Spelling suggestions: "subject:"mixed land used"" "subject:"fixed land used""
1 |
Mixed land use and travel behavior : a case study for incorporating land use patterns into travel demand modelsPang, Hao 01 October 2014 (has links)
Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) have become increasingly interested in incorporating land use patterns and design ideas into transportation problems. Many design ideas under the umbrella of the New Urbanism; yet in practice they hardly get fully implemented in the standard transportation planning procedures. This research intends to contribute to the continuing debate on land use pattern-travel connection by adding further empirical evidence from the Austin, TX region. Also, it demonstrates ways to integrate land use patterns in transportation demand analysis. The study identifies 42 mixed use districts (MXD) in the Austin region and analyzes the following aspects of travel behavior in MXDs and non-MXDs: production trip rates, frequency of produced trips, network trip length, internal rate of capture, and person-miles of travel (PMT). The study contributes to transportation planning and policy making in Central Texas by providing local empirical evidence on urban form-travel connection. The study’s method and process can be of interest to a broad audience in academia and practice. / text
|
2 |
ASSESSING THE ROLE OF NORMS AND INFORMATION IN SHAPING RESIDENTS' INTENTIONS TO ADOPT WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PRACTICES ACROSS URBAN-TO-RURAL LANDSCAPESJennifer A. Domenech (5930615) 17 January 2019 (has links)
<p> </p>
Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution refers to pollution entering receiving
waterbodies from diffuse sources, and is one of the main causes of water
pollution in the United States. Best management practices (BMPs) and low impact
development (LID) strategies are water and land management practices geared at
reducing the effect of NPS pollution. This research focused on residents in
northwestern Indiana and assessed their interest in adopting BMPs and LID
strategies across the urban-to-rural gradient. Resident groups of interest
include medium/large-scale farmers, small-scale farmers, rural non-farming
residents, suburban residents, and urban residents. Specifically, this research
explored residents’ awareness of and attitudes towards water quality
improvement practices, their likelihood of adopting these practices, and
factors that influence their likelihood of adoption. Data was collected through
a household survey that was mailed to residents of Porter and LaPorte counties.
In addition to survey questions measuring respondents’ awareness, attitudes,
perceptions, likelihood of adoption, and demographics, the survey also
contained an experimental component in the form of an information page. By
using descriptive, bivariate and multivariate statistical procedures to analyze
survey data, this research found that respondents generally reported high
levels of awareness of and positive attitudes towards BMPs and LID strategies.
Despite this, 41% of respondents reported a likelihood of adopting any water
quality improvement practices. This research found that resident groups
differed in their awareness of water quality improvement practices, as well as
their descriptive and subjective norms associated with adopting these
practices. Respondents valued improved environmental quality and reduced flash
flood risk as benefits of adopting water quality improvement practices, and
identified not knowing enough about specific conservation practices and
concerns about how to install and maintain the practices as main barriers to
adoption. Generally, respondents who were younger, perceived more problems with
various potential water pollution sources, were more aware of water quality
improvement practices, had more positive attitudes, had a stronger sense of
personal responsibility, sought information in the past about water quality
problems, or perceived stronger social expectations from peers (i.e.,
subjective norms) were more likely to be interested in adopting water quality
improvement practices in the next year. The role of information was more
ambiguous. While information about how to choose, install and maintain specific
water quality improvement practices may be useful for residents, the
information treatment about the responsibility of each resident group for NPS
pollution did not seem to affect respondents’ likelihood of adoption. However,
this research did find that respondents reacted differently to the information
provided based on their initial self-reported likelihood of adoption prior to
receiving any information. Based on these results, this research suggests
strategies that may be used by public and private entities to motivate
residents’ adoption of water quality improvement practices, including but not
limited to: (1) developing education programs that highlight both the broader
environmental quality benefits and geography-specific practical benefits of
water quality improvement; (2) developing technical assistance programs that
help residents identify appropriate conservation practices for their homes and
properties and that facilitate installation and maintenance of such practices;
(3) developing communication strategies to help residents establish a sense of
self-responsibility and align their perceived water quality problems with their
own actions; and, (4) developing outreach programs to help establish and
facilitate descriptive and subjective norms in favor of adopting water quality
improvement practices at the watershed scale. <br>
Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution refers to pollution entering receiving
waterbodies from diffuse sources, and is one of the main causes of water
pollution in the United States. Best management practices (BMPs) and low impact
development (LID) strategies are water and land management practices geared at
reducing the effect of NPS pollution. This research focused on residents in
northwestern Indiana and assessed their interest in adopting BMPs and LID
strategies across the urban-to-rural gradient. Resident groups of interest
include medium/large-scale farmers, small-scale farmers, rural non-farming
residents, suburban residents, and urban residents. Specifically, this research
explored residents’ awareness of and attitudes towards water quality
improvement practices, their likelihood of adopting these practices, and
factors that influence their likelihood of adoption. Data was collected through
a household survey that was mailed to residents of Porter and LaPorte counties.
In addition to survey questions measuring respondents’ awareness, attitudes,
perceptions, likelihood of adoption, and demographics, the survey also
contained an experimental component in the form of an information page. By
using descriptive, bivariate and multivariate statistical procedures to analyze
survey data, this research found that respondents generally reported high
levels of awareness of and positive attitudes towards BMPs and LID strategies.
Despite this, 41% of respondents reported a likelihood of adopting any water
quality improvement practices. This research found that resident groups
differed in their awareness of water quality improvement practices, as well as
their descriptive and subjective norms associated with adopting these
practices. Respondents valued improved environmental quality and reduced flash
flood risk as benefits of adopting water quality improvement practices, and
identified not knowing enough about specific conservation practices and
concerns about how to install and maintain the practices as main barriers to
adoption. Generally, respondents who were younger, perceived more problems with
various potential water pollution sources, were more aware of water quality
improvement practices, had more positive attitudes, had a stronger sense of
personal responsibility, sought information in the past about water quality
problems, or perceived stronger social expectations from peers (i.e.,
subjective norms) were more likely to be interested in adopting water quality
improvement practices in the next year. The role of information was more
ambiguous. While information about how to choose, install and maintain specific
water quality improvement practices may be useful for residents, the
information treatment about the responsibility of each resident group for NPS
pollution did not seem to affect respondents’ likelihood of adoption. However,
this research did find that respondents reacted differently to the information
provided based on their initial self-reported likelihood of adoption prior to
receiving any information. Based on these results, this research suggests
strategies that may be used by public and private entities to motivate
residents’ adoption of water quality improvement practices, including but not
limited to: (1) developing education programs that highlight both the broader
environmental quality benefits and geography-specific practical benefits of
water quality improvement; (2) developing technical assistance programs that
help residents identify appropriate conservation practices for their homes and
properties and that facilitate installation and maintenance of such practices;
(3) developing communication strategies to help residents establish a sense of
self-responsibility and align their perceived water quality problems with their
own actions; and, (4) developing outreach programs to help establish and
facilitate descriptive and subjective norms in favor of adopting water quality
improvement practices at the watershed scale.
|
3 |
Hostel redevelopment programme of the Kagiso Hostel in the Mogale City Local MunicipalityUbisi, Salphinah Vuloyimuni 17 March 2014 (has links)
Hostels are a product of the migrant labour system that originated in the copper mining industry in Namaqualand in the 1850s. The migrant labour compounds were used to accommodate migrant labour workers in the urban areas. However, these compounds also meant that migrant labour workers were denied the right of access to permanent accommodation and residential space in the urban areas. After the repeal of the influx control and segregative laws in South Africa in 1986, some of the hostel dwellers brought their relatives and friends to live in the hostels and this resulted in problems such as overcrowding which were exacerbated by poor management and control of the hostels. The living conditions of the hostel dwellers deteriorated during the 1990s. After the announcement of the unbanning of all liberation movements and political parties in South Africa in the 1990s, hostel violence broke out. This hostel violence left many hostel blocks vandalised and without basic municipal services such as electricity, water and waste removal. The hostel violence was primarily between the Inkata Freedom Party (IFP) aligned hostel dwellers and the African National Congress (ANC) aligned township and informal settlement residents.
The hostel violence has catalysed the public housing challenges faced by the democratic government since its inception in 1994. Nevertheless, since 1994 the democratic government has introduced various housing programmes in an effort to provide adequate houses for all South African citizens. One such housing programme is the hostel redevelopment programme. The hostel redevelopment programme was adopted by the democratic government after 1994 with the aim of, among other things, upgrading public hostels, redeveloping and converting the rooms in public hostels into family rental units in order to improve the living conditions of the hostel dwellers and introducing hostel dwellers to family life. The Mogale City Local Municipality (MCLM) is one of the municipalities in Gauteng province that is participating in the hostel redevelopment programme. The findings of this study have revealed that the upgrading of the Kagiso hostel involved the following two processes: During the first process, the MCLM upgraded the Kagiso hostel by fixing broken windows and doors, repairing toilets and providing basic municipal services such as electricity, water, and waste removal in order to improve the living conditions of the hostel dwellers. The second process involved demolishing the hostel blocks and converting them into family units in order to address the public housing challenges relevant to the Kagiso hostel. In this study, the hostel redevelopment programme is called process 1 and the community residential units (CRU) programme is called process 2. / Public Administration & Management / M. Tech. (Public Management)
|
4 |
Hostel redevelopment programme of the Kagiso Hostel in the Mogale City Local MunicipalityUbisi, Salphinah Vuloyimuni 17 March 2014 (has links)
Hostels are a product of the migrant labour system that originated in the copper mining industry in Namaqualand in the 1850s. The migrant labour compounds were used to accommodate migrant labour workers in the urban areas. However, these compounds also meant that migrant labour workers were denied the right of access to permanent accommodation and residential space in the urban areas. After the repeal of the influx control and segregative laws in South Africa in 1986, some of the hostel dwellers brought their relatives and friends to live in the hostels and this resulted in problems such as overcrowding which were exacerbated by poor management and control of the hostels. The living conditions of the hostel dwellers deteriorated during the 1990s. After the announcement of the unbanning of all liberation movements and political parties in South Africa in the 1990s, hostel violence broke out. This hostel violence left many hostel blocks vandalised and without basic municipal services such as electricity, water and waste removal. The hostel violence was primarily between the Inkata Freedom Party (IFP) aligned hostel dwellers and the African National Congress (ANC) aligned township and informal settlement residents.
The hostel violence has catalysed the public housing challenges faced by the democratic government since its inception in 1994. Nevertheless, since 1994 the democratic government has introduced various housing programmes in an effort to provide adequate houses for all South African citizens. One such housing programme is the hostel redevelopment programme. The hostel redevelopment programme was adopted by the democratic government after 1994 with the aim of, among other things, upgrading public hostels, redeveloping and converting the rooms in public hostels into family rental units in order to improve the living conditions of the hostel dwellers and introducing hostel dwellers to family life. The Mogale City Local Municipality (MCLM) is one of the municipalities in Gauteng province that is participating in the hostel redevelopment programme. The findings of this study have revealed that the upgrading of the Kagiso hostel involved the following two processes: During the first process, the MCLM upgraded the Kagiso hostel by fixing broken windows and doors, repairing toilets and providing basic municipal services such as electricity, water, and waste removal in order to improve the living conditions of the hostel dwellers. The second process involved demolishing the hostel blocks and converting them into family units in order to address the public housing challenges relevant to the Kagiso hostel. In this study, the hostel redevelopment programme is called process 1 and the community residential units (CRU) programme is called process 2. / Public Administration and Management / M. Tech. (Public Management)
|
Page generated in 0.0625 seconds