Depuis plus d’une trentaine d’années, l’histoire, et plus généralement les sciences sociales, apparaissent comme bousculées sur leurs assises, brutalisées sur leurs acquis, heurtées jusque dans leurs concepts et leurs méthodes. Cela n’aura échappé à personne, l’histoire, ce métarécit de véridiction, est en perte de vitesse, en proie à une désorientation manifeste. Il semble que ce qu’annonçait Jean-François Lyotard, dans son ouvrage identifiant le postmodernisme en 1979, soit en passe de trouver des conditions favorables de réalisation. À quels phénomènes est due cette métamorphose frappant l’histoire ? Quelles sont les racines de cette mutation de la place des savoirs dans la société ? Est-ce dû à une forme d’accélération de l’histoire, aux déstructurations imposées par le mouvement de la globalisation, ou à ce simultanéisme auquel il soumet un monde de plus en plus connecté ? Sont-ce les crises multiples et de tous ordres qui entraînent également l’histoire dans le tourbillon créé par cette tyrannie du présent que l’historien François Hartog a identifié comme le présentisme ? Ce monde en mutations profondes, lesquelles redéfinissent la place des savoirs au sein des collectivités occidentales, laisse songeur. Quel futur restera-t-il pour le passé ? Quel est l’avenir de la discipline scientifique historique ? Les objectifs de cet essai engagent plutôt à comprendre ce qui est à l’œuvre et se confronte à l’histoire comme discipline, comme rapport au passé également, comme régime d’historicité surtout. Dans cette perspective, l’indice le plus révélateur, le plus signifiant et le plus directement identifiable de cette perte de repère est l’ère de la mémoire qui s’est installée en Occident, depuis la deuxième moitié du XXe siècle. Excès de mémoire qui a assez rapidement mené au mémorialisme, et à la politique de la mémoire, au polymémorialisme et à l’hypermnésie enfin. Histoire et mémoire, mémoire et histoire. Le débat qui questionne la relation chahutée entre ces deux ennemis complémentaires ne semble pas neuf, pourtant le surgissement massif de la mémoire, au cours du deuxième vingtième siècle, jette les cartes d’une nouvelle redistribution des enjeux, des attentes et usages sociaux du passé, dans ce présent hyperprésent. Une réflexion critique, entre mémoire et histoire, parce qu’il « faut ouvrir un futur au passé », comme l’écrivait le philosophe Paul Ricoeur. / For the last thirty years, history, and more generally social sciences, have been upset in their foundation, their knowledge brutalized and their concepts and methods attacked. It has not eluded anybody that this meta-narrative of veridiction which is history, has been losing momentum, prey to blatant disorientation.It seems that what Jean-François Lyotard announced in his work identifying postmodernism in 1979, is on the verge of finding favourable circumstances of realization. Indeed, history, as one of those meta narratives, whose future loss of credibility was predicted by the philosopher, is showing worrisome signs of debilitation of its position of authority within Western contemporary societies. What kind of phenomenon is the root cause of this metamorphosis striking history ? What is the underlying cause of this change in the place of knowledge in a society ? Is it because of a form of acceleration of history, of the destructuring imposed by globalization, of the simultanéisme to which it subjects a world which is more and more connected ? Or is it because of the multiple crises of all kinds- social, economic, political, ideological and religious- which drag history down in the whirlwind created by this tyranny of the present the historian François Hartog coined as présentisme ? This world, constantly subject to profound changes which redefine the place of knowledge within the Western community, is rather puzzling. What kind of future remains for the past ? What is the future of the scientific, historic subject ? The objectives of this dissertation deal with understanding what is going on and comes into conflict with history as a subject, as a connection to the past and above all as a system of historicity. In this regard, the most revealing clue, the most significant and the most directly identifiable of this loss of reference is the era of memory which has settled in the West, since the second half of the twentieth century. This excess of memory has fairly quickly led to mémorialisme, and to the politics of memory to polymémorialisme and to hypermnésie finall. History and memory, memory and history. The debate that questions the disrupted relation between these two complementary enemies is nothing new, yet the massive upsurge of memory during the second twentieth century, sets up a new redistribution of the stakes, of the expectations and the social purposes of the past, in this hyperpresent present. A critical reflection between memory and history because, as the philosopher Paul Ricoeur wrote, “a future has to be opened for the past”.

Submitted by Jaqueline Silva (jtas29@gmail.com) on 2016-11-16T16:44:56Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Josiane das Graças Adorno- 2015.pdf: 11947110 bytes, checksum: 8ad7cb65b894101cbf78ffe7c03eda38 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Jaqueline Silva (jtas29@gmail.com) on 2016-11-16T16:45:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Josiane das Graças Adorno- 2015.pdf: 11947110 bytes, checksum: 8ad7cb65b894101cbf78ffe7c03eda38 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-16T16:45:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Josiane das Graças Adorno- 2015.pdf: 11947110 bytes, checksum: 8ad7cb65b894101cbf78ffe7c03eda38 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-18 / The relevance of micro-history is the perspective that accompanies the initial studies that address the history of the founding of the city of Uruaqu, state of Goiås, Brazil, written by memoirist Cristovam Francisco de Avila. The basic structure of the foundation, which originates with the understanding of the city development, culminating in the advent of the formation of the Serra da Mesa Lake and the construction of the Memorial Serra da Mesa, served us as the foundation that supported the story of the trajectory of the french Louis Bernard Tranquilin by this city. The history of Uruaqu City Foundation with a historiographical approach of factual and descriptive evidence Seeking dialogue with narratives as bibliographic Elaborate hair memoirist Cristovam Francisco de Avila. The Character trajectory , Louis Bernard Tranquilin , addressed in any double between city- Subject Movement Character -City . / A relevância da micro-história é a perspectiva que acompanha os estudos iniciais que abordam a Historia da fundação da cidade de Uruaçu, escrita pelo memorialista Cristovam Francisco de Avila. A estrutura basilar da fundação parte do desenvolvimento da cidade, que culminou com o advento da formação do Lago Serra da Mesa e a construção do Memorial Serra da Mesa, serviu-nos como o alicerce que sustentou a história da trajetória do francês Louis Bernard Tranquilin por essa cidade. A história da fundação da cidade de Uruaçu com uma abordagem historiográfica de evidências factuais e descritivas que procuram dialogar com as narrativas bibliográficas elaboradas pelo memorialista Cristovam Francisco de Avila. A trajetória do personagem, Louis Bernard Tranquilin, abordada em no duplo movimento entre cidade-sujeito, personagem-cidade.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:06:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ElizabeteMAS_DISSERT.pdf: 2370555 bytes, checksum: 8d6d7f66565e2c06518f6d69f6a5e4b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-11-05 / Inf?ncia is undoubtedly memory, high qual ity l iterature, reputable, as the story moves between f ict ion and reality. Personal and social history, wi th such a sense of reality, causing the reader to prof it f rom the honesty and the sinceri ty producing, in this work, remarkable results in a constancy of cl ippings, f rame -by-f rame. Memory and obl ivion are this work guidance. We aim to denounce the relat ionship between the chi ld and violence, and as it is a memorialist ic text , we see the importance of f ict ion for this type of narrat ive to be sustained. I aim thereby show the tone of this report humanizing memories, its deep and decisive meaning, through the memories concepts by Le Gof f , by Seligmann-Silva and by Ecl?a Bosi. I t is also through the theories of Jeanne Marie Ganegbin that I just ify the concept of remembering and forget t ing, and also it is also according the concepts of Eliane Zagury that I give support to the importance of autobiography as a a mean of expressing the reported memor ies. Final ly, in Inf?ncia, there is no room for fantasy. The lyricism that overwhelms, throughout each chapter, commands the author's imaginat ion. The need to invent gives way to the need to test ify, to denounce. And this t ransit ion occurs gradually, slow as Gra c il ia n o s c h i ld li f e , d u e to such humiliat ion and submission / Inf?ncia ?, sem d?vida, mem?ria, l iteratura de grande qualidade, respei t?vel, ? medida que a hist?ria contada transita ent re f ic??o e real idade. Hist?r ia social e pessoal, com tamanho senso de real idade, fazendo com que o leitor lucre com a honest idade e a sinceridade que produziu, nessa obra, resultados marcantes em sua const?ncia de recortes quadro-a-quadro. Lembran?a e esquecimento s?o, portanto, os guiadores deste trabalho, tendo como prop?sito a den?ncia do encontro da crian?a com a viol?ncia e, sendo o texto memor ial ?st ico, v? -se a import?ncia da f ic??o para que esse t ipo de narrat iva se sustente. Busco, com isso, mostrar no tom humanizador deste relato de mem?rias, o seu signif icado profundo e decisivo, atrav?s dos conceitos de mem?ria de Le gof f , de Seligmann-Silva e de Ecl?a Bosi. ?, tamb?m, atrav?s das teorias de Jeanne Marie Ganegbin que just if ico o conceito de lembran?a e esquecimento e que, me ut il izando dos conceitos de El iane Zagury, acrescento e amparo a rela??o da autobiograf ia como meio de express?o do relato de mem?rias. Por ?lt imo, em Inf?ncia, n?o h? espa?o para a fantasia. O lir ismo que se avassala, no decorrer de cada cap?tulo, comanda a imagina??o do autor. A necessidade de inventar cede espa?o ? necessidade de depor, de denunciar . E essa transi??o ocor re de forma lenta e gradual, assim como lenta ? a vida do menino Gracil iano, diante de tanta humilha??o e submiss?o

This dissertation investigates the implications of memory in fiction Francisco J. C. Dantas, in the context of a postmodern scene still under construction. Coivara da memória (1991), Cartilha do silêncio (1997) and Sob o peso das sombras (2004) are literary texts in which the sophistication of language and the fragmented narrative narrators put into play direct and indirect memories. With that, the aim is to understand how, in these fictional texts, the memory is constructed and represented, starting from ruins or fragments, how that remembering reflects and metaphor the tradition. Although our arguments happen in a gradual process, in which one chapter offers clues to the subsequent chapter, the work is presented in three steps. The first concerns the representation of social memory by giving voice to time and individual experiences on the sidelines of a social process and a family clan. The second corresponds to the fragmentation of narrative and the subsequent deceiving reading that the narrators present to the reader. The third is dedicated to the critical appropriation of tradition by Dantas, the consequent intertextual dialogue with it, which results in the weight of tradition itself and the potentiation of characters in a condition to the social margin. The weight of memory, the fragmentation of narrative and tradition as a loan in the postmodern scene form the foundation of this work that analyzes such elements in a past-present cycle, while use of different social voices and some procedures in the ways of recounting the memories. / Esta dissertação investiga as implicações da memória na ficção de Francisco J. C. Dantas, no contexto de uma cena pós-moderna ainda em construção. Coivara da memória (1991), Cartilha do silêncio (1997) e Sob o peso das sombras (2004) são textos literários nos quais a sofisticação da linguagem e a narrativa fragmentada colocam em cena narradores diretos e indiretos de suas memórias. Com isso, objetiva-se compreender como, nesses textos ficcionais, a memória é construída e representada, a partir de ruínas ou fragmentos, como essa rememoração espelha e metaforiza a tradição. Embora a argumentação deste trabalho aconteça num processo gradativo, em que um capítulo oferece pistas do capítulo subsequente, a discussão apresenta-se em três etapas. A primeira diz respeito à representação da memória social dando voz ao tempo e às experiências individuais à margem de um processo social e de um clã familiar. A segunda corresponde à fragmentação da narrativa e à consequente leitura ludibriadora que os narradores apresentam ao leitor. A terceira é dedicada à apropriação crítica de Dantas à tradição, ao consequente diálogo intertextual estabelecido com esta, o qual resulta na ironia à própria tradição e na potencialização dos personagens numa condição à margem social. A importância da rememoração, a fragmentação da narrativa e a tradição como empréstimo na cena pós-moderna formam o tripé deste trabalho que analisa tais elementos num ciclo presente-passado, enquanto apropriação de diversas vozes sociais estigmatizadas e de alguns procedimentos nos modos de se narrar as memórias.