Text in Afrikaans / Prospektering is een van die eerste en belangrikste stappe in die mineraalontginningsproses en dit word ondersoek teen die agtergrond van die Mineraalwet 50 van 1991, wat die belangrikste "mynwette" herroep en die Suid-Afrikaanse mineraal- en mynreg in vele opsigte op 'n heel nuwe grondslag geplaas het. Die hoofdoel met hierdie proefskrif is om prospekteerregte te sistematiseer en te bepaal of dit beperkte saaklike regte daarstel. Ten aanvang word bepaal welke aktiwiteite prospektering daarstel en welke stowwe regtens as minerale kwalifiseer. Daar word gekyk na die regte waarvan prospekteerregte dee! vorm of waaruit dit afgelei word, naamlik eiendomsreg en mineraalregte. Die afskeiding van minerale van grond, die afskeiding van mineraalregte van grondeiendomsreg en die afskeiding van prospekteerregte van mineraalregte en grondeiendomsreg, asook die inhoud van en beperkings op die uitoefening van prospekteer- en mineraalregte, word ook ondersoek. Daar word veral aangetoon dat mineraalregte nie so wyd is as wat algemeen aanvaar word nie en dat dit 6f by die af skeiding van die roerende minerale tot niet gaan of uitgeput raak 6f in eiendomsreg daarop oorgaan. Prospekteerregte word meestal verleen by wyse van prospekteerkontrakte, waarvan daar verskillende verskyningsvorme bestaan en waarvan die een wat in die Registrasie van Aktes Wet 47 van 1937 omskryf word, as uitgangspunt geneem word. Aangesien die reg om te myn ook die reg om te prospekteer insluit, word die verlening van mynregte en antler verkrygings van prospekteerregte ook behandel. Alvorens gemeneregtelike prospekteerregte egter uitgeoefen mag word, meet magtiging daarvoor by die staat verkry word. Die verlening van statutere prospekteer- en mynmagtigings het by die inwerkingtreding van die Mineraalwet 50 van 1991 grondige veranderings ondergaan wat tesame met die relevante oorgangsbepalings ondersoek word ten einde die uitwerking van die wet op prospekteerregte te bepaal. Die vereistes vir en die regsaard van die verskillende regte word ondersoek ten einde 'n oorsig van prospekteerregte daar te stel en dit vlugtig met veral Australiese reg te vergelyk. Daar word tot die gevolgtrekking geraak dat blote prospekteerregte nie beperkte saaklike regte daarstel nie. / Prospecting is one of the first and most important steps in the minerals exploitation process and is examined against the background of the Minerals Act so of 1991, which repealed the most important "mining" legislation and in many ways placed the South African mining and minerals law on a completely new basis. The main purpose of this thesis is to systematise prospecting rights and to establish whether they constitute limited real rights. It is at the outset determined which activities constitute prospecting and which materials qualify in law as minerals. The rights from which prospecting rights are derived or of which they form part, namely ownership and mineral rights, are considered. The severing of minerals from land, the severing of mineral rights from landownership and the severing of prospecting rights from mineral rights and landownership, as well as the contents of and limitations on the exercising of prospecting and mineral rights, are also examined. It is in particular shown that mineral rights are not as comprehensive as is generally accepted and that they either terminate or are exhausted upon severance of the movable minerals from the land or are converted into ownership thereof. Prospecting rights are mostly granted by way of prospecting contracts, of which different varieties exist and of which the one defined in the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 is taken as the starting point. Since the right to mine includes the right to prospect, mining rights and other acquisitions of prospecting rights are also considered. Before common law prospecting rights may be exercised, however, authority to do so must be obtained from the state. Upon the commencement of the Minerals Act 50 of 1991, the granting of statutory prospecting and mining authorisations underwent fundamental changes, which are examined with the relevant transitional provisions to determine the effect of the act. The requirements for and the juridical nature of the various rights are considered in order to establish an overview of prospecting rights and briefly to compare them mainly with Australian law. The conclusion is reached that mere prospecting rights do not constitute limited real rights. / Jurisprudence / LL. D.

Text in Afrikaans / Prospektering is een van die eerste en belangrikste stappe in die mineraalontginningsproses en dit word ondersoek teen die agtergrond van die Mineraalwet 50 van 1991, wat die belangrikste "mynwette" herroep en die Suid-Afrikaanse mineraal- en mynreg in vele opsigte op 'n heel nuwe grondslag geplaas het. Die hoofdoel met hierdie proefskrif is om prospekteerregte te sistematiseer en te bepaal of dit beperkte saaklike regte daarstel. Ten aanvang word bepaal welke aktiwiteite prospektering daarstel en welke stowwe regtens as minerale kwalifiseer. Daar word gekyk na die regte waarvan prospekteerregte dee! vorm of waaruit dit afgelei word, naamlik eiendomsreg en mineraalregte. Die afskeiding van minerale van grond, die afskeiding van mineraalregte van grondeiendomsreg en die afskeiding van prospekteerregte van mineraalregte en grondeiendomsreg, asook die inhoud van en beperkings op die uitoefening van prospekteer- en mineraalregte, word ook ondersoek. Daar word veral aangetoon dat mineraalregte nie so wyd is as wat algemeen aanvaar word nie en dat dit 6f by die af skeiding van die roerende minerale tot niet gaan of uitgeput raak 6f in eiendomsreg daarop oorgaan. Prospekteerregte word meestal verleen by wyse van prospekteerkontrakte, waarvan daar verskillende verskyningsvorme bestaan en waarvan die een wat in die Registrasie van Aktes Wet 47 van 1937 omskryf word, as uitgangspunt geneem word. Aangesien die reg om te myn ook die reg om te prospekteer insluit, word die verlening van mynregte en antler verkrygings van prospekteerregte ook behandel. Alvorens gemeneregtelike prospekteerregte egter uitgeoefen mag word, meet magtiging daarvoor by die staat verkry word. Die verlening van statutere prospekteer- en mynmagtigings het by die inwerkingtreding van die Mineraalwet 50 van 1991 grondige veranderings ondergaan wat tesame met die relevante oorgangsbepalings ondersoek word ten einde die uitwerking van die wet op prospekteerregte te bepaal. Die vereistes vir en die regsaard van die verskillende regte word ondersoek ten einde 'n oorsig van prospekteerregte daar te stel en dit vlugtig met veral Australiese reg te vergelyk. Daar word tot die gevolgtrekking geraak dat blote prospekteerregte nie beperkte saaklike regte daarstel nie. / Prospecting is one of the first and most important steps in the minerals exploitation process and is examined against the background of the Minerals Act so of 1991, which repealed the most important "mining" legislation and in many ways placed the South African mining and minerals law on a completely new basis. The main purpose of this thesis is to systematise prospecting rights and to establish whether they constitute limited real rights. It is at the outset determined which activities constitute prospecting and which materials qualify in law as minerals. The rights from which prospecting rights are derived or of which they form part, namely ownership and mineral rights, are considered. The severing of minerals from land, the severing of mineral rights from landownership and the severing of prospecting rights from mineral rights and landownership, as well as the contents of and limitations on the exercising of prospecting and mineral rights, are also examined. It is in particular shown that mineral rights are not as comprehensive as is generally accepted and that they either terminate or are exhausted upon severance of the movable minerals from the land or are converted into ownership thereof. Prospecting rights are mostly granted by way of prospecting contracts, of which different varieties exist and of which the one defined in the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 is taken as the starting point. Since the right to mine includes the right to prospect, mining rights and other acquisitions of prospecting rights are also considered. Before common law prospecting rights may be exercised, however, authority to do so must be obtained from the state. Upon the commencement of the Minerals Act 50 of 1991, the granting of statutory prospecting and mining authorisations underwent fundamental changes, which are examined with the relevant transitional provisions to determine the effect of the act. The requirements for and the juridical nature of the various rights are considered in order to establish an overview of prospecting rights and briefly to compare them mainly with Australian law. The conclusion is reached that mere prospecting rights do not constitute limited real rights. / Jurisprudence / LL. D.

Thesis (LLM. (Management and Development Law)) -- University of Limpopo, 2016 / Previously the concept of ownership has played a role in the development of Minerals right and was regarded as an absolute right of the owner to do what he desired with property. It is nowadays accepted that ownership is not an absolute and unlimited but the concept is still undergoing transformation. Since the enacted of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) now vest on the State as the Custodian of all minerals in South Africa. The vesting of the Mineral right does however interfere with the common law right private ownership, and the investor as expressed in the constitution. The term Custodian as used in the Bill is a misnomer, in that the Bill proposes not mere Custodianship, but an actual vesting in the State by giving effect to the universally accepted right of the State to exercise permanent Sovereignty to all minerals resources. The new Mining legislation regime with specific reference Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and National Environmental Management Act are precisely paced to ensure optimal exploitation of natural resources while promoting sustainable development.

A project report submitted to the Faculty of Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering. / This study addresses a principal issue associated with the small-scale mining industry in South Africa, namely mineral rights. Firstly it defines a small-scale mine and its role in the South African economy. It then examines the current mineral rights policy and the conditions under which the current mineral rights policy could be reformed in order to encourage the growth of the small-scale mining sector. Various models and proposals have been examined in an attempt to suggest the most suitable policy in terms of acquisition and distribution of mineral rights, Acquisition of mineral rights remains one of the major obstacles facing small-scale mining companies. The need to change the legal framework surrounding the acquisition of mineral rights is clearly demonstrated in this project report. Simplification of the legal framework would lead to easy access to mineral rights by both large-scale and small-scale, South African and foreign mining companies and remove the traditional complexities associated with the current South African mineral rights policy which tend to sterilise mineral rights. These complexities include subdivision of mineral rights, potential lockup of mineral rights by private companies and individuals and the State. Analysis of methods to rationalise the mineral rights policy have demonstrated that nationalisation and expropriation of mineral rights are counter productive and can not be used as vehicles for access to mineral rights. In order to strengthen the small-scale mining industry changes to the mineral rights have been proposed. A model mineral rights policy framework has been designed to promote small-scale mining. Introduction of a mineral fights tax, taking into consideration the specifics of the South African mining industry, similar to that of Swaziland of 1958 is proposed as one of the ways of discouraging the sterilisation of mineral rights. It introduces a cost element in the locking up of mineral rights by private companies and individuals. It is envisaged that when the cost of holding these mineral rights is greater than the benefits of holding the mineral rights, mineral rights holders would relinquish them thereby allowing access to these mineral rights to other interested parties. The relinquished mineral rights should revert to the State, which in tum should allocate them to qualified mining companies. Due considerations of the unique characteristics of the South African mining industry need to be taken into account when designing any mineral rights policy. Implementation of any such policy should therefore be done with the consensus of the mining industry. Access to State mineral rights is also considered vital. Whilst it is important to provide the small-scale mining sector with access to mineral rights it is recognised that the success of the sector depends many factors, mineral rights among others. A holistic approach that take into all facets of small-scale mining are included in the proposed policy framework for the development of the small-scale mining industry in South Africa. / AC2017

Thesis (M. Phil.(Environmental law and management))--University of Limpopo, 2009

"Mining operations" and "mining" are defined in s 1 of the Income Tax Act (ITA). A concept that is of great significance to this definition is the matter of when a mineral is won and the related question of when does the mining process end and the process of manufacture commences. Case law has not established a definitive point that can be used by the mining taxpayer to determine where the mining process ends for income tax purposes. The Supreme Court of Appeal was presented with the perfect opportunity in the Foskor1 case to clearly define the boundaries between these processes. Unfortunately, the court did not seize this opportunity to provide legal certainty. The significance of the distinction lies in the fact that a mining taxpayer is allowed to claim accelerated capital allowances. The objective of these allowances is to provide tax relief to the mining taxpayer taking the immense risk of investing billions of rands in capital expenditure. The capital expenditure incurred will also result in direct foreign investment. This in turn will result in economic growth and job creation. Currently, there is no legal certainty as to which processes will qualify as mining operations for income tax purposes. This may result in mining taxpayers being hesitant to incur capital expenditure as the risk relating to a project would have increased. The accelerated capital allowances may therefore not serve their intended purpose. The gross domestic product (GDP) contribution from gold mining has been decreasing in the last number of years, but this decrease has to a large extent been offset by an increase in the downstream or beneficiated minerals industry. This industry has also been identified by Government as a growth sector. The downstream or beneficiated mineral industry may not be catered for in the current definition of "mining operations" and "mining" and may therefore not qualify for beneficial tax allowances. It is therefore proposed that the term "won" as used in the definition of "mining operations" and "mining" should be defined in s 1 of the ITA as follows: A mineral is "won" when all the requisite and necessary processes, including, amongst other things, refinement, beneficiation, smelting, separation, have been undertaken to the mineral to render it saleable in an open and general market. This extension will provide legal certainty to a mining taxpayer and will ensure that South Africa obtains direct foreign investment and maximum value for its minerals. This will contribute to economic growth for South Africa's developing economy and result in job creation.

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Johannesburg 2015 / Regardless of the strategic role that mining plays in South Africa‟s economic growth and development, there are perceptions that mining benefits are still enjoyed by a few elite individuals. This is partly due to high expectations from lower level workers in the sector and communities where mining takes place. Failures in the implementation of some of the policies that are social in nature are making people question the wisdom of the current mining legislation, the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA). The main question of this research paper is whether the MPRDA, in its current form, is a suitable mining legislative framework that can usher a better dispensation for all or whether there is a need to overhaul it in order to deliver the desired end results that are expected by the majority of South Africans. It is against this background that this research was undertaken, by studying best practice in other mining jurisdictions and conducting a survey of those involved in the South African mining sector. From the research and surveys, recommendations are proposed on what amendments could be effected on the MPRDA to make the South African mining sector more attractive and simultaneously, meet the citizens‟ expectations.

Elinor Ostrom (2005: 238) assumes that in understanding the make up and behaviour of institutional systems governing natural resources: “Resource users are explicitly thought of as rational egoists who plunder local resources so as to maximise their own short-term benefits. Government officials are implicitly depicted, on the other hand, as seeking, the more general public interest, having the relevant information at hand and the capability of designing optimal policies.” This thesis examines the validity of this assumption through an historical analysis of the deep-level gold mining industry of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. The main focus of the assessment is on the institutions of ownership – that is, the development of mining rights and title legislation between 1886 and 2008. The study looks at the legislations’ transformation and implementation from the perspective of the gold mining industry – made up of the mining finance houses and the Chamber of Mines of South Africa – and that of the state. The transformation of the mining industry’s institutional framework was both a choice by government as well as that of the firms in the mining industry. The theoretical framework is constructed from four areas of economic thought. These include: the neoclassical and Keynesian schools of macroeconomic thought; industrial organisation and its relevance to the relationship between firms and the market; institutional and new institutional economics; and finally property rights. The determinants of policy design and the impact of such design on firms and industry is examined. The development, implementation and use of the aforementioned legislation is examined from two perspectives, namely, that of preserver or exploiter. Throughout the history of this prominent South African industry, the motivation for action from the industry or government has oscillated between the two extremes of preserver or exploiter over the time period examined. The conclusion is drawn on an overall and broad focus of actions – with a strong focus on the most recent developments in mining legislation – post-1992.

This research explored the nature of conflict that arose in Xolobeni, a small area in the Mbizana Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, and the environmental politics emanating from the arguments that supported development rather than environmental protection. The proposed mining project was known as the Xolobeni mining development project within the Amadiba Tribal Authority, an area dominated by Pondos or (Mpondos). The Xolobeni area is located between the Mzamba and Mtentu Rivers, covering some 2 867 hectares, and extends for 20km along the coast of the Mbizana Local Municipality, in the Alfred Nzo District Municipality. In 2005, the Minister of the National Department of Minerals and Energy (DME), now known as the Department of Minerals and Petroleum Resources, announced that an Australian company, Transworld Energy and Minerals (TEM) will establish a mining development project in Xolobeni to mine red sand dunes which are contained within five blocks, each named after the river at its southern boundary. These blocks were Mtentu, Sikombe, Kwanyana, Mnyameni and Mphalane. According to the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act (Act 28 of 2002), the Department of Minerals and Energy is the sole custodian of the mining licence and therefore the only Department that issues mining licences. The research investigated the nature of conflict that erupted in Xolobeni after this announcement, resulting in the formation of two groups namely, the Amadiba Crisis Committee (ACC) which represented the communities who were against the mining project in the area and the Xolobeni Local Community (Xolco) which was a Black Economic Empowerment company that represented the communities that supported the mining project and was to receive 26 percent of the proceeds from the mining company. The purpose of the Amadiba Crisis Committee was to channel complaints and grievances of local residents emanating from the mining development project and other development to all relevant authorities so that the Constitutional rights of residents can be respected. The research also investigated the role of each stakeholder in the proposed mining project, namely, local communities in the area, environmentalists, councillors, the National Department of Minerals and Energy, the National Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, the Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs (DEDEA), the traditional authority and the Eastern Cape Provincial Legislature Portfolio Committee on Economic Development and Environmental Affairs. Central to this research was the level of consultation during the proposed mining project. Qualitative and quantitative research methodologies were used to collect data in Xolobeni. Interviews were conducted with the two opposing groups and other various stakeholders including the chieftaincy, environmentalists, councillors and officials in the Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs (DEDEA). The researcher used questionnaires in order to get the views of the targeted participants. Eighty questionnaires were distributed among the targeted participants but only forty five were returned. Some of the participants were reluctant to participate in this study because the mining project had not taken place. Secondary data from the Departments of Environment of Affairs nationally and provincially revealed that the Department of Minerals and Energy through its Minister, Bulelwa Sonjica, awarded the mining licence despite recommendations of both Departments not to do so. The Minister of the new Department of Mineral Resources, Susan Shabangu, withdrew the licence and gave three months to Transworld Energy and Minerals to address the outstanding issues raised in the environmental impact assessment (EIA). The data collected revealed that the proposed mining project affected all communities in the Amadiba Tribal Administrative area. The research also illustrated how the Xolobeni community organised themselves and protested against development that intended to force them to relocate from their ancestral land without proper consultation. Issues of sustainable development and environmental protection also formed part of the discussions in this research. While the mining project had stalled, it emerged that the majority of respondents in the area did not want the mining project to proceed.

Whilst the mining industry has stimulated the economic growth of South Africa, its activities have also impacted on the social and environmental well-being of the communities and ecosystems in which it operates. Environmental degradation often severely affects the livelihoods of people in rural areas, who are often impoverished. Hondeklip Bay, a small fishing community in the Northern Cape, has been affected by the mining activities of the adjacent Hondeklip Bay Mine. The purpose of this paper is to identify whether impoverished residents affected by the detrimental effects of mining activity have rights to enforce the protection of their environment. These environmental rights pertain to an environment that is safe and not harmful to one's health and well-being. Environmental obligations of the mines as illustrated in terms of applicable legislation, and legal recourse available to the residents affected by the infringement of their environmental rights are furthermore explored. / Jurisprudence / LL.M