There are formulated validity and transference of cooperation methods and cooperation buildup with a view to reach positive changes in education of learners with special needs. The methods promoting the cooperation of Lithuanian and foreign authors were analyzed in this work. The analysis of already made-up practical cooperation pattern was done as well. Experimentally when building up the cooperation inside and outside validity of made-up cooperation pattern was reviewed and evaluated. The research hypothesis, certifying the efficiency of the made-up cooperation pattern when building up the cooperation in practice, formulated by the author has been confirmed. The pattern allows initiating the changes of cooperation and the changes to meet the special educational needs. By the initiative of the professionals and educators following the pragmatic viewpoint the cooperation pattern would stimulate parents to participate in the educational process of educating the learners with special needs. When transferring practical pattern of cooperation into another educational environment the resistance of educational environment against the transference might arise.

Kandidatų požiūriai į įvairius atrankos metodus traukia organizacinės ir darbo psichologijos atstovų dėmesį dėl įvairių priežasčių, viena svarbiausių jų – tai, jog individų požiūriai į personalo atrankos metodus įtakoja jų vėlesnį elgesį. Ir nors tyrimų atlikta skirtingose šalyse nemažai, tačiau jokių duomenų nerandama Lietuvos ir Švedijos imtims. Šiame darbe iškeliamas tikslas - ištirti lietuvių studentų, lietuvių darbuotojų ir švedų studentų požiūrį į personalo atrankos metodus. Tiriamieji (197 studentai ir 86 darbuotojai) pildė Steiner ir Gilliland (1996) klausimyną, kurį sudaro trumpi 10 atrankos metodų aprašymai ir teiginiai apie šių metodų teisingumą. Rezultatai parodė, jog darbo pavyzdžio testai vertinami kaip teisingiausias personalo atrankos metodas lietuvių imtyje. Švedų imtyje teisingiausi personalo atrankos metodai yra šie: darbo pavyzdžio testai, interviu, gyvenimo aprašymas, asmeninės rekomendacijos. Lietuviai studentai palankiau vertina gebėjimų testų, sąžiningumo testų teisingumą nei švedai studentai, tačiau švedai studentai palankiau nei lietuviai studentai vertina interviu, gyvenimo aprašymą, asmenines rekomendacijas ir asmenines pažintis. Prasčiausiai teisingumo atžvilgiu lietuviai vertina asmenines pažintis ir grafologiją, o švedų grupėje vien tik grafologija vertinama kaip mažiausiai teisinga personalo atrankos procedūra. Lietuviai darbuotojai asmeninių rekomendacijų, asmeninių pažinčių ir grafologijos teisingumą vertina palankiau nei lietuviai... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Candidates’ attitudes towards various personnel selection methods get attention of organizational and work psychology specialists because of various reasons. The most important reason is that individuals’ attitudes towards personnel selection methods influence their latter behavior. Although there is a substantial amount of studies carried out in different countries, yet there is no data for Lithuanian and Swedish samples. The aim of current study is to analyze the attitudes towards personnel selection methods among Lithuanian students, Lithuanian employees and Swedish students. Participants of the study (197 students and 86 employees) filled in the questionnaire, which includes short descriptions of 10 personnel selection methods as well as items about fairness of these methods. According to the results of the study, work-sample tests are ranked as the fairest personnel selection method in Lithuanian sample. The fairest personnel selection methods in Swedish sample are work-sample tests, interview, resumes, and personal references. Lithuanian students rank the fairness of written ability test and honesty test more favorably than Swedish students, but Swedish students tend to rank more favorably interview, resumes, personal references and personal contacts. Personal contacts and graphology were ranked the lowest on fairness dimension in Lithuanian sample, and Swedes ranked only graphology as the least fair personnel selection method. Lithuanian employees rank personal... [to full text]