No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Marine debris is improperly disposed of solid waste, also called litter, which is deposited in the marine environment (NOAA, 2010). Litter prevention techniques such as fines, cleanups, incentives, and others, can help to decrease litter, and ultimately decrease marine debris. This research analyzed 2000 and 2010 International Coastal Cleanup (ICC) data obtained from The Ocean Conservancy to ascertain whether certain litter prevention techniques did reduce amounts and types of marine debris found in coastal areas. The litter prevention techniques analyzed included state bottle bills, voluntary monofilament fishing line recycling programs, and the Keep America Beautiful (KAB) cigarette butt litter prevention campaign. In addition, coastal population density and coastline length were also studied to uncover any potential impact they may have on marine debris amounts. This study found no significant connection between population density and kilometers of coastline and marine debris amounts. In addition, no statistically significant difference of marine debris amounts was found between states with bottle bills and without bottle bills for 2000 or 2010. Florida has the highest participation in the monofilament line recycling and was analyzed to find any difference between Florida and national averages. No significant difference was found between Florida and the national averages of fishing line debris for the year 2000 or 2010. Finally, there was no significant reduction in cigarette butt litter from 2000 to 2010 (the KAB cigarette butt litter prevention program began in 2002), but there was an increase in cigarette butts per smoker from 2000 to 2010. Other aspects that could impact marine debris amounts are also discussed to help understand the complex causes that lead to marine debris. Despite these results, the study did highlight some interesting trends. OR, LA, AL, MS, and NC had the largest decreases in marine debris per capita from 2000 to 2010, with decreases of 87%, 79%, 65%, 54%, and 52% respectively. RI more than doubled the amount of marine debris per capita, up 52%, from 2000 to 2010, and DE increased per capita debris 91% in the same time period. RI and DE also saw large increases in marine debris per kilometer coastline, along with MD, over the ten year time span. In addition to population, bottle bill data also provided some interesting clues to potential marine debris reduction. There was no statistical difference between bottle bill and non-bottle states, but bottle bill states did have slightly lower amounts of returnable debris both years. Similar results were found for monofilament fishing line debris. There was no statically significant difference between Florida and the national average of fishing line debris, but Florida did have 92% less fishing line debris than the national average in 2010. The cigarette butt marine debris data, analyzed to find the number of butts found per smoker, increased from 2000 to 2010, which is the opposite trend that was expected. This is most likely due to increased awareness of the impacts cigarette butt debris can have on the environment which is discussed.

Damage to the nervous system may cause sensorimotor impairment, often resulting in chronic neuropathic pain. Phantom limb pain affects multiple amputees and the treatment options are limited. A promising treatment option to reduce chronic pain is by training sensory discrimination. At the Center for Bionics and Pain Research, a sensory training device has been developed. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique to stimulate different regions of the cerebral cortex. In studies, anodal tDCS of the sensorimotor cortex has shown to improve tactile acuity. Until now, the effect of the sensory discrimination training, performed with the sensory training device, in combination with tDCS has not been tested. The purpose of this master’s thesis was to determine the effect of tDCS applied on the sensorimotor cortex on the outcomes of sensory discrimination training. The purpose was also to compare the effect of two different methods of stimulation, namely conventional and High Definition tDCS. 16 able-bodied participants underwent three single sessions with 40 minutes of sensory discrimination training: one session combined with conventional tDCS, one session combined with High Definition tDCS and one session without tDCS. The tactile acuity was determined by the two-point discrimination test and the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, prior to and one hour after each session. This study showed that 40 minutes of sensory discrimination training was sufficient to improve the two-point discrimination in the sensory trained areas, compared to the sensory untrained areas (p=0.02). However, the improvement in two-point discrimination was not statistically significant between the interventions, i.e. the improvement in two-point discrimination for the sessions with brain modulation was not statistically significant compared to the session without brain modulation. The monofilament assessments showed an improvement in monofilament score for the sensory untrained skin patches (p=0.053). This study concluded that single sessions of training was enough to improve two-point discrimination but not monofilament score at the site of stimulation. This study lays a foundation for what parameters to include in future studies.

Les matériaux architecturés attirent de plus en plus d’attentions de par leur capacité à combiner différentes propriétés ciblées. Dans ce contexte, les matériaux enchevêtrés, et plus particulièrement les matériaux monofilamentaires enchevêtrés, présentent des propriétés intéressantes en terme de légèreté, de ductilité, et de facteur de perte. En raison de l’architecture interne complexe de ces matériaux, leur caractérisation et la compréhension des mécanismes de déformation nécessitent une méthodologie adaptée. Dans cette étude, l’enchevêtrement est réalisé manuellement pour différents fils d’acier et soumis à une compression oedométrique. De manière à étudier le comportement sous charge de ce type de matériaux, un dispositif de compression uniaxiale guidée a été mis en place dans le tomographe. Il est ainsi possible de suivre, à l’aide de mesures quantitatives, la déformation de l’échantillon et l’évolution du nombre de contacts pour différentes fraction volumiques. L’utilisation de ces données microstructurales a permis un meilleure compréhension du comportement mécanique de tels enchevêtrements. Une rigidité pouvant varier de 20 à 200 MPa en fonction des paramètres de mise en forme (diamètre et forme du fil, fraction volumique, matériau constitutif) a été déterminé. Un matériau homogène de rigidité plus faible a pu être obtenu en pré-déformant le fil sous forme de ressort avant enchevêtrement. Le facteur de perte du matériau a ensuite été mesuré à la fois sous chargement statique et dynamique. L’analyse mécanique dynamique a mis en évidence la capacité de ce matériau à absorber de l’énergie avec une valeur de facteur de perte d’environ 0.25. Les propriétés mécaniques du matériau ont tout d’abord été modélisées analytiquement par un modèle de poutres et un bon accord avec les résultats expérimentaux a pu être obtenu en définissant un paramètre d’orientation equivalent, spécifique à la compression oedométrique de matériaux enchevêtrés. En parallèle, un modéle éléments discrets a été developé afin de simuler le comportement en compression de matériaux monofilamentaires enchevêtrés. Ce modèle s’appuie sur une discrétisation du fil en éléments sphériques, acquise à partir de données de tomographie. Bien que seul le comportement élastique du fil constitutif ait été pris en compte, une bonne adéquation entre résultats numériques et expérimentaux a été obtenu en ajustant les coefficients de frottement du modèle. / Playing with the architecture of a material is a clever way of tailoring its properties for multi-functional applications. A lot of research have been made, in the past few years, on what is now referred to as “architectured materials” (metal foams, entangled materials, steel wool, etc), mostly for their capacity to be engineered in order to present specific properties, inherent to their architecture. In this context, some studies have been carried out concerning entangled materials but only a few on monofilament entangled materials. Such a material, with no filament ends, could exhibit interesting properties for shock absorption, vibration damping and ductility. In this study, entanglements were manually produced, using different types of wire, and submitted to constrained (inside a PTFE die) in-situ compressive tests within the laboratory tomograph. This technique enabled a 3D, non destructive, microstructural characterization of the complex architecture of these materials, along with the analysis of their macroscopic mechanical properties. The stiffness of this material was found to be in a 20-200 MPa range and homogeneous samples could be obtained, while lowering their stiffness, by pre-deforming the initial wire as a spring. Damping measurements were performed using different types of entanglements (constitutive materials, volume fraction, wire diameter, wire shape) under both monotonic and dynamic loadings and directly linked to the measurements of the number of contacts. The Dynamic Mechanical Analysis underlined the great capacity of this material to absorb energy with a loss factor of about 0.25 and damping was found to decrease with the stiffness of the entanglement. The mechanical properties of this material were first modeled using an analytical “beam” model based on the experimental evolution of the mean distance between contacts and a good agreement was found with the experimental results. In parallel, a Discrete Element Method was used in order to model the compressive behaviour of Monofilament Entangled Materials. Although purely elastic properties were taken into account in the model, a very good agreement with the experimental results was obtained by adjusting the friction coefficients of the model. This tends to prove that the plasticity of these entangled materials is rather due to the structure (friction) than to the constitutive material itself.