Allt fler barn i Sverige lider av psykisk ohälsa. Det finns ett behov av bättre kunskapsunderlag för att hitta de barn som visar tidiga tecken på psykisk ohälsa. Syftet med studien var att undersöka vad personal inom förskolan har för inställning till att utföra skattning av barns sociala och känslomässiga utveckling med formulär. Tretton intervjuer genomfördes och materialet analyserades med kvalitativ innehållsanalys. Resultatet visade att det fanns en olust bland förskollärare att möta föräldrars reaktion och oro inför en eventuell bedömning. Att redovisa formulärets svar för föräldrarna kändes inte heller helt lätt. Förskollärarna ansåg att förskolan är ett bra forum för att bedöma socialt beteende och att formuläret kan resultera i en tydlig och rättvis bild av barnen. Men lärarna var också rädda för att stämpla barn. En del ansåg att bedömningar av enskilda barns utveckling är ett förlegat arbetssätt. Personalen hade delade meningar i frågan om tidsbrist skulle utgöra ett hinder för skattningsarbetet. I alla intervjuer fanns en vilja från lärarnas sida att se till barnets bästa. Slutsats: Skattning av barns beteende med hjälp av formulär i förskolan är komplext. Ett eventuellt införande av metoden ställer krav på tydlig information om metoden och syftet till såväl förskollärare som föräldrar. / An increasing number of Swedish children suffer from psychiatric disorders. There is a need for better knowledge to detect children that show early signs of psychiatric disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate what attitude preschool staffs have to perform evaluations of children’s social and mental development using a questionnaire. A total number of thirteen interviews have been performed and the material have been analysed according to a qualitative content analysis. The results showed a discomfort amongst preschool teachers to meet the parents’ reaction and concern in relation to a possible evaluation. The preschool is considered to be a good forum when to assess children´s behaviour and the actual questionnaire is considered to be a useful tool. But the teachers were worried that they would put a label on the children. Some of the teachers believed that assessing children is an outdated way to work. There were different opinions whether lack of time is an obstacle to use the questionnaire. There was generally an intention to ensure the children´s best. Conclusion: Evaluations of the children´s behaviour using the questionnaire in preschool is a complex issue. An implementation of the method requires extensive information to preschool teachers and parents.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: B, page: 1623. Adviser: Luisa Franzini. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 78-80).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2007. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on Feb. 4, 2010). Includes bibliographical references (p. 127-135).

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, page: 3544. Advisers: John R. Herbold; Sharon Cooper. Includes bibliographical references.

In Australia, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common registrable cancer affecting both men and women, and the third most common cause of cancer deaths. Clinical data from randomised, controlled trials indicate that population-based screening utilising the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) can reduce mortality from this disease. However, high adherence rates with repeated testing are required to secure these outcomes. This study examines repeat adherence with FOBT screening in a rural community two years after a first screening round was conducted. Patients, aged 50 to 74 years, registered with four local general practices were mailed a FOBT kit with a letter of invitation from their general practitioner. Following the intervention, 119 telephone interviews were conducted with adherers and non-adherers to examine knowledge and attitudes related to screening. Compliance with screening was recorded and compared with first round-data. Participation in the screening program was modest. Of the 3,406 participants eligible for both screening rounds, 34.1% and 34.7% participated in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. A majority of participants (56.8%) did not adhere to either screening, a quarter (25.7%) participated in both rounds, and 17.5% participated in one of the two rounds. First-round adherence was the strongest predictor of second-round adherence (OR=16.29; 95% CI: 13.58, 19.53) with 75.2% of first-round adherers completing a FOBT in round 2. Females were also more likely to adhere in both rounds, although the difference between females and males decreased across rounds. Knowledge and attitudes differed between adherers and non-adherers and are discussed within the context of the major findings. Results from this trial indicate that achieving high levels of compliance in a national screening program will be challenging. Strategies to increase repeat adherence are suggested.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karolinska institutet, 2007. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2002. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2003. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2003. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2005. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.