Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2005. / Abstract. Vita. Includes bibliographic references (p.63-64).

Thesis (M.S.)--Missouri State University, 2008. / "December 2008." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 23-27). Also available online.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2009. / Title from title page screen (viewed on Oct. 23, 2009). Thesis advisor: Donald G. Hodges. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--West Virginia University, 2010. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains xiii, 181 p. : ill. (some col.), maps (some col.). Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references.

The use of common species as surrogates for those that are threatened or endangered is best conducted using species that are biologically related. If the two species are fairly dissimilar then conclusions based on data collected from surrogates may be misleading. The abundant little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) has been suggested as a suitable surrogate for the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) due to their close morphological similarities. In order to examine the suitability of little brown bats as surrogates in ecological based research and management, research was conducted on the roosting ecology, foraging home ranges, foraging habitat selection, and diets of both species. While research is available on Indiana bats in these subjects, there is a paucity of information on little brown bat roosting ecology and foraging ecologies. Therefore, data were collected concerning these ecological factors to determine the similarity between the species. There was enough research on little brown bat and Indiana bat diets available to compile data and compare them without conducing additional research. Roosting ecology and foraging ecology data were collected during the summers of 2003, 2007, and 2009-2011 from 2 study areas in the Shawnee National Forest, IL, and 2 study areas in south-central Indiana. Bats of both species were tracked during the day to record maternity roost characteristics and again at night to record foraging locations. A total of 67 Indiana bats and 31 little brown bats were tracked during our study. Our results show that while the species are similar in some ecological characteristics (roosting habitat, roost tree species) they are also different in several other characteristics (roost type, home range, and habitat selection). Therefore, little brown bats may be suitable surrogates for some research and management projects and unsuitable for others, depending on the objectives of the project. However, holistically little brown bats are unsuitable surrogates for Indiana bat summer habitat management. / Introduction and literature review -- An examination of the characteristics of little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) natural tree roosts within the central portion of the species' range -- Horizontal resource partitioning between sympatric populations of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) and the little brown bat (M. lucifugus) -- Suitability of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) as surrogates for Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) summer research and management. / Department of Biology

No description available.

The Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) population had decreased by 56% between 1967 and 2006. In summer 2006, a mysterious disease called White Nose Syndrome was first identified. Since then, the disease killed almost one million bats in North America. Many Biologists believe that both the population decrease before the appearance of the disease and WNS are associated with climate. In a joined effort with Yellowstone Ecological Research Center (YERC), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NASA Terrestrial Observation and Prediction System (TOPS), our study is a partial population viability analysis which aims to establish a link between bat population dynamic and climate before the appearance of WNS. / Biostatistics

Since white-nose syndrome (WNS) arrived in the northeastern U.S. in 2006, several affected bat species have exhibited marked population declines (> 90%). For areas such as Fort Drum in northern New York that are subject to regulatory mandates because of the presence of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), acoustic monitoring is now likely more effective than traditional capture methodologies. In the summers of 2011 and 2012, I implemented intensive acoustic sampling using Anabat detectors at Fort Drum to develop a summer acoustic monitoring protocol that is both cost efficient and effective at detecting species of high conservation or management interest, such as the Indiana bat and the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus). Habitat analysis of radio telemetry data and occupancy models of acoustic data were congruent in confirming nocturnal spatial use of forested riparian zones by little brown bats.  Additionally, occupancy models of passive versus active sampling revealed that passive acoustic sampling is preferable to active sampling for detecting declining species in the post-WNS context. Finally, assessment of detection probabilities at various arrays of acoustic detector layouts in an expected area of use revealed that a grid of detectors covering a wide spatial extent was more effective at detecting Indiana and little brown bats than permanent stations, transects, or double transects. My findings suggest that acoustic monitoring can be affectively implemented for monitoring Indiana and little brown bats even in areas of severe decline. Future efforts should be aimed at determining effective sampling designs for additional declining species. / Master of Science

<p dir="ltr">Bat population numbers are declining in the Midwestern United States. Reasons for decline are multifaceted (habitat degradation, fatalities at wind turbines, White Nose Syndrome, and declining insect populations), and many species are listed as endangered (Myotis sodalis, Myotis septentrionalis, Perimyotis subflavus). Other species in the Midwestern United States have no conservation status (Eptesicus fuscus), or are only listed as a species of concern (Lasiurus cinereus, Lasiurus borealis, Lasionycteris noctivagans). Bats play a crucial role in our ecosystems, providing both ecological and economic benefit as pollinators and insect population regulators. Thus, conserving these species is vital. To gain better insight into the ecology of Midwestern bat species I studied five species in two respects. First, I investigated the availability of roosts for a colony of endangered Myotis sodalis near Indianapolis. This colony has withstood high levels of urbanization and habitat degradation. Therefore, understanding what aspects of the roosting area has allowed for continued use by the colony is crucial for future conservation efforts. I used an Akaike’s Information Criteria approach to rank models that best differentiate between the current roosting area and surrounding landscape. I identified that the roosting area contained a greater number of large standing dead trees (Snags >42.6 cm) that are able to serve as primary roosts for the colony. These results demonstrate that a colony of Indiana bats may be able to withstand urbanization if they have enough large DBH snags available in the area. Future conservation efforts in a heavily urbanized environment should focus on the maintaining large snags as primary roosts. Second, I studied the morphological variation of four species (Lasiurus cinereus, Lasiurus borealis, Lasionycteris noctivagans, and Eptesicus fuscus) to parse out differences that may lead to niche specialization. These four species share habitat and foraging range and therefore may directly compete for resources. However, despite declining insect populations these four species have moderately stable populations. I collected approximately 30 craniums and mandibles for each species and compared the linear size differences between landmarks and the overall shape variation from these landmarks. Due to different phylogenies and body sizes, the four species were different from one another in all 24 linear measurements. In regards to shape variation, the Eptesicini bat craniums had characteristics of more gracile species. In addition, the mandibles of Eptesicini were highly distinct. Lasionycteris noctivagans was the least durable and Eptesicus fuscus had 10 specialization for hard bodied prey consumption. These results suggest potential niche specialization due variation in morphology.</p>

No description available.