Upon entry into G2 and mitosis (G2/M), dynein dissociates from its interphase cargos and forms mitotic-specific interactions that direct dynein to the nuclear envelope, cell-cortex, kinetochores, and spindle poles to ensure equal segregation of genetic material to the two daughter cells. Although the need for precise regulation of dynein’s activity during mitosis is clear, questions remain about the mechanisms that govern the cell-cycle dependent dynein interactions. Frequently dynein cofactors provide platforms for regulating dynein activity either by directing dynein to specific sites of action or by tuning the motor activity of the dynein motor. In particular the dynein cofactor Nde1 may play a key role in defining dynein’s mitotic activity. During interphase, Nde1 is involved in the dynein-dependent processes of Golgi positioning and minus-end directed lysosome transport (Lam et al., 2009; Yi et al., 2011), but as the cell progresses into G2/M, Nde1 adopts mitotic specific interactions at the nuclear envelope and kinetochores. It is unknown how Nde1’s cell-cycle specific localization is regulated and how, if at all, Nde1 is ultimately able to influence dynein’s recruitment and activity at each of these sites. One candidate is cell-cycle specific phosphorylation of Nde1 by a G2/mitotic specific kinase, cyclinB/Cdk1 (Alkurayaet al. 2011). To study the potential function of the phosphorylation by Cdk1, we assayed the localization of GFP Cdk1Nde1 phospho-mimetic and phospho-mutant constructs at the NE and kinetochores. We demonstrate Cdk1 phosphorylation of Nde1 is required for Nde1 localization to both the NE and to the kinetochore, and also the phosphorylation of Nde1 directly activates physical interactions between Nde1 and its nuclear envelope and the kinetochore-binding partner, CENP-F. Furthermore, physiological studies of Nde1 phosphorylation constructs show that over-expression of GFP Nde1 phospho-mutant causes a significant delay in time from NEBD to anaphase onset, specifically demonstrating a late prometaphase/metaphase arrest. Therefore, we conclude Cdk1 phosphorylation of Nde1 not only regulates its localization to the nuclear envelope and kinetochore but also plays an important functional role in Nde1’s mitotic activity in vivo. In addition to understanding how the cell cycle specific activity of Nde1 is regulated, to fully comprehend how dynein functions during mitosis it is necessary to understand how Nde1 is able to modulate dynein’s activity. Nde1 is typically believed to act as a bridge between dynein and specific cellular cargo by physically interacting both with the cargo and dynein/Lis1 to specify the sites of dynein’s activity. Therefore, to understand how Nde1 functions with Lis1 and dynein during mitosis, we created point mutations in the N-terminal coiled-coil domain that specifically disrupted either the Nde1-Lis1 interaction or the Nde1-dynein interaction. We find that disrupting the Nde1-dynein interaction has more severe phenotypic effects compared to disrupting the Nde1-Lis1 interaction: expression of GFP Nde1 del dynein mutant caused a significant delay in anaphase onset while GFP Nde1 del Lis1 only caused a slight increase in cell cycle duration before anaphase onset. Phenotypic analysis suggests that the effects of abolishing the Nde1-dynein interaction on mitotic progression may be due to defects in maintaining kinetochore-microtubule stability during metaphase. Nde1 plays a role in this dynein-dependent mitotic activity through recruitment of a subfraction of dynein to the kinetochore by Nde1’s coiled-coil domain. While the phenotypic effect of removing the Lis1-Nde1 interaction is less severe than removing the dynein-Nde1 interaction, the interaction between Lis1 and Nde1 plays an important role in Nde1’s mitotic behavior as it is affects Nde1’s localization at the kinetochore, specifically by influencing Nde’1 interaction with its kinetochore recruitment partner, CENP-F. The entirety of this work demonstrates that Nde1 acts as a link between cellular cargo and dynein behavior as phospho-regulation of Nde1 throughout the cell cycle allows Nde1’s to interact with unique mitotic cargoes and influence the recruitment and activity of dynein at the kinetochore.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of protein synthesis. Dysregulation of mTOR signaling occurs in many human cancers and its inhibition causes arrest at the G1 cell cycle stage. However, mTOR’s impact on mitosis (M-phase) is less clear. Here, suppressing mTOR activity impacted the G2-M transition and reduced levels of M-phase kinase, Aurora A. mTOR inhibitors did not affect Aurora A mRNA levels. However, translational reporter constructs showed that mRNA containing a short, simple 5’-untranslated region (UTR), rather than a complex structure, is more responsive to mTOR inhibition. mTOR inhibitors decreased Aurora A protein amount whereas blocking proteasomal degradation rescues this phenomenon, revealing that mTOR affects Aurora A protein stability. Inhibition of protein phosphatase, PP2A, a known mTOR substrate and Aurora A partner, restored mTOR-mediated Aurora A abundance. Finally, a non-phosphorylatable Aurora A mutant was more sensitive to destruction in the presence of mTOR inhibitor. These data strongly support the notion that mTOR controls Aurora A destruction by inactivating PP2A and elevating the phosphorylation level of Ser51 in the “activation-box” of Aurora A, which dictates its sensitivity to proteasomal degradation. In summary, this study is the first to demonstrate that mTOR signaling regulates Aurora-A protein expression and stability and provides a better understanding of how mTOR regulates mitotic kinase expression and coordinates cell cycle progression. The involvement of mTOR signaling in the regulation of cell migration by its upstream activator, Rheb, was also examined. Knockdown of Rheb was found to promote F-actin reorganization and was associated with Rac1 activation and increased migration of glioma cells. Suppression of Rheb promoted platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) expression. Pharmacological inhibition of PDGFR blocked these events. Therefore, Rheb appears to suppress tumor cell migration by inhibiting expression of growth factor receptors that in turn drive Rac1-mediate actin polymerization.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Break-induced replication (BIR) is a mechanism to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs) that possess only a single end that can find homology in the genome. This situation can result from the collapse of replication forks or telomere erosion. BIR frequently produces various genetic instabilities including mutations, loss of heterozygosity, deletions, duplications, and template switching that can result in copy-number variations (CNVs). An important type of genomic rearrangement specifically linked to BIR is half crossovers (HCs), which result from fusions between parts of recombining chromosomes. Because HC formation produces a fused molecule as well as a broken chromosome fragment, these events could be highly destabilizing. Here I demonstrate that HC formation results from the interruption of BIR caused by a defective replisome or premature onset of mitosis. Additionally, I document the existence of half crossover instability cascades (HCC) that resemble cycles of non-reciprocal translocations (NRTs) previously described in human tumors. I postulate that HCs represent a potent source of genetic destabilization with significant consequences that mimic those observed in human diseases, including cancer.