphaeria leaf spot (PLS) resistance, drought tolerance, yield stability and maize cultivar preferences in Southern Africa. The objective of this study was to: a) determine farmers’ preferences for cultivars; b) investigate the gene action and heritability for resistance to GLS and PLS, and drought tolerance; and c) evaluate yield stability and its relationship with high yield potential in Southern African maize germplasm. The study was conducted in South Africa and Zimbabwe during 2003 to 2004. A participatory rural appraisal (PRA) established that farmers preferred old hybrids of the 1970s because they had better tolerance to drought stress. Farmers also preferred their local landrace because of its flintier grain and better taste than the hybrids. The major prevailing constraints that influenced farmers’ preferences were lack of appropriate cultivars that fit into the ultra short seasons, drought and low soil fertility. Thus they preferred cultivars that combine high yield potential, early maturity, and drought tolerance in all areas. However, those in relatively wet areas preferred cultivars with tolerance to low soil fertility, and weevil resistance, among other traits. A genetic analysis of 72 hybrids from a North Carolina Design II mating revealed significant differences for GLS and PLS resistance, and drought tolerance. General combining ability (GCA) effects accounted for 86% of genetic variation for GLS and 90% for PLS resistance indicating that additive effects were more important than non-additive gene action in controlling these traits. Some crosses between susceptible and resistant inbreds had high resistance to GLS suggesting the importance of dominance gene action in controlling GLS resistance. Resistance to GLS and PLS was highly heritable (62 to 73%) indicating that resistance could be improved by selection. Also large GCA effects for yield (72%), number of ears per plant (77%), and anthesis-silking interval (ASI) (77%) under drought stress indicated that predominantly additive effects controlled hybrid performance under drought conditions. Although heritability for yield declined from 60% under optimum to 19% under drought conditions, heritability for ASI ranged from 32 to 49% under moisture stress. High heritability for ASI suggested that yield could be improved through selection for short ASI, which is positively correlated with high yield potential under drought stress. The stability analyses of the hybrids over 10 environments indicated that 86% had average stability; 8% had below average stability and were adapted to favourable environments; and 6% displayed above average stability and were specifically adapted to drought stress environments. Grain yield potential and yield stability were positively correlated. In sum, the study indicated that farmers’ preferences would be greatly influenced by the major prevailing constraints. It also identified adequate genetic variation for stress tolerance, yield potential and yield stability in Southern African maize base germplasm, without negative associations among them, suggesting that cultivars combining high yield potential, high stress tolerance and yield stability would be obtainable. / Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2005.

Local maize landraces have evolved over hundreds of years of natural and farmer selection under varying conditions. These landraces may have developed tolerance to abiotic stresses such as water deficits during this cycle of selection. However, despite its continued existence and importance, little is known on their agronomy and responses to water stress. If indeed landraces have developed tolerance to water stress, they may prove a key genetic resource for future crop improvement in light of increasing water scarcity. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the responses of a local maize landrace to water stress at different stages of growth in comparison to two known commercial hybrids, SC701 and SR52. Seed from a local maize landrace was multiplied and characterised according to kernel colour. Two distinct colours were selected for the purposes of this study, white (Land A) and dark red (Land B). In a holistic approach, the thesis consisted of four separate studies whose overall objective was to evaluate the responses of the maize landraces to water stress at different growth stages, up to and including yield and its components. These comprised three controlled environment studies (25°C; 60% RH) and a field trial. For the controlled environment, two water regimes were used, 25% field capacity (FC) (stress treatment) and 75% FC (non-stress). The first study investigated the effect of water stress on early establishment performance. Seed quality was evaluated using the standard germination test together with electrolyte leakage. Catalase activity and accumulation of proline were examined as seedling physiological response to water stress. The second study was conducted as a pot trial to investigate the effect of water stress on growth, photosynthesis and yield. Photosynthesis was measured as chlorophyll fluorescence (CF). In addition, a field study over three planting dates was conducted at Ukulinga Research Farm in Pietermaritzburg, under dryland conditions, during the period from August 2008 to June 2009. The objective was to evaluate the effect of planting dates and changing soil water content on growth, yield and yield components. Three planting dates were used, representative of early (28 August 2008), optimum (21 October 2008) and late planting (9 January 2009). Lastly, a study on hydro-priming was conducted, necessitated by observations made primarily in the first study. The study was carried out under controlled environment conditions. The objective was to evaluate whether hydropriming can improve germination, vigour and emergence under water stress. Seeds were soaked in water for 0 hours (Un-primed or control), 12 hours (P12) and 24 hours (P24). Results from the first study showed that maize landraces were slower to germinate and emerge, and produced less vigorous seedlings compared to the hybrids. The study showed that hybrids were more superior under optimum (75% FC) conditions than under stress conditions (25% FC). Physiological showed that both hybrids and landraces expressed catalase under water stress, with landraces showing slightly better expression compared to the hybrids. Proline accumulation was observed in both hybrids and landraces as a response to water stress, with hybrids being more sensitive to water stress. In the pot trial, results showed that the vegetative stage of both hybrids and landraces was less sensitive to water stress than the reproductive stage. Results showed no differences between field capacities, with respect to emergence, mean emergence time, leaf number, CF, ear prolificacy and ear length. Photosynthesis, as measured by CF, was shown to be desiccation tolerant. Water stress had a negative effect on cob mass, lines per cob, grains per cob and total grain mass, and resulted in barrenness in the landraces. The hybrids had superior yield compared to the landraces. Results for the field trials showed that planting date had highly significant effects on emergence, plant height, leaf number and days to tasseling (DTT). Landraces emerged better than hybrids in all plantings; highest emergence was in the early and late plantings. Optimum and late planting resulted in maximum plant height and leaf number, respectively, compared to early planting. Hybrids were superior, growing taller and with more leaves than landraces in all plantings. DTT decreased with successive plantings. Planting date had an effect on ear prolificacy (EP), kernels/ear (KNE) and 100 grain mass. Planting date had no effect on ear length and mass, kernel rows/cob, grain mass and yield. With the exception of EP, hybrids out-yielded the landraces in all three planting dates. Hydro-priming landraces for 12 hours and 24 hours, respectively, improved germination velocity index, reduced mean germination time and improved emergence and mean emergence time of maize landraces under water stress. Performance of hybrid seeds remained superior to that of landraces even after seed treatment to improve germination and vigour. Landraces were slower to germinate and emerge and produced less vigorous seedlings in controlled conditions only. Both hybrids and landraces expressed catalase activity and also accumulated proline in response to water stress, although hybrids were more sensitive to stress in the establishment phase. Results confirmed literature, showing that, for both hybrids and landraces, the vegetative stage is less sensitive to stress than the reproductive stage. Hybrids produced superior yields compared to landraces in both controlled environment and field conditions. However, the pattern of seedling establishment observed in the initial controlled environment study for hybrids and landraces was reversed in the field study. Lastly, hydro-priming is of some benefit to maize establishment. / Thesis (M.Sc.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 2009.