Transaction costs and resampling are two important issues that need great attention in every portfolio investment planning. In practice costs are incurred to rebalance a portfolio. Every investor tries to find a way of avoiding high transaction cost as much as possible. In this thesis, we investigated how transaction costs and resampling affect portfolio investment. We modified the basic mean-variance optimization problem to include rebalancing costs we incur on transacting securities in the portfolio. We also reduce trading as much as possible by applying the resampling approach any time we rebalance our portfolio. Transaction costs are assumed to be a percentage of the amount of securities transacted. We applied the resampling approach and tracked the performance of portfolios over time, assuming transaction costs and then no transaction costs are incurred. We compared how the portfolio is affected when we incorporated the two issues outlined above to that of the basic mean-variance optimization.

<p>There is a big interest for alternative investment strategies than investing in traditional asset classes. Commodities are having a boom dynamic with increasing prices. This thesis is therefore based on applying Modern Portfolio Theory concept to this alternative asset class.</p><p>In this paper we manage to create optimal portfolios of commodities for investors with known and unknown risk preferences. When comparing expected returns to actual returns we found that for the investor with the known risk preference almost replicated the return of the markets. The other investor with unknown risk preference also profited but not as efficient as the market portfolio.</p>

There is a big interest for alternative investment strategies than investing in traditional asset classes. Commodities are having a boom dynamic with increasing prices. This thesis is therefore based on applying Modern Portfolio Theory concept to this alternative asset class. In this paper we manage to create optimal portfolios of commodities for investors with known and unknown risk preferences. When comparing expected returns to actual returns we found that for the investor with the known risk preference almost replicated the return of the markets. The other investor with unknown risk preference also profited but not as efficient as the market portfolio.

京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(経済学) / 甲第19953号 / 経博第540号 / 新制||経||279(附属図書館) / 33049 / 京都大学大学院経済学研究科経済学専攻 / (主査)教授 江上 雅彦, 教授 若井 克俊, 教授 原 千秋 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Economics / Kyoto University / DFAM

The concept of portfolio optimization has been widely studied in the academy and implemented in the financial markets since its introduction by Markowitz 70 years ago. The problem of the mean-variance optimization framework caused by input uncertainty has been one of the foci in the previous research. In this study, several models (linear shrinkage and Black-Litterman) based on Bayesian approaches are studied to improve the estimation of inputs. Moreover, a new framework based on robust optimization is presented to mitigate the input uncertainty further.  An out-of-sample test is specially designed, and the results show that Bayesian models in this study can improve the optimization results in terms of higher Sharpe ratios (the quotient between portfolio returns and their risks). Both covariance matrix estimators based on the linear shrinkage method contain less error and provide better optimization results, i.e. higher Sharpe ratios. The Black-Litterman model with a proper choice of inputs can significantly improve the portfolio return. The new framework based on the combination of shrinkage estimators, Black-Litterman, and robust optimization presents a better way for portfolio optimization than the classical framework of mean-variance optimization.

Many important tasks in finance often rely on complex and time-consuming computations. The rapid development of quantum technology has raised the question of whether quantum computing can be used to solve these tasks more efficiently than classical computing. This thesis studies the potential use of quantum computing in finance by solving differently-sized problem instances of the mean-variance portfolio selection model using commercially available quantum resources. The experiments employ gate-based quantum computers and quantum annealing, the two main technologies for realizing a quantum computer. To solve the mean-variance optimization problem on gate-based quantum computers, the model was formulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, which was then used as input to quantum resources available on the largest quantum computing as a service (QCaaS) platforms, IBM Quantum Lab, Microsoft Azure Quantum and Amazon Braket. To solve the problem using quantum annealing, a hybrid quantum-classical solver available on the service D-Wave Leap was employed, which takes as input the mean-variance model’s constrained quadratic form. The problem instances were also solved classically on the model’s QUBO form, where the results acted as benchmarks for the performances of the quantum resources. The results were evaluated based on three performance metrics: time-to-solve, solution quality, and cost-to-solve. The findings indicate that gate-based quantum computers are not yet mature enough to consistently find optimal solutions, with the computation times being long and costly as well. Moreover, the use of gate-based quantum computers was not trouble-free, with the majority of quantum computers failing to even complete the jobs. Quantum annealing, on the other hand, demonstrated greater maturity, with the hybrid solver being capable of fast and accurate optimization, even for very large problem instances. The results from using the hybrid solver justify further research into quantum annealing, to better understand the capabilities and limitations of the technology. The results also indicate that quantum annealing has reached a level of maturity where it has the potential to make a significant impact on financial institutions, creating value that cannot be obtained by using classical computing.

Ever since its introduction in 1952, the Mean-Variance (MV) portfolio selection theory has remained a centerpiece within the realm of e_cient asset allocation. However, in scienti_c circles, the theory has stirred controversy. A strand of criticism has emerged that points to the phenomenon that Mean-Variance Optimization su_ers from the severe drawback of estimation errors contained in the expected return vector and the covariance matrix, resulting in portfolios that may signi_cantly deviate from the true optimal portfolio. While a substantial amount of e_ort has been devoted to estimating the expected return vector in this context, much less is written about the covariance matrix input. In recent times, however, research that points to the importance of the covariance matrix in MV optimization has emerged. As a result, there has been a growing interest whether MV optimization can be enhanced by improving the estimate of the covariance matrix. Hence, this thesis was set forth by the purpose to investigate whether nancial practitioners and institutions can allocate portfolios consisting of assets in a more e_cient manner by changing the covariance matrix input in mean-variance optimization. In the quest of chieving this purpose, an out-of-sample analysis of MV optimized portfolios was performed, where the performance of ve prominent covariance matrix estimators were compared, holding all other things equal in the MV optimization. The optimization was performed under realistic investment constraints, taking incurred transaction costs into account, and for an investment asset universe ranging from equity to bonds. The empirical _ndings in this study suggest one dominant estimator: the covariance matrix estimator implied by the Gerber Statistic (GS). Speci_cally, by using this covariance matrix estimator in lieu of the traditional sample covariance matrix, the MV optimization rendered more e_cient portfolios in terms of higher Sharpe ratios, higher risk-adjusted returns and lower maximum drawdowns. The outperformance was protruding during recessionary times. This suggests that an investor that employs traditional MVO in quantitative asset allocation can improve their asset picking abilities by changing to the, in theory, more robust GS  ovariance matrix estimator in times of volatile nancial markets.

Multi-period portfolio optimization (MPO) has gained a lot of interest in modern portfolio theory due to its consideration for inter-temporal trading e effects, especially market impacts and transactions costs, and for its subtle reliability on return predictability. However, because of the heavy computational demand, portfolio policies based on this approach have been sparsely explored. In that regard, a tractable MPO framework proposed by N. Gârleanu &amp; L. H. Pedersen has been investigated. Using the stochastic control framework, the authors provided a closed form expression of the optimal policy. Moreover, they used a specific, yet flexible return predictability model. Excess returns were expressed using a linear factor model, and the predicting factors were modeled as mean reverting processes. Finally, transactions costs and market impacts were incorporated in the problem formulation as a quadratic function. The elaborated methodology considered that the market returns dynamics are governed by fast and slow mean reverting factors, and that the market transactions costs are not necessarily quadratic. By controlling the exposure to the market returns predicting factors, the aim was to uncover the importance of the mean reversion speeds in the performance of the constructed trading strategies, under realistic market costs. Additionally, for the sake of comparison, trading strategies based on a single-period mean variance optimization were considered. The findings suggest an overall superiority in performance for the studied MPO approach even when the market costs are not quadratic. This was accompanied with evidence of better usability of the factors' mean reversion speed, especially fast reverting factors, and robustness in adapting to transactions costs. / Portföljoptimering över era perioder (MPO) har fått stort intresse inom modern portföljteori. Skälet till detta är att MPO tar hänsyn till inter-temporala handelseffekter, särskilt marknadseffekter och transaktionskostnader, plus dess tillförlitlighet på avkastningsförutsägbarhet. På grund av det stora beräkningsbehovet har dock portföljpolitiken baserad på denna metod inte undersökts mycket. I det avseendet, har en underskriven MPO ramverk som föreslagits av N.Gârleanu L. H. Pedersen undersökts. Med hjälp av stokastiska kontrollramen tillhandahöll författarna formuläret för sluten form av den optimala politiken. Dessutom använde de en specifik, men ändå flexibel returförutsägbarhetsmodell. Överskjutande avkastning uttrycktes med hjälp av en linjärfaktormodell och de förutsägande faktorerna modellerades som genomsnittligaåterföringsprocesser. Slutligen inkorporerades transaktionskostnader och marknadseffekter i problemformuleringen som en kvadratisk funktion. Den utarbetade metodiken ansåg att marknadens avkastningsdynamik styrs av snabba och långsammaåterhämtningsfaktorer, och att kostnaderna för marknadstransaktioner inte nödvändigtvis är kvadratiska. Genom att reglera exponeringen mot marknaden återspeglar förutsägande faktorer, var målet att avslöja vikten av de genomsnittliga omkastningshastigheterna i utförandet av de konstruerade handelsstrategierna, under realistiska marknadskostnader. Dessutom, för jämförelses skull, övervägdes handelsstrategier baserade på en enstaka genomsnittlig variansoptimering. Resultaten tyder på en överlägsen överlägsenhet i prestanda för det studerade MPO-tillvägagångssättet, även när marknadsutgifterna inte är kvadratiska. Detta åtföljdes av bevis för bättre användbarhet av faktorernas genomsnittliga återgångshastighet, särskilt snabba återställningsfaktorer och robusthet vid anpassning till transaktionskostnader

Risk management in portfolio construction is a widely discussed topic and the tradeoff between risk and return is always considered before an investment is made. Modern portfolio theory is a mathematical framework which describes how a rational investor can use diversification to optimize a portfolio, which suggests using variance to measure financial risk. However, since variance is a symmetrical metric, the framework fails to correctly account for the loss aversion preferences most investors exhibit. Therefore, the use of downside risk measures were proposed, which only measures the variance of the portfolio below a certain threshold, usually set to zero or the risk-free rate. This thesis empirically investigates the differences in performance between the two risk measures when used to solve a real world portfolio optimization problem. Backtests using the different measures on all major Nordic equity markets are performed to highlight the dynamics between the frameworks, and when one should be preferred over the other. It is concluded that the optimization frameworks indeed provides a useful tool for investors to construct great performing portfolios. However, even though the downside risk framework is more mathematically rigorous, implementing this risk measure instead of variance seems to be of less importance for the actual results. / Riskhantering för aktieportföljer är mycket centralt och en avvägning mellan risk och avkastning görs alltid innan en investering. Modern Portföljteori är ett matematiskt ramverk som beskriver hur en rationell investerare kan använda diversifiering för att optimera en portfölj. Centralt för detta är att använda portföljens varians för att mäta risk. Dock, eftersom varians är ett symmetriskt mått lyckas inte detta ramverk korrekt ta hänsyn till den förlustaversion som de flesta investerare upplever. Därför har det föreslagits att istället använda olika mått på nedsiderisk (downside risk), som endast tar hänsyn till portföljens varians under en viss avkastningsgräns, oftast satt till noll eller den riskfria räntan. Denna studie undersöker skillnaderna i prestation mellan dessa två riskmått när de används för att lösa ett verkligt portföljoptimeringsproblem. Backtests med riskmåtten har genomförts på de olika nordiska aktiemarknaderna för att visa på likheter och skillnader mellan de olika riskmåtten, samt när det enda är att föredra framför det andra. Slutsatsen är att ramverken ger investerare ett användbart verktyg för att smidigt optimera portföljer. Däremot verkar den faktiska skillnaden mellan de två riskmåtten vara av mindre betydelse för portföljernas prestation. Detta trots att downside risk är mer matematiskt rigoröst.

Optimal portfolios have historically been computed using standard deviation as a risk measure.However, extreme market events have become the rule rather than the exception. To capturetail risk, investors have started to look for alternative risk measures such as Value-at-Risk andConditional Value-at-Risk. This research analyzes the financial model referred to as Markowitz 2.0 and provides historical context and perspective to the model and makes a mathematicalformulation. Moreover, practical implementation is presented and an optimizer that capturesthe risk of non-extreme events is constructed, which meets the needs of more customized investment decisions, based on investment preferences. Optimal portfolios are generated and anefficient frontier is made. The results obtained are then compared with those obtained throughthe mean-variance optimization framework. As concluded from the data, the optimal portfoliowith the optimal weights generated performs better regarding expected portfolio return relativeto the risk level for the investment.