<p><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of this mixed methods study is to understand, from the perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients, the effect of modifiable physician behaviours on the perceived quality of end-of-life and ACP communication. <strong></strong></p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A convergent parallel mixed methods design is used. Participants were recruited from inpatient medical wards at two academic hospitals, and a population with a high risk of mortality at 6-12 months was selected. In the quantitative strand, a questionnaire was administered to measure patients’ self-rated satisfaction with their physician’s ACP communication skills. The primary analysis involved calculation of the strength of correlation between individual QOC items and a global satisfaction score. In the qualitative strand, interpretive description methods were used to explore seriously ill patients’ perceptions of the quality of ACP communication with their physicians. The mixed methods analysis phase involved the creation of a merged analysis table.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>From the quantitative strand, three priority behaviours pertained to eye contact, providing full attention, and listening. The three major qualitative themes related to nonverbal behaviours; situating a patient in the context of their background, family and social roles; and assisting patients to make the challenging end-of-life transition. The merged analysis allowed for a fuller, contextualized understanding of why the QOC items with the strongest correlation measures were important from a patient perspective.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This mixed methods study is well-positioned to understand, holistically and from the patient perspective, physician behaviours that influence quality of communication at the end of life.</p> / Master of Science (MSc)

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Postnatal growth of preterm infants does not match recommended intrauterine growth, due to the initial weight loss that accompanies healthy body composition rearrangements after birth. Thus, optimal postnatal growth for preterm infants is currently unknown.</p> <p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1)<strong> </strong>Collect longitudinal postnatal growth data of 30–36 week GA preterm infants with unimpaired postnatal adaptation; (2) Develop regressions that predict the growth trajectory such an infant will adjust to by days of life 7/14/21; (3) Extrapolate and validate the regressions downwards to 25 weeks.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Infants of 30–36 week GA, born/admitted to 1/5 participating centres between 2008–2012, who met pre-specified criteria for unimpaired postnatal adaptation and who had at minimum 14 days of data were included. Day-specific anthropometric data from birth to discharge were abstracted retrospectively. Z-score regressions for days 7/14/21 were developed. Regressions were then extrapolated to 25 weeks and validated using an independent study population.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Of 6203 infants, 665 met the screening criteria. By day 14, infants adjusted to stable growth trajectories that were 84±13% of the recommended weight-for-age. Using the following predictors: GA, z-score at birth and hospital-centre, regressions accurately predicted z-scores at days 7, 14 (n=665; R²=0.939, 0.889) and 21 (n=333; R²=0.841). Validation using 25-29 week GA infants (n=173) suggested models were also accurate within this age-range.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide robust estimates of a hypothesis of healthy postnatal growth for preterm infants. Future steps include assessing long-term outcomes in a randomized control trial and assessing the quality of growth using body composition analyses.</p> / Master of Science in Medical Sciences (MSMS)

Accounting for nearly 19% of the United States population in 2020, Latinos and Hispanics represent the second largest racial/ethnic group in the United States, totaling roughly 62.1 million people. Given the growing population size and longer life expectancy estimates amongst the U.S. Latino/Hispanic community, healthcare practitioners and public health officials are increasingly emphasizing the healthcare needs and outcomes of this population. Alarmingly, current literature has highlighted significant disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and risk factors among U.S. Latinos/Hispanics. As CVD continues to be one of the leading causes of death amongst all racial/ethnic groups across the United States, risk reduction through preventative care utilization remains of utmost importance for mitigating potential risk factors and eventual diagnosis of CVD. The purpose of the study was to quantify healthcare engagement through preventive care utilization for cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors among U.S. Latino/Hispanics. This research study used a cross-sectional design with secondary data from the 2017- March 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Variables related to sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of CVD/risk factor history, and preventive service utilization for CVD were collected from a sample of N=2122 adult Latino/Hispanic participants, representing 40,412,679 U.S. Latinos/Hispanics. All 9 demographic variables were found to have significant associations with the 7 preventive service use variables (p<.001-.016). Similarly, most of the 11 variables related to knowledge of CVD history were found to have significant associations with the 7 preventive service use variables (p<.001). No significant associations were found between knowledge of high blood pressure history with medication use, and knowledge of diabetes history with A1C testing use. Findings from this study reveal various disparities in CVD preventive care utilization amongst the study participants. Limitations of this study included lack of disaggregated ethnic data, possible bias in self-reported data, and missing responses. Results from this study can be utilized to inform clinicians and public health officials in establishing personalized preventive care interventions and increasing community engagement with cardiovascular preventive care services.

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are prone to develop muscle weakness and the causes are multi-factorial. Muscle strength in adult, critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation decreases with immobility. The influence of muscle strength on different muscle groups and its influence on progressive mobility in the adult, critically ill patient on mechanical ventilation has not been examined. Identifying muscle strength in this patient population can benefit overall muscle health and minimize muscle deconditioning through a progressive mobility plan. The objective of this dissertation was to describe muscle strength in different muscle groups and to describe the influence of muscle strength on mobility in critically ill adult patients on mechanical ventilation (MV). Fifty ICU patients were enrolled in this descriptive, cross sectional study. Abdominal core, bilateral hand grip and extremity strength was measured using three measurement tools. Mobility was measured using the following scale: 0=lying in bed; 1=sitting on edge of bed; 2=sitting on edge of bed to standing; 3=walking to bedside chair and 4=walking >7 feet from the standing position. Predictors of mobility were examined using stepwise regression. Abdominal core, bilateral hand grip and extremity strength demonstrated statistically significant relationships with all variables. Extremity strength accounted for 82% of the variance in mobility and was the sole predictor (β=0.903; F=212.9; p=0.000). Future research addressing the outcomes of implementing a mobility protocol in this patient population and prioritizing when such a protocol should be implemented would be beneficial to ongoing plans to decrease MV, ICU and hospital days. Muscle strength tests implemented at the bedside are crucial to implementing a progressive mobility plan for critically ill adults while they are on MV therapy.

Background: Historically, patients with cancer have been perceived as poor candidates for ICU admission. General ICU admission criteria lists cancer patients as low priority in ICU admission depriving them of the care they rightfully deserve. The purpose of this literary synthesis was to examine ICU admission criteria, risk factors, and outcomes of ICU admission in relation to hematological and solid tumor cancers and discuss ways that practitioners and nurses can educate patients with cancer and their families on appropriateness of ICU care. Methods: A total of 768 articles were found in a literature search including all literature from 2005 to 2016 from all countries using the databases CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Premier. These were further narrowed down based on relevancy by topic or reading abstracts. A total of 13 articles utilizing the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the literature search were included in the final literature synthesis. Results: In addition to general ICU admission criteria several other criteria and scores can be helpful in admitting patients with cancer to the ICU including cancer specific criteria, mortality predictor tools, performance status, and ICU trials. Mortality predictors, in combination with other patient characteristics, demonstrated effectiveness to predict outcomes in patients with cancer. Survival rates in hematological and solid tumor cancers have improved from the past, and lower prognostic scores can predict who will have better outcomes. Conclusion: Cancer specific criteria, mortality predictor tools, performance status, and ICU trials in addition to general ICU criteria should be used for admission of cancer patients into ICU. Practitioners and nurses should become familiar with the newest outcomes in patients with cancer to make collaborative informed decisions about ICU admission.

Background: Disruptive technology describes technology that is significantly more advanced than previous iterations, such as: 3D printing, genetic manipulation, stem cell research, innovative surgical procedures, and computer-based charting software. These technologies often require extensive overhauls to implement into older systems and must overcome many difficult financial and societal complications before they can be widely used. In a field like healthcare that makes frequent advancements, these difficulties can mean that the technology will not be utilized to its full potential or implemented at all. Objective: To determine the inhibiting factors that prevent disruptive technology from being implemented in conventional healthcare. Methods: Peer reviewed articles were gathered from Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Elton B. Stephens Co. Host (Ebsco Host), Medical Literature On-line (Medline), and Psychological Information Database (PsychINFO). Articles were included if written in English and focusing on technology that was or is difficult to implement. Results: Research suggests that the primary reason disruptive technology is not implemented sooner is the cost versus benefit ratio. Those technologies with extremely high benefits that greatly improve efficiency, safety, or expense are integrated relatively quickly, especially if their cost is reasonable. Secondary reasons for difficulty with integration include ethical dilemmas, extreme complexity, technical limitations, maintenance, security, and fallibility. Conclusion: Research indicates that a decrease in production cost and selling price along with removing any issues that may depreciate the technology will provide better incentives for healthcare systems to integrate disruptive technologies on a wider scale.

<p>All images in this document may not be produced without the expressed written consent of the author.</p> / <p>The innovative research method of “body mapping” was used in this study with geriatric inpatients receiving daily hæmodialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute.</p> <p>Five people took part in this study; three participants completed all study phases. They created three body maps each and took part in one follow up, semi-structured interview to share their experiences of body mapping. Two themes were drawn from the data: (1) body mapping gives patients a voice to communicate their experiences in the dialysis unit; and (2) body mapping makes visible participants’ illness adjustment patterns, and levels of connection, or disconnection in the dialysis unit.</p> <p>Based on the ways body mapping benefitted participants in this study, it is reasonable to suggest that this visual communication tool could be useful in other research settings, and as a clinical tool to support patients’ attention to their bodies and their interactions with healthcare providers.</p> / Master of Arts (MA)